If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"mag3" wrote in message ... On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:42:42 GMT, "spamfree" wrote: According to most airlines, luggage sized at 9" x 14" x 22" is the maximum size allowed for carry-on. Most airlines seem to have luggage templates (Delta calls it Size Wise) that passengers can drop their luggage into to see if the size is acceptable. [SNIP] I'd like to hear comments from owners of 22" roll-aboards on whether their luggage fits through the templates (please state the luggage manufacturer and airline for the template). Mostly, for me it's a CO 777-200 (which provides more than adequate space in the overheads), and a Samsonite 22" hard rollaboard, similar to the one the FA's use. The problem with that is that some countries have different rules. Australia for one, where the maximum length dimension is 20" not 22". So even if all you did was fly CO going in and then going out, you might get an evil eye from the check in and/or gate reps, as I did. CO hasn't flown into Oz in years (or did you fly Continental Micronesia into Brisbane or Cairnes?). To those cities they don't fly 777's. And God help you if you fly domestic in OZ. You won't get near a gate ramp with your 22" rollaboard. I had to take everything out of mine, put it in plastic bags and let the rollaboard be checked empty!!! I'm flying on an A340-300 out of JFK this summer so we'll see what that brings. ____________________________________________ Regards, Arnold (formerly ) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Maxx.
wrote: € ? € ? While you're at it, don't forget the laws about CHECKED luggage in € ? Australia. There is a weight limit. I recall standing in line to check € ? in at the Cairns airport. There was a German family in front of me € ? heading home from vacation. A couple of their bags were over the € weight € ? limit. They had to go buy new bags from an airport shop and repack or € ? the counter person wouldn't allow them to check them in. € ? € ? Some of that crap really scalds my ass. I have two check ins. Last € ? flight to Montreal on American. My tool box was one pound over, € ? and my personal suitcase was ten pounds under. The ticket agent € ? asked me to remove a pound and put it in the other case. She was € ? surprised when I started to laugh. Both cases are going on the plane! € ? Does transferring *one* freaking pound change the total weight!? She € ? smiled & said "I don't see anything", and passed them through. € ? € ? € € The law was implemented to protect baggage handlers from lifting € luggage that is over 70lbs. Frankly, it doesn't sound like such a bad € idea. € € 100% agreed. *But* - 1 or 2 lbs? I *Know* my box weighs 69 lbs. € and I keep it there to avoid the 70+ charge. The ticket € counter scales are not nearly calibrated as often as the scales € which I use. People have to use a little discression too. € € I agree, and in your case it sounds like the gate agent acted like a normal human being after she realized the absurdity :-) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Alan Street" wrote:
? ? I have two check ins. Last flight to Montreal on American my ? ? toolbox was one pound over, and my personal suitcase was ? ? ten pounds under. ? The law was implemented to protect baggage handlers from ? lifting luggage that is over 70lbs. Frankly, it doesn't sound like ? such a bad idea. ? 100% agreed. *But* - 1 or 2 lbs? I agree, and in your case it sounds like the gate agent acted like a normal human being after she realized the absurdity :-) Although a gender-generalization, weight limits benefit others than the baggage handlers, such as husbands whose wives tend to take 1/2 their stuff with them on any trip. Who do you think is gonna haul the heaviest piece of luggage out of the trunk and onto shuttle buses? I talked my wife into packing lighter by saying, "Hon, you don't want to have to pay a surcharge for your luggage, do you?" = R = |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Rog'" wrote in message . .. "Alan Street" wrote: ? ? I have two check ins. Last flight to Montreal on American my ? ? toolbox was one pound over, and my personal suitcase was ? ? ten pounds under. ? The law was implemented to protect baggage handlers from ? lifting luggage that is over 70lbs. Frankly, it doesn't sound like ? such a bad idea. ? 100% agreed. *But* - 1 or 2 lbs? I agree, and in your case it sounds like the gate agent acted like a normal human being after she realized the absurdity :-) Although a gender-generalization, weight limits benefit others than the baggage handlers, such as husbands whose wives tend to take 1/2 their stuff with them on any trip. Who do you think is gonna haul the heaviest piece of luggage out of the trunk and onto shuttle buses? I talked my wife into packing lighter by saying, "Hon, you don't want to have to pay a surcharge for your luggage, do you?" = R = That's a good idea, but does it really work? My wife *needs* everything. 3/4 of her things come back untouched. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:40:48 -0500, "Jeff Hacker" wrote:
The problem with that is that some countries have different rules. Australia for one, where the maximum length dimension is 20" not 22". So even if all you did was fly CO going in and then going out, you might get an evil eye from the check in and/or gate reps, as I did. CO hasn't flown into Oz in years (or did you fly Continental Micronesia into Brisbane or Cairnes?). To those cities they don't fly 777's. CO Micronesia to CNS. The comment about 777's was a general one, not directly associated with my Australia experience. Of course, CO Micronesia flies primarily 737's which is what I flew there. But in any case, CO permits the 22" rollaboard as part of CO's regular carry on policy on either aircraft. The problem was convincing the Australian check in rep. that that was CO's policy (upon the return flight) and that she should let me carry it on. The question was, which policy prevailed - CO's or Australian law (since we were talking "international flight/carrier")? In my case, CO's policy prevailed. Not the same story with Anset Australia for the "domestic" flights I took while there. I was almost denied boarding for insisting on taking it on board knowing it would fit in the overhead of an A320. They didn't care. I had to dump everything out of it, and carry it all by hand onto the A320. Oddly enough, my empty 22" rollaboard was the first thing off the belt in Sydney. ____________________________________________ Regards, Arnold (formerly ) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Maxx." wrote:
Although a gender-generalization, weight limits benefit others than baggage handlers, such as husbands whose wives tend to take 1/2 their stuff with them on any trip. Who do you think is gonna haul the heaviest piece of luggage out of the trunk and onto shuttle buses? I talked my wife into packing lighter by saying, "Hon, you don't want to have to pay a surcharge for your luggage, do you?" = R = That's a good idea, but does it really work? My wife *needs* everything. 3/4 of her things come back untouched. To get her to leave our largest bags behind, I agreed to book hotels with hairdryers, have our laundry done half-way thru our trip, and gave her space in my bag. :-) The slight expense was, IMO, well worth it. =R= |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
glenn P wrote: That's not quite correct. Airlines in Australia will charge excess baggage over your allowance (economy) of 20kg. It would seem the family didn't want to pay the charge, and looked for a cheaper way out. No, the law was specifically about weight per bag. There was a sign posted on the counter. After they repacked the airline accepted it all. From the horse's mouth: "Baggage Allowances Restrictions apply to baggage on all airlines. If you have baggage that is in excess of the free allowance, you will be liable for charges. " Not refused to be checked in..... "Tchiowa" wrote in message oups.com... mag3 wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:42:42 GMT, "spamfree" wrote: According to most airlines, luggage sized at 9" x 14" x 22" is the maximum size allowed for carry-on. Most airlines seem to have luggage templates (Delta calls it Size Wise) that passengers can drop their luggage into to see if the size is acceptable. [SNIP] I'd like to hear comments from owners of 22" roll-aboards on whether their luggage fits through the templates (please state the luggage manufacturer and airline for the template). Mostly, for me it's a CO 777-200 (which provides more than adequate space in the overheads), and a Samsonite 22" hard rollaboard, similar to the one the FA's use. The problem with that is that some countries have different rules. Australia for one, where the maximum length dimension is 20" not 22". While you're at it, don't forget the laws about CHECKED luggage in Australia. There is a weight limit. I recall standing in line to check in at the Cairns airport. There was a German family in front of me heading home from vacation. A couple of their bags were over the weight limit. They had to go buy new bags from an airport shop and repack or the counter person wouldn't allow them to check them in. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
They've been taking the templates out at some airports, if airlines
share a concourse, and the airlines have different size limits, though Continental lost on appeal. The other solution is to lift the templates for Continental passengers with larger bags. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Maxx. wrote: --------------------SNIP--------- Some of that crap really scalds my ass. I have two check ins. Last flight to Montreal on American. My tool box was one pound over, and my personal suitcase was ten pounds under. The ticket agent asked me to remove a pound and put it in the other case. She was surprised when I started to laugh. Both cases are going on the plane! Does transferring *one* freaking pound change the total weight!? She smiled & said "I don't see anything", and passed them through. This just shows the silliness of some regs. I got tired of traveling with two carry-on sized bags, which I checked, along with my computer case, which I carry on. So I bought one rolling duffle that can hold mofre than the former two. First trip I discovered, with it only about 2/3 full, it was one pound over the 50 pound weight limit. The ticket agent was nice and let me through. But I asked her, if I had two separate bags, each weighing 45 pounds, total 90, would those go through, but not one bag at 52 pounds? Yes. She explained that the main concern was what she, at the countr, and later other baggage handlers, were required to pick up and place on the various conveyor belts. That made sense to me. Alas, I'm stuck with an almost new large bag that I really can't use unless it's half empty. So my second trip I filled the empty space with bubble wrap to keep things from sliding around. Unfortunately the hotel maid threw out the bubblewrap the first day. Try explaining to the hotel desk why you want your bubble wrap replaced. "You want three yards of WHAT, sir?" |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"JimL" wrote in message oups.com... Maxx. wrote: --------------------SNIP--------- Some of that crap really scalds my ass. I have two check ins. Last flight to Montreal on American. My tool box was one pound over, and my personal suitcase was ten pounds under. The ticket agent asked me to remove a pound and put it in the other case. She was surprised when I started to laugh. Both cases are going on the plane! Does transferring *one* freaking pound change the total weight!? She smiled & said "I don't see anything", and passed them through. This just shows the silliness of some regs. I got tired of traveling with two carry-on sized bags, which I checked, along with my computer case, which I carry on. So I bought one rolling duffle that can hold mofre than the former two. First trip I discovered, with it only about 2/3 full, it was one pound over the 50 pound weight limit. The ticket agent was nice and let me through. But I asked her, if I had two separate bags, each weighing 45 pounds, total 90, would those go through, but not one bag at 52 pounds? Yes. She explained that the main concern was what she, at the countr, and later other baggage handlers, were required to pick up and place on the various conveyor belts. But if you pay the overweight charge, they *still* have to lift em. That made sense to me. Alas, I'm stuck with an almost new large bag that I really can't use unless it's half empty. So my second trip I filled the empty space with bubble wrap to keep things from sliding around. Unfortunately the hotel maid threw out the bubblewrap the first day. Try explaining to the hotel desk why you want your bubble wrap replaced. "You want three yards of WHAT, sir?" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rock & Roll Holiday Cruise! | Ray Goldenberg | Cruises | 5 | August 12th, 2004 04:35 AM |
Flying Coach on Air Portugal from Toronto, Carry Ons | stephen | Air travel | 0 | July 19th, 2004 04:20 PM |
It's a good idea to carry nutrition bars when you travel. | Francis Ardi | Travel - anything else not covered | 0 | May 12th, 2004 05:10 AM |
How do you Carry your Stuff on Shore? | Ken Vonk | Cruises | 7 | October 31st, 2003 03:35 PM |
TSA advises parachutes as carry on. | me | Air travel | 4 | September 22nd, 2003 08:09 PM |