If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra
As far as I am concerned, if you can not fit into a plane seat, then you should
pay double for an extra seat. If you are just a fat slob, even if a kid, then why should normal people have to suffer, either from your surplus blubber occupying THEIR space, or from your offensive STINK? If you refuse to look after yourself, then you should pay. And I do not care if it is a blubberbutt kid, or their whale-like adults. Since there are more NORMAL people than slobs, let the majority rule once again. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra
20April wrote:
As far as I am concerned, if you can not fit into a plane seat, then you should pay double for an extra seat. If you are just a fat slob, even if a kid, then why should normal people have to suffer, either from your surplus blubber occupying THEIR space, or from your offensive STINK? If you refuse to look after yourself, then you should pay. And I do not care if it is a blubberbutt kid, or their whale-like adults. Since there are more NORMAL people than slobs, let the majority rule once again. As long as you also charge extra for offensive obnoxious asinine opinionated loudmouths such as yourself. By the way, plonk you and the keywords you rode in on. -- -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra
"20April" wrote in message ... there are more NORMAL people than slobs, let the majority rule once again. There are also NORMAL people who don't keep posting the same crap over & over. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:13:19 GMT, 20April wrote:
As far as I am concerned, if you can not fit into a plane seat, then you should pay double for an extra seat. If you are just a fat slob, even if a kid, then why should normal people have to suffer, either from your surplus blubber occupying THEIR space, or from your offensive STINK? If you refuse to look after yourself, then you should pay. And I do not care if it is a blubberbutt kid, or their whale-like adults. Since there are more NORMAL people than slobs, let the majority rule once again. I heard an interesting view the other day. If this ever happens, then the vegans with flatulence should also have to pay extra. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra
"20April" wrote in message ... As far as I am concerned, if you can not fit into a plane seat, then you should pay double for an extra seat. If you are just a fat slob, even if a kid, then why should normal people have to suffer, either from your surplus blubber occupying THEIR space, or from your offensive STINK? If you refuse to look after yourself, then you should pay. And I do not care if it is a blubberbutt kid, or their whale-like adults. Since there are more NORMAL people than slobs, let the majority rule once again. If they charge by weight, there would be lots of people they wouldn't bother to sell tickets to. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra
20April wrote:
As far as I am concerned, if you can not fit into a plane seat, then you should pay double for an extra seat. If you are just a fat slob, even if a kid, then why should normal people have to suffer, either from your surplus blubber occupying THEIR space, or from your offensive STINK? If you refuse to look after yourself, then you should pay. Here in America, we have large guys known as NFL football players, who sometimes fly with commercial carriers. Since they're hardly out of shape, be sure to vociferously expound on your gripe, should you find yourself seated next to one of them. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra
Jorge W. Arbusto, Prezidentchul Candydate wrote:
20April wrote: As far as I am concerned, if you can not fit into a plane seat, then you should pay double for an extra seat. If you are just a fat slob, even if a kid, then why should normal people have to suffer, either from your surplus blubber occupying THEIR space, or from your offensive STINK? If you refuse to look after yourself, then you should pay. Here in America, we have large guys known as NFL football players, who sometimes fly with commercial carriers. Since they're hardly out of shape, be sure to vociferously expound on your gripe, should you find yourself seated next to one of them. I did. Some guy name Joe offered me his Coke. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra
Newsgroups: soc.support.fat-acceptance, misc.consumers,
rec.travel.air, rec.travel.cruises From: Icono Clast Date: 22 May 2004 01:40:32 -0700 Subject: My Fat Posts A few posts on fat, obesity, nutrition, and health from 2004-04-27 to 1998/05/29. From my 2004-04-27 report on rec.travel.cruises FAT I don't know whether fat people have a tendency to go on cruises or people who go on cruises have a tendency to be fat. Whichever, the proportion of fat people on this ship was extraördinarily high when compared with what one usually sees in Coastal USA. *** From: Icono Clast Subject: Stay in LA Newsgroups: rec.travel.usa-canada Date: 2003-01-31 01:01:20 "Paul Tauger" wrote: I have a photographic package that, I expect far exceeds 5 kilos, and doesn't fit in a shoulder bag. The solution is simple: I have a . . . backpack, which is a very comfortable way to carry all this stuff Good luck on your back's future health. I hope you're at least in your fifties and your skeleton is well developed. Were it up to me, persons under age 18 would be prohibited from carrying anything on their backs for longer than a minute or two. I cringe at the future of the backs-burdened children I see on the streets. O how they'll suffer! The fat ones, though, probably won't live long enough for their mis-treated backs to bother them. *** From: Icono Clast Subject: Teach them to not ingest junk Newsgroups: alt.california Date: 2002-08-28 02:54:15 PST I come to praise the Los Angeles School Board for electing to pull soda beverages from its schools. I've never understood why schools permitted their students to have access to such unhealthful beverages on school premises thus teaching them that they're OK. I hope that they'll pull all high salt, high sugar, and high fat foods from the schools and serve only healthful, well-balanced meals to the growing bodies in their care. *** Subject: Ridiculous dining experience 2 Newsgroups: ba.food Date: 1999/10/11 (Geoff Miller) wrote: Icono Clast writes: I think it's unconscionable for schools to sell sodas and other beverages and foods that are commonly known to be either unhealthful or of no nutritional value. If they want junk food, they can leave the campus to visit the corner grocery. Why does every single thing a kid puts into his mouth have to be actively nutritious? Water isn't nutritious but it's clearly more healthful than a soda or coffee. Making sure a kid gets proper nutrition is his parents' responsibility. If he eats well at home, then clearly a soda or roll of SweeTarts at school isn't going to do any harm. Schools are places of learning. By the unavailability of unhealthful or non-nutritious foods, one can learn what to not eat. If they want junk food, they can leave the campus to visit the corner grocery. And how many schools have open campuses these days? Irrelevant. If the student knows the campus is closed, junk foods can be acquired from a negligent parent on from a grocery store on the way to school. I'm saying the schools shouldn't make it avaiable. If you, as I, spent any time in amusement parks, you'd probably be as shocked as I by the bodies of today's youth. So many of them are grotesquely fat slobs that we won't have to worry about them collecting Social Security or their union pensions. I, by the way, am getting heavy. But I'm old. Although healthy, I'm gaining weight in spite of a generally heathful diet and am very unhappy about it. My problem is an enormous appetite for all that good healthful food. Yes, I eat junk food, high-fat, -salt, and -sugar foods too, but it's rare. Gorged on that stuff this week-end while at a dance convntion but probably sweat most of it off. Well, I hope I did. *** A response: Newsgroups: rec.roller-coaster Date: 1999/08/27 Icono Clast said: The picture I've seen . . . is of a quite normal-looking, although frightfully-fat (that could be the result of parental feeding abuse) boy. Skip Smith alleged: Funny....Fat bashing is still socially acceptable. An observation and a bash are not the same thing. Make fun of a . . . Fat person? People agree with you... I did not make fun of the boy. In fact, by calling him "frightfully fat" I was sympathizing with him and the probable feeding abuse by his mother. Considering the grotesquely fat woman claiming to be the boy's mother, perhaps his frightful flab is the result of a genetic pre-disposition. Once again I was neither bashing nor making fun of them. I observed the woman to be grotesquely fat. Perhaps your observation differs from mine. Perhaps your opinion of her appearance differs from mine. I even gave her a way out of my food abuse charge by speculating that "perhaps [the boy's] frightful flab is the result of a genetic pre- disposition". Totally off topic... Yes, if all you want to talk about is fat but that wasn't the subject of the original post. It is you who has created the off-topic Thread. *** From my 1998/12/13 report on rec.travel.cruises The proportion of fat people was shockingly high. Although I didn't count, my guess is that at least 40% of the passengers were enough overweight to be unhealthy. *** From my 1998/05/29 report on rec.roller-coaster FAT: Waiting in amusement park lines can be tedius and looking at others in the same situation is one of the most interesting things to do. It didn't take me long to notice how fat the people were, so fat, in fact, that I started to count them. It seems that every time I counted, a third of the people I counted was fat. No, I don't mean merely overweight and I didn't count beer bellies, either, but real fat people, most of them quite young. Many of them also smoke cigarettes. It's sad. Their lives will probably be very short. __________________________________________________ __________ A San Francisco gourmand: "You serve it, I'll eat it!" http://geocities.com/dancefest/ http://geocities.com/iconoc/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra
kirjoitti ... Newsgroups: soc.support.fat-acceptance, misc.consumers, rec.travel.air, rec.travel.cruises From: Icono Clast Date: 22 May 2004 01:40:32 -0700 Subject: My Fat Posts A few posts on fat, obesity, nutrition, and health from 2004-04-27 to 1998/05/29. From my 2004-04-27 report on rec.travel.cruises FAT I don't know whether fat people have a tendency to go on cruises or people who go on cruises have a tendency to be fat. Whichever, the proportion of fat people on this ship was extraördinarily high when compared with what one usually sees in Coastal USA. *** From: Icono Clast Subject: Stay in LA Newsgroups: rec.travel.usa-canada Date: 2003-01-31 01:01:20 "Paul Tauger" wrote: I have a photographic package that, I expect far exceeds 5 kilos, and doesn't fit in a shoulder bag. The solution is simple: I have a . . . backpack, which is a very comfortable way to carry all this stuff Good luck on your back's future health. I hope you're at least in your fifties and your skeleton is well developed. Were it up to me, persons under age 18 would be prohibited from carrying anything on their backs for longer than a minute or two. I cringe at the future of the backs-burdened children I see on the streets. O how they'll suffer! The fat ones, though, probably won't live long enough for their mis-treated backs to bother them. *** From: Icono Clast Subject: Teach them to not ingest junk Newsgroups: alt.california Date: 2002-08-28 02:54:15 PST I come to praise the Los Angeles School Board for electing to pull soda beverages from its schools. I've never understood why schools permitted their students to have access to such unhealthful beverages on school premises thus teaching them that they're OK. I hope that they'll pull all high salt, high sugar, and high fat foods from the schools and serve only healthful, well-balanced meals to the growing bodies in their care. *** Subject: Ridiculous dining experience 2 Newsgroups: ba.food Date: 1999/10/11 (Geoff Miller) wrote: Icono Clast writes: I think it's unconscionable for schools to sell sodas and other beverages and foods that are commonly known to be either unhealthful or of no nutritional value. If they want junk food, they can leave the campus to visit the corner grocery. Why does every single thing a kid puts into his mouth have to be actively nutritious? Water isn't nutritious but it's clearly more healthful than a soda or coffee. Making sure a kid gets proper nutrition is his parents' responsibility. If he eats well at home, then clearly a soda or roll of SweeTarts at school isn't going to do any harm. Schools are places of learning. By the unavailability of unhealthful or non-nutritious foods, one can learn what to not eat. If they want junk food, they can leave the campus to visit the corner grocery. And how many schools have open campuses these days? Irrelevant. If the student knows the campus is closed, junk foods can be acquired from a negligent parent on from a grocery store on the way to school. I'm saying the schools shouldn't make it avaiable. If you, as I, spent any time in amusement parks, you'd probably be as shocked as I by the bodies of today's youth. So many of them are grotesquely fat slobs that we won't have to worry about them collecting Social Security or their union pensions. I, by the way, am getting heavy. But I'm old. Although healthy, I'm gaining weight in spite of a generally heathful diet and am very unhappy about it. My problem is an enormous appetite for all that good healthful food. Yes, I eat junk food, high-fat, -salt, and -sugar foods too, but it's rare. Gorged on that stuff this week-end while at a dance convntion but probably sweat most of it off. Well, I hope I did. *** A response: Newsgroups: rec.roller-coaster Date: 1999/08/27 Icono Clast said: The picture I've seen . . . is of a quite normal-looking, although frightfully-fat (that could be the result of parental feeding abuse) boy. Skip Smith alleged: Funny....Fat bashing is still socially acceptable. An observation and a bash are not the same thing. Make fun of a . . . Fat person? People agree with you... I did not make fun of the boy. In fact, by calling him "frightfully fat" I was sympathizing with him and the probable feeding abuse by his mother. Considering the grotesquely fat woman claiming to be the boy's mother, perhaps his frightful flab is the result of a genetic pre-disposition. Once again I was neither bashing nor making fun of them. I observed the woman to be grotesquely fat. Perhaps your observation differs from mine. Perhaps your opinion of her appearance differs from mine. I even gave her a way out of my food abuse charge by speculating that "perhaps [the boy's] frightful flab is the result of a genetic pre- disposition". Totally off topic... Yes, if all you want to talk about is fat but that wasn't the subject of the original post. It is you who has created the off-topic Thread. *** From my 1998/12/13 report on rec.travel.cruises The proportion of fat people was shockingly high. Although I didn't count, my guess is that at least 40% of the passengers were enough overweight to be unhealthy. *** From my 1998/05/29 report on rec.roller-coaster FAT: Waiting in amusement park lines can be tedius and looking at others in the same situation is one of the most interesting things to do. It didn't take me long to notice how fat the people were, so fat, in fact, that I started to count them. It seems that every time I counted, a third of the people I counted was fat. No, I don't mean merely overweight and I didn't count beer bellies, either, but real fat people, most of them quite young. Many of them also smoke cigarettes. It's sad. Their lives will probably be very short. __________________________________________________ __________ A San Francisco gourmand: "You serve it, I'll eat it!" http://geocities.com/dancefest/ http://geocities.com/iconoc/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra
Jorge W. Arbusto, Prezidentchul Candydate wrote: 20April wrote: As far as I am concerned, if you can not fit into a plane seat, then you should pay double for an extra seat. If you are just a fat slob, even if a kid, then why should normal people have to suffer, either from your surplus blubber occupying THEIR space, or from your offensive STINK? If you refuse to look after yourself, then you should pay. Here in America, we have large guys known as NFL football players, who sometimes fly with commercial carriers. Since they're hardly out of shape, be sure to vociferously expound on your gripe, should you find yourself seated next to one of them. Particularly since the effort to fit more and more seats into a row has resulted in airline seats so narrow even anorexic passengers have trouble fitting into them! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra | 20April | Air travel | 52 | August 18th, 2008 08:54 PM |
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra | 20April | Europe | 12 | June 21st, 2008 11:34 PM |
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra | 20April | Travel Marketplace | 12 | June 21st, 2008 11:34 PM |
Fat Slobs Should Pay Extra | 20April | USA & Canada | 12 | June 21st, 2008 11:34 PM |