If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Safer at sea than on land
To Whom It May Concern:
We came across this information in the trades and thought it would be of interest to this newsgroup as well. If this is somehow a repeat of an earlier post, sorry we missed it. This can always be ignored or deleted. In the wake of the US Congress looking into cruise industry safety, officials released data showing risks from crime are extremely low. According to data based on 15 cruise lines, from 2003-2005, there were 178 complaints of sexual assault, four robberies and 24 missing persons in that time, said the International Council of Cruise Lines (ICCL). During that time, the 15 cruise lines carried 31 million passengers. Said criminologist James Fox, hired as an independent expert to review the data which was also provided to Congress: "While virtually no place -- on land or sea -- is totally free of risk, the number of reported incidents of serious crime from cruise lines is extremely low, no matter what benchmark or standard is used." Michael Cyre, president of the ICCL, termed cruising one of the safest vacations available. Happy sailing, John Sisker SHIP-TO-SHORE CRUISE AGENCY® (714) 536-3850 or toll free at (800) 724-6644 & (pagoo ID: 714.536.3850) http://www.shiptoshorecruise.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Safer at sea than on land
Thus spake "John Sisker" :
To Whom It May Concern: We came across this information in the trades and thought it would be of interest to this newsgroup as well. If this is somehow a repeat of an earlier post, sorry we missed it. This can always be ignored or deleted. Four days old & cold. -- dillon Could have been is in the past Could be is in the future There is only the now |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Safer at sea than on land
But John beat Steinbrenner to the "negative" news by six hours.
-- DG in Cherry Hill, NJ "Dillon Pyron" wrote in message ... Thus spake "John Sisker" : To Whom It May Concern: We came across this information in the trades and thought it would be of interest to this newsgroup as well. If this is somehow a repeat of an earlier post, sorry we missed it. This can always be ignored or deleted. Four days old & cold. -- dillon Could have been is in the past Could be is in the future There is only the now |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Safer at sea than on land
Dillon Pyron wrote:
Thus spake "John Sisker" : To Whom It May Concern: We came across this information in the trades and thought it would be of interest to this newsgroup as well. If this is somehow a repeat of an earlier post, sorry we missed it. This can always be ignored or deleted. Four days old & cold. Do you have a program to calculate how old the news is??? To me, his postings are better then Ray's. At least his sig lines are at the end... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Safer at sea than on land
"Cruising is one of the safest vacations available," according to the
International Council of Cruise Lines, is Negative news? I guess it all prospective by some. Likewise, others are apparently into counting... this is "two days old", this is "four days old and cold!" That's all well and good if they have that kind of time on their hands, but as I said... "if this is somehow a repeat of an earlier post, sorry we missed it. This can always be ignored or deleted." Seemingly, that's the only part that is being ignored. And true to form, nothing is ever said when my information just happens to be the first time posted, just when it apparently isn't. And yes, my sig information is at the bottom of my posts, as required by the guidelines of this newsgroup. At least, I'm trying to follow the procedures. Happy sailing, John Sisker SHIP-TO-SHORE CRUISE AGENCY® (714) 536-3850 or toll free at (800) 724-6644 & (pagoo ID: 714.536.3850) http://www.shiptoshorecruise.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Safer at sea than on land
"John Sisker" wrote in message ink.net... "Cruising is one of the safest vacations available," according to the International Council of Cruise Lines, is Negative news? I guess it all prospective by some. Likewise, others are apparently into counting... this is "two days old", this is "four days old and cold!" That's all well and good if they have that kind of time on their hands, but as I said... "if this is somehow a repeat of an earlier post, sorry we missed it. This can always be ignored or deleted." Seemingly, that's the only part that is being ignored. And true to form, nothing is ever said when my information just happens to be the first time posted, just when it apparently isn't. And yes, my sig information is at the bottom of my posts, as required by the guidelines of this newsgroup. At least, I'm trying to follow the procedures. John, you are not getting it..First you started here giving incorrect information, then you started bombarding the group with outdated material that had already been posted days ago..and forget the, *if this is a repeat of an earlier post, sorry, we missed it.* That doesn't cut it...Do some research before you post...Then you give a very negative report about a ship that someone here is excited about taking..I don't see any other T/As doing that..You can give a negative opinion without dredging up something that happened years ago; that is not as explicit and detrimental and applies or has applied to other cruise ships as well. You are posting to many veteran cruisers here as well as newbies, who should be getting correct information to make the right decisions about cruising. Sorry, but I feel that you are trying too hard and not checking your information before putting it into print as fact that can be trusted. You might think about this before you post. I'm only trying to tell you how I feel about your posts and not to be hurtful. --Jean |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Safer at sea than on land
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:50:02 GMT, John Sisker wrote:
"Cruising is one of the safest vacations available," according to the International Council of Cruise Lines, is Negative news? I guess it all prospective by some. Likewise, others are apparently into counting... this is "two days old", this is "four days old and cold!" That's all well and good if they have that kind of time on their hands, but as I said... "if this is somehow a repeat of an earlier post, sorry we missed it. This can always be ignored or deleted." Seemingly, that's the only part that is being ignored. And true to form, nothing is ever said when my information just happens to be the first time posted, just when it apparently isn't. And yes, my sig information is at the bottom of my posts, as required by the guidelines of this newsgroup. At least, I'm trying to follow the procedures. Happy sailing, John Sisker SHIP-TO-SHORE CRUISE AGENCY® (714) 536-3850 or toll free at (800) 724-6644 & (pagoo ID: 714.536.3850) http://www.shiptoshorecruise.com LOL You're screwed no matter which way you turn. Some around here will secretly detest you b/c you are hording in on Ray Spammerberg's Home For Free Advertising. Others will detest you since I forecasted a long time back of your Coming, and more like you, who walk the fence of newsgroup etiquette and the beloved Charter which isn't worth the paper it isn't written on. At least you appear to have a shred of decency and understand that whatever value you, me or others perceive of your postings, in your heart, certainly in mine, it's a gimmick that ends up being, drum roll completely free, international marketing. I say "Post On, Sir" and the following tides of Siskers as well. As long as you, as Googleberg refused to ever admit, that you do this not for the pleasures of the cruiser but, at the end of the day, for your bottom line. -- http://www.punkvoter.com/anim/anim-idiot.html |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Safer at sea than on land
"Jean O'Boyle" wrote in message
m... John, you are not getting it..First you started here giving incorrect information, then you started bombarding the group with outdated material that had already been posted days ago..and forget the, *if this is a repeat of an earlier post, sorry, we missed it.* That doesn't cut it...Do some research before you post...Then you give a very negative report about a ship that someone here is excited about taking..I don't see any other T/As doing that..You can give a negative opinion without dredging up something that happened years ago; that is not as explicit and detrimental and applies or has applied to other cruise ships as well. You are posting to many veteran cruisers here as well as newbies, who should be getting correct information to make the right decisions about cruising. Sorry, but I feel that you are trying too hard and not checking your information before putting it into print as fact that can be trusted. You might think about this before you post. I'm only trying to tell you how I feel about your posts and not to be hurtful. --Jean Where we used to have one person posting press releases, now we have three, and they each appear to be trying to get the information posted, and more important (at least to them) their "sig lines". What we now have are multiple posts of the same information, by Ray and John and now by Eric, who is promoting his website. The result, to our detriment, is an overabundance of information, and maybe it is time to call a halt to the posting of news stories from the "Gardenia Gazette" or the "Hong Kong Herald". As Roberto Duran, a great prize fighter, exclaimed back in 1980, when he took one too many fights, and was taking a beating, "no mas". No more. No mas, people. -- DG in Cherry Hill, NJ (* _ *) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Safer at sea than on land
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:08:42 GMT, Jean O'Boyle wrote:
John, you are not getting it..First you started here giving incorrect information, then you started bombarding the group with outdated material Jeannie, below. http://www.starterupsteve.com/swf/stfu.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Safer at sea than on land
In article , Dick G
dickdotgoldhaber@gmaildotcom wrote: What we now have are multiple posts of the same information, by Ray and John and now by Eric, who is promoting his website. The result, to our detriment, is an overabundance of information, and maybe it is time to call a halt to the posting of news stories from the "Gardenia Gazette" or the "Hong Kong Herald". Eric and John don't even look to see if the information has already been posted. When you read their posts it is evident that both John and Eric are meatheads. Ray has been posting info in a timely manner for years. Besides the info posts, Ray has made intelligent contributions to the discussions. Ray is not a meathead. I'll stick with Ray. No mas, people. If you don't want to read their posts use your kill file. -- Charles |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cruise vs. land vacation: cost comparison | Ike | Cruises | 6 | March 6th, 2006 01:10 AM |
CALL USA&AUSTRALIA FOR FREE FROM UK | pappy | Australia & New Zealand | 0 | August 10th, 2005 12:34 PM |
17 mile drive by motorbike | C.d.N.P. | USA & Canada | 66 | July 14th, 2005 07:45 AM |
Crystal Land Package to Tibet! | Ray Goldenberg | Cruises | 6 | November 23rd, 2004 06:26 PM |
World's Best Cruise & Land Program! | Ray Goldenberg | Cruises | 0 | August 13th, 2004 08:41 PM |