If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
American Airlines removes checked baggage without telling passengers
I recently flew on an American Eagle (AA) flight from Dallas (DFW) to
Pittsburgh (PIT) and had the misfortune of being completely taken advantage of by American Airlines...along with about 15 other passengers on my flight. Before, during, and after that flight, American Airlines and its employees conducted unethical business practices that should be abhorent to anyone that knows about them. Our departure gate was switched 3 times within the course of 15 minutes...but only one of those gate switches were announced over the loud speaker at the airport. Myself and the other passengers had to continually look at the monitors to see what gate to go to. Next, the plane was about and hour and a half late in taking off. I can live with that, because delays happen. However, the AA reps at the gate(s) kept telling the anxious passengers that the plane would board momentarilly, for about the first 45 minutes of that wait. If you know that it is going to be 45 minutes before the plane boards, tell the people that, don't lie to them. If you truly have no idea how long it will be, then say that...don't just keep saying "momentarilly". Once on the plane, prior to taxying away from the gate, we sat there for about 15 minutes before pulling away. At one point during that wait, some of the passengers on the left hand side of the plane noticed that some AA baggage handlers had opened up the cargo doors and were taking luggage off of the plane...luggage that looked quite similar to the luggage that belonged to people on the plane. One passenger asked the flight attendant if she know why they would be taking luggage OFF of the plane. Her reply was an utter lie, "I am only a flight attendant and I don't know why they do what they do on the ground..." Most people just hoped that an Airline with AA's experience and reputation would know what they are doing, and the people convinced themselves that the luggage that was being taken off was from the previous flight for that plane. We all assumed at that point that OUR luggage was still on the plane and would reunite with us in Pittsburgh. After getting to Pittsburgh (2 hours behind schedule) everyone on the flight went to the baggage carousel to retrieve their checked baggage. Surprisingly, and pleasantly, the baggage was already coming down the conveyer belt when we got to the baggage claim area. After about 10 minutes, with about half of the passengers having retrieved all of their luggage and the other half still waiting for theirs, the conveyer belt stopped moving. At that point, one of the passengers waiting for a piece of luggage went to the American Airlines baggage claim customer support window and asked the AA employee if there was more baggage coming from our flight from Dallas, and if the conveyer belt was just temporarily stopped. She replied that no, that was all of the luggage that there was. There were about 20 people from our flight who did not have some or all of their checked luggage. Needless to say, we were mad. How could the airline make this mistake. It had become obvious what happened. The baggage-cart full of baggage that had been taken off of the plane in Dallas was OUR baggage, and should have been left on the plane. The American Airlines representative at Pittsburgh's airport continued to be unhelpful. All she did was take everyone's info and tell everyone that an AA rep would deliver the delayed luggage to our homes the next day. She did not, or could not, explain how this mistake happened and admit the reasons for the intentional removal of the baggage. What we know to be the truth but American Airlines won't tell us: the baggage was removed intentionally either to get the plane below the required weight limit or to lessen the weight so that the plane could travel faster and make up lost time. Neither the pilot nor the flight attendents ever did the courtious thing and tell the passengers of flight 3629 why our baggage was being taken off of the plane. Instead, they proceed to cover up their actions with a cloak of secrecy and lies. Just another example of how the airlines proceed to do anything they can to erode customer loyalty and respect. I will never fly with AA again, and I know that the Travel agency that purchased half of the seats on that plane that day for myself and the group I was with will never buy tickets from AA again. They just lost ten's of thousands of dollars in business because they wouldn't be honest. All I ask for is honesty. Be upfront and honest, and I will respect you...hide behind silence and lies, and I will never trust you. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
American Airlines removes checked baggage without telling passengers
On Mar 1, 3:17 am, wrote:
All I ask for is honesty. Be upfront and honest, and I will respect you...hide behind silence and lies, and I will never trust you. I don't think you are typical. The airline is truly damned if they do and damed if they don't. I think they would get more flack from most people for being honest. ("Ladies and Gentlemen, I have no idea when flight 123 will be ready to board, but it will probably be within a few hours.") Do you think honesty won't generate ill-will just because it's honest? Same thing with the weight issue. You might have appreciated an announcement like "From the flight deck, well it looks like this ol plane is just too heavy to fly legally, so we are just gonna remove some of your luggage and put it on another plane. I dunno when it will arrive -- just being honest". That kind of honesty might cause a riot! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
American Airlines removes checked baggage without telling passengers
On 1 Mar, 13:54, "Patrick Danville" wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:17 am, wrote: All I ask for is honesty. Be upfront and honest, and I will respect you...hide behind silence and lies, and I will never trust you. I don't think you are typical. The airline is truly damned if they do and damed if they don't. I think they would get more flack from most people for being honest. ("Ladies and Gentlemen, I have no idea when flight 123 will be ready to board, but it will probably be within a few hours.") Do you think honesty won't generate ill-will just because it's honest? But why do they have to behave as if there is somebody with a gun behind them instructing them to lie..? Most people don't mind things going wrong, it is partly expected. The problem is with how it is dealt with when it happens. E.g. bad weather and delays are not 'extraordinary', but the incompetence in dealing with them often is. Same thing with the weight issue. You might have appreciated an announcement like "From the flight deck, well it looks like this ol plane is just too heavy to fly legally, so we are just gonna remove some of your luggage and put it on another plane. I dunno when it will arrive -- just being honest". That kind of honesty might cause a riot! Too often airlines simply want to pass on the problem to somebody else down the chain so they don't have to deal with it but somebody else does (usually when its already too late). People are forgiving of mistakes, less so for preventable ones down to incompetence. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
American Airlines removes checked baggage without telling passengers
I would have like the captain to announce "Due to weight issues, and
the safety of the flight, some baggage needs to be removed from the cargo hold. We will make every attempt to get your luggage to you as soon as possible. Please see the American Airlines baggage claim representative at your final destination if you would like to arrange for delayed baggage to be delivered to your home. We apologize for this inconvenience but safety is the first priorty. Thank you." I guarantee that any sane person would completely understand this and realize that the right decision was made. Will some people gripe and complain, sure. But after they get it out of their system, they will respect the pilot and the airline for being up-front and honest. And if the captain explains it as a safety precaution, people will be understanding. And in regards to checked baggage. With all of the restrictions on what can go in your carry-on baggage, and never really being able to decipher what is and what is not allowed, many people pack important, crucial things in their checked baggage, such as medication. Having your baggage delayed by day may not seem like a big deal, but if your daily medication is in your checked baggage, it surely is a big deal. Also, respectful flighers try to put as much in their checked baggage so that they can limit their carry-ons...with limited carry on space on the plane. As a result, more of that person's important items end up in the belly of the plane. I have a solution to this problem that would require very little modification to the current baggage handling system: Every passenger can declare ONE of their checked baggages as "Critical" or "Important" or any other term you want to use. Any other items that are checked by that passenger would be regarded as "Secondary" or "Non-vital". The baggage could be differentiated with different color tags...like white for "Non-vital" and Green for "Critical". In the situation that baggage needs to be taken off of a plane, the baggage handlers could only remove items with a White tag. All of the Green luggage would remain on the plane, ensuring that it arrives with its owner at the destination. Generally, planes are overweight when many of the passengers have checked numerous baggage,...which becomes more likely when people are returning from vacations or other trips. If someone buys a large item while on vacation, and they don't want to FedEx or UPS it back to themself, they will often check it and put it on the plane, especially if it is too large for carry-on. These items are obviously not critical and do not need to arrive at the destination with the passenger. However, that person's primary piece of baggage probably should. And I know that currently, it doesn't work like this. Most of the people on my flight from Dallas to Pittsburgh coming back from a trip to Puerto Vallarta in Mexico, with the large group that I was with. I saw, at the Pittsburgh airport, some people who received their checked "hammocks" yet did not receive their primary suitcase. Why? Shouldn't the airline have taken the "hammock" or other non-essential item off of the plane first? These things need to be thought out more by the airline. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
American Airlines removes checked baggage without telling passengers
wrote in message ups.com... I recently flew on an American Eagle (AA) flight from Dallas (DFW) to Pittsburgh (PIT) and had the misfortune of being completely taken advantage of by American Airlines...along with about 15 other passengers on my flight. Before, during, and after that flight, American Airlines and its employees conducted unethical business practices that should be abhorent to anyone that knows about them. Our departure gate was switched 3 times within the course of 15 minutes...but only one of those gate switches were announced over the loud speaker at the airport. Myself and the other passengers had to continually look at the monitors to see what gate to go to. Next, the plane was about and hour and a half late in taking off. I can live with that, because delays happen. However, the AA reps at the gate(s) kept telling the anxious passengers that the plane would board momentarilly, for about the first 45 minutes of that wait. If you know that it is going to be 45 minutes before the plane boards, tell the people that, don't lie to them. If you truly have no idea how long it will be, then say that...don't just keep saying "momentarilly". Once on the plane, prior to taxying away from the gate, we sat there for about 15 minutes before pulling away. At one point during that wait, some of the passengers on the left hand side of the plane noticed that some AA baggage handlers had opened up the cargo doors and were taking luggage off of the plane...luggage that looked quite similar to the luggage that belonged to people on the plane. One passenger asked the flight attendant if she know why they would be taking luggage OFF of the plane. Her reply was an utter lie, "I am only a flight attendant and I don't know why they do what they do on the ground..." Most people just hoped that an Airline with AA's experience and reputation would know what they are doing, and the people convinced themselves that the luggage that was being taken off was from the previous flight for that plane. We all assumed at that point that OUR luggage was still on the plane and would reunite with us in Pittsburgh. After getting to Pittsburgh (2 hours behind schedule) everyone on the flight went to the baggage carousel to retrieve their checked baggage. Surprisingly, and pleasantly, the baggage was already coming down the conveyer belt when we got to the baggage claim area. After about 10 minutes, with about half of the passengers having retrieved all of their luggage and the other half still waiting for theirs, the conveyer belt stopped moving. At that point, one of the passengers waiting for a piece of luggage went to the American Airlines baggage claim customer support window and asked the AA employee if there was more baggage coming from our flight from Dallas, and if the conveyer belt was just temporarily stopped. She replied that no, that was all of the luggage that there was. There were about 20 people from our flight who did not have some or all of their checked luggage. Needless to say, we were mad. How could the airline make this mistake. It had become obvious what happened. The baggage-cart full of baggage that had been taken off of the plane in Dallas was OUR baggage, and should have been left on the plane. The American Airlines representative at Pittsburgh's airport continued to be unhelpful. All she did was take everyone's info and tell everyone that an AA rep would deliver the delayed luggage to our homes the next day. She did not, or could not, explain how this mistake happened and admit the reasons for the intentional removal of the baggage. What we know to be the truth but American Airlines won't tell us: the baggage was removed intentionally either to get the plane below the required weight limit or to lessen the weight so that the plane could travel faster and make up lost time. Neither the pilot nor the flight attendents ever did the courtious thing and tell the passengers of flight 3629 why our baggage was being taken off of the plane. Instead, they proceed to cover up their actions with a cloak of secrecy and lies. Just another example of how the airlines proceed to do anything they can to erode customer loyalty and respect. I will never fly with AA again, and I know that the Travel agency that purchased half of the seats on that plane that day for myself and the group I was with will never buy tickets from AA again. They just lost ten's of thousands of dollars in business because they wouldn't be honest. All I ask for is honesty. Be upfront and honest, and I will respect you...hide behind silence and lies, and I will never trust you. This sounds like a classic weight and balance issue - they had a small plane on a route that is at the end of its range, and, due to winds, weather, and/or load they couldn't carry the bags. That simple. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
American Airlines removes checked baggage without telling passengers
In message "Jeff
Hacker" wrote: This sounds like a classic weight and balance issue - they had a small plane on a route that is at the end of its range, and, due to winds, weather, and/or load they couldn't carry the bags. That simple. Better communication would be nice. Even better would be an offer to let a couple passengers deplane (voluntary bump) to let everyone else's bag through. -- Insert something clever here. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
American Airlines removes checked baggage without telling passengers
On Mar 1, 8:03 pm, "Jeff Hacker" wrote:
This sounds like a classic weight and balance issue - they had a small plane on a route that is at the end of its range, and, due to winds, weather, and/or load they couldn't carry the bags. That simple.- Hide quoted text - I understand WHY they did it. And I don't have problem with it. It is just something that I think could be handled differently, like DevilsPGD said. Why did they not offer people on my plane take another flight, to lighten the load. Or, tell the passengers prior to pulling away from the gate,"some of the baggage is going to be removed for safety reasons, we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause..." Also, what do you think of the system I proposed where some baggage is regarded as critical and some is regarded as non-essential? When they decide to take baggage off, they can only take off the non-essential baggage. And if your response is that they would waist time looking through all of the luggage to find the non-essential ones, to take off...how about if they loaded the non-essential ones last, so that they would be the easiest to take off, if needed? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
American Airlines removes checked baggage without telling passengers
wrote in message ups.com... On Mar 1, 8:03 pm, "Jeff Hacker" wrote: This sounds like a classic weight and balance issue - they had a small plane on a route that is at the end of its range, and, due to winds, weather, and/or load they couldn't carry the bags. That simple.- Hide quoted text - I understand WHY they did it. And I don't have problem with it. It is just something that I think could be handled differently, like DevilsPGD said. Why did they not offer people on my plane take another flight, to lighten the load. Or, tell the passengers prior to pulling away from the gate,"some of the baggage is going to be removed for safety reasons, we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause..." It would have been nice if they'd made that announcement. But I'm guessing, from experience, that announcement would have caused some people to get extremely angry, and then you would have the added delay of going back to the gate to pull the angry people and their luggage off. I think pretty much any other solution would have caused more delays. Once you start asking for volunteers to deplane you have to find their luggage, which takes awhile. Once you give up your spot for takeoff it may be awhile before you get another one. Also, what do you think of the system I proposed where some baggage is regarded as critical and some is regarded as non-essential? When they decide to take baggage off, they can only take off the non-essential baggage. And if your response is that they would waist time looking through all of the luggage to find the non-essential ones, to take off...how about if they loaded the non-essential ones last, so that they would be the easiest to take off, if needed? I think the number of people that check two bags is much, much lower than the number of people that check one. And the number of people who check two bags and are willing to count one of them as non-essential (translated to you can bring it to me whenever...) would be hovering close enough to 0 to make this a moot exercise. You might have better luck if the airlines could tell which bags were returning to their original departure point, and which ones were on their first legs, and then consider the bags going home as non-essential, as those are the ones you can get back to people easier. In your example I'm not sure they didn't do that. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
American Airlines removes checked baggage without telling passengers
On Mar 2, 11:06 am, "Cathy Kearns" wrote:
It would have been nice if they'd made that announcement. But I'm guessing, from experience, that announcement would have caused some people to get extremely angry, and then you would have the added delay of going back to the gate to pull the angry people and their luggage off. I think pretty much any other solution would have caused more delays. Once you start asking for volunteers to deplane you have to find their luggage, which takes awhile. Once you give up your spot for takeoff it may be awhile before you get another one. I think the number of people that check two bags is much, much lower than the number of people that check one. And the number of people who check two bags and are willing to count one of them as non-essential (translated to you can bring it to me whenever...) would be hovering close enough to 0 to make this a moot exercise. You might have better luck if the airlines could tell which bags were returning to their original departure point, and which ones were on their first legs, and then consider the bags going home as non-essential, as those are the ones you can get back to people easier. In your example I'm not sure they didn't do that. So you are saying that it was right of them to not inform me ahead of time, that when I got to my home airport...aka Pittsburgh International...some of my baggage may not be there? That makes sense...NOT. They are a business...in a free-market industry. They are not a government run agency or authority, like the USPS or some local transit authority. I would expect this type of behavior from a government organization, because the government organization has a monolopy and isn't really concerned with pleasing the customer...because they don't need to be. However, a company that operates in a free-market industry, you would think would like to treat customers nice, so that they maintain or grow their market share and profits. Maybe American, and some other airlines, don't feel a need to treat customers good. Well, I know for one thing, I have already emailed them twice since I go home on Monday night, and all I have received back from them were two standard automatic replies. I still have not had someone from American answer my questions. The main thing I want is for them to be open and honest. One word you sometimes hear in government or in industry is "transparency". That means that things are not being covered-up for, or hidden...and that business is being conducted ethicly and openly. That is all I want. I don't want rebates for future flights, I don't want to be paid off. I just want honesty. Cathy, about your baggage remark...there are instances where people do check more than one piece of baggage, and in those instances that person should have to choose one that is more important than the other. Why do I say this? Because it is not a matter of convenience, and liking to have both of your pieces of luggage at your destination when you get there. Rather, it is a question of life and death. Some people seriously do have a piece of checked luggage that is "critical," meaning that they have prescription medication in there, or something else that is vital to keeping them healthy, and maybe alive. And you are also wrong when saying that if the pilot told the passengers that some baggage would be taken off that there would be an uproar. You don't give people enough credit. Sure, some would complain. But the 90% of the level-headed people on the plane would (on their own) get the complainers to quiet down. They would explain that it more important for the plane to be safe than for their luggage to arrive on time. People would police themselves, like they always do. Now, if the Pilot said, "Ladies and gentlemen, we are removing luggage to save on fuel costs and to speed up our flight..." that would not be taken well...and it shouldn't. That would be an unethical business practice. It is quite clear: Decisions that are made for safety are appropriate and correct...decisions made for other reasons (i.e. money, time) are not. PERIOD. NO ARGUMENT. They should do what is right. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
American Airlines removes checked baggage without telling passengers
In message "Cathy
Kearns" wrote: I think the number of people that check two bags is much, much lower than the number of people that check one. And the number of people who check two bags and are willing to count one of them as non-essential (translated to you can bring it to me whenever...) would be hovering close enough to 0 to make this a moot exercise. I'd be happy to tell the airline up front that I'll accept a gift certificate/equivalent-to-cash-toward-my-next-flight for $50 if they don't get my bags there, and put me to the top of the list. Most of my flights don't require me to have anything in my luggage (Or at least I'll survive for 24 hours without it) -- Insert something clever here. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American Airlines Removes Pillows From MD-80 Flights | nobody | USA & Canada | 3 | November 19th, 2004 10:05 PM |
American Airlines Removes Pillows From MD-80 Flights | Truth | Air travel | 0 | November 18th, 2004 09:08 PM |
American Airlines Removes Pillows From MD-80 Flights | me | Air travel | 0 | November 18th, 2004 01:47 PM |
American Airlines Removes Pillows From MD-80 Flights | anon | Air travel | 1 | November 18th, 2004 08:41 AM |
American Airlines Removes Pillows From MD-80 Flights | nobody | USA & Canada | 0 | November 18th, 2004 08:41 AM |