Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%

rick++ wrote:

I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has
propose
a platform. You cant run on negation forever.
Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at
each others throats then. The conservatives promote government
intervention
in social issues, while libs abhor that.

Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in
social issues.



--
"It is illuminating for purposes of reflection, if not for
argument, to note that one of the greatest 'fictions' of our
federal system is that the Congress exercises only those powers
delegated to it, while the remainder are reserved to the States or
to the people. The manner in which this Court has construed the
Commerce Clause amply illustrates the extent of this fiction.",
Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining, 452 U.S. 264, 307 (1981)

On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:50:27 -0700 (PDT), in uk.politics.misc, "rick++"
, wrote

I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has
propose
a platform. You cant run on negation forever.
Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at
each others throats then. The conservatives promote government
intervention
in social issues, while libs abhor that.

Libs promote government intervention in every aspect of life.

FACE

In article ,
Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote:


rick++ wrote:

I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has
propose
a platform. You cant run on negation forever.
Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at
each others throats then. The conservatives promote government
intervention
in social issues, while libs abhor that.

Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in
social issues.

Nah.... forcing an entire nation to buy HC insurance
isn't a "social issue," nah, it's, er, for your own
good.

Wasting tax money on a tunnel in Florida for turtles
isn't a "social issue," nah, it's er, for your own
good... I mean, turtle road kill is just WRONG, man...

Progressives NEVER meddle in "social issues." Just ask
ACORN :-)

--
"The Nizkor website (secretly financed by the ADL and other Jewish front
organizations) is behind it." (David Irving, whining about Google's
reminder of his disgrace.) The facts:
http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/i/irvi...ent-00-00.html

Om Nitron wrote:

Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On
04/07/2010 02:35 PM:

rick++ wrote:


Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at
each others throats then. The conservatives promote government
intervention
in social issues, while libs abhor that.


Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in
social issues.

Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are
the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin.

Commie Libs are Liberals, you nitwir. Libertarians are
Libertarians.




--
"It is illuminating for purposes of reflection, if not for
argument, to note that one of the greatest 'fictions' of our
federal system is that the Congress exercises only those powers
delegated to it, while the remainder are reserved to the States or
to the people. The manner in which this Court has construed the
Commerce Clause amply illustrates the extent of this fiction.",
Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining, 452 U.S. 264, 307 (1981)

On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:35:07 -0700, in uk.politics.misc, Om Nitron
, wrote

FACE wrote, On 04/07/2010 02:58 PM:

On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:50:27 -0700 (PDT), in uk.politics.misc, "rick++"
, wrote

I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has
propose
a platform. You cant run on negation forever.
Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at
each others throats then. The conservatives promote government
intervention
in social issues, while libs abhor that.

Libs promote government intervention in every aspect of life.

You're as much of an illiterate idiot as Bonde. The "libs" are
the **LIBERTARIANS**, twit.

Look you ****ing idiot, I am well aware of what a classic liberal is and
what a modern liberal is and who holds the remnants of true liberalism
today. I often make the distinction but maybe it has never reached
whatever backwater you are in. Tough.

Your attempt to set a silent followup newsgroup shows just what a ****ing
coward you are, ****-for-brains.

Check this out http://www.strangepolitics.com/image...ent/162342.JPG

FACE

From: "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)"

Organization: Our legacy is not the lives we lived but the lives we leave to
those who come after us.
Newsgroups:
alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,soc.retirement,rec.travel .europe
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:04:45 +0000
Subject: Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%



Om Nitron wrote:

Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On
04/07/2010 02:35 PM:

rick++ wrote:


Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at
each others throats then. The conservatives promote government
intervention
in social issues, while libs abhor that.


Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in
social issues.

Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are
the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin.

Commie Libs are Liberals, you nitwir. Libertarians are
Libertarians.

I thought you loved abbreviations. You just got caught on one that was
extremely clear when read in its context. I read it in context, and got it
right away.

However, since this abbreviation caught you, it should be a lesson: avoid
abbreviations, spell it out.

Donna Evleth




--
"It is illuminating for purposes of reflection, if not for
argument, to note that one of the greatest 'fictions' of our
federal system is that the Congress exercises only those powers
delegated to it, while the remainder are reserved to the States or
to the people. The manner in which this Court has construed the
Commerce Clause amply illustrates the extent of this fiction.",
Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining, 452 U.S. 264, 307 (1981)

Donna Evleth wrote:

From: "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)"

Organization: Our legacy is not the lives we lived but the lives we leave to
those who come after us.
Newsgroups:
alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,soc.retirement,rec.travel .europe
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:04:45 +0000
Subject: Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%



Om Nitron wrote:

Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On
04/07/2010 02:35 PM:

rick++ wrote:


Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at
each others throats then. The conservatives promote government
intervention
in social issues, while libs abhor that.


Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in
social issues.

Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are
the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin.

Commie Libs are Liberals, you nitwir. Libertarians are
Libertarians.

I thought you loved abbreviations.

There is no abbreviation for "libertarian" that isn't overloaded
with "liberal". Do you support overloaded abbreviations now?



You just got caught on one that was
extremely clear when read in its context. I read it in context, and got it
right away.

I didn't read the context because it's irrelevant. "Lib" is short
for liberal or Liberal.



However, since this abbreviation caught you, it should be a lesson: avoid
abbreviations, spell it out.

When overloaded abbreviations exist, the question should be will
there be ambiguity. In the case of using the same short form for
two political groups, yes. If the compiler could disambiguate,
fine, but it can't.




--
"It is illuminating for purposes of reflection, if not for
argument, to note that one of the greatest 'fictions' of our
federal system is that the Congress exercises only those powers
delegated to it, while the remainder are reserved to the States or
to the people. The manner in which this Court has construed the
Commerce Clause amply illustrates the extent of this fiction.",
Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining, 452 U.S. 264, 307 (1981)

On Apr 5, 8:11*am, "Tis Odonovan, Himself" wrote:
Poll:TeaParty48% Obama 44%

Monday, April 05, 2010

*http://preview.tinyurl.com/95f4zEvleths

On major issues, 48% of voters say that the averageTeaPartymember
is closer to their views than President Barack Obama.

We will take our country back from this dangerous looser. Obama is a
complete & utter disaster on every front, everything he touches turns
to crap, the most pathetic congress and president ever imaginable in
US history. He is a virtual enemy within, chairman Mao, Stalin or
Chavez or Dr King could not of screwed up America's economy, policies
or world standing any quicker than the phoney one and whoever is
pulling his strings and fitted him w/ a teleprompter are hell bent on
reducing America to just another socialist Afriacan nation, just
another bankrupt welfare state

BrickboyTX wrote:
On Apr 5, 8:11 am, "Tis Odonovan, Himself" wrote:
Poll:TeaParty48% Obama 44%

Monday, April 05, 2010

http://preview.tinyurl.com/95f4zEvleths

On major issues, 48% of voters say that the averageTeaPartymember
is closer to their views than President Barack Obama.

We will take our country back from this dangerous looser. Obama is a
complete & utter disaster on every front, everything he touches turns
to crap, the most pathetic congress and president ever imaginable in
US history. He is a virtual enemy within, chairman Mao, Stalin or
Chavez or Dr King could not of screwed up America's economy, policies
or world standing any quicker than the phoney one and whoever is
pulling his strings and fitted him w/ a teleprompter are hell bent on
reducing America to just another socialist Afriacan nation, just
another bankrupt welfare state


Suggest you place your head in a large bucket of water.
Leave it there for five or six minutes. You'll feel so much
better afterwards.

From: "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)"

Organization: Our legacy is not the lives we lived but the lives we leave to
those who come after us.
Newsgroups:
alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,soc.retirement,rec.travel .europe
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:07:21 +0000
Subject: Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%



Donna Evleth wrote:

From: "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)"

Organization: Our legacy is not the lives we lived but the lives we leave to
those who come after us.
Newsgroups:
alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,soc.retirement,rec.travel .europe
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:04:45 +0000
Subject: Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%



Om Nitron wrote:

Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On
04/07/2010 02:35 PM:

rick++ wrote:


Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at
each others throats then. The conservatives promote government
intervention
in social issues, while libs abhor that.


Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in
social issues.

Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are
the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin.

Commie Libs are Liberals, you nitwir. Libertarians are
Libertarians.

I thought you loved abbreviations.

There is no abbreviation for "libertarian" that isn't overloaded
with "liberal". Do you support overloaded abbreviations now?

I don't support abbreviations at all as a general rule.



You just got caught on one that was
extremely clear when read in its context. I read it in context, and got it
right away.

I didn't read the context because it's irrelevant. "Lib" is short
for liberal or Liberal.

I will repeat, I will even shout: CONTEXT IS ALWAYS RELEVANT. In fact, it
is the most relevant element of most paragraphs.

The bottom line is that because you ignored context, you got caught.

Donna Evleth