If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Japan Airlines - JALways and worn-out B747
thegoons wrote:
I flew from Osaka (Kansai) to Sydney last week, on a Japan Airlines ticket. Was most disappointed to learn that whilst it was still listed as a JAL flight, it was in fact operated by JALways, a JAL Group company (subsidiary, but operated independently as a separate company with separate board/chairman etc) with Bangkok-based flight attendants (mix of Japanese but mostly Thai) and Honolulu-based pilots (Americans). To add insult to injury, the JALways aircraft (complete with the old livery that was starting to be phased out 2 years ago) was a 747-300 series, extremely worn and battered. The interior was like from some cheap motel in the 1970's (complete with peeling retro wallpaper and worn-out carpets). Funny how they try and fake it too, the Thai stewardesses had obviously been handpicked, they chose those that most resembled Japanese, put their hairstyles in the same JAL standard and try to flog-off an inferior cheap "product" at JAL premium prices. This has been the situation on their "Resocha" flights to Hawaii for about as long I as I have lived where I am now, perhaps eight years. All foreign cabin crew except chief flight attendant or crew chief. I see no difference in quality (which is telling) between the Japanese attendants and the well trained Thai attendants. And now I realize that most Japanese customers have been satisfied enough, for the practice to be continued, and expanded. It is a cost saving measure, I am sure, NOT to provide an exotic experience on the way to the resort destination, as the in flight announcement used to claim. I am not complaining about the service, that was quite good, but I do feel that it is wrong for JAL to exploit cheaper crews, I am pretty sure the Thai ladies are well paid considering. I do feel sympathy for Japanese flight attendants in general, who had experienced a hiring freeze for a number of years, or been hired for only part time positions. It is a far cry from the days in which the news reported the average salary of a Japanese flight attendant was eight million yen a year. and have the hide to charge passengers the full premium JAL airfare. Nowhere on my ticket or itinerary was it published that the flight would be operated by another airline. Keep it up JAL, I'll try another airline next time. I'm still hard pressed to find an airline with flight service home better than JAL or JAZ (charter), as it may be called here. Particularly if going through a ticket discounter such as H.I.S., the difference between a JAL flight and the cheapest flights like Korean Air, Northwest or Continental, is only about 3,000 yen. There is no reason for me to try to save money by choosing another airline now. And in 11 years of living in Japan, I have never flown cheaper. I've flown round trip to Hawaii for as little as 58,000 yen on JAL. My previous low was more like 78,000 yen. And I've paid as high as 198,000 during a peak season, and been asked for 300,000 during a walk up (and had it "discounted" to the one year ahead rate of 130,000 at the time because I was flying home when my father died). This year I flew again for 78,000 this summer, probably due to higher fuel costs. -- "I'm on top of the world right now, because everyone's going to know that I can shove more than three burgers in my mouth!" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
thegoons wrote:
I object to JAL's greed, All I have noticed is that I am paying the lowest JAL fares I have paid in 15 years of flying, and believe the cost cuts, hiring freezes, use of temporary and part time flight attendants, and foreign flight attendants, are related. JAL, like many other airlines, are experiencing decreased revenues and actual losses. then to pretend the staff are Nihon-jin by putting them in stereotype JP hairstyle, uniform etc. JAL is not pretending Thai flight attendants are Japanese. One can see or hear it quite readily. The names, such as "Porntep" are also a hint they are not Japanese. What JAL is pretending on flights to Honolulu, is that the use of non-Japanese flight attendants is for the express purpose of beginning the travelers' "resort" experience. Aircraft used for "Resocha" flights are painted in yellow and pink with a long billed bird and hibiscus motif to set them apart from normal flights and aircraft. -- "I'm on top of the world right now, because everyone's going to know that I can shove more than three burgers in my mouth!" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:17:54 +0900, Eric Takabayashi
brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed: What JAL is pretending on flights to Honolulu, is that the use of non-Japanese flight attendants is for the express purpose of beginning the travelers' "resort" experience. Aircraft used for "Resocha" flights are painted in yellow and pink with a long billed bird and hibiscus motif to set them apart from normal flights and aircraft. Y'all take turns going out on the wing during flight to admire the paint scheme, do ya? -- Michael Cash "I am sorry, Mr. Cash, but we are unable to accept your rap sheet in lieu of a high school transcript." Dr. Howard Sprague Dean of Admissions Mount Pilot College |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:17:54 +0900, Eric Takabayashi
brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed: What JAL is pretending on flights to Honolulu, is that the use of non-Japanese flight attendants is for the express purpose of beginning the travelers' "resort" experience. Aircraft used for "Resocha" flights are painted in yellow and pink with a long billed bird and hibiscus motif to set them apart from normal flights and aircraft. Y'all take turns going out on the wing during flight to admire the paint scheme, do ya? -- Michael Cash "I am sorry, Mr. Cash, but we are unable to accept your rap sheet in lieu of a high school transcript." Dr. Howard Sprague Dean of Admissions Mount Pilot College |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Cash wrote:
. . . I object to JAL's greed, then to pretend the staff are Nihon-jin by putting them in stereotype JP hairstyle, uniform etc. So you want the airline to have separate uniforms and grooming standards for their employees based on their ethnicity or national origin? Ah, I completely forgot! On Resocha flights to Honolulu, the flight attendants also dress differently from the usual JAL flights. True, the lone Japanese crew chief, if male, is middle aged and wears a black tuxedo. The women (including Japanese crew chief, if female, any age) wear green uniforms with bright colored scarves, I think orange or yellow. I have never seen an ordinary male flight attendant in Japan, just the one trainee in a flight attendant's school on TV years ago, whose fate never became clear. What other discriminatory employment practices do you advocate? That JAL continue to favor attractive flight attendants, be they male or female, and put them in professional, yet attractive uniforms. I don't care about nationality as long as they can speak common languages. "Standard" dialect only, no teenspeak. Flight attendants should be tall enough to reach overhead compartments unaided, and thin enough to pass down aisles walking forward, preferably able to squeeze by a colleague with a cart. Flight attendants should have two usable legs and two usable arms with at least one hand and two fingers. They also need to be sighted in at least one eye. Hearing impaired flight attendants must be able to lip read in common languages. Pregnant flight attendants should be grounded to avoid exposure to solar radiation. Invasive background or security checks should also be conducted, at least prior to hiring. Firearms restricted to approved cockpit crew. "Tasteful" use of cosmetics, piercings, and tattoos. No smoking, eating or gum chewing while making rounds. No stereos or handheld games. No wireless communications devices. Try to limit restroom visits to break time. Prayer in separate, designated prayer areas. Did I forget something? -- "I'm on top of the world right now, because everyone's going to know that I can shove more than three burgers in my mouth!" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Eric Takabayashi wrote: Flight attendants should be tall enough to reach overhead compartments unaided, Yes, perhaps for doing things like digging out a pillow or blanket for an already buckled-in passenger, closing compartment doors prior to takeoff, maybe assisting in rearranging stuff in a compartment to allow a late arrival to fit in one more bag -- -- but not for lifting some passenger's overloaded wheelie or overweight backpack up into the compartment. Sure, either they or any of us able-bodied fellow passengers can voluntarily help some frail elderly person lift a carryon up into a compartment -- but I don't see that wrestling with heavy bags should be any part of their officially designated duties. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Eric Takabayashi wrote: Flight attendants should be tall enough to reach overhead compartments unaided, Yes, perhaps for doing things like digging out a pillow or blanket for an already buckled-in passenger, closing compartment doors prior to takeoff, maybe assisting in rearranging stuff in a compartment to allow a late arrival to fit in one more bag -- -- but not for lifting some passenger's overloaded wheelie or overweight backpack up into the compartment. Sure, either they or any of us able-bodied fellow passengers can voluntarily help some frail elderly person lift a carryon up into a compartment -- but I don't see that wrestling with heavy bags should be any part of their officially designated duties. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Eric Takabayashi wrote: Flight attendants should be tall enough to reach overhead compartments unaided, Yes, perhaps for doing things like digging out a pillow or blanket for an already buckled-in passenger, closing compartment doors prior to takeoff, maybe assisting in rearranging stuff in a compartment to allow a late arrival to fit in one more bag -- -- but not for lifting some passenger's overloaded wheelie or overweight backpack up into the compartment. Sure, either they or any of us able-bodied fellow passengers can voluntarily help some frail elderly person lift a carryon up into a compartment -- but I don't see that wrestling with heavy bags should be any part of their officially designated duties. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:17:54 +0900, Eric Takabayashi
posted the following: thegoons wrote: I object to JAL's greed, All I have noticed is that I am paying the lowest JAL fares I have paid in 15 years of flying Is this why my JAL ticket home for Christmas is $200 cheaper than the American one? Hmm... -Chris |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:17:54 +0900, Eric Takabayashi
posted the following: thegoons wrote: I object to JAL's greed, All I have noticed is that I am paying the lowest JAL fares I have paid in 15 years of flying Is this why my JAL ticket home for Christmas is $200 cheaper than the American one? Hmm... -Chris |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|