If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
john wrote:
CBS was dealing with a news item--NOT producing a BUSH propaganda commercial. Bull. They didn't just read the news of the day. They produced a TV show production which was deliberate anti-Bush propaganda as they had done many times before. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
In article jTyRd.18394$Tt.17707@fed1read05, miles
wrote: € john wrote: € € € CBS was dealing with a news item--NOT producing a BUSH propaganda € commercial. € € Bull. They didn't just read the news of the day. They produced a TV € show production which was deliberate anti-Bush propaganda as they had € done many times before. But if they'd done an anti-Kerry piece you'd have been just fine with it? |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
In article 5HyRd.18386$Tt.5128@fed1read05, miles
wrote: Some of those other countries have learned or will € learn the hard way of their own arrogance. Just a matter of time. Would that include the US? |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
"miles" wrote in message news:kAyRd.18384$Tt.12549@fed1read05... PTRAVEL wrote: For starters, how about the columnists who were paid by the Bush administration: You forgot to mention what happened to those columnists. What happened to them? Are they the subject of a Senate investigation? Have the Democrats started a move to impeach Bush? Are they being sued by the syndicates who carry their bought-and-paid-for "opinion"? Or, perhaps, the fake reporters who snuck in to news conferencers so they could feed Bush questions? Like the reporters who prepped soldiers for the town hall meeting in Iraq? This is so typical of your ilk. The issue isn't whether _a_ reporter assisted _a_ soldier in how best to frame the soldier's question (leave it to people like you to not even have the basic facts rights), but whether it is appropriate for the highest elected official in the United States to engage in deliberate propaganda by subverting a supposedly-free press with huge cash bribes. Try to stay on point. Of course, knowing your kind, the next thing we'll hear about is Clinton lying about blow-jobs, right? After all, that's the same thing as the attack on Constitutional government engaged in by your administration, isn't it? Or, simply, Fox News. Why didn't you mention CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN? Because they report news instead of disseminating opinion masquerading as fact. You're a Bush hater so you just follow the propaganda headlines like a puppet. Yeah, right. You should be ashamed of yourself. Answer this question, Bu****e: Do you feel the administration should be held responsible for paying columnists to report the party line? Yes or no? Is this something that this government should do? By the way, the last government official I heard of doing this was named Eichman. So, what do you think, Bushie? |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
"miles" wrote in message news:5HyRd.18386$Tt.5128@fed1read05... PTRAVEL wrote: I'm not suggesting that America's so-called "security" isn't an issue. It is, however, part-and-parcel of a negative perception of the US that is the direct result of the policies of the current administration. When the USA was all fuzzy warm with so many in the 90's we were struck with our guard down. We were struck with our guard down in 2001 because this administration simply refused to listen anything coming from its predecessor. Did you pay any attention to the actual hearings, or do you just depend on Rush and Fox News for what you're supposed to think? Follow the money and you'll see why some decided not to be quite as friendly behind the scenes. Yes, I know -- the money leads to Bush, Texas and the Saudis. Remember the Saudis? The ones who directly funded Al Qaeda, who pay for the madrassas that train the suicide killers, who obstructed our investigation of 2001. You know who I mean -- Bush's friends. Oil for Food fiasco is only a fraction. Some of those other countries have learned or will learn the hard way of their own arrogance. "Some of those countries"? Which countries? Do you mean our allies? God, go out and read a NEWSPAPER. Learn something! Just a matter of time. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Street wrote:
But if they'd done an anti-Kerry piece you'd have been just fine with it? What kind of crap is that reply? I didn't complain about anything other than to point out the hypocrisy of the bias in this thread. Both sides fling mud. So what the heck is your point? |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Street wrote:
In article 5HyRd.18386$Tt.5128@fed1read05, miles wrote: Some of those other countries have learned or will € learn the hard way of their own arrogance. Just a matter of time. Would that include the US? Yes. The USA learned of its decades of arrogance on 9/11. Many disagree and want to continue with the very same methods that failed us. Not gonna argue with you. You have your views, I have mine. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
miles wrote: Alan Street wrote: In article 5HyRd.18386$Tt.5128@fed1read05, miles wrote: Some of those other countries have learned or will € learn the hard way of their own arrogance. Just a matter of time. Would that include the US? Yes. The USA learned of its decades of arrogance on 9/11. Many disagree and want to continue with the very same methods that failed us. Not gonna argue with you. You have your views, I have mine. Your cowardly views will guarantee that you will be six feet under in no time at all. -- Best Greg |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
PTRAVEL wrote:
but whether it is appropriate for the highest elected official in the United States to engage in deliberate propaganda by subverting a supposedly-free press with huge cash bribes Talk about twisting the facts to suit your own bias and hatred. The highest elected official in the US did not engage in deliberate propaganda by subverting a supposedly-free press with huge cash bribes. That is the leftists conspiracy theory at work. The key here is your assumption that Bush directed it. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
miles wrote: PTRAVEL wrote: but whether it is appropriate for the highest elected official in the United States to engage in deliberate propaganda by subverting a supposedly-free press with huge cash bribes Talk about twisting the facts to suit your own bias and hatred. The highest elected official in the US did not engage in deliberate propaganda by subverting a supposedly-free press with huge cash bribes. I was so overjoyed when John Kerry got elected. That is the leftists conspiracy theory at work. The key here is your assumption that Bush directed it. You should cease your running off at the mouth. As it is you appear to be rather stupid. -- Best Greg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
U.S. tourism may be casualty of war on terror | spamfree | Air travel | 333 | February 26th, 2005 01:12 AM |
Cruise ship contracts spout controversy !!! | steinbrenner | Cruises | 0 | October 8th, 2004 10:43 PM |
Myanmar Times - Tourism in the age of globalisation | utunlin | Asia | 0 | August 4th, 2004 05:05 AM |
National Geog. says Scottish Highlands beat Colorado Rockies, Key West and Yosemite for sustainable tourism | Owain | Europe | 1 | April 22nd, 2004 10:02 AM |
Zanzibar - Terror, tourism and odd beliefs (from The Economist) | Hans-Georg Michna | Africa | 1 | February 20th, 2004 10:49 PM |