A Travel and vacations forum. TravelBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » TravelBanter forum » Travel Regions » Europe
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populistmovement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and expensively more?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 1st, 2010, 03:46 PM posted to alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe
PJ O'Donovan HimSelf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populistmovement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and expensively more?

In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populist
movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and
expensively more?

"IT IS not hard, if you really try, to find good things to say about
America’s tea-partiers. They are not French, for a start......"

Exerpt above from British magazine ,The Economist dated 30/10/2010
with the cover stating "Angry America" including article below:



http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10
  #2  
Old November 1st, 2010, 03:49 PM posted to alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe
Max d'Ontario
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and expensively more?

PJ O'Donovan HimSelf wrote:
| In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populist
| movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and
| expensively more?
|
| "IT IS not hard, if you really try, to find good things to say about
| America’s tea-partiers. They are not French, for a start......"
|
| Exerpt above from British magazine ,The Economist dated 30/10/2010
| with the cover stating "Angry America" including article below:
|
|
|
| http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10



The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because
you're obsessed
by starting wars and killing people to extend your empire and that costs
billions and billions
of dollars that the country needs to be a decent place to live in - right
now it's a ******** -
except of course for the megarich who run the place.


  #3  
Old November 1st, 2010, 05:19 PM posted to alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe
Werner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerfulpopulist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly andexpensively more?

On Nov 1, 11:49*am, "Max d'Ontario"
wrote:...

The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because
you're obsessed
by starting wars and killing people to extend your empire and that costs
billions and billions
of dollars that the country needs to be a decent place to live in - right
now it's a ******** -
except of course for the megarich who run the place.



You might be interested in this before you get too strident:
http://buttonwood.economist.com/content/gdc
  #4  
Old November 1st, 2010, 05:23 PM posted to alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe
Runge 124
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 150
Default donovan the typical american ?

and donovan doesn't belong to the mega rich, just to the bigots hand on the
heart and waving flags at every occasion.
Ridiculous.


"Max d'Ontario" a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion :
...

PJ O'Donovan HimSelf wrote:
| In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populist
| movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and
| expensively more?
|
| "IT IS not hard, if you really try, to find good things to say about
| America’s tea-partiers. They are not French, for a start......"
|
| Exerpt above from British magazine ,The Economist dated 30/10/2010
| with the cover stating "Angry America" including article below:
|
|
|
| http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10



The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because
you're obsessed
by starting wars and killing people to extend your empire and that costs
billions and billions
of dollars that the country needs to be a decent place to live in - right
now it's a ******** -
except of course for the megarich who run the place.

  #5  
Old November 1st, 2010, 06:58 PM posted to alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe
PJ O'Donovan HimSelf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerfulpopulist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly andexpensively more?

On Nov 1, 1:19*pm, Werner wrote:
On Nov 1, 11:49*am, "Max d'Ontario"

wrote:...

The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because
you're obsessed
by starting wars and killing people to extend your empire and that costs
billions and billions
of dollars that the country needs to be a decent place to live in - right
now it's a ******** -
except of course for the megarich who run the place.


You might be interested in this before you get too strident:http://buttonwood.economist.com/content/gdc


http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10

Another excerpt from the above article appearing in the current issue
of the British magazine. The Economist, with the cover titled "angry
America"


"...The tea-partiers do not just have less selfish motives than the
pampered French. They also have better manners. Let the French block
roads and set things on fi among tea-partiers it is a point of
pride that their large but orderly rallies leave barely a crumpled
candy wrapper behind them. Though some wear tricorn hats, and the
movement takes its name from the Boston Tea Party, tea-partiers are
peaceful folk...."
  #6  
Old November 1st, 2010, 10:37 PM posted to alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe
Werner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerfulpopulist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly andexpensively more?

On Nov 1, 2:58*pm, "PJ O'Donovan HimSelf" wrote:
On Nov 1, 1:19*pm, Werner wrote:

On Nov 1, 11:49*am, "Max d'Ontario"


wrote:...


The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because
you're obsessed
by starting wars and killing people to extend your empire and that costs
billions and billions
of dollars that the country needs to be a decent place to live in - right
now it's a ******** -
except of course for the megarich who run the place.


You might be interested in this before you get too strident:http://buttonwood.economist.com/content/gdc


http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10

Another excerpt from the above article appearing in the current issue
of the British magazine. The Economist, with the cover titled "angry
America"

"...The tea-partiers do not just have less selfish motives than the
pampered French. They also have better manners. Let the French block
roads and set things on fi among tea-partiers it is a point of
pride that their large but orderly rallies leave barely a crumpled
candy wrapper behind them. Though some wear tricorn hats, and the
movement takes its name from the Boston Tea Party, tea-partiers are
peaceful folk...."



Indeed. But this can change. Other groups might form with different
tactics when conditions deteriorate.

  #7  
Old November 2nd, 2010, 01:14 AM posted to alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe
necromancer[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and expensively more?

On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:49:05 +0100, "Max d'Ontario"
wrote:

The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because
you're obsessed by starting wars and killing people to extend your
empire


More like to plunder the resources of those nations invaded.

--
"America is now a socialist economy. The definition of
a socialist economy is when 50% or more your economy
is dependent on the federal government."

--Christine O'Donnell
  #8  
Old November 2nd, 2010, 01:17 AM posted to alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe
necromancer[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and expensively more?

On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:58:58 -0700 (PDT), "PJ O'Donovan HimSelf"
wrote:

http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10

Another excerpt from the above article appearing in the current issue
of the British magazine. The Economist, with the cover titled "angry
America"


"...The tea-partiers do not just have less selfish motives than the
pampered French. They also have better manners. Let the French block
roads and set things on fi among tea-partiers it is a point of
pride that their large but orderly rallies leave barely a crumpled
candy wrapper behind them. Though some wear tricorn hats, and the
movement takes its name from the Boston Tea Party, tea-partiers are
peaceful folk...."


No, the tea-party just put up threats of violence if their candidates
lose.

Ref: http://tinyurl.com/2v8xgut

--
"God may choose to heal someone from cancer, yet that
person still has a great deal of medical bills. The
outstanding bills do not determine whether or not
the patient has been healed by God."

--Christine O'Donnell
  #9  
Old November 2nd, 2010, 04:04 AM posted to alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe
Jigsaw1695
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 55
Default In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerfulpopulist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly andexpensively more?

On Nov 1, 9:14*pm, necromancer
Zidane's_Last_Red_Card@worldofnecromancer_no_spam _no_way.org wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:49:05 +0100, "Max d'Ontario"

wrote:
The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because
you're obsessed by starting wars and killing people to extend your
empire


More like to plunder the resources of those nations invaded.

--
"America is now a socialist economy. The definition of
*a socialist economy is when 50% or more your economy
*is dependent on the federal government."

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *--Christine O'Donnell


Better we take theirs then they take ours.

Jigsaw
  #10  
Old November 2nd, 2010, 04:09 AM posted to alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,soc.retirement,rec.travel.europe
Jigsaw1695
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 55
Default In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerfulpopulist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly andexpensively more?

On Nov 1, 9:17*pm, necromancer
Zidane's_Last_Red_Card@worldofnecromancer_no_spam _no_way.org wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:58:58 -0700 (PDT), "PJ O'Donovan HimSelf"

wrote:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10


Another excerpt from the above article appearing in the current issue
of the British magazine. The Economist, with the cover titled "angry
America"


"...The tea-partiers do not just have less selfish motives than the
pampered French. They also have better manners. Let the French block
roads and set things on fi among tea-partiers it is a point of
pride that their large but orderly rallies leave barely a crumpled
candy wrapper behind them. Though some wear tricorn hats, and the
movement takes its name from the Boston Tea Party, tea-partiers are
peaceful folk...."


No, the tea-party just put up threats of violence if their candidates
lose.

Ref:http://tinyurl.com/2v8xgut

--
"God may choose to heal someone from cancer, yet that
*person still has a great deal of medical bills. The
*outstanding bills do not determine whether or not
*the patient has been healed by God."

* * * * * * * * * * * *--Christine O'Donnell


Uh son.... I think I should remind you that when the FOunding Fathers
wrote the US Constitution, the placed the right of free men to have
guns and not fear the government will take them away.

The purpose of the 2nd Amendent...and there is only one... is to
insure the populace that they have the means to overthrow a tyrannical
government if the need arises.

You may not like it or even approve of it, but that is the way it is.

Jigsaw
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Greedy government bureaucrats ,many parasites, feasting off the restof us at that Federal Government Trough O'Donovan, PJ, Himself Europe 1 March 20th, 2010 04:21 PM
Constantly on the alert for new and innovative ways to extract moretax revenue from its subjects, zee Fwench government considers nationalizingand licensing prostitution to become available in special government whorehouses PJ Odonovan Europe 2 March 20th, 2010 03:01 PM
US dollar keeps sinking endlessly--worth the same as the Canadian dollar now Viking Europe 76 October 15th, 2007 11:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 TravelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.