If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
TOliver wrote:
Next she'll be wanting to ride in one of those folding FA seats (with the lifesaving 4 point harness) adjacent to the exit door, so all she has to do is simply board last, exit first or be bundled like a bowling ball onto the slide after any unplanned sudden descent into terrain unapproved for conventional landings. If possible, reduced mobility people should be booked at a bulkhead to give them a better fighting chance in case of emergency exit. (Though I do like the idea of door-mounted ejection seats.) -- Ken Tough |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
TOliver wrote:
Next she'll be wanting to ride in one of those folding FA seats (with the lifesaving 4 point harness) adjacent to the exit door, so all she has to do is simply board last, exit first or be bundled like a bowling ball onto the slide after any unplanned sudden descent into terrain unapproved for conventional landings. If possible, reduced mobility people should be booked at a bulkhead to give them a better fighting chance in case of emergency exit. (Though I do like the idea of door-mounted ejection seats.) -- Ken Tough |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:42:52 +0200, Ken Tough
wrote: TOliver wrote: Next she'll be wanting to ride in one of those folding FA seats (with the lifesaving 4 point harness) adjacent to the exit door, so all she has to do is simply board last, exit first or be bundled like a bowling ball onto the slide after any unplanned sudden descent into terrain unapproved for conventional landings. If possible, reduced mobility people should be booked at a bulkhead to give them a better fighting chance in case of emergency exit. (Though I do like the idea of door-mounted ejection seats.) And where do you propose the baby basinets go, and of course those travelling with said small children? -- Cheers, Jason. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:42:52 +0200, Ken Tough
wrote: TOliver wrote: Next she'll be wanting to ride in one of those folding FA seats (with the lifesaving 4 point harness) adjacent to the exit door, so all she has to do is simply board last, exit first or be bundled like a bowling ball onto the slide after any unplanned sudden descent into terrain unapproved for conventional landings. If possible, reduced mobility people should be booked at a bulkhead to give them a better fighting chance in case of emergency exit. (Though I do like the idea of door-mounted ejection seats.) And where do you propose the baby basinets go, and of course those travelling with said small children? -- Cheers, Jason. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:42:52 +0200, Ken Tough
wrote: TOliver wrote: Next she'll be wanting to ride in one of those folding FA seats (with the lifesaving 4 point harness) adjacent to the exit door, so all she has to do is simply board last, exit first or be bundled like a bowling ball onto the slide after any unplanned sudden descent into terrain unapproved for conventional landings. If possible, reduced mobility people should be booked at a bulkhead to give them a better fighting chance in case of emergency exit. (Though I do like the idea of door-mounted ejection seats.) And where do you propose the baby basinets go, and of course those travelling with said small children? -- Cheers, Jason. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:31:05 +0100, Jason
wrote: And where do you propose the baby basinets go, and of course those travelling with said small children? Leave them at home, they shouldn't be annoying us on board an airraft anyway. Dave ===== NSW Rural Fire Service - become a volunteer today. http://www.rfs.nsw.gov.au/ |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:31:05 +0100, Jason
wrote: And where do you propose the baby basinets go, and of course those travelling with said small children? Leave them at home, they shouldn't be annoying us on board an airraft anyway. Dave ===== NSW Rural Fire Service - become a volunteer today. http://www.rfs.nsw.gov.au/ |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 08:59:32 on Wed, 6 Apr 2005, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" remarked: most of the aircraft I've been in have only two seats on the window sides - at worst one would only inconvenience ONE person. No, most seem to have three. Especially those smaller aircraft used by people like Easyjet, that only have one aisle. What's "Easyjet"? I only book whatever flies out of LAX with the fewest (preferably no) transfers. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 08:59:32 on Wed, 6 Apr 2005, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" remarked: most of the aircraft I've been in have only two seats on the window sides - at worst one would only inconvenience ONE person. No, most seem to have three. Especially those smaller aircraft used by people like Easyjet, that only have one aisle. What's "Easyjet"? I only book whatever flies out of LAX with the fewest (preferably no) transfers. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 08:59:32 on Wed, 6 Apr 2005, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" remarked: most of the aircraft I've been in have only two seats on the window sides - at worst one would only inconvenience ONE person. No, most seem to have three. Especially those smaller aircraft used by people like Easyjet, that only have one aisle. What's "Easyjet"? I only book whatever flies out of LAX with the fewest (preferably no) transfers. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA Accuses British Airways of Recklessness | NEWS | Air travel | 145 | March 17th, 2005 07:41 PM |
SWA at PIT - The End of U.S. Airways? | Dain Bramage | Air travel | 0 | January 9th, 2005 03:28 PM |
SWA at PIT - The End of U.S. Airways? | Dain Bramage | Air travel | 0 | January 9th, 2005 03:28 PM |
US Airways files for 2nd Bankruptcy | AquaGuyLA | Air travel | 0 | September 13th, 2004 05:30 AM |
British Airways emissions | Miss L. Toe | Air travel | 35 | July 19th, 2004 06:15 PM |