If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link - 14 years after the French....
Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link
snip The French had their high-speed Channel Tunnel link ready in 1993 - a year before the tunnel was officially opened - while the Belgians completed their link in the late 1990s. The UK, however, spent years dithering over the cost and route of its link. It meant Eurostar trains could only reach their ultimate 186mph speed in France and Belgium, while comparatively crawling through south London and Kent. snip |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link - 14 years after the French....
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:12:26 -0800, Furze Platt
wrote: Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link snip The French had their high-speed Channel Tunnel link ready in 1993 - a year before the tunnel was officially opened - while the Belgians completed their link in the late 1990s. The UK, however, spent years dithering over the cost and route of its link. It meant Eurostar trains could only reach their ultimate 186mph speed in France and Belgium, while comparatively crawling through south London and Kent. Is the French Eurostar track from Paris to Lille different from the TGV track? If not, France had it easy since Eurostar only require trackage from Lille to Calais, which didn't involve routing through the sort of major metropolitan area the Brit version had to pass through. I assume, also, that the Belgian track from Lille to Brussels is both TGV and Eurostar -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link - 14 years after the French....
On 6 Nov, 21:20, Hatunen wrote:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:12:26 -0800, Furze Platt wrote: Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link snip The French had their high-speed Channel Tunnel link ready in 1993 - a year before the tunnel was officially opened - while the Belgians completed their link in the late 1990s. The UK, however, spent years dithering over the cost and route of its link. It meant Eurostar trains could only reach their ultimate 186mph speed in France and Belgium, while comparatively crawling through south London and Kent. Is the French Eurostar track from Paris to Lille different from the TGV track? If not, France had it easy since Eurostar only require trackage from Lille to Calais, which didn't involve routing through the sort of major metropolitan area the Brit version had to pass through. I assume, also, that the Belgian track from Lille to Brussels is both TGV and Eurostar -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * I assume that the coming of the channel tunnel must of been a surprise......or perhaps it just shows that they have their head up their arse when it comes to transport ;-) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link - 14 years after the French....
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:48:25 -0800, Furze Platt
wrote: On 6 Nov, 21:20, Hatunen wrote: On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:12:26 -0800, Furze Platt wrote: Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link snip The French had their high-speed Channel Tunnel link ready in 1993 - a year before the tunnel was officially opened - while the Belgians completed their link in the late 1990s. The UK, however, spent years dithering over the cost and route of its link. It meant Eurostar trains could only reach their ultimate 186mph speed in France and Belgium, while comparatively crawling through south London and Kent. Is the French Eurostar track from Paris to Lille different from the TGV track? If not, France had it easy since Eurostar only require trackage from Lille to Calais, which didn't involve routing through the sort of major metropolitan area the Brit version had to pass through. I assume, also, that the Belgian track from Lille to Brussels is both TGV and Eurostar I assume that the coming of the channel tunnel must of been a surprise......or perhaps it just shows that they have their head up their arse when it comes to transport ;-) "Arse"? You seem to be the Brit so you tell me who has their head up their arse. But I would still think the British had a considerably more difficult job of decision making than the French, who already had track for their TGV that could be used. Not to mention, of course, that the UK does not have the same sort of authoritarian government that the French do. -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link - 14 years after the French....
Hatunen wrote:
[] But I would still think the British had a considerably more difficult job of decision making than the French, who already had track for their TGV that could be used. Not to mention, of course, that the UK does not have the same sort of authoritarian government that the French do. I won't get into the idiot OP's points here, but there has certainly been criticism of the various UK governments lack of decision making on this. -- (*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate http://www.davidhorne.net - real address on website "He can't be as stupid as he looks, but nevertheless he probably is quite a stupid man." Richard Dawkins on Pres. Bush" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link - 14 years after the French....
David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*) wrote:
Hatunen wrote: [] But I would still think the British had a considerably more difficult job of decision making than the French, who already had track for their TGV that could be used. Not to mention, of course, that the UK does not have the same sort of authoritarian government that the French do. I won't get into the idiot OP's points here, but there has certainly been criticism of the various UK governments lack of decision making on this. And I meant to add. _However_, while there can be legitimate complaints made about the UK railways, they do have a high number of fast lines between major population areas. Not high speed, in terms of over 150 mph or whatever the definition is, but still very high. I think that only Germany beats the UK in terms of average speed of the network. If I'm wrong, no doubt I'll be corrected... -- (*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate http://www.davidhorne.net - real address on website "He can't be as stupid as he looks, but nevertheless he probably is quite a stupid man." Richard Dawkins on Pres. Bush" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link - 14 years after the French....
Furze Platt wrote:
On 6 Nov, 21:20, Hatunen wrote: On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:12:26 -0800, Furze Platt wrote: Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link snip The French had their high-speed Channel Tunnel link ready in 1993 - a year before the tunnel was officially opened - while the Belgians completed their link in the late 1990s. The UK, however, spent years dithering over the cost and route of its link. It meant Eurostar trains could only reach their ultimate 186mph speed in France and Belgium, while comparatively crawling through south London and Kent. Is the French Eurostar track from Paris to Lille different from the TGV track? If not, France had it easy since Eurostar only require trackage from Lille to Calais, which didn't involve routing through the sort of major metropolitan area the Brit version had to pass through. I assume, also, that the Belgian track from Lille to Brussels is both TGV and Eurostar -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * I assume that the coming of the channel tunnel must of been a surprise......or perhaps it just shows that they have their head up their arse when it comes to transport ;-) "It only started to be dug in 1881, guv'nor..." -- Best Greg |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link - 14 years after the French....
Hatunen wrote:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:48:25 -0800, Furze Platt wrote: On 6 Nov, 21:20, Hatunen wrote: On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:12:26 -0800, Furze Platt wrote: Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link snip The French had their high-speed Channel Tunnel link ready in 1993 - a year before the tunnel was officially opened - while the Belgians completed their link in the late 1990s. The UK, however, spent years dithering over the cost and route of its link. It meant Eurostar trains could only reach their ultimate 186mph speed in France and Belgium, while comparatively crawling through south London and Kent. Is the French Eurostar track from Paris to Lille different from the TGV track? If not, France had it easy since Eurostar only require trackage from Lille to Calais, which didn't involve routing through the sort of major metropolitan area the Brit version had to pass through. I assume, also, that the Belgian track from Lille to Brussels is both TGV and Eurostar I assume that the coming of the channel tunnel must of been a surprise......or perhaps it just shows that they have their head up their arse when it comes to transport ;-) "Arse"? You seem to be the Brit so you tell me who has their head up their arse. But I would still think the British had a considerably more difficult job of decision making than the French, who already had track for their TGV that could be used. Not to mention, of course, that the UK does not have the same sort of authoritarian government that the French do. The Brits were concerned about possible military uses of the chunnel... -- Best Greg |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link - 14 years after the French....
Furze Platt wrote:
Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link snip The French had their high-speed Channel Tunnel link ready in 1993 - a year before the tunnel was officially opened - while the Belgians completed their link in the late 1990s. The UK, however, spent years dithering over the cost and route of its link. It meant Eurostar trains could only reach their ultimate 186mph speed in France and Belgium, while comparatively crawling through south London and Kent. snip Hi, I'm just wondering when the Belgians and the Dutch will get the thalys hs rail lines working north of Brussels. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Queen Opens High Speed Rail Link - 14 years after the French....
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:41:51 -0800, Gregory Morrow
wrote: Hatunen wrote: On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:48:25 -0800, Furze Platt But I would still think the British had a considerably more difficult job of decision making than the French, who already had track for their TGV that could be used. Not to mention, of course, that the UK does not have the same sort of authoritarian government that the French do. The Brits were concerned about possible military uses of the chunnel... This isn't about the tunnel per se, since it was built before the UK finally found a route for the high speed connection to London. Before that the impressively sleek Eurostar, which looks like it's doing 150mph when it's standing still, had to creep along on regular rails. -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
French set new rail speed record | ocelot | Europe | 1 | April 3rd, 2007 08:20 PM |
Wales rail line re-opens | Keith Anderson | Europe | 0 | June 20th, 2005 12:02 AM |
What does "Free high speed internet" mean? | Jeff Guay | Travel - anything else not covered | 2 | February 27th, 2005 11:48 PM |
High speed rail | Green Hill | USA & Canada | 11 | September 20th, 2003 04:15 PM |
High speed rail | David Nebenzahl | USA & Canada | 2 | September 14th, 2003 09:16 AM |