A Travel and vacations forum. TravelBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » TravelBanter forum » Travelling Style » Air travel
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Southwest casually looking at smaller jets...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 21st, 2003, 02:48 AM
Kizzer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Southwest casually looking at smaller jets...

I wonder they they'd consider?

http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/031020/airli...st_jets_1.html

Reuters
Southwest 'casually' looking at smaller jets
Monday October 20, 11:09 am ET


CHICAGO, Oct 20 (Reuters) - Southwest Airlines' (NYSE:LUV - News) chief
financial officer said on Monday that the carrier was "casually" looking at
using smaller 100-seat jets but was not close to reaching a decision on the
issue.
"It's something that we have only casually begun to look at and certainly
haven't gotten serious," CFO Gary Kelly said in a conference call with
analysts and reporters.

Southwest's fleet currently consists of only one type of aircraft, the
Boeing 737. Kelly also said the Dallas-based low-cost carrier was
considering in-flight entertainment offerings.



  #2  
Old October 21st, 2003, 03:34 AM
Pre Khum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Southwest casually looking at smaller jets...

Kizzer wrote:
Southwest's fleet currently consists of only one type of aircraft, the
Boeing 737. Kelly also said the Dallas-based low-cost carrier was
considering in-flight entertainment offerings.


How many types of 737s does Southwest operate ? Do they still have old -200s ?

Could the 717 (aka MD95) get a rebirth ?

It is a shame that BAe stopped making the 146s. Seems that this plane would
have found itself a nice market if it had been updated to a 2 engine puppy
that was just as quiet.

I don't think that 2*2 seating is really suitable for 100 pax jets. 25 rows
makes for a very long narow tube. Although logically, 2*2 gives half the
passengers a window seat.

Of course, there are a dozen 100 seats jets available as second hand. They
were built by the french and british and can go mighty fast. Southwest would
surely make quite a profit with those since they could do twice the number of
flights in a given day :-).

However, Southwest's 1960s livery wouldn't go well on those sleek jets...
  #3  
Old October 22nd, 2003, 07:10 AM
A Guy Called Tyketto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Southwest casually looking at smaller jets...


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Pre Khum wrote:
Kizzer wrote:
Southwest's fleet currently consists of only one type of aircraft, the
Boeing 737. Kelly also said the Dallas-based low-cost carrier was
considering in-flight entertainment offerings.


How many types of 737s does Southwest operate ? Do they still have old -200s ?


The 732s are still in service with SWA, but are dwindling out.
Most are doing the short hops out of KDAL. Everything else is the 733
or newer.

Could the 717 (aka MD95) get a rebirth ?


Nope. The jets in question are the Embraer 170s, the same that
JBU has already purchased.

I don't think that 2*2 seating is really suitable for 100 pax jets. 25 rows
makes for a very long narow tube. Although logically, 2*2 gives half the
passengers a window seat.


A CRJ or ERJ is just as narrow as what SWA is thinking of
doing, but they are doing the more unique runs, like LAX-SBP, LAX-SBA,
etc. I'm not sure on how they're going to be used in a cattlecar-like
environment, but there you have it.

Of course, there are a dozen 100 seats jets available as second hand. They
were built by the french and british and can go mighty fast. Southwest would
surely make quite a profit with those since they could do twice the number of
flights in a given day :-).

However, Southwest's 1960s livery wouldn't go well on those sleek jets...


On the 170s, it would, and would look nice. Think of it as a
smaller prelude to their plan for retrofitting their 737 fleet with
winglets, which is another thing on their plate (something about having
money on the side to do it after another profiting quarter).

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |

Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! |
http://www.sbcglobal.net/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/lh9dyBkZmuMZ8L8RAjNfAJ41XHqy+Srk9HQqn9hLdjYZgcKu+Q CdEDl+
xGxfC7Rcu83UoEknbIV3MQo=
=nxXk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flying on Southwest Airlines may be hazardous to your health. [email protected] Air travel 16 October 12th, 2003 12:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 TravelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.