Driver Licensing not about highway safety

wrote:

I have proven over and over again that I am a ****ing moron.

Yes, you have. Now, as a reward for your self, give your self a
clensing 12 gauge enema.

"-" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 30, 11:49 pm, proffsl wrote:
"Lawrence Akutagawa" wrote:

[personal problems]

Take your personal dispute with Alan elsewhere. I don't appreciate
you bringing your personal problems with Alan here.

Why do you presume to issue directives to others on an open internet
forum? Have you not heard of the right of free speech?

And the right of free "silence". ~(:-X) KM
--
(-:alohacyberian:-) At my website view over 3,600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI, and
NBA, the White House, Academy Awards, 150 language translators!
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more at: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/

"proffsl" wrote in message
oups.com...
"Alohacyberian" wrote:
"proffsl" wrote:

Licensing does have nothing to do with highway safety.

Your assertion is simply deluded. A school child could
present cogent reasons as to the correlation between the
two.

Hahahahaha!!!! And, should I presume you are using "school child"
powers of reasoning in your assertion that I'm "simply deluded"?
Would it be a stretch to expect you to actually pose arguments with a
bit more content than "school children could present cogent reasons"?
I do so bore of the line of arguments that go something like: "Anybody
could prove you wrong.", without anybody actually doing so.


Why should anyone try to "prove" you wrong when you haven't proved your
statements to be otherwise? KM
--
(-:alohacyberian:-) At my website view over 3,600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI, and
NBA, the White House, Academy Awards, 150 language translators!
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more at: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/

"proffsl" wrote in message
oups.com...
"Alohacyberian" wrote:
"Alan S" wrote:
"Alohacyberian" wrote:
Very interesting concept, but I predict it will increase accidents,
especially for pedestrians.

Seems as if your "school child" powers of reasoning are wrong even
before you express them. From that same article:

"The radical philosophy has already been implented in the town of
Drachten in the Netherlands, which has abolished its road signs and
traffic lights. Accidents there have declined dramatically since the
new regime was introduced."


Because a new experiment proves successful in the beginning, such phenomena
don't guarantee future success and long-term success. Yes, those who
control the local government also control the compilation of statistics.
;-P Amazing how they cover their own rumps. KM
--
(-:alohacyberian:-) At my website view over 3,600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI, and
NBA, the White House, Academy Awards, 150 language translators!
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more at: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/

On Oct 1, 12:00 am, proffsl wrote:

BWAHAHAAAAA!! You had to repost your personal attack because you
forgot to change the subject line back to a lie!

at 12:30 am wrote:
at 12:20 am wrote:
"Alohacyberian" wrote:
"proffsl" wrote:

Licensing does have nothing to do with highway safety.

Your assertion is simply deluded. A school child could
present cogent reasons as to the correlation between the
two.

Hahahahaha!!!! And, should I presume you are using "school child"
powers of reasoning in your assertion that I'm "simply deluded"?
Would it be a stretch to expect you to actually pose arguments with a
bit more content than "school children could present cogent reasons"?
I do so bore of the line of arguments that go something like: "Anybody
could prove you wrong.", without anybody actually doing so.

But we already did that, more than a year ago. That you choose to
ignore it and plunge forward regardless of having no facts or logic on
your side is your choice. At this point, we can merely marvel at your
ability to ignore reality.

Yadda, yadda, yadda.

All those "yaddas" represented the complete dismantling of your
arguments.

Do you wait at your computer, like some kind of troll under a bridge,
for yet another opportunity to respond with your hollow claims of
victory?

No.

Besides, they are not hollow. I have completely refuted everything you
said with facts and logic, and you know it, which is why you never
deal head-on with those refutations preferring your trademark
initiation of personal insults.

Only 10 minutes after I post, THERE YOU ARE.

I am at home working on my computer. I am doing plenty of other
things. Your idiocy pops up once more, so I respond. Don't care to see
it, then don't post your disproven nonsense.

Proffy is really are a desperate buffoon.

Yes, you are, because for the past 18 months you keep desperately
repeating things that have been shown to be false. That's the
definition of crazy.

But, as usual, a buffoon which contributes
NOTHING, NADA, ZELCH, except more of your **** slinging hysterics.

Uh, Proffy... you started it, remember? I dismantled all of your
arguments and you have failed to deal with that, instead just ignoring
the fact that you have no legs to stand on.

Other than name-calling.

On Oct 1, 12:00 am, proffsl wrote:
at 12:30 am wrote:
at 12:20 am wrote:
"Alohacyberian" wrote:
"proffsl" wrote:

Licensing does have nothing to do with highway safety.

Your assertion is simply deluded. A school child could
present cogent reasons as to the correlation between the
two.

Hahahahaha!!!! And, should I presume you are using "school child"
powers of reasoning in your assertion that I'm "simply deluded"?
Would it be a stretch to expect you to actually pose arguments with a
bit more content than "school children could present cogent reasons"?
I do so bore of the line of arguments that go something like: "Anybody
could prove you wrong.", without anybody actually doing so.

But we already did that, more than a year ago. That you choose to
ignore it and plunge forward regardless of having no facts or logic on
your side is your choice. At this point, we can merely marvel at your
ability to ignore reality.

Yadda, yadda, yadda.

All those "yaddas" represented the complete dismantling of your
arguments.

Do you wait at your computer, like some kind of troll under a bridge,
for yet another opportunity to respond with your hollow claims of
victory?

No.

Besides, they are not hollow. I have completely refuted everything you
said with facts and logic, and you know it, which is why you never
deal head-on with those refutations preferring your trademark
initiation of personal insults.

Only 10 minutes after I post, THERE YOU ARE.

I am at home working on my computer. I am doing plenty of other
things. Your idiocy pops up once more, so I respond. Don't care to see
it, then don't post your disproven nonsense.

Proffy is really are a desperate buffoon.

Yes, you are, because for the past 18 months you keep desperately
repeating things that have been shown to be false. That's the
definition of crazy.

But, as usual, a buffoon which contributes
NOTHING, NADA, ZELCH, except more of your **** slinging hysterics.

Uh, Proffy... you started it, remember? I dismantled all of your
arguments and you have failed to deal with that, instead just ignoring
the fact that you have no legs to stand on.

Other than name-calling.

On Oct 1, 12:03 am, proffsl wrote:
wrote:
proffsl wrote:
"Lawrence Akutagawa" wrote:

[personal problems]

Take your personal dispute with Alan elsewhere. I don't
appreciate you bringing your personal problems with Alan
here.

Why do you presume to issue directives to others on an open
internet forum? Have you not heard of the right of free speech?

Give your self a clensing 12 gauge enema.

Oh, and violent too? Have you acted out on your fantasy of murdering
law enforcement officers yet?

I was only taking your position, which was that people on usenet
shouldn't "give directives" to others. Or does that prerogative belong
only to you?

On Oct 1, 12:06 am, proffsl wrote:
wrote:

I have proven over and over again that Proffy Woffy is a ****ing moron.

Yes, you have. I am a moron indeed, like when I FABRICATED a court
case in a pathetic attemp to prop up my failed arguments. Now, as a
reward for myself, I should give myself a clensing 12 gauge enema. But
first I should learn to spell "cleansing."

OK, go ahead.

I see you haven't learned many new insults in the last 18 months.

"Alohacyberian" wrote in message
...
"-" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 30, 11:49 pm, proffsl wrote:
"Lawrence Akutagawa" wrote:

[personal problems]

Take your personal dispute with Alan elsewhere. I don't appreciate
you bringing your personal problems with Alan here.

Why do you presume to issue directives to others on an open internet
forum? Have you not heard of the right of free speech?

And the right of free "silence". ~(:-X) KM

aka doing the Alvin Toda of hiding under that rock...and avoiding
accountability/responsibility.

So Keith, once again - a very simple, straightforward question which your
post here, of course, ducks once again -

"Do you agree that a maker of a statement is accountable for that
statement? A simple 'yes' or 'no' from you will suffice."

Driver Licensing serves no purpose for highway safety that laws
against endangerment did not already serve, and instead only serves
fiscal greed.

Our public highways were built on our property with our money for the
purpose of enhancing and increasing the exercise of our Right of
Locomotion ordinarily used for personal travel. But, the more our
public highways are made unusable by anything but the automobile, the
more this LIE that Driving is a privilege makes us all prisoners of
privilege behind bars lf blacktop.

Read about it at: http://proffsl.110mb.com/driver_licensing.php