If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
US transit for Australia/NZ<->Canada passengers
For those that travel this route, have the new US rules (pax must clear
customs/immigration even for transit passengers) made you take a different (and usually longer) route to Canada? If so, how much longer did it take compared to the usual route via LAX/SFO or HNL? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Before I answer, may I ask why you want to know? Sue
"Mel3k" wrote in message ups.com... For those that travel this route, have the new US rules (pax must clear customs/immigration even for transit passengers) made you take a different (and usually longer) route to Canada? If so, how much longer did it take compared to the usual route via LAX/SFO or HNL? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Mel3k" wrote in message ups.com... For those that travel this route, have the new US rules (pax must clear customs/immigration even for transit passengers) made you take a different (and usually longer) route to Canada? If so, how much longer did it take compared to the usual route via LAX/SFO or HNL? It's not a new rule - it's been in for long while. What is new is the new Visa requirement policies, even for TWOV country passengers. The logical Canada-Oz connection is AC's daily flight YVR-SYD via HNL. Given the time of night the AC flight from SYD lands, there is limited hassle as it is the only flight in Immigration. (The main hassle comes as they want you to re-clear security to get back to the gate area.) Southbound, the U.S. clearance is at YVR itself, so there is again limited hassle factor as it's part of the departure airport procedure, rather than a mid flight/end point procedure. HNL is by far a better & easier checkpoint than LAX (which I avoid like the plague these days if I can) although I would transit SFO as well. The only way from NthAm to South Pac without going through the U.S. is either Asia (from Western Canada) or Europe and Asia (from Eastern Canada). Both options add several hours to the journey - over and above the limited time spent in U.S. immigration checks. Unless you have a background that requires a Visa from the Americans to transit, or have a passport that is no longer up to code for them etc etc, I personally feel the extra travel is just not worth it to avoid U.S. inspections. Then again, if AC introduced it's nonstop YVR-SYD they ran for a few months last year, it would be a moot point. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Al Bennett wrote:
"Mel3k" wrote in message ups.com... For those that travel this route, have the new US rules (pax must clear customs/immigration even for transit passengers) made you take a different (and usually longer) route to Canada? If so, how much longer did it take compared to the usual route via LAX/SFO or HNL? It's not a new rule - it's been in for long while. What is new is the new Visa requirement policies, even for TWOV country passengers. The logical Canada-Oz connection is AC's daily flight YVR-SYD via HNL. Given the time of night the AC flight from SYD lands, there is limited hassle as it is the only flight in Immigration. (The main hassle comes as they want you to re-clear security to get back to the gate area.) Southbound, the U.S. clearance is at YVR itself, so there is again limited hassle factor as it's part of the departure airport procedure, rather than a mid flight/end point procedure. HNL is by far a better & easier checkpoint than LAX (which I avoid like the plague these days if I can) although I would transit SFO as well. The only way from NthAm to South Pac without going through the U.S. is either Asia (from Western Canada) or Europe and Asia (from Eastern Canada). Both options add several hours to the journey - over and above the limited time spent in U.S. immigration checks. Unless you have a background that requires a Visa from the Americans to transit, or have a passport that is no longer up to code for them etc etc, I personally feel the extra travel is just not worth it to avoid U.S. inspections. Then again, if AC introduced it's nonstop YVR-SYD they ran for a few months last year, it would be a moot point. To answer Sue's question: I was just curious as to who actually flies via Asia to/from Canada to Australia/NZ to avoid having to go through US Immigrations/Customs. I think someone had a similar post earlier about getting to Australia (with a side trip to Bali) from Toronto without having to connect through the US so I was wondering if there were others who do the same. I guess I should have realized that my question was kind of moot as my preferred airline is Cathay Pacific and I would have to fly via HKG either way;-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On 13 Sep 2005 08:56:41 -0700, "Mel3k" wrote:
To answer Sue's question: I was just curious as to who actually flies via Asia to/from Canada to Australia/NZ to avoid having to go through US Immigrations/Customs. I do - I use CX when flying to Canada, specifically to avoid the Untied States. I do not wish the "bastion of freedom and democracy" to violate my rights which they hold so dear. It is a PITA flying through there anyway, I got the dreaded SSSS on my last six flights, I avoid the Untied States wherever I can avoid it. Dave There are 10 types of people, those who understand binary and those who don't. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hi, I was the original poster, we are flying Singapore via Seoul and taking
a side trip to Bali from Singapore before going on to Melbourne. There is no sinister motive, we just don't want to be bothered with the additional checks and they can be pretty pedantic here in Toronto where we clear US customs before we even leave the ground. The US are entitled to make whatever demands they think fit for their security, we are also free to choose not to go that route. Not too much longer really and once we are on our way it doesn't make much difference to us. We are off on November 10th following a vacation in Cuba, something else the US wouldn't like. :-) Must admit we like Cathay too but don't want to go via Hong Kong again. We will stop over in Singapore for a few days on our way home. Regards..Sue To answer Sue's question: I was just curious as to who actually flies via Asia to/from Canada to Australia/NZ to avoid having to go through US Immigrations/Customs. I think someone had a similar post earlier about getting to Australia (with a side trip to Bali) from Toronto without having to connect through the US so I was wondering if there were others who do the same. I guess I should have realized that my question was kind of moot as my preferred airline is Cathay Pacific and I would have to fly via HKG either way;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
73 New Princess European Adventures! | Ray Goldenberg | Cruises | 0 | June 8th, 2005 06:24 PM |
My terrible Dragoman experience in Africa | Nadine S. | Africa | 5 | April 26th, 2004 06:54 PM |
Safety board wants airline passengers weighed | Jean C | Air travel | 49 | March 15th, 2004 08:31 PM |
Barbados Rethinks Passports for Cruise Passengers | Diane Giambalvo | Cruises | 4 | February 13th, 2004 12:43 AM |
JetBlue Gave Defense Firm Files on Passengers | citizen | Air travel | 13 | September 24th, 2003 07:43 PM |