If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
Flying The Gestapo Skies: Woman arrested for refusing to delete unflattering video on airplane.
mrtravel wrote
Rod Speed wrote mrtravel wrote SMS wrote JR Weiss wrote Nope. The FAA merely says that the individual airline must "determine" that devices "will not cause interference with the navigation or communication system of the aircraft" before they can be operated in flight. No test whatsoever is required -- only an administrative determination. This is true. It's the excuse airlines use to prohibit cell phone use, when the real reason has nothing to do with interference with the plane's navigation systems. No tests are required or performed. Cell phone use, while airborne, is banned by the FCC. No it isnt and many private pilots use them all the time. I drive over the speed limit most of the time. That doesn't make it legal. Its legal anyway. However, I do not know if the FCC rule applies to low flying private aircraft, It aint the low flying that matters and plenty of private aircraft fly as high as heavy commercial aircraft anyway. which wasn't being discussed. Wrong again. |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
Flying The Gestapo Skies: Woman arrested for refusing to deleteunflattering video on airplane.
Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article , "Jim Davis" wrote: Police will often handcuff someone until stories can be verified. One or two cops, five suspects, they'll handcuff them all until they find out what's happening. Just because they handcuff you, doesn't mean you're under arrest. Actually it does. You don't have to go to jail to be arrested. Technically, any time one is impeded or restrained by the cops, they are under arrest. It is just that the cop that did the arrest can also end it at their discretion. Small point, but many legal points are. Wrong, again. Police can detain you, without arresting you. You can have arrest without handcuffs. You can have handcuffs without arrest. |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
Flying The Gestapo Skies: Woman arrested for refusing to deleteunflattering video on airplane.
Rod Speed wrote:
Kurt Ullman wrote: Technically, any time one is impeded or restrained by the cops, they are under arrest. Wrong, most obviously when they pull you over for speeding etc and you're free to leave once they write out the ticket etc. That is a very good example. |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
Flying The Gestapo Skies: Woman arrested for refusing to delete unflattering video on airplane.
In article , mrtravel wrote:
Rod Speed wrote: Kurt Ullman wrote: Technically, any time one is impeded or restrained by the cops, they are under arrest. Wrong, most obviously when they pull you over for speeding etc and you're free to leave once they write out the ticket etc. That is a very good example. As I said, try to leave w/o signing the ticket. Heck try to leave before the ticket is written. The Supremes would also tend to disagree: "whenever a police officer accosts an individual and restrains his freedom to walk away, he has 'seized' that person." Terry V Ohio which was about a person just walking down the street, it was extended later to other things including car stops. |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
Flying The Gestapo Skies: Woman arrested for refusing to delete unflattering video on airplane.
"mrtravel" wrote...
I drive over the speed limit most of the time. That doesn't make it legal. However, I do not know if the FCC rule applies to low flying private aircraft, which wasn't being discussed. AFAIK, it does. I know of no general exemption (i.e., other than emergency use). |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
Flying The Gestapo Skies: Woman arrested for refusing to delete unflattering video on airplane.
Kurt Ullman wrote
mrtravel wrote Rod Speed wrote Kurt Ullman wrote Technically, any time one is impeded or restrained by the cops, they are under arrest. Wrong, most obviously when they pull you over for speeding etc and you're free to leave once they write out the ticket etc. That is a very good example. As I said, try to leave w/o signing the ticket. Irrelevant to what was being discussed, whether you have been ARRESTED. Heck try to leave before the ticket is written. Irrelevant to what was being discussed, whether you have been ARRESTED. The Supremes would also tend to disagree: Nope. "whenever a police officer accosts an individual and restrains his freedom to walk away, he has 'seized' that person." Not the same thing as being ARRESTED. Terry V Ohio which was about a person just walking down the street, it was extended later to other things including car stops. Irrelevant to what was being discussed, whether you have been ARRESTED. |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
Flying The Gestapo Skies: Woman arrested for refusing to delete unflattering video on airplane.
Kurt Ullman writes:
The Supremes would also tend to disagree: "whenever a police officer accosts an individual and restrains his freedom to walk away, he has 'seized' that person." Amazing the things that come out of Motown. |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
Flying The Gestapo Skies: Woman arrested for refusing to deleteunflattering video on airplane.
Mxsmanic wrote:
Kurt Ullman writes: The Supremes would also tend to disagree: "whenever a police officer accosts an individual and restrains his freedom to walk away, he has 'seized' that person." Amazing the things that come out of Motown. Well, if these aren't as popular. |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
Flying The Gestapo Skies: Woman arrested for refusing to delete unflattering video on airplane.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:21:17 -0700, mrtravel wrote:
David Johnston wrote: On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:39:38 -0700, mrtravel wrote: James Of Tucson wrote: On Aug 17, 12:24 pm, Mxsmanic wrote: Jim Davis writes: Without a doubt. Keeping it is her right, but there may be problems if she shows it publicly. Or maybe not. The real danger, though, is that she'd show in in a courtroom, and the airline can't do anything about that. My first thought was that there might be a civil suit or even a criminal case involving one or both of the subjects of the video, in which case the video is *evidence* and ordering the destruction of evidence is often itself a serious crime. How about 1. She was told by the FA to stop taping 2. She refused to obey that instruction Do you have any actual reason to think that happened? Not any more reason than a reason to believe the events occured as the "grandmother" reported them. I see. So a total absence of any evidence is equal in weight in your mind to the existence of some evidence. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hidden Camera Video Shows Mice On Airplane | Auzerais . | Air travel | 2 | July 13th, 2006 01:07 AM |
Woman tries to open airplane door midflight | Fly Guy | Air travel | 24 | August 17th, 2005 04:14 AM |
Flying The Skies of Comedy Air | Robert Cohen | Air travel | 5 | December 27th, 2004 01:41 AM |
Moralist Pharmacists Refusing To Fill Prescriptions | nobody | Europe | 5 | November 11th, 2004 07:29 PM |
MAIL /SMTP refusing .. in username | Nik | Air travel | 1 | November 17th, 2003 07:42 AM |