Hitler's Pizza

On 30-Aug-2006, Pumba wrote:

Keith E. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:46:15 GMT, wrote:
On 28-Aug-2006, "MÐ" mÃÐMÁ×¹@ÅsSrEmOvEr.çøm wrote:
And thanks for admitting that you arem, inded, a troll.
Kee-RIST you're stoopid!

she's right, though.

Keith E is obviously too stupid to see that.

Susan

md is an online abuser and i sentence him to 5 years hard labour.

ur_droll wrote:
I'm sick and tired of hearing about 'enraged' Jews.
As long as people have YOUR attitude, you will ALWAYS hear about "enraged"
Jews. If you don't like it, there is ONE solution. Kill yourself.
I disagree..... there is a solution for the jewish problem.... it's
called sulphuric acid

Colin, haven't you learnt anything I've tried to teach you over the years?

you just hit the bottom of a 1000 people's kill files.

plonk

--
I am Pumba, hear me ro-aaa-r!
This is what I look like:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne...1364968&size=o

On 30-Aug-2006, Pumba wrote:

MÐ wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:25:59 +0200, Pumba
Anti-Semitism is an oxymoron, kneeler. Jews haven't existed since
approximately 70 AD.
70AD Masada
did you think that ALL the Jews died on that mountain top?
Goes a little deeper than that.. essentially, the very definition of
Judaism was destroyed with Christ's crucifixion

prove that Christ existed.

can't be done.

Please - any idiot who pretends that an entire religion dies because
- as their book says - someone espousing a different religion dies -
is a LOON. Jesus had absolutely nothing to do with the "definition
of Judaism", but I can see the wishful thinking is hard at work.

Susan


there isn't even a single shred of credible evidence that he even existed.

and subsequent resurrection.

prove that resurrection can occur.

to date, no-one has accomplished that feat.

By the time certain prophecies were fulfilled in 70 AD

prophecies?

i don't accept a single one of them. they're all ambiguous. like
Nostradamus.

they're all short on detail. no specifics. no acid tests. just general
blather and waffle.

now go and get a tarot reading. you'll get specifics.

(not just the destruction of the temple), it became physically and
spiritually impossible for biblical Jews to exist, by definition.

by definition, the Jews do not accept any of the Christian bull****.

so, it's moot.

it's all allegation and counter-allegation with no substance.

The 'Jews' of today are just a militant group of ****y, warmongering
squatters that pray to a wall and have big noses.

I support them.

the Arabs do not have a right to demand their annihilation.

no-one has to stand for that kind of **** from anyone.

the Muslims can go blow donkey dicks.

--
I am Pumba, hear me ro-aaa-r!
This is what I look like:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne...1364968&size=o

On 30-Aug-2006, Pumba wrote:

MÐ wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:04:17 +0200, Pumba
MÐ wrote:
Now, stay killfiled, loser.
Thanks for that Usenet record.. backpedal, IKY, rebuttal failure, and

killfile in one.
I'm da ****in' bomb, yo!
sure. and i can see that you have a very tiny fuse too.
blow me

Good grief - and he proves it *instantly*!!

something's gonna blow, but, trust me, it's not going to be ME!

short dick man.

You'd think that if he were so concerned about it,
he wouldn't go out of his way to confirm it.

Susan

Pumba wrote:
Keith E. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:42:40 GMT, wrote:
On 28-Aug-2006, "Ed" wrote:
More like, none, because no records show that he had any Jewish
antecedents.
Susan
I was going by the "rumor" that one of his great-great parents was
Jewish.
Ah, okay.
Okay? O****INGKAY?!? He doesn't have to prove his statements?
do rumours ever need proving?
by def, they're suspect and therefore prove is not forthcoming.
perhaps an English course for you, Keith?

oh well. "proof" cringe blush

--
I am Pumba, hear me ro-aaa-r!
This is what I look like:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne...1364968&size=o

wrote:
On 30-Aug-2006, Pumba wrote:
Keith E. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:46:15 GMT, wrote:
On 28-Aug-2006, "MÐ" mÃÐMÁ×¹@ÅsSrEmOvEr.çøm wrote:
And thanks for admitting that you arem, inded, a troll.
Kee-RIST you're stoopid!
she's right, though.
Keith E is obviously too stupid to see that.

well, of course he's stupid.

he's got a Latin sig that he can't even translate.

go ahead, ask him.

he thinks it's his genus.

silly man. that's spelled Potamochoerus porcus.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_River_Hog

--
I am Pumba, hear me ro-aaa-r!
This is what I look like:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne...1364968&size=o

On 30-Aug-2006, Pumba wrote:

Ben C'ramer wrote:
"Pumba" wrote in message
Ben C'ramer wrote:
WHEN DO YOU START, YOU THICK IRISH ****?
Please Ben-dover and **** off.
Feckorf yourself, you yarpie ****.

hahahahaha!!

okaaaay.

IOW, SLAMDUNK!
Good work.

Susan

On 30-Aug-2006, Pumba wrote:

Ben C'ramer wrote:
wrote in message
news:VS_Ig.8057$Xl5.5942@trnddc06...
On 29-Aug-2006, Pumba wrote:
Please Ben-dover and **** off.
That is certainly what that thick c--- wants,
Lying ****.

Nice of cramer to sign his posts accurately for a change.

Poofters should be ****ed and burned.

And to confess this as well:

http://www.brucemulkey.com/archives/...y_zeal_gr.html

but I doubt he's irish.
Or even part Irish.
Pure Aryan, me.

Okay, so he's a *pure* c---.

that's unhealthy, you know.

And a lie, because there is no such thing - not outside Iran, anyway.

i hope you have a black wife to help you get over your genetically
disadvantaged heritage.

Oh, don't get him started - the only time he has ever mentioned
his wife, it was sick-making. He is so maladjusted, it's nauseating.

Susan

On 30-Aug-2006, Pumba wrote:

ur_droll wrote:
wrote:
On 29-Aug-2006, "Ed" wrote:
"Keith E." wrote in message
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:42:40 GMT, wrote:
On 28-Aug-2006, "Ed" wrote:
wrote in message
More like, none, because no records show that he had any Jewish
antecedents.
Susan
I was going by the "rumor" that one of his great-great parents was
Jewish.
Ah, okay.
Okay? O****INGKAY?!? He doesn't have to prove his statements?
Hey, genius, I said it was a RUMOR. Do I need to prove rumors?
And to clarfiy for Mr. Hissy Fit - when you admit something is a rumor,
you are already saying that you can;t vreify it and you don't expect
your statement to have the same consideration a proven fact has.
much like the rumor that during the times of the rumored holocaust a
prisoner spot check revealed that a jew was found to have balls......

Isn;t it nice when they admit, right up front, that they have no actual
refutation, just projectionary filth?

These sorts of fictitious claims are obviously hogwash and simply don't
warrant a serious effort to attempt verification.....

Translation: facts bother bigots.

quite obviously
the balls in question belonged to a german soldier and were found in
the jews mouth.

ooh, Colin, you're trying waaaaay too hard to offend.

But you see what I mean about projectionism?
It's all too obvious where he fantasizes the balls we

http://www.brucemulkey.com/archives/...y_zeal_gr.html

you need to dial it back a bit if you really want to get people riled up.

you should know - a small prick is often all that is needed.

Or, rather, will have to do when it's all he has.

Susan
:-D

--
I am Pumba, hear me ro-aaa-r!
This is what I look like:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne...1364968&size=o

On 30-Aug-2006, Pumba wrote:

ur_droll wrote:
I'm sick and tired of hearing about 'enraged' Jews.
As long as people have YOUR attitude, you will ALWAYS hear about
"enraged"
Jews. If you don't like it, there is ONE solution. Kill yourself.
I disagree..... there is a solution for the jewish problem.... it's
called sulphuric acid

Colin, haven't you learnt anything I've tried to teach you over the years?

you just hit the bottom of a 1000 people's kill files.

But it *would* help if all the Jews had sulphuric acid to throw at their
enemies.
it would help humanity *loads* as well!

Susan


plonk