Ping ATB.

Sarah Czepiel wrote:

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:15:23 +1300, Greg Procter
wrote:

:Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:
: On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:44:18 +1300, Greg Procter
: wrote:
:
: :Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:
: : : : : : You always step in your own steaming pile, groggy. You should
: : : : : : remember " almost" includes Iran after you got slapped for claiming
: : : : : : they had aircraft carriers roaming the desert.
: : : : : :
: : : : : :
: : : : : :You and Ken-scum claimed the US had aircraft carriers roaming the desert
: : : : :
: : : : : No groggy. Ken informed you that F14's are almost exclusively
: : : : : carrier based aircraft. You then went on a toot about Iran having
: : : : : aircraft carriers roaming the desert. You get caught all the time
: : : : : making stupid comments which you think are funny.
: : : : :
: : : : :There was no "almost" Sarah, Ken-scum made an absolute statement.
: : : :
: : : : Then prove it. Cite the message with message ID.
: : : :
: : : :
: : : :It's you who keeps adding the fudge word to Ken-scum's idiotic
: : : :statement, Sarah. You cite it.
: : :
: : : I can't cite words he never wrote, groggy.
: : :
: : :You keep citing words he never wrote!
: :
: : Invisible cites?
: :
: :Well, they would be "visible non-cites" AKA "lies"
:
: The liar is you, greg-scum.

:There's no lie involved. (on my side)

You and Ken-scum claimed the US had aircraft carriers roaming the
desert. " Cited.

That's a lie, greg-scum.


No lie at all Sarah, you discounted every other possibility.

Greg Procter wrote:



I've already posted the proof, MsTravel - either you missed it or you're
stupid.

I posted proof that the US used AO in Vietnam between 1961 and 1971.
I posted proof that (many of) the side effects of AO were known in the
1940s/50s.

You provided a Wikipedia article. ANYONE can edit a Wikipedia article.

Greg Procter wrote:


Sarah, old ****-witted one, what you've quoted is a discussion relating
to F14s being operated from other than their home airfield.
Ken-scum has stupidly tried to argue logically, which he obviously isn't
capable of doing.

F14s can't fly off dirt runways? Agreed.

I disagree.

Greg Procter wrote:


In that case, isn't it odd that I cited a web-site that claimed that the
effects were known at the time?

You cited Wikipedia.

I could cite the Weekly World News and claim you are from outer space.

"Mr. Travel" wrote:

Greg Procter wrote:


I've already posted the proof, MsTravel - either you missed it or you're
stupid.

I posted proof that the US used AO in Vietnam between 1961 and 1971.
I posted proof that (many of) the side effects of AO were known in the
1940s/50s.

You provided a Wikipedia article. ANYONE can edit a Wikipedia article.


That's nice - I thought you considered wikipedia to be the bible of US
facts, I must be confusing you with some other idiot.

"Mr. Travel" wrote:

Greg Procter wrote:

Sarah, old ****-witted one, what you've quoted is a discussion relating
to F14s being operated from other than their home airfield.
Ken-scum has stupidly tried to argue logically, which he obviously isn't
capable of doing.

F14s can't fly off dirt runways? Agreed.

I disagree.


Go argue with Ken-scum on that one.

Anything is _possible_.
However, as I understand the situation, and I claim no deep knowledge of
the specifics of F14s, they tend to ingest dust, sand and rubble from
unpaved runways when operated from same.

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:49:15 +1300, Greg Procter
wrote:

:"Mr. Travel" wrote:
:
: Greg Procter wrote:
:
:
: I've already posted the proof, MsTravel - either you missed it or you're
: stupid.
:
: I posted proof that the US used AO in Vietnam between 1961 and 1971.
: I posted proof that (many of) the side effects of AO were known in the
: 1940s/50s.
:
: You provided a Wikipedia article. ANYONE can edit a Wikipedia article.
:
:
:That's nice - I thought you considered wikipedia to be the bible of US
:facts, I must be confusing you with some other idiot.

It's your cite, self proclaimed idiot.

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:58:48 +1300, Greg Procter
wrote:

:Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:
: On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:15:23 +1300, Greg Procter
: wrote:
:
: :Sarah Czepiel wrote:
: :
: : On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:44:18 +1300, Greg Procter
: : wrote:
: :
: : :Sarah Czepiel wrote:
: :
: : : : : : : You always step in your own steaming pile, groggy. You should
: : : : : : : remember " almost" includes Iran after you got slapped for claiming
: : : : : : : they had aircraft carriers roaming the desert.
: : : : : : :
: : : : : : :
: : : : : : :You and Ken-scum claimed the US had aircraft carriers roaming the desert
: : : : : :
: : : : : : No groggy. Ken informed you that F14's are almost exclusively
: : : : : : carrier based aircraft. You then went on a toot about Iran having
: : : : : : aircraft carriers roaming the desert. You get caught all the time
: : : : : : making stupid comments which you think are funny.
: : : : : :
: : : : : :There was no "almost" Sarah, Ken-scum made an absolute statement.
: : : : :
: : : : : Then prove it. Cite the message with message ID.
: : : : :
: : : : :
: : : : :It's you who keeps adding the fudge word to Ken-scum's idiotic
: : : : :statement, Sarah. You cite it.
: : : :
: : : : I can't cite words he never wrote, groggy.
: : : :
: : : :You keep citing words he never wrote!
: : :
: : : Invisible cites?
: : :
: : :Well, they would be "visible non-cites" AKA "lies"
: :
: : The liar is you, greg-scum.
:
: :There's no lie involved. (on my side)
:
: You and Ken-scum claimed the US had aircraft carriers roaming the
: desert. " Cited.
:
: That's a lie, greg-scum.
:
:
:No lie at all Sarah, you discounted every other possibility.

You lied greg-scum. I cited the relevant material.

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:05:40 +1300, Greg Procter
wrote:

:"Mr. Travel" wrote:
:
: Greg Procter wrote:
:
: Sarah, old ****-witted one, what you've quoted is a discussion relating
: to F14s being operated from other than their home airfield.
: Ken-scum has stupidly tried to argue logically, which he obviously isn't
: capable of doing.
:
: F14s can't fly off dirt runways? Agreed.
:
: I disagree.
:
:
:Go argue with Ken-scum on that one.
:
:Anything is _possible_.
:However, as I understand the situation, and I claim no deep knowledge of
:the specifics of F14s, they tend to ingest dust, sand and rubble from
:unpaved runways when operated from same.

That's correct greg. FOD walkdowns are routine on military airfields
and especially on aircraft carriers to ensure that the aircraft don't
ingest any Foreign Object Debris.

Sarah Czepiel wrote:

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:49:15 +1300, Greg Procter
wrote:

:"Mr. Travel" wrote:
:
: Greg Procter wrote:
:
:
: I've already posted the proof, MsTravel - either you missed it or you're
: stupid.
:
: I posted proof that the US used AO in Vietnam between 1961 and 1971.
: I posted proof that (many of) the side effects of AO were known in the
: 1940s/50s.
:
: You provided a Wikipedia article. ANYONE can edit a Wikipedia article.
:
:
:That's nice - I thought you considered wikipedia to be the bible of US
:facts, I must be confusing you with some other idiot.

It's your cite, self proclaimed idiot.


You're claiming that I've confused MsTravel with myself???
Sometimes you're truely weird, Sarah!