If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat
J. Clarke writes:
Personally I would be very surprised if there was a separate circuit for each outlet in any case. Each outlet might well be separately fused. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:57:25 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote: J. Clarke writes: Personally I would be very surprised if there was a separate circuit for each outlet in any case. Each outlet might well be separately fused. In either or both of the above cases the voltage, in this specific case 15V DC, would be the same for each plug if a splitter was used. Just as it would be if you used a splitter in your automobile cigarette lighter, there is the same number of volts going to each device. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat
R Brickston wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:57:25 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote: J. Clarke writes: Personally I would be very surprised if there was a separate circuit for each outlet in any case. Each outlet might well be separately fused. In either or both of the above cases the voltage, in this specific case 15V DC, would be the same for each plug if a splitter was used. Just as it would be if you used a splitter in your automobile cigarette lighter, there is the same number of volts going to each device. And if you're drawing excessive current then the result won't be "low current", it will be _no_ current as the fuse blows. -- -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:23:40 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote: R Brickston wrote: On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:57:25 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote: J. Clarke writes: Personally I would be very surprised if there was a separate circuit for each outlet in any case. Each outlet might well be separately fused. In either or both of the above cases the voltage, in this specific case 15V DC, would be the same for each plug if a splitter was used. Just as it would be if you used a splitter in your automobile cigarette lighter, there is the same number of volts going to each device. And if you're drawing excessive current then the result won't be "low current", it will be _no_ current as the fuse blows. The odds of the event you describe being caused by an additional plug on the system in question, imo, is zero. That said, one can imagine because this system is aloft it may have a low tolerance for any additional drain on a single fused, or circuit with fuse, per plug design. In any event, back to almost the original argument, plugging in an aditional device does not halve the volts/amps. And going back *the* original premise, Mr. notabushsupporter simply made a stupid gaff remark based on his non-logical thought process, got caught out and then tried to deny. Case closed, game, set, match. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat
R Brickston writes:
The odds of the event you describe being caused by an additional plug on the system in question, imo, is zero. Not if the receptacles are limited to 75 W. A single laptop can blow that; two would definitely be riding the edge. In any event, back to almost the original argument, plugging in an aditional device does not halve the volts/amps. A heavy load can lower the voltage in some cases. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat
R Brickston wrote:
The odds of the event you describe being caused by an additional plug on the system in question, imo, is zero. That said, one can imagine because this system is aloft it may have a low tolerance for any additional drain on a single fused, or circuit with fuse, per plug design. In any event, back to almost the original argument, plugging in an aditional device does not halve the volts/amps. And going back *the* original premise, Mr. notabushsupporter simply made a stupid gaff remark based on his non-logical thought process, got caught out and then tried to deny. Case closed, game, set, match. I didn't say it gave each device half the power. I said you couldn't power 2 average laptops from one outlet. In your post, YOU said "Sure, you get half the volts and amps to each device. LOL! " I said that the amount wouldn't be enough to power the average laptop. I didn't say you would get half for each device. You don't get a an unlimited amount power out of the socket. https://www.aa.com/aa/pubcontent/en_...Technology.jsp "with a maximum 75-watt capacity". How much power does the average laptop use? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat
NotABushSupporter wrote:
R Brickston wrote: The odds of the event you describe being caused by an additional plug on the system in question, imo, is zero. That said, one can imagine because this system is aloft it may have a low tolerance for any additional drain on a single fused, or circuit with fuse, per plug design. In any event, back to almost the original argument, plugging in an aditional device does not halve the volts/amps. And going back *the* original premise, Mr. notabushsupporter simply made a stupid gaff remark based on his non-logical thought process, got caught out and then tried to deny. Case closed, game, set, match. I didn't say it gave each device half the power. I said you couldn't power 2 average laptops from one outlet. In your post, YOU said "Sure, you get half the volts and amps to each device. LOL! " I said that the amount wouldn't be enough to power the average laptop. I didn't say you would get half for each device. You don't get a an unlimited amount power out of the socket. A laptop doesn't need "an unlimited amount of power". https://www.aa.com/aa/pubcontent/en_...Technology.jsp "with a maximum 75-watt capacity". How much power does the average laptop use? More than 75 watts, so clearly no laptop can be used with that outlet according to your theory. -- -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat
J. Clarke wrote:
NotABushSupporter wrote: You don't get a an unlimited amount power out of the socket. A laptop doesn't need "an unlimited amount of power". No, but the response was relative to the plan using a splitter to share the socket. https://www.aa.com/aa/pubcontent/en_...Technology.jsp "with a maximum 75-watt capacity". How much power does the average laptop use? More than 75 watts, so clearly no laptop can be used with that outlet according to your theory. Yeah, right. 1. The ability of the average laptop to use it, doesn't mean "no" laptop can use `1it. 2. I think the average would be under 75. By aveage, I mean the average maximum required. I currently have a 65 watt AC adapter connected to it my Dell D610; I have used my laptop on many flights. I have seen people have trouble getting enough power from the airline power adapter for other models. So, I stand by my reasoning that it would be unwise to count on using 2 laptops from a single adapter. Additionally, someone also indicated something about an adapter in every other row. On an AA 777, in the back, there not that many. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:04:50 -0700, NotABushSupporter
wrote: R Brickston wrote: The odds of the event you describe being caused by an additional plug on the system in question, imo, is zero. That said, one can imagine because this system is aloft it may have a low tolerance for any additional drain on a single fused, or circuit with fuse, per plug design. In any event, back to almost the original argument, plugging in an aditional device does not halve the volts/amps. And going back *the* original premise, Mr. notabushsupporter simply made a stupid gaff remark based on his non-logical thought process, got caught out and then tried to deny. Case closed, game, set, match. I didn't say it gave each device half the power. I said you couldn't power 2 average laptops from one outlet. In your post, YOU said "Sure, you get half the volts and amps to each device. LOL! " I said that the amount wouldn't be enough to power the average laptop. I didn't say you would get half for each device. You're still in denial on your original stupid statement. And now you have the unmitigated gall to misquote a transcript that's openly available to anyone who cares to google it: I wrote: "Sure, you get half the volts and amps to each device. LOL!" And you replied to that specific quote: "Which would not be enough to power the aveage laptop. That is the point." So, Mr. Clinton, the word "which" means in your above usage, "half the volts." |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat
R Brickston wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:04:50 -0700, NotABushSupporter wrote: R Brickston wrote: The odds of the event you describe being caused by an additional plug on the system in question, imo, is zero. That said, one can imagine because this system is aloft it may have a low tolerance for any additional drain on a single fused, or circuit with fuse, per plug design. In any event, back to almost the original argument, plugging in an aditional device does not halve the volts/amps. And going back *the* original premise, Mr. notabushsupporter simply made a stupid gaff remark based on his non-logical thought process, got caught out and then tried to deny. Case closed, game, set, match. I didn't say it gave each device half the power. I said you couldn't power 2 average laptops from one outlet. In your post, YOU said "Sure, you get half the volts and amps to each device. LOL! " I said that the amount wouldn't be enough to power the average laptop. I didn't say you would get half for each device. You're still in denial on your original stupid statement. And now you have the unmitigated gall to misquote a transcript that's openly available to anyone who cares to google it: I wrote: "Sure, you get half the volts and amps to each device." And you replied to that specific quote: "Which would not be enough to power the aveage laptop. That is the point." So, Mr. Clinton, the word "which" means in your above usage, "half the volts." Yes, I was saying that 1/2 (of the 75) would not be enough to count on for 2 laptops. I didn't say each would be limited to 1/2. You made that statement. I wasn't agreeing with your statement. But... back to the issue... If you try to use BOTH at the same time, there is a good chance that neither will work. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat | SMS | Air travel | 38 | June 8th, 2007 07:43 AM |
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat | SMS | Europe | 38 | June 8th, 2007 07:43 AM |
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat | SMS | Europe | 1 | June 2nd, 2007 02:19 AM |
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat | SMS | USA & Canada | 1 | June 2nd, 2007 02:19 AM |
AA Boeing 777 DC power source under seat | Donald Newcomb | Europe | 0 | June 1st, 2007 09:51 AM |