If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
http://just2reason.newsvine.com/_new...ort-screenings |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
"Just2Reason" wrote in message
... Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings? http://just2reason.newsvine.com/_new...ort-screenings Absolutely. We should not allow the government's terrorism fearmongering to deprive us of our freedoms and privacy. Also such airport screenings, even full body and baggage searches, cannot guarantee safety. Any "terrorist" with half a brain, like the 9/11 conspirators in the Bush administration, can simply use a surface to air missile to take down a plane and then blame it on whomever they want, or claim it was some sort of accident. They did just that to TWA flight 800 over Long Island, NY about 10 years ago. And as with 9/11, their lies, control of the media, and the brainwashed, apathetic Sheeple allowed these murdering warmongers to get away with it. Could the shootdown of flight 800 possibly have been a test to see what they could get away with? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
There are two ways to secure internal air travel in the US.
1) Secure the borders. Put an effective defense that can stop *most* terrorists from even getting into the US. 2) Use the TSA to treat anybody and everybody as a terrorist. From the Obama administration point of view #1 has two problems: A) Cost. The Israeli fence around Gaza that stops suicide bombers cost only a million dollar per km. A similar fence between the US and Mexico would cost, for 3,000 km, about $3 billion. The TSA cost about $7 billion per year so an effective fence would mean that the Obama administration will have $4 billion less to spend as it wishes. In addition, the fence will be built by private companies after a competitive bidding. Not much opportunity to get some jobs for friends and family of those in power. B) Power. The TSA is about power. Either you let them sexually molest you or you will not fly. It is that simple. The only exception is people that the administration likes, AKA VIP. You may feel that the government is too intrusive and vote for the Tea Party, but the Obama administration will get to molest you in the air port and teaches you once and for all who is the real boss. Why would Obama give up this kind of power? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
On Nov 22, 11:24*am, "Freedom Man" wrote:
"Just2Reason" wrote in message ... Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings? http://just2reason.newsvine.com/_new...6-poll-should-... Absolutely. We should not allow the government's terrorism fearmongering to deprive us of our freedoms and privacy. Also such airport screenings, even full body and baggage searches, cannot guarantee safety. Any "terrorist" with half a brain, like the 9/11 conspirators in the Bush administration, can simply use a surface to air missile to take down a plane and then blame it on whomever they want, or claim it was some sort of accident. They did just that to TWA flight 800 over Long Island, NY about 10 years ago. And as with 9/11, their lies, control of the media, and the brainwashed, apathetic Sheeple allowed these murdering warmongers to get away with it. Could the shootdown of flight 800 possibly have been a test to see what they could get away with? No muslims, no terrorists. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
"Al Nakba" wrote in message
... On Nov 22, 11:24 am, "Freedom Man" wrote: "Just2Reason" wrote in message ... Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings? http://just2reason.newsvine.com/_new...6-poll-should-... Absolutely. We should not allow the government's terrorism fearmongering to deprive us of our freedoms and privacy. Also such airport screenings, even full body and baggage searches, cannot guarantee safety. Any "terrorist" with half a brain, like the 9/11 conspirators in the Bush administration, can simply use a surface to air missile to take down a plane and then blame it on whomever they want, or claim it was some sort of accident. They did just that to TWA flight 800 over Long Island, NY about 10 years ago. And as with 9/11, their lies, control of the media, and the brainwashed, apathetic Sheeple allowed these murdering warmongers to get away with it. Could the shootdown of flight 800 possibly have been a test to see what they could get away with? -- No muslims, no terrorists. That was the most stupid and bigoted statement I've read in a long time. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
On Nov 23, 1:20*pm, "Freedom Man" wrote:
"Al Nakba" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 11:24 am, "Freedom Man" wrote: "Just2Reason" wrote in message .... Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings? http://just2reason.newsvine.com/_new...6-poll-should-.... Absolutely. We should not allow the government's terrorism fearmongering to deprive us of our freedoms and privacy. Also such airport screenings, even full body and baggage searches, cannot guarantee safety. Any "terrorist" with half a brain, like the 9/11 conspirators in the Bush administration, can simply use a surface to air missile to take down a plane and then blame it on whomever they want, or claim it was some sort of accident. They did just that to TWA flight 800 over Long Island, NY about 10 years ago. And as with 9/11, their lies, control of the media, and the brainwashed, apathetic Sheeple allowed these murdering warmongers to get away with it. Could the shootdown of flight 800 possibly have been a test to see what they could get away with? -- No muslims, no terrorists. That was the most stupid and bigoted statement I've read in a long time.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - was it untruthful? Be honest now.. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
"Just2Reason" wrote in message ... Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings? http://just2reason.newsvine.com/_new...ort-screenings When was the last time an Israeli aircraft or airport has a problem? Passengers don't remove shoes or go through body searches etc. etc. They rely primarily on a short conversation, a couple of questions and profiling. Whatever else they do is essentially non-intrusive and obviously very effective. Why aren't we taking lessons from them? MLD |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
On 24/11/2010 07:49, Al Nakba wrote:
No muslims, no terrorists. That was the most stupid and bigoted statement I've read in a long time.- Hide quoted text - was it untruthful? Be honest now.. Yes. Not many of the I.R.A or the Red Army Faction, or The Shining Path, were Muslims. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
In mikeos
wrote: On 24/11/2010 07:49, Al Nakba wrote: No muslims, no terrorists. That was the most stupid and bigoted statement I've read in a long time.- Hide quoted text - was it untruthful? Be honest now.. Yes. Not many of the I.R.A or the Red Army Faction, or The Shining Path, were Muslims. Thanks for the history lesson, but I think he was talking about what's going on right now. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
On 24/11/2010 16:17, Fred wrote:
In wrote: On 24/11/2010 07:49, Al Nakba wrote: No muslims, no terrorists. That was the most stupid and bigoted statement I've read in a long time.- Hide quoted text - was it untruthful? Be honest now.. Yes. Not many of the I.R.A or the Red Army Faction, or The Shining Path, were Muslims. Thanks for the history lesson, but I think he was talking about what's going on right now. Focus on one ethnic group and you could get off guard, and find you're looking the wrong way at the wrong time. I guess Oklahoma is also considered ancient history. Don't know what mosque Timothy Mcveigh went to! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Questions re. security screenings | P T | Air travel | 6 | March 23rd, 2008 11:46 PM |
Madrid Barajas Airport Surpass Amsterdam Schiphol Airport as4rd busiest airport | Ulf Kutzner | Europe | 0 | February 21st, 2006 02:10 PM |
Reader Poll: How do you feel about the proposed changes to airport security? | Ablang | Air travel | 1 | August 19th, 2005 07:32 AM |