If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#371
|
|||
|
|||
On 20 Sep 2005 03:16:37 -0700, "A Human Being"
wrote: DDT Filled Mormons wrote: only that there is a tendency toward this. Why is there a tendency? Because people are actually getting smarter as time goes on, as hard to believe as it may be. Ultimately there is a tendency that children will eventually become smarter than their parents. Its true that some will become smarter, but some may not.Depends on a variety of factors. Thus it's only a tendency. The same applies for many other things in life. The same flawed argument you just made is often used for other things in life. Such as? Health. -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- -- |
#372
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:15:15 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote: DDT Filled Mormons writes: Because people are actually getting smarter as time goes on, as hard to believe as it may be. We don't really know that. Add it to your list. -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- -- |
#373
|
|||
|
|||
DDT Filled Mormons wrote: On 20 Sep 2005 03:16:37 -0700, "A Human Being" wrote: DDT Filled Mormons wrote: only that there is a tendency toward this. Why is there a tendency? Because people are actually getting smarter as time goes on, as hard to believe as it may be. Ultimately there is a tendency that children will eventually become smarter than their parents. Its true that some will become smarter, but some may not.Depends on a variety of factors. Thus it's only a tendency. The same applies for many other things in life. The same flawed argument you just made is often used for other things in life. Such as? Health. Could u give an example? -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- -- |
#374
|
|||
|
|||
On 21 Sep 2005 09:03:31 -0700, "A Human Being"
wrote: DDT Filled Mormons wrote: On 20 Sep 2005 03:16:37 -0700, "A Human Being" wrote: DDT Filled Mormons wrote: only that there is a tendency toward this. Why is there a tendency? Because people are actually getting smarter as time goes on, as hard to believe as it may be. Ultimately there is a tendency that children will eventually become smarter than their parents. Its true that some will become smarter, but some may not.Depends on a variety of factors. Thus it's only a tendency. The same applies for many other things in life. The same flawed argument you just made is often used for other things in life. Such as? Health. Could u give an example? Smoking kills you. -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- -- |
#375
|
|||
|
|||
Jack Campin - bogus address a =E9crit : Those French who are ethnically Arab may have to hide it. Speaking good French is one road out of the trap. If you are Arab, the first thing to do is give you newborn French names. If you are only ethnically Arab, then you ARE French, so why not give your children French names? Why the **** do you care? People should be able to give their children the names that they want. You're talking like a ****ing National Socialist. Is it still the case that children in France have to be given names from a list of approved French ones? Bengt Danielsson described that policy in force in Polynesia in "The Happy Island" - children were given an official French name which they never used in daily life. (French must be an utter ******* of a language to pronounce if you come from a Polynesian background). Make a search in rec.travel.europe with "meurgues + surname + pablo" M=2E Campin, your Bengt Danielsson is once for all wrong : There is no law of that kind in force in France and in Polynesia in particular which is a part of it and there have in fact never existed one AS FAR AS the jurisprudency was finally given the opportunity to precise its meaning : The 1803 law was only accepting forenames coming from ancient history (which the jurisprudency assimilated to the notions of familial history and local usage as soon as it could) and from =ABdiverse =BB calendars (meaning in fact all kinds of existing religious forenames, oecumenically). But an =AB official list =BB has never existed nor been officially PUBLISHED and was in fact impossible to make because of the enormous number of possibilities, as several Courts decisions reminded it AS SOON AS this question was brought to them. In fact, originally, the a priori control by mayor was made in the interest of the children to avoid ridiculous, pejorative, complex, or fantaisist names after the excessive liberty given by the 1791 law and disappeared in 1993. This last law essentially supressed the reluctance of mayors to accept names which are not originally forenames, like names of things, of places, or invented names (now you can name your illigitimate son =AB locomotive =BB or =AB toilets =BB or =AB red locomotivette toilets =BB and the mayor has to accept it until HE goes to courts... (wich WAS, and is still, fortunately totally free of charge for anybody at first level, since lawers are not mandatory before the tribunal administratif). It is true that notably in subsaharian Africa, a still freely choosen christian name was often ADDED for christians to the local name and perhaps was it the case also in Polynesia but I know young ivorians born there who still have been named that way... 30 years after independence..., and I've also heard (through my collegues) of people who were given strictly local names in french overseas departements as soon as the end of the XIXth century. Finally, french civil registers have never been closed to foreign and even common local forenames as I've DEMONSTRATED with the 1900-2005 FORENAMES STATISTICS http://www.voila.fr/Famille given in the link to rec.travel.europe quoted above. It has in fact never been LEGALLY forbiden to use a local name and if some mayors did imposed the contrary some decades/centuries ago they were doing it in contradiction with the law AS PRECISED by the jurisprudency as soon as was given to it the opportunity to precise this very point. PS : I made an error in my former post : the francisation of names at the EXCLUSIVE DEMAND of foreigners which was intoduced in France after decolonisation for immigrants is still possible in the decree of naturalisation. The 1993 law just abrogated the former law and rewrote it on this point. So there is as few official list of forenames as : - there was a total privation of inheritance for a wife before the law which (only) rised their share few years ago in case of death of the husband "intestat" (without will) and application BY DEFECT of the legal dispositions of civil code according to the different kinds of mariages contracts previously CHOOSEN by the couple when they civily married ; since the content of wills (testaments) has always prevailed in France over these dispositions... ; - there has been at last a devolution of powers to Corsica ONLY 2 or 3 years ago when was created the "assembl=E9e de corse" ; since it was only the gathering of the 2 departemental and the regional assemblies already existing with virtually the same powers, at least since the decentralisation laws of 1982-83... ; - there was finally an introduction of the "presumption of innocence" by a recent law only few years ago ; since the title of this particular law was only EXPLICITELY concerning its REINFORCEMENT (juge de la d=E9tention) not its introduction ; this principle existing since the declaration of human rights of... 1789... etc... And I could continue the long list of all the rumors and misconceptions of comments that I often read in anglo-saxon medias concerning french legal reforms...!!! Now concerning discrimination, IMO it is essentially fuelled by the =AB impressions =BB that people have according to their OWN experiments or those of their friends. Personnally the fact that I've been exclusevily verbally agressed in the street by young muslims in Paris (or physically by a black in London) didn't have any influence on my doubts about the justification of racist conceptions. IMO with the exception of Pieds noirs and now old uneducated french which didn't swallowed the consequences of the expulsion of the first, it is true that some employers fear to have problems with young muslim man, because they are/were often verbally violent (due sometimes to proudness, and as far as algerians were concerned, to the attitude of their parents towards their scolarship and their will to return home soon "de toute fa=E7on", which often prooved imaginary) even if this attitude is considerably decreasing, since few years exactly because they are more and more integrated to french society (perhaps does the numerous TV talkshows about it help !). And as well some landlords fear the particular attitude that some susaharians africans newcomers have towards the properties of their own... friends and a fortiori of the others (due to their habit of community life). They have a reputation, justified or not, to consider rent payment as subalterne to their own everyday life needs. The example given by Earl is interesting since a true racist would have IMO refused BOTH black and muslim students... But one would IMO be amased by the number of shopkeepers/owners of foreign origin in Paris intra muros, notably arabic and chinese, if he could make a survey... What prooves that they have no particular difficulty to buy commerces to french "de souche" and allows them to give increasingly job opportinuties to young (or not) members of their own communities. Generalisatons are nevertheless difficult in both... directions. For example I still dare to find difficult to swallow that, even if it was largely the case of the ELITES, that the ALL french population was petainist on the pretext that a by definition secret army of resistance compted about 5% of the population as I recently read, when I know the strong influence that the communist party and the SFIO (socialists) or radicals and even christian democrats had before and DURING the war on french population, that a majority of french elected and was still ruled by a... jewish prime minister (BLUM) just 1 year... before WWII, that christians french hided at the risk of their own life 2/3 of the jewish french and very recently immigrated jewish population in a proportion unparallalled in the occupied countries, that no other nation in the world fought so much with countless revolutions for the establishment of a Republican regime which was simply... suppressed... by the Vichy "governement", that the economical setback due to occupation was about twice as important as the one brought about by the devastating WWI..., and finally that no elections occured then to gave to the people the occasion to express their REAL opinion...!! didier Meurgues PS : Stanislas, are you a parent of Yves de Kertanguy ? (d=E9sol=E9 d'=EAtre indiscret) =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D j-c =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D @ = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D purr . demon . co . uk =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D Jack Campin: 11 Third St, Newtongrange EH22 4PU, Scotland | tel 0131 660= 4760 http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/ for CD-ROMs and free | fax 0870 055= 4 975 stuff: Scottish music, food intolerance, & Mac logic fonts | mob 07800 73= 9 557 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
French Family Values... | Gregory Morrow | Europe | 23 | August 1st, 2005 08:20 AM |
Ooh là là! Starbucks in Paris? | laurent | Europe | 647 | December 28th, 2003 10:44 PM |
Top 25 Rated Five-Star Cruise Ships! | Ray Goldenberg | Cruises | 10 | December 26th, 2003 06:43 PM |
Cruising and Diving in French Polynesia (LONG) | Reef Fish | Cruises | 4 | November 2nd, 2003 02:11 PM |
The Food on Ships Thread (Ben Smith and Others) | Becca | Cruises | 0 | September 12th, 2003 09:22 PM |