If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Washington Post 03/11/13: "The Holocaust: FDRs indelible failure"
Washington Post 03/11/13: "The Holocaust: FDRs indelible failure"
excerpts: "...He is a god no more. His New Deal is no longer solely credited with ending the Great Depression World War II did that and the war in Europe was not won, as we all once thought, primarily by the United States but more so by the Soviet Union. Yet these, to my mind, are trifles compared to the criticism that Roosevelt was passive in the face of the Holocaust. Its not that he did nothing, its that he did nothing much.... .....Both FDR and his wife, Eleanor, were genteel anti-Semites ... .....As late as 1943, at the Casablanca Conference, he sympathized with a French generals observation that the Jews were overrepresented in the professions. FDR referenced the understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews......." Amazon.com: FDR and the Jews [Hardcover] Richard Breitman (Author), Allan J. Lichtman (Author) 5.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (1 customer review) List Price: $29.95 Price: $18.45 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details You Save: $11.50 (38%) Usually ships within 1 to 3 weeks. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Washington Post 03/11/13: "The Holocaust: FDRs indelible failure"
On Mar 13, 10:10*pm, :ПеаБраин wrote:
Washington Post 03/11/13: "The Holocaust: FDR’s indelible failure" excerpts: "...He is a god no more. His New Deal is no longer solely credited with ending the Great Depression — World War II did that — and the war in Europe was not won, as we all once thought, primarily by the United States but more so by the Soviet Union. Yet these, to my mind, are trifles compared to the criticism that Roosevelt was passive in the face of the Holocaust. It’s not that he did nothing, it’s that he did nothing much.... ....Both FDR and his wife, Eleanor, were genteel anti-Semites —.... ....As late as 1943, at the Casablanca Conference, he sympathized with a French general’s observation that the Jews were overrepresented in the professions. FDR referenced the “understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews.”......" Amazon.com: FDR and the Jews [Hardcover] Richard Breitman (Author), Allan J. Lichtman (Author) 5.0 out of 5 stars *See all reviews (1 customer review) List Price: * * $29.95 Price: *$18.45 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details You Save: * * * $11.50 (38%) Usually ships within 1 to 3 weeks. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available. The Zionists wouldn't let him. They WANTED Jewish suffering, and a sufficiency of it. Read say Hanna Arendt or Edwin Black (a Christian doesn't have the Jew- determined dispensation to write such - admittedly limited - truths). Ever heard of them? But why the focus on the "suffering of the Jews"? Non-Jewish soldiers, sailors, airmen and civilians in their native towns and cities suffered far higher risks than those put in - relatively - sheltered concentration camps, albeit as slave labour; though when Allied fire and other criminal carpet bombing of civilians on Germany commenced. medical and other supplies wasn't available or didn't get through to attenuate the incidence of horrific starvation and associated infectious disease. The model was established in the first concentration camps which were a necessary part of the so-called "Boer" War (really War of the Janissaries against the white farmers under the pretext of "Human Rights". How old are you? Did you ever FEEL any empathy with the men who returned from the War, warts and all? For the suffering of the Russian masses? Or are you just another wretched cosmopolitan? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Washington Post 03/11/13: "The Holocaust: FDRs indelible failure"
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 03:50:42 -0700 (PDT), dusty
wrote: But why the focus on the "suffering of the Jews"? Non-Jewish soldiers, sailors, airmen and civilians in their native towns and cities suffered far higher risks than those put in - relatively - sheltered concentration camps, albeit as slave labour; Utter ********. though when Allied fire and other criminal carpet bombing of civilians on Germany commenced. Well after the indiscriminate German bombing of the UK. The model was established in the first concentration camps which were a necessary part of the so-called "Boer" War Lie. They're older than that. How old are you? Did you ever FEEL any empathy with the men who returned from the War, warts and all? The Allied ones, yes. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Washington Post 03/11/13: "The Holocaust: FDRs indelible failure"
On Mar 16, 12:51*am, Bill wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 03:50:42 -0700 (PDT), dusty wrote: But why the focus on the "suffering of the Jews"? Non-Jewish soldiers, sailors, airmen and civilians in their native towns and cities suffered far higher risks than those put in - relatively - sheltered concentration camps, albeit as slave labour; Utter ********. though when Allied fire and other criminal carpet bombing of civilians on Germany commenced. Well after the indiscriminate German bombing of the UK. *The model was established in the first concentration camps which were a necessary part of the so-called "Boer" War Lie. They're older than that. How old are you? Did you ever FEEL any empathy with the men who returned from the War, warts and all? The Allied ones, yes. Take just the German retaliatory behaviour in villages and towns on the Eastern front* or say Greece (where most of the deaths were from starvation (300,000) arising from earlier requisitioning of the harvest) or the fire bombing of Dresden or other saturation bombing of Allied / German cities. On the Boer War : this was the first modern, organised military, use of concentration camps. Where else? The mortality - due to infectious disease and poor nutrition - was very high as the Germans and Allies would have known. Sounds like you are part of the "Special Suffering" school...er, Bill.. *Most Jews died there - as Communist partisans or supporters and the bullet was the method of choice. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Washington Post 03/11/13: "The Holocaust: FDRs indelible failure"
On Mar 16, 10:47*am, dusty wrote:
On Mar 16, 12:51*am, Bill wrote: On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 03:50:42 -0700 (PDT), dusty wrote: But why the focus on the "suffering of the Jews"? Non-Jewish soldiers, sailors, airmen and civilians in their native towns and cities suffered far higher risks than those put in - relatively - sheltered concentration camps, albeit as slave labour; Utter ********. though when Allied fire and other criminal carpet bombing of civilians on Germany commenced. Well after the indiscriminate German bombing of the UK. *The model was established in the first concentration camps which were a necessary part of the so-called "Boer" War Lie. They're older than that. How old are you? Did you ever FEEL any empathy with the men who returned from the War, warts and all? The Allied ones, yes. Take just the German retaliatory behaviour in villages and towns on the Eastern front* or say Greece (where most of the deaths were from starvation (300,000) arising from earlier requisitioning of the harvest) or the fire bombing of Dresden or other saturation bombing of Allied / German cities. On the Boer War : this was the first modern, organised military, use of concentration camps. Where else? The mortality - due to infectious disease and poor nutrition - was very high as the Germans and Allies would have known. Sounds like you are part of the "Special Suffering" school...er, Bill.. *Most Jews died there - as Communist partisans or supporters and the bullet was the method of choice. Or in the immediate post-war period: "...the Czech Republic...expelled around 3,500,000 (in words: three and one half million) Czech citizens of German ethnicity in 1945-48. About 240,000 Germans died or were killed during what Germans around the world refer to as die Vertreibung (The Expulsion). The legal bases for The Expulsion and seizure of all personal and real property without payment were the Benes Decrees,which also amnestied anyone who committed any violent or non-violent illegal act, including murder or rape, against the Germans. The Expulsion depopulated the Sudetenland, the Czech border areas next to Germany and Austria, and offered ethnic Czechs free, fully-furnished real estate just for the taking...." Remind you of a certain state in the Middle East...there it's VERY ongoing. And we need mention the mass expulsions in the same period of ethnic Germans from Rumania and the huge suffering associated with that? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Washington Post 03/11/13: "The Holocaust: FDRs indelible failure"
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:47:36 -0700 (PDT), dusty
wrote: On the Boer War : this was the first modern, organised military, use of concentration camps. Where else? Poland in the Bar Confederation The Spanish on Cuba in the 'Ten Years War'. Sounds like you are part of the "Special Suffering" school...er, Bill.. The inevitable sly anti-Semitic jibe, as expected. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Washington Post 03/11/13: "The Holocaust: FDRs indelible failure"
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 01:12:44 -0700 (PDT), dusty
wrote: On Mar 16, 10:47*am, dusty wrote: The Expulsion depopulated the Sudetenland, the Czech border areas next to Germany and Austria, and offered ethnic Czechs free, fully-furnished real estate just for the taking...." Remind you of a certain state in the Middle East...there it's VERY ongoing. Lie, but expected... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Washington Post 03/11/13: "The Holocaust: FDRs indelible failure"
On Mar 16, 11:30*pm, Bill wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:47:36 -0700 (PDT), dusty wrote: On the Boer War : this was the first modern, organised military, use of concentration camps. Where else? Poland in the Bar Confederation The Spanish on Cuba in the 'Ten Years War'. Sounds like you are part of the "Special Suffering" school...er, Bill.. The inevitable sly anti-Semitic jibe, as expected. Nothing "sly" Bill, very direct: I deny the lie of "Special Suffering". There were only several thousands of key figures of the Bar Confederation imprisoned or deported to Siberia whereas 100's of thousands of Boers were imprisoned and 30,000 died in the camps. For the Jews concentration was universal, clearly a barbaric practice*. It was so often done with the collaboration and direct aid of the leaders of the Jewish communities. The Ten Years War example is closer to the mark - but this applied to those who "disobeyed" the brutal demands of the colonial power and was only intended for the duration of the uprising, with practices rather like the Strategic Hamlets used by the USA in Vietnam. We could add to the list Allied soldiers in the Japanese slave labour/ death camps in WW 2, Japanese civilians in WW 2 USA, the British civilians in the Black Hole of Calcutta, the Gulag series, including that of 'political' prisoners and returned captured Russian soldiers. Some Indian reservations could be loosely included, a form of concentration more humane than the Gaza concentration in which the inmates are periodically subjected to near-genocidal military bombardment. It's strange how the undoubted Jewish suffering during WW2 has apparently had very little role at all in moderating Zionist behaviour in Palestine and its support by the "children of the holocaust" living in the USA, Britain etc. Incidentally, I typed in "pre-Nazi concentration camp" on Google and had to go through 30 pages before seeing any entry other than the Jews in Nazi camps - and that was a refutation of Ron Paul's view that Gaza is a concentration camp! Now that's what I call control! * with the exception of the large numbers and capital allowed to migrate to Palestine under the 'Transfer Agreement': "...the agreement between Adolf Hitler and an organization of Zionist Jews in 1933, which made Hitler "the chief economic sponsor of the state of Israel". A sweeping, worldwide economic boycott of Germany by Jews helped spur a deal between the Nazis and Zionists.[1] At that time, there were few Jews in Palestine, but from 1933 through 1936, 60,000 German Jews immigrated into the region, bringing with them $100,000,000 dollars ($1.6 billion in 2009 dollars).[2]" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Washington Post 03/11/13: "The Holocaust: FDRs indelible failure"
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:58:04 -0700 (PDT), dusty
wrote: On Mar 16, 11:30*pm, Bill wrote: On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:47:36 -0700 (PDT), dusty wrote: On the Boer War : this was the first modern, organised military, use of concentration camps. Where else? Poland in the Bar Confederation The Spanish on Cuba in the 'Ten Years War'. Sounds like you are part of the "Special Suffering" school...er, Bill.. The inevitable sly anti-Semitic jibe, as expected. Nothing "sly" Bill, very direct: I deny the lie of "Special Suffering". There were only several thousands of key figures of the Bar Confederation imprisoned or deported to Siberia whereas 100's of thousands of Boers were imprisoned and 30,000 died in the camps. For the Jews concentration was universal, clearly a barbaric practice* So how many people must it affect before it becomes barbaric? .. It was so often done with the collaboration and direct aid of the leaders of the Jewish communities. Because the alternative was death. It's strange how the undoubted Jewish suffering during WW2 has apparently had very little role at all in moderating Zionist behaviour in Palestine and its support by the "children of the holocaust" living in the USA, Britain etc. Why should it? British cities were bombed between 1939 and 1944 but nobody in the UK ever said that the RAF should get rid of bombs... Incidentally, I typed in "pre-Nazi concentration camp" on Google and had to go through 30 pages before seeing any entry other than the Jews in Nazi camps - and that was a refutation of Ron Paul's view that Gaza is a concentration camp! Now that's what I call control! You should learn to use the Internet. It took me all of two minutes to find a refutation of your nonsense. * with the exception of the large numbers and capital allowed to migrate to Palestine under the 'Transfer Agreement': "...the agreement between Adolf Hitler and an organization of Zionist Jews in 1933, which made Hitler "the chief economic sponsor of the state of Israel". Love the 'an organisation of Zionist Jews' bit. Which organisation? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Washington Post 03/11/13: "The Holocaust: FDRs indelible failure"
On Mar 17, 12:48*pm, Bill wrote:
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:58:04 -0700 (PDT), dusty wrote: On Mar 16, 11:30 pm, Bill wrote: On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:47:36 -0700 (PDT), dusty wrote: On the Boer War : this was the first modern, organised military, use of concentration camps. Where else? Poland in the Bar Confederation The Spanish on Cuba in the 'Ten Years War'. Sounds like you are part of the "Special Suffering" school...er, Bill.. The inevitable sly anti-Semitic jibe, as expected. Nothing "sly" Bill, very direct: I deny the lie of "Special Suffering". There were only several thousands of key figures of the Bar Confederation imprisoned or deported to Siberia whereas 100's of thousands of Boers were imprisoned and 30,000 died in the camps. For the Jews concentration was universal, clearly a barbaric practice* So how many people must it affect before it becomes barbaric? . It was so often done with the collaboration and direct aid of the leaders of the Jewish communities. Because the alternative was death. It's strange how the undoubted Jewish suffering during WW2 has apparently had very little role at all in moderating Zionist behaviour in Palestine and its support by the "children of the holocaust" living in the USA, Britain etc. Why should it? British cities were bombed between 1939 and 1944 but nobody in the UK ever said that the RAF should get rid of bombs... Incidentally, I typed in "pre-Nazi concentration camp" on Google and had to go through 30 pages before seeing any entry other than the Jews in Nazi camps - and that was a refutation of Ron Paul's view that Gaza is a concentration camp! Now that's what I call control! You should learn to use the Internet. It took me all of two minutes to find a refutation of your nonsense. * with the exception of the large numbers and capital allowed to migrate to Palestine under the 'Transfer Agreement': "...the agreement between Adolf Hitler and an organization of Zionist Jews in 1933, which made Hitler "the chief economic sponsor of the state of Israel". Love the 'an organisation of Zionist Jews' bit. Which organisation? Never mind the smart arse remarks. I won't take your word for the Googling as I have my own experience - the first 30 pages and much more is totally swamped by THE Holocaust. You deny the Transfer Agreement? Look it up Bill. The organisation directly involved in these agreements was the German Zionist Federation but the initial meetings on "the problem" after the Jewish boycotts of German goods involved Goering and the anti-Zionist German organisations and later German Zionist emigres in Jerusalem. The "alternative" MAY have been death for the leaders - so they handed over the lists - and calmed and policed the community so that they would accept their lot and made deals for their cobbers and themselves. Here's Hannah Arendt on the matter: Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil p. 117: "Without Jewish help in administrative and police work--the final roundup of Jews in Berlin was, as I have mentioned, done entirely by Jewish police--there would have been either complete chaos or an impossibly severe drain on German manpower. p. 125: "Wherever Jews lived, there were recognized Jewish leaders, and this leadership, almost without exception, cooperated in one way or another, for one reason or another, with the Nazis. The whole truth was that if the Jewish people had been unorganized and leaderless, there would have been chaos and plenty of misery but the total number of victims would hardly have been between four and a half and six million. According to Freudiger's calculations about half of them could have saved themselves if they had not followed the instructions of the Jewish councils." p. 42, 118, etc. Rudolf Kastner, a Jew made a deal with Eichmann in which 1,684 Jews were allowed to go to Palestine in exchange for Kastner's silence before and during which 476,000 Hungarian Jews were sent to the gas chambers of Auschwitz. pp. 217-218 pp. 275-276 "The measures against Eastern Jews were not only the result of anti- Semitism, they were part and parcel of an all-embracing demographic policy, in the course of which, had the Germans won the war, the Poles would have suffered the same fate as the Jews--genocide. This is no mere conjectu the Poles in Germany were already being forced to wear a distinguishing badge in which the "P" replaced the Jewish star, and this, which we have seen, was always the first measure to be taken by the police in instituting the process of destruction)." p. 95: "...Eichmann knew that right behind the front lines all Russian functionaries ("Communists"), all Polish members of the professional classes, and all native Jews were being killed in mass shootings." |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DC rally by conservatives: "tens of thousands?" "three hundredthousand?" "five hundred thousand?" "A million people came?" The only thingagreed upon was that it was a "vast crowd" and it spells big tr | O'Donovan, PJ, Himself | Europe | 16 | August 31st, 2010 04:16 AM |
Huffington Post whines: "Birthers" set to storm Washington DC | Tis PJ Odonovan | Europe | 0 | May 6th, 2010 07:38 PM |
"Systemic Failure" but B. Hussein Obama remains in Hawaii | PJ O'Donovan[_1_] | Europe | 49 | January 24th, 2010 04:59 AM |
"liberalism" to "socialism" to "communism": The "end" justifies the "means" in America | PJ O'Donovan[_1_] | Europe | 5 | February 24th, 2007 05:57 PM |