If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populistmovement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and expensively more?
In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populist
movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and expensively more? "IT IS not hard, if you really try, to find good things to say about America’s tea-partiers. They are not French, for a start......" Exerpt above from British magazine ,The Economist dated 30/10/2010 with the cover stating "Angry America" including article below: http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and expensively more?
PJ O'Donovan HimSelf wrote:
| In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populist | movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and | expensively more? | | "IT IS not hard, if you really try, to find good things to say about | America’s tea-partiers. They are not French, for a start......" | | Exerpt above from British magazine ,The Economist dated 30/10/2010 | with the cover stating "Angry America" including article below: | | | | http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10 The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because you're obsessed by starting wars and killing people to extend your empire and that costs billions and billions of dollars that the country needs to be a decent place to live in - right now it's a ******** - except of course for the megarich who run the place. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerfulpopulist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly andexpensively more?
On Nov 1, 11:49*am, "Max d'Ontario"
wrote:... The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because you're obsessed by starting wars and killing people to extend your empire and that costs billions and billions of dollars that the country needs to be a decent place to live in - right now it's a ******** - except of course for the megarich who run the place. You might be interested in this before you get too strident: http://buttonwood.economist.com/content/gdc |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
donovan the typical american ?
and donovan doesn't belong to the mega rich, just to the bigots hand on the
heart and waving flags at every occasion. Ridiculous. "Max d'Ontario" a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion : ... PJ O'Donovan HimSelf wrote: | In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populist | movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and | expensively more? | | "IT IS not hard, if you really try, to find good things to say about | America’s tea-partiers. They are not French, for a start......" | | Exerpt above from British magazine ,The Economist dated 30/10/2010 | with the cover stating "Angry America" including article below: | | | | http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10 The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because you're obsessed by starting wars and killing people to extend your empire and that costs billions and billions of dollars that the country needs to be a decent place to live in - right now it's a ******** - except of course for the megarich who run the place. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerfulpopulist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly andexpensively more?
On Nov 1, 1:19*pm, Werner wrote:
On Nov 1, 11:49*am, "Max d'Ontario" wrote:... The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because you're obsessed by starting wars and killing people to extend your empire and that costs billions and billions of dollars that the country needs to be a decent place to live in - right now it's a ******** - except of course for the megarich who run the place. You might be interested in this before you get too strident:http://buttonwood.economist.com/content/gdc http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10 Another excerpt from the above article appearing in the current issue of the British magazine. The Economist, with the cover titled "angry America" "...The tea-partiers do not just have less selfish motives than the pampered French. They also have better manners. Let the French block roads and set things on fi among tea-partiers it is a point of pride that their large but orderly rallies leave barely a crumpled candy wrapper behind them. Though some wear tricorn hats, and the movement takes its name from the Boston Tea Party, tea-partiers are peaceful folk...." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerfulpopulist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly andexpensively more?
On Nov 1, 2:58*pm, "PJ O'Donovan HimSelf" wrote:
On Nov 1, 1:19*pm, Werner wrote: On Nov 1, 11:49*am, "Max d'Ontario" wrote:... The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because you're obsessed by starting wars and killing people to extend your empire and that costs billions and billions of dollars that the country needs to be a decent place to live in - right now it's a ******** - except of course for the megarich who run the place. You might be interested in this before you get too strident:http://buttonwood.economist.com/content/gdc http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10 Another excerpt from the above article appearing in the current issue of the British magazine. The Economist, with the cover titled "angry America" "...The tea-partiers do not just have less selfish motives than the pampered French. They also have better manners. Let the French block roads and set things on fi among tea-partiers it is a point of pride that their large but orderly rallies leave barely a crumpled candy wrapper behind them. Though some wear tricorn hats, and the movement takes its name from the Boston Tea Party, tea-partiers are peaceful folk...." Indeed. But this can change. Other groups might form with different tactics when conditions deteriorate. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and expensively more?
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:49:05 +0100, "Max d'Ontario"
wrote: The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because you're obsessed by starting wars and killing people to extend your empire More like to plunder the resources of those nations invaded. -- "America is now a socialist economy. The definition of a socialist economy is when 50% or more your economy is dependent on the federal government." --Christine O'Donnell |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerful populist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly and expensively more?
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:58:58 -0700 (PDT), "PJ O'Donovan HimSelf"
wrote: http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10 Another excerpt from the above article appearing in the current issue of the British magazine. The Economist, with the cover titled "angry America" "...The tea-partiers do not just have less selfish motives than the pampered French. They also have better manners. Let the French block roads and set things on fi among tea-partiers it is a point of pride that their large but orderly rallies leave barely a crumpled candy wrapper behind them. Though some wear tricorn hats, and the movement takes its name from the Boston Tea Party, tea-partiers are peaceful folk...." No, the tea-party just put up threats of violence if their candidates lose. Ref: http://tinyurl.com/2v8xgut -- "God may choose to heal someone from cancer, yet that person still has a great deal of medical bills. The outstanding bills do not determine whether or not the patient has been healed by God." --Christine O'Donnell |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerfulpopulist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly andexpensively more?
On Nov 1, 9:14*pm, necromancer
Zidane's_Last_Red_Card@worldofnecromancer_no_spam _no_way.org wrote: On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:49:05 +0100, "Max d'Ontario" wrote: The US is the third world and it's not because of Obama - it's because you're obsessed by starting wars and killing people to extend your empire More like to plunder the resources of those nations invaded. -- "America is now a socialist economy. The definition of *a socialist economy is when 50% or more your economy *is dependent on the federal government." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *--Christine O'Donnell Better we take theirs then they take ours. Jigsaw |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In how many countries other than the USof A would a powerfulpopulist movement demand less of government, rather than endlessly andexpensively more?
On Nov 1, 9:17*pm, necromancer
Zidane's_Last_Red_Card@worldofnecromancer_no_spam _no_way.org wrote: On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:58:58 -0700 (PDT), "PJ O'Donovan HimSelf" wrote: http://preview.tinyurl.com/4zEvleths304d10 Another excerpt from the above article appearing in the current issue of the British magazine. The Economist, with the cover titled "angry America" "...The tea-partiers do not just have less selfish motives than the pampered French. They also have better manners. Let the French block roads and set things on fi among tea-partiers it is a point of pride that their large but orderly rallies leave barely a crumpled candy wrapper behind them. Though some wear tricorn hats, and the movement takes its name from the Boston Tea Party, tea-partiers are peaceful folk...." No, the tea-party just put up threats of violence if their candidates lose. Ref:http://tinyurl.com/2v8xgut -- "God may choose to heal someone from cancer, yet that *person still has a great deal of medical bills. The *outstanding bills do not determine whether or not *the patient has been healed by God." * * * * * * * * * * * *--Christine O'Donnell Uh son.... I think I should remind you that when the FOunding Fathers wrote the US Constitution, the placed the right of free men to have guns and not fear the government will take them away. The purpose of the 2nd Amendent...and there is only one... is to insure the populace that they have the means to overthrow a tyrannical government if the need arises. You may not like it or even approve of it, but that is the way it is. Jigsaw |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Greedy government bureaucrats ,many parasites, feasting off the restof us at that Federal Government Trough | O'Donovan, PJ, Himself | Europe | 1 | March 20th, 2010 04:21 PM |
Constantly on the alert for new and innovative ways to extract moretax revenue from its subjects, zee Fwench government considers nationalizingand licensing prostitution to become available in special government whorehouses | PJ Odonovan | Europe | 2 | March 20th, 2010 03:01 PM |
US dollar keeps sinking endlessly--worth the same as the Canadian dollar now | Viking | Europe | 76 | October 15th, 2007 11:19 PM |