If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AIDS is predominately a lifestyle disease - of fags - Repost
AIDS is certainly a lifestyle disease, but that lifestyle is unprotected promiscuity, not homesexuality per se. -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
AIDS is predominately a lifestyle disease - of fags - Repost
Make credence recognised that on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:28:27 -0700,
Hatunen has scripted: AIDS is certainly a lifestyle disease, but that lifestyle is unprotected promiscuity, not homesexuality per se. Definitely not so. It is in fact quite rare for a male to catch aids from a woman from sex. And so in purely heterosexual circles it's also rare, no matter how much shagging around is done. As such, it's by and large a disease that affects homosexual men, plus hard drugs users, but that's well known. -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- -- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
AIDS is predominately a lifestyle disease - of fags - Repost
Deeply Filled Mortician
wrote: Make credence recognised that on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:28:27 -0700, Hatunen has scripted: AIDS is certainly a lifestyle disease, but that lifestyle is unprotected promiscuity, not homesexuality per se. Definitely not so. It is in fact quite rare for a male to catch aids from a woman from sex. And so in purely heterosexual circles it's also rare, no matter how much shagging around is done. As such, it's by and large a disease that affects homosexual men, plus hard drugs users, but that's well known. No, it's not, but you're so full of **** on this one it reaches a new low, even for you. For a start, there is no such thing as "purely heterosexual circles" so you can get rid of that myth. Your second sentence is in fact true, but "quite rare" depends a lot on the part of the world you're talking about, and the kind of unprotected heterosexual sex involved. As for who it affects, well you think you know, but in fact, 60% of people infected with HIV live in sub-saharan Africa, and of them, most are women- 13 women for every 10 men. Most people living with HIV are women. This gap is growing alarmingly in fact. In young people (aged 15-24) in sub-saharan Africa around 3 times as many women are infected than men. So, I'll let the reader decide how true your 'by and large' statement was above. I find you appallingly ignorant, and I've had quite enough of this kind of thing. -- (*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net (don't email yahoo address) usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
AIDS is predominately a lifestyle disease - of fags - Repost
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:32:31 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
wrote: Make credence recognised that on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:28:27 -0700, Hatunen has scripted: AIDS is certainly a lifestyle disease, but that lifestyle is unprotected promiscuity, not homesexuality per se. Definitely not so. It is in fact quite rare for a male to catch aids from a woman from sex. And so in purely heterosexual circles it's also rare, no matter how much shagging around is done. As such, it's by and large a disease that affects homosexual men, plus hard drugs users, but that's well known. -- You certainly show a deeply ingrained ignorance of the subject, I suggest you look at overall infection rates in subsaharan Africa. the type of ignorance of HIV that you show is exactly why the disease has a had a devastating impact in that continent G --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
AIDS is predominately a lifestyle disease - of fags - Repost
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
AIDS is predominately a lifestyle disease - of fags - Repost
Hatunen wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:45:33 +0100, (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)) wrote: Deeply Filled Mortician wrote: Make credence recognised that on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:28:27 -0700, Hatunen has scripted: AIDS is certainly a lifestyle disease, but that lifestyle is unprotected promiscuity, not homesexuality per se. Definitely not so. It is in fact quite rare for a male to catch aids from a woman from sex. And so in purely heterosexual circles it's also rare, no matter how much shagging around is done. As such, it's by and large a disease that affects homosexual men, plus hard drugs users, but that's well known. No, it's not, but you're so full of **** on this one it reaches a new low, even for you. For a start, there is no such thing as "purely heterosexual circles" so you can get rid of that myth. Your second sentence is in fact true, but "quite rare" depends a lot on the part of the world you're talking about, and the kind of unprotected heterosexual sex involved. The homosexual orgies of the 1980s are long gone. Most homosexuals are as, um, monogamous as heterosexuals and lead rather hum-drum lives. Mine is _exciting_, thanks very much! They may actually disapprove of the promiscuous lifestyles of some others. That's their problem- I don't care what other people of any persuasion get up to. Of course, the Baby Boom caused there to be a large increase in the absolute number of homosexuals that resulted in some of the excesses of the 1970s. Now these boomers are aging and settling down just like the straight boomers. While the mechanics of HIV transmission tend to favor the activities of homosexuals (really, mostly only one specific practice) the disease remains a disease of promiscuity, not homosexuality per se. The statistics are quite clear- most HIV infected people in the world are female. It seems to me a little misogynist (I'm certainly not saying you are BTW) to only identify HIV by methods in which it's easily transmitted (i.e. sexually, by males) rather than concentrating on the gender of most of the infected. -- (*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net (don't email yahoo address) usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
AIDS is predominately a lifestyle disease - of fags - Repost
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:03:53 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician
wrote: Make credence recognised that on Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:45:33 +0100, (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)) has scripted: Deeply Filled Mortician wrote: You misread what I wrote David. I said it's rare for a WOMAN to catch aids from a MAN, not vice versa as you seem to have read. Odd, then. I personally know three women who got HIV from men. One was a whore; she was the mother of the HIV-infected little girl we adopted. Another was a friend of our family who had got it while having a foolish extra-marital fling. And the third is the mother of the little HIV-infected girl for whom we are currently foster parents, both being immigrants from Cote D'Ivoire. In America HIV-infected males tend to be homosexuals, a fact which militates against a large number of women being infected by men, but there are infected straight and bi- men out there so it is most certainly not rare for a women to be infected by a male. -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
AIDS is predominately a lifestyle disease - of fags - Repost
Make credence recognised that on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:57:55 -0700,
Hatunen has scripted: On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:03:53 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician wrote: Make credence recognised that on Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:45:33 +0100, (David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*)) has scripted: Deeply Filled Mortician wrote: You misread what I wrote David. I said it's rare for a WOMAN to catch aids from a MAN, not vice versa as you seem to have read. Odd, then. I personally know three women who got HIV from men. I reversed it for irony. Read what I originally wrote. -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- -- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
AIDS is predominately a lifestyle disease - of fags - Repost
Make credence recognised that on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:12:05 GMT, grant
kinsley has scripted: On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:32:31 +0200, Deeply Filled Mortician wrote: Make credence recognised that on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:28:27 -0700, Hatunen has scripted: AIDS is certainly a lifestyle disease, but that lifestyle is unprotected promiscuity, not homesexuality per se. Definitely not so. It is in fact quite rare for a male to catch aids from a woman from sex. And so in purely heterosexual circles it's also rare, no matter how much shagging around is done. As such, it's by and large a disease that affects homosexual men, plus hard drugs users, but that's well known. -- You certainly show a deeply ingrained ignorance of the subject, I suggest you look at overall infection rates in subsaharan Africa. Great, and then what... I'll make the same conclusions and you will continue to be unclear about what you're trying to say? the type of ignorance of HIV that you show is exactly why the disease has a had a devastating impact in that continent Oh, just how is that? -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- -- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIDS is predominately a lifestyle disease - of fags - Repost | Brian K | USA & Canada | 0 | February 8th, 2007 08:35 AM |
AIDS is predominately a lifestyle disease - of fags - Repost | Brian K | Europe | 8 | February 6th, 2007 01:50 AM |
AIDS is predominately a lifestyle disease - of fags - Repost | Brian K | USA & Canada | 12 | February 6th, 2007 01:50 AM |