Cofirmed by the UK for Obama and his minions: Smokers have lower IQs

Cofirmed by the UK for Obama and his minions: Smokers have lower IQs

http://preview.tinyurl.com/94f4zEvleths

http://preview.tinyurl.com/94g4zEvleths

On Apr 4, 7:57*am, Tis PJ Odonovan wrote:
Cofirmed by the UK for Obama and his minions: Smokers have lower IQs

http://preview.tinyurl.com/94f4zEvleths

http://preview.tinyurl.com/94g4zEvleths

FDR must be channeling thru Obama with his famous cigarette holder.
Smoking helped push through Social Security and the Health Care bill.
Maybe more Republicans need to light up.

On 04/04/2010 14:28, GLOBALIST wrote:
On Apr 4, 7:57 am, Tis PJ wrote:
Cofirmed by the UK for Obama and his minions: Smokers have lower IQs

Well I would vote for Winston Churchill (smoker/drinker) over Adolf
Hitler (non-smoking teetotal vegetarian).

"mikeos" wrote in message
...
On 04/04/2010 14:28, GLOBALIST wrote:
On Apr 4, 7:57 am, Tis PJ wrote:
Cofirmed by the UK for Obama and his minions: Smokers have lower IQs

Well I would vote for Winston Churchill (smoker/drinker) over Adolf Hitler
(non-smoking teetotal vegetarian).

# As someone who suffered from both of them, how do you equate a man who
brought a country out of poverty into a first class nation in six years to
one who destroyed and Empire in five by winning a war against him...and
using Americans and Russians to help him do it.

SPierce wrote:
"mikeos" wrote in message
...
On 04/04/2010 14:28, GLOBALIST wrote:
On Apr 4, 7:57 am, Tis PJ wrote:
Cofirmed by the UK for Obama and his minions: Smokers have lower IQs
Well I would vote for Winston Churchill (smoker/drinker) over Adolf Hitler
(non-smoking teetotal vegetarian).

# As someone who suffered from both of them, how do you equate a man who
brought a country out of poverty into a first class nation in six years to
one who destroyed and Empire in five by winning a war against him...and
using Americans and Russians to help him do it.


A "first class nation"? Depends on what you think
is first class.

On 04/04/2010 23:52, SPierce wrote:

Well I would vote for Winston Churchill (smoker/drinker) over Adolf Hitler
(non-smoking teetotal vegetarian).

# As someone who suffered from both of them, how do you equate a man who
brought a country out of poverty into a first class nation in six years to
one who destroyed and Empire in five by winning a war against him...and
using Americans and Russians to help him do it.

Nazi nostalgia, I love it!

On 5 Apr, 15:44, mikeos wrote:
On 04/04/2010 23:52, SPierce wrote:

Well I would vote for Winston Churchill (smoker/drinker) over Adolf Hitler
(non-smoking teetotal vegetarian).

# *As someone who suffered from both of them, *how do you equate a man who
brought a country out of poverty into a first class nation in six years to
one who destroyed and Empire in five by winning a war against him...and
using Americans and Russians to help him do it.

Nazi nostalgia, I love it!

I doubt that even Obama could smoke enough to give himself a lower IQ
than the previous president.

"mikeos" wrote in message
...
On 04/04/2010 23:52, SPierce wrote:

Well I would vote for Winston Churchill (smoker/drinker) over Adolf
Hitler
(non-smoking teetotal vegetarian).

# As someone who suffered from both of them, how do you equate a man
who
brought a country out of poverty into a first class nation in six years
to
one who destroyed and Empire in five by winning a war against him...and
using Americans and Russians to help him do it.

Nazi nostalgia, I love it!

# It takes more than nostalgia to bring a poverty stricken nation with no
gold reserves to a bustling first class economy in six years. And to have a
thankful population because of it. Churchill achieved nothing people were
thankful for...they sacked him instead.

SPierce wrote:
"mikeos" wrote in message
...
On 04/04/2010 23:52, SPierce wrote:
Well I would vote for Winston Churchill (smoker/drinker) over Adolf
Hitler
(non-smoking teetotal vegetarian).
# As someone who suffered from both of them, how do you equate a man
who
brought a country out of poverty into a first class nation in six years
to
one who destroyed and Empire in five by winning a war against him...and
using Americans and Russians to help him do it.

Nazi nostalgia, I love it!

# It takes more than nostalgia to bring a poverty stricken nation with no
gold reserves to a bustling first class economy in six years.

It didn't end well though...


--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.

"William Black" wrote in message
...
SPierce wrote:
"mikeos" wrote in message
...
On 04/04/2010 23:52, SPierce wrote:
Well I would vote for Winston Churchill (smoker/drinker) over Adolf
Hitler
(non-smoking teetotal vegetarian).
# As someone who suffered from both of them, how do you equate a man
who
brought a country out of poverty into a first class nation in six years
to
one who destroyed and Empire in five by winning a war against him...and
using Americans and Russians to help him do it.

Nazi nostalgia, I love it!

# It takes more than nostalgia to bring a poverty stricken nation with
no gold reserves to a bustling first class economy in six years.

It didn't end well though...



# No it didn't end well, for them or us. A different story altogether
though. I was considering the economic COMPETENCE of the leaders to manage
the country for the betterment of their people. Churchill had no history
of improving his country.