A Travel and vacations forum. TravelBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » TravelBanter forum » Travelling Style » Cruises
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Alaska cruise ship tax (long)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 13th, 2005, 06:20 AM
Thomas Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Alaska cruise ship tax (long)

For those of you who have seen the rumors about the Alaska legislature
considering taxing cruise ships, rest assured they are not. However, Alaska
voters will consider such a tax at the next statewide election, currently
scheduled for August, 2006. Here is the information I could find on this
issue from the Alaska Division of Elections

BEGIN QUOTE

03CTAX - An Act providing for taxation of certain commercial ship vessels,
pertaining to certain vessel activities and related to ship vessel
operations taking place in the marine waters of the State of Alaska.
Application was received in the Lieutenant Governor's Office on August 21,
2003. A copy of the application and signatures were sent to the Department
of Law and Division of Elections on August 22, 2003. The Division of
Elections determined that there were a sufficient number of sponsor
signatures on September 30, 2003. The application was certified on October
8, 2003. Petition booklets were issued on October 20, 2003. Petition
booklets were submitted to the Division of Elections on October 19, 2004.
Lieutenant Governor Leman certified the petition for this initiative as
properly filed on December 17, 2004. The proposition will be placed on the
August 2006 primary ballot unless a statewide special election is held more
than 120 days after the adjournment of the 2005 legislative session or
substantially similar legislation is passed.

END QUOTE

Source: http://www.gov.state.ak.us/ltgov/ele...ons/status.htm

The exact language proposed is as follows:

BEGIN QUOTE

INITIATIVE PETITION BILL LANGUAGE
by Petition Sponsors

Petition ID: 03CTAX

AN ACT PROVIDING FOR TAXATION OF CERTAIN COMMERCIAL SHIP VESSELS, PERTAINING
TO CERTAIN VESSEL ACTIVITIES AND RELATED TO SHIP VESSEL OPERATIONS TAKING
PLACE IN THE MARINE WATERS OF THE STATE OF ALASKA.

Posted 10/10/03

Proposed Bill:

AN ACT PROVIDING FOR TAXATION OF CERTAIN COMMERCIAL SHIP VESSELS, PERTAINING
TO CERTAIN VESSEL ACTIVITIES AND RELATED TO SHIP VESSEL OPERATIONS TAKING
PLACE IN THE MARINE WATERS OF THE STATE OF ALASKA

Be it enacted by the people of the State of Alaska:

Section 1. AS 43 is amended by adding a new chapter to read:

Chapter 52. Excise Tax on Travel Aboard Commercial Passenger Vessels.

Sec. 42.52.010. Levy of excise tax on overnight accommodations on commercial
passenger vessels. There is imposed an excise tax on travel on commercial
passenger vessels providing overnight accommodations in the state's marine
waters.

Sec. 43.52.020. Rate of tax. The tax imposed by AS 43.52.010 - 42.52.095 is
levied at a rate of $46 a passenger per voyage.

Sec. 43.52.030. Liability for payment of tax. A passenger traveling on a
commercial passenger vessel providing overnight accommodations in state
marine water is liable for the tax imposed by AS 43.52.010 - 43.52.095. The
tax shall be collected and is due and payable to the department


(1) by the person who provides travel aboard a commercial vessel for which
the tax is payable; and

(2) in the manner and at the times required by the department by regulation.
Sec. 43.52.040. Disposition of receipts. (a) The proceeds from the tax on
travel on commercial passenger vessels providing overnight accommodations in
the state's marine water shall be deposited in a special "Commercial Vessel
Passenger Tax Account" in the general fund. The legislature may appropriate
money from this account for the purposes described in (b) and (c) of this
section, for state-owned port and harbor facilities, other services to
properly provide for vessel or water craft visits, to enhance the safety and
efficiency of interstate and foreign commerce and such other lawful purposes
as determined by the legislature.

(b) For each sailing of a commercial passenger vessel providing overnight
accommodations, the commissioner shall identify the first five ports of call
in the state and the number of passengers on board the vessel at each port
of call. Subject to appropriation by the legislature, the commissioner shall
distribute to each port of call $5 per passenger of the tax revenue
collected from the tax levied under this chapter. If the port of call is a
city located within a borough not otherwise unified with the borough, the
commissioner shall, subject to appropriation by the legislature, distribute
$2.50 per passenger to the city and $2.50 to the borough. Each port of call
receiving funds under this section shall use the funds in a manner
calculated to improve port and harbor facilities and other services to
properly provide for vessel or water craft visits and to enhance the safety
and efficiency of interstate and foreign commerce.

(c) A "Regional Cruise Ship Impact Fund" consisting of 25% of the proceeds
from the tax on travel aboard commercial passenger vessels providing
overnight accommodations in the state's marine water shall be established as
sub-account of the funds established in (a), above, and deposited in the
general fund. Subject to appropriation by the legislature and regulations
adopted by the Department of Revenue, the commissioner shall distribute
funds to municipalities or other governmental entities within the Prince
William Sound Region, Southeast Alaska or any other distinctive region
impacted by cruise ship related tourism activities but not entitled to
receive funds based on port of call visitation as allowed by (b), above,
provided that any funds used from this account shall be used to provide
services and infrastructure directly related to passenger vessel or water
craft visits or to enhance the safety and efficiency of interstate and
foreign commerce related to vessel or water craft activities.

Sec. 43.52.050. Administration. (a) The department shall


(1) administer this chapter; and

(2) collect, supervise, and enforce the collection of taxes due under this
chapter and penalties as provided in AS 43.05.
(b) The department may adopt regulations necessary for the administration of
this chapter.

Sec. 43.52.060. Local levies. Any municipality, whether home rule or general
law, that receives passenger ship fee funds under this chapter may not
impose a similar form of tax on travel on commercial passenger vessels
engaged in activities involving overnight accommodations for passengers in
state marine waters. Any form of tax on travel on commercial passenger
vessels engaged in activities involving overnight accommodations for
passengers in state marine waters enacted by a municipality, whether home
rule or general law, prior to the effective date of this legislation shall
expire one year after enactment of this law if that municipality elects to
receive funds under this chapter.

Sec. 43.52.095. Definitions. In this chapter, (1) "commercial passenger
vessel" means a boat or vessel that is used in the common carriage of
passengers in commerce; "commercial passenger vessel" does not include

(a) vessels with fewer than 250 berths or other overnight accommodations for
passengers;

(b) noncommercial vessels, warships, and vessels operated by the state, the
United States, or a foreign government;


(2) "marine water of the state" and "state marine water" have the meaning
given to "waters" in AS 46.03.900, except that they include only marine
waters.

(3) "passenger" means a person whom a common carrier has contracted to carry
from one place to another.

(4) "voyage" means any trip or itinerary lasting more than 72 hours.
Section 2. AS 05, is amended by adding a new chapter to read:

Chapter 16. Games of Chance and Contests of Skill on Ships Operating on
Waters Within the Jurisdiction of Alaska.

Sec. AS 05.16.010. Gambling activities aboard commercial vessels purportedly
authorized by federal law. This chapter applies to the use of playing cards,
dice, roulette wheels, coin-operated instruments or machines, or other
objects or instruments used, designed, or intended for gaming or gambling
used in the waters under the jurisdiction of the State of Alaska on a voyage
described in 15 U.S.C. Section 1175(c)(2), and to any other gambling
activities taking place aboard large passenger vessels in the state.

Sec. 05.16.020. Tax on gambling activities authorized by AS 05.16.010. There
is imposed on the operator of a gaming or gambling activities aboard large
passenger vessels in the state a tax of 33% of the adjusted gross income
from those activities. "Adjusted gross income" means gross income less
prizes awarded and federal and municipal taxes paid or owed on the income.
The tax shall be collected and is due and payable to the department of
revenue in the manner and at the times required by the department of
revenue.

Sec. 05.16.030. Disposition of receipts. (a) The proceeds from the tax on
gambling operations aboard commercial passenger vessels in the state's
marine water shall be deposited in a special sub-account within the
"Commercial Vessel Passenger Tax Account" in the general fund.

Section 3. AS 43.20.021 is repealed and reenacted as follows:

Sec. 43.20.021(a). Internal Revenue Code adopted by reference. (a) Sections
26 U.S.C. - 1399 and 6001 - 7872 (Internal Revenue Code), as amended, are
adopted by reference as a part of this chapter. These portions of the
Internal Revenue Code have full force and effect under this chapter unless
excepted to or modified by other provisions of this chapter.

(b) Nothing in this chapter or in AS 43.19 (Multistate Tax Compact) may be
construed as an exception to or modification of 26 U.S.C. 883.

(c) The provision in (b), above, does not apply to commercial passenger
vessels as defined in AS 43.52.095.

Section 4. Sec. 4. AS 46.03.462 is repealed and re-enacted as follows:

Sec. 46.03.462. Terms and conditions of discharge permits. (a) An owner or
operator may not discharge any treated sewage, graywater, or other
wastewater from a large commercial passenger vessel into the marine waters
of the state unless the owner or operator obtains a permit under AS
46.03.100, which shall comply with the terms and conditions of vessel
discharge requirements specified in (b) of this section.

(b) The minimum standard terms and conditions for all discharge permits
authorized under this provision require that the owner or operator:
(1) may not discharge untreated sewage, treated sewage, graywater, or other
wastewaters in a manner that violates any applicable effluent limits or
standards under state or federal law, including Alaska Water Quality
Standards governing pollution at the point of discharge;
(2) shall maintain records and provide the reports required under AS
46.03.465(a);
(3) shall collect and test samples as required under AS 46.03.465(b) and (d)
and provide the reports with respect those samples required by AS
46.03.475(c);
(4) shall report discharges in accordance with AS 46.03.475(a);
(5) shall allow the department access to the vessel at the time samples are
taken under AS 46.03.465 for purposes of taking the samples or for purposes
of verifying the integrity of the sampling process; and
(6) shall submit records, notices, and reports to the department in
accordance with AS 46.03.475(b), (d), and (e).
Section 5. AS 46.03.463 is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 46.03.463(d) is repealed.

Sec. 46.03.463.(e) is repealed and reenacted to read: An owner or operator
may not discharge any treated sewage, graywater, or other wastewater from a
large commercial passenger vessel into the marine waters of the state unless
the owner or operator obtains a permit under AS 46.03.100 and AS 46.03.462,
and provided that the vessel is not in an area where the discharge of
treated sewage, graywater or other wastewaters is otherwise prohibited.

Sec. 46.03.463(g) is repealed.

Section 6. AS 46.03.465 repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
Sec. 46.03.465. Information-gathering requirements. (a) The owner or
operator of a commercial passenger vessel shall maintain daily records
related to the period of operation while in the State, detailing the dates,
times, and locations and the volumes and flow rates of any discharges of
sewage, graywater, or other waster into the marine waters of the State,
provide electronic copies of such records on a monthly basis to the
department no later than 5 days after each calendar month of operation in
State waters.

(b) while a commercial passenger vessel is present in the marine waters of
the State, the owner or operator of the vessel shall provide an hourly
report of the vessel's location based on Global Positioning System
technology and collect routine samples of the vessel's treated sewage,
graywater, and other wastewaters being discharged into marine waters of the
State with a sampling technique approved by the department.

(c) while a commercial passenger vessel is present in the marine waters of
the State, the Department, or an independent contractor retained by the
Department, may collect additional samples of the vessel's treated sewage,
graywater, and other wastewaters being discharged into the marine waters of
the State.

(d) the owner or operator of a vessel required to collect samples under (b)
of this section shall ensure that all sampling techniques and frequency of
sampling events are approved by the department in a manner sufficient to
ensure demonstration of compliance with all discharge requirements under AS
46.03.462.

(e) the owner or operator of a commercial passenger vessel shall pay for all
reporting, sampling and testing of samples under this section. (f) if the
owner or operator of a commercial passenger vessel has, when complying with
another state of federal law that requires substantially equivalent
information required under (a), (b), or (d) of this section, the owner or
operator shall be considered to be in compliance with that subsection so
long as the information is also provided to the department.

Section 7. AS 46.03 is amended to include new provisions as follows:

Sec. 46.03.476. Ocean Rangers. (a) An owner or operator of a large
commercial passenger vessel entering the marine waters of the state is
required to have a marine engineer licensed by the United States Coast Guard
hired or retained by the department on board the vessel to act as an
independent observer for the purpose of monitoring state and federal
requirements pertaining to marine discharge and pollution requirements and
to insure that passengers, crew and residents at ports are protected from
improper sanitation, health and safety practices.

(b) The licensed marine engineer shall monitor, observe and record data and
information related to the engineering, sanitation and health related
operations of the vessel, including but not limited to registration,
reporting, record keeping and discharge functions required by state and
federal law.

(c) Any information recorded or gathered by the licensed marine engineer
shall be promptly conveyed to the Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation and the United States Coast Guard on a form or in a manner
approved by the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation. The Commissioner
may share information gathered with other state and federal agencies.

Sec. 46.03.481. Citizens suits. (a) Any citizen of the State of Alaska may
commence a civil action (1) against an owner or operator of a large
passenger vessel alleged to have violated any provision of this chapter, or
(2) against the department where there is an alleged failure to perform any
act or duty under this chapter which is not discretionary. No civil action
may be commenced under this section, however, prior to 45 days after the
plaintiff has provided written notice of the intent to sue to the Attorney
General of Alaska.


(b) Subject to appropriation, as necessary, up to 50% and not less than 25%
of any fines, penalties or other funds recovered as a result of enforcement
of this chapter shall be paid to the person or entity, other than the
defendant, providing information sufficient to commence an investigation and
enforcement of this chapter under this provision.

Section 8. AS 46.03.480 is amended as follows:

Sec. 46.03.480 is amended by adding a new section to read:

(d) An additional fee in the amount of $4.00 per berth, is imposed on all
large commercial passenger vessels, other than vessels operated by the
state, for the purpose of operating the Ocean Ranger program established in
AS 46.03.476; said program shall be subject to legislative appropriation.

Sec. 46.03.480(d) shall be repealed and reenacted as 46.03.480(e).

Section 9. As 46.03.760 is amended as follows:

Sec. AS 46.03.760 is amended by adding a new section to read:


(f) An owner, agent, employee or operator of a commercial passenger vessels
as defined in AS 43.52.095 who falsifies a registration or report required
by AS 46.03.460 or 46.03.475 or who violates or causes or permits to be
violated a provision of AS 46.03.250 - 46.03.314, 46.03.460 - 46.03.490, AS
46.14, or a regulation, a lawful order of the department, or a permit,
approval, or acceptance, or term or condition of a permit, approval, or
acceptance issued under AS 46.03.250 - 46.03.314, 46.03.460 - 46.03.490, or
AS 46.14 is liable, in a civil action, to the state for a sum to be assessed
by the court of not less than $5000 nor more than $100,000 for the initial
violation, nor more than $10,000 for each day after that on which the
violation continues, and that shall reflect, when applicable,


(1) reasonable compensation in the nature of liquidated damages for any
adverse environmental effects caused by the violation, that shall be
determined by the court according to the toxicity, degradability and
dispersal characteristics of the substance discharged, the sensitivity of
the receiving environment, and the degree to which the discharge degrades
existing environmental quality; for a violation relating to AS 46.14, the
court, in making its determination under this paragraph, shall also consider
the degree to which the discharge causes harm to persons or property; this
paragraph may not be construed to limit the right of parties other than the
state to recover for personal injuries or damage to their property;

(2) reasonable costs incurred by the state in detection, investigation, and
attempted correction of the violation;

(3) the economic savings realized by the person in not complying with the
requirement for which a violation is charged; and

(4) the need for an enhanced civil penalty to deter future noncompliance.
Sec. 46.03.760(f) shall be repealed and reenacted as 46.03.760(g)

Section 10. AS 45.50.474 is repealed and reenacted to read as follows:

Sec. 45.50.474. Required disclosures in promotions and shore side sales on
board cruise ships. (a) A person may not conduct a promotion on board a
cruise ship that mentions or features a business in a state port that has
paid something of value for the purpose of having the business mentioned,
featured or otherwise promoted, unless the person conducting the promotion
clearly and fully discloses orally and in all written materials used in the
promotion that the featured businesses have paid to be included in the
promotion. All such written notice of disclosure shall be in a type not less
than 14-point typeface and in a contrasting color calculated to draw
attention to the disclosure.

(b) A person or other entity aboard a cruise ship conducting or making a
sale of tours, flightseeing operations or other shore-side activities to be
delivered by a vendor or other entity at a future port of call shall
disclose, both orally and in writing, the amount of commission or percentage
of the total sale retained or returned to the person making the sale. The
person or entity aboard a cruise ship making or attempting to make a sale of
services or goods provided by a shore-side vendor shall disclose the address
and telephone number of the shore side vendor if asked by a customer. All
such written notice of disclosure shall be in a type not less than 14-point
typeface and in a contrasting color calculated to draw attention to the
disclosure.

(c) Each violation of this section constitutes an unfair trade practice
under AS 45.50.471, and shall result in a penalty of not more than $100 for
each violation. In this section, "cruise ship" means a ship that operates at
least 48 hours in length for ticketed passengers, provides overnight
accommodations and meals for at least 250 passengers, is operated by an
authorized cruise ship operator, and is certified under the International
Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea or otherwise certified by the
United States Coast Guard.

Section 11. Severability. It is the intention of the people of Alaska that
any portion of this legislation that is declared unlawful shall be stricken
in a manner that preserves the remaining portion of the remaining
legislation to the maximum extent possible.

Section 12. Effective Date. This Act takes effect 90 days after enactment.

End

END QUOTE

Source: http://www.gov.state.ak.us/ltgov/ele...ons/03ctax.htm

--
I'm Tom Smith, and I approved this message.


  #2  
Old January 13th, 2005, 09:50 PM
Dillon Pyron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thus spake "Thomas Smith" -NO-SPAM :

For those of you who have seen the rumors about the Alaska legislature
considering taxing cruise ships, rest assured they are not. However, Alaska
voters will consider such a tax at the next statewide election, currently
scheduled for August, 2006. Here is the information I could find on this
issue from the Alaska Division of Elections


IIRC, Federal law extends state's rights to either the 3 or 12 mile
limit. I don't think the tax on gambling will hold up. As far as the
port tax goes, I don't see any flaws in it. I don't see where it
really isn't anything more than money in the treasury. Of course it
will pass. "Gouge the tourist" taxes always pass. Look at hotel
taxes. Houston's is around 25% now, with the latest additions.
--
dillon

"When the French are against it, you know we can't
be far wrong." - Adm. Bobbie Ray Inman
  #3  
Old January 13th, 2005, 09:50 PM
Dillon Pyron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thus spake "Thomas Smith" -NO-SPAM :

For those of you who have seen the rumors about the Alaska legislature
considering taxing cruise ships, rest assured they are not. However, Alaska
voters will consider such a tax at the next statewide election, currently
scheduled for August, 2006. Here is the information I could find on this
issue from the Alaska Division of Elections


IIRC, Federal law extends state's rights to either the 3 or 12 mile
limit. I don't think the tax on gambling will hold up. As far as the
port tax goes, I don't see any flaws in it. I don't see where it
really isn't anything more than money in the treasury. Of course it
will pass. "Gouge the tourist" taxes always pass. Look at hotel
taxes. Houston's is around 25% now, with the latest additions.
--
dillon

"When the French are against it, you know we can't
be far wrong." - Adm. Bobbie Ray Inman
  #4  
Old January 13th, 2005, 10:01 PM
Ray Goldenberg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:50:33 GMT, Dillon Pyron
wrote:

As far as the
port tax goes, I don't see any flaws in it.


Hi Dillon,

It could be challenged on the grounds that it discriminates against
tourists who arrive by cruise ship as compared to not being a charge
for tourists that arrive by plane. I think this is how the opposition
will battle it in court if it ever passes.

Best regards,
Ray
LIGHTHOUSE TRAVEL
800-719-9917 or 805-566-3905
http://www.lighthousetravel.com
  #5  
Old January 13th, 2005, 10:01 PM
Ray Goldenberg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:50:33 GMT, Dillon Pyron
wrote:

As far as the
port tax goes, I don't see any flaws in it.


Hi Dillon,

It could be challenged on the grounds that it discriminates against
tourists who arrive by cruise ship as compared to not being a charge
for tourists that arrive by plane. I think this is how the opposition
will battle it in court if it ever passes.

Best regards,
Ray
LIGHTHOUSE TRAVEL
800-719-9917 or 805-566-3905
http://www.lighthousetravel.com
  #6  
Old January 14th, 2005, 12:39 AM
RTCReferee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ray G wrote:

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:50:33 GMT, Dillon Pyron
wrote:

As far as the
port tax goes, I don't see any flaws in it.


It could be challenged on the grounds that it discriminates against
tourists who arrive by cruise ship as compared to not being a charge
for tourists that arrive by plane. I think this is how the opposition
will battle it in court if it ever passes.


Tourists who arrive by plane spend money every night to stay in Alaska's hotels
or B&B's or whatever other lodging is available.

They also buy all their meals in Alaska.

If a port tax per person tax does not pass, then Alaska could pass a "per ship"
(based on GRT, not number of passengers) tax, and that certainly would not
discriminate on a tourist.

By the way, some of us "tourists" don't mind paying our fair share to protect
the environment we so enjoy. I would not feel discriminated against if Alaska
wants to tax cruise ships or cruise passengers.

I will still go to Alaska.
  #7  
Old January 14th, 2005, 12:39 AM
RTCReferee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ray G wrote:

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:50:33 GMT, Dillon Pyron
wrote:

As far as the
port tax goes, I don't see any flaws in it.


It could be challenged on the grounds that it discriminates against
tourists who arrive by cruise ship as compared to not being a charge
for tourists that arrive by plane. I think this is how the opposition
will battle it in court if it ever passes.


Tourists who arrive by plane spend money every night to stay in Alaska's hotels
or B&B's or whatever other lodging is available.

They also buy all their meals in Alaska.

If a port tax per person tax does not pass, then Alaska could pass a "per ship"
(based on GRT, not number of passengers) tax, and that certainly would not
discriminate on a tourist.

By the way, some of us "tourists" don't mind paying our fair share to protect
the environment we so enjoy. I would not feel discriminated against if Alaska
wants to tax cruise ships or cruise passengers.

I will still go to Alaska.
  #8  
Old January 14th, 2005, 03:11 AM
PARNAMI
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I will still go to Alaska.

I probably won't! In the 70's, I vowed never to patronize any town that
implemented a chargeto use the beach. To this day, I've remained true to my
word...and I'm just an hour's drive away.

Cruising is like being awake, and dreaming!

Visit my cruise page:
http://parnami.tripod.com/


  #9  
Old January 14th, 2005, 03:11 AM
PARNAMI
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I will still go to Alaska.

I probably won't! In the 70's, I vowed never to patronize any town that
implemented a chargeto use the beach. To this day, I've remained true to my
word...and I'm just an hour's drive away.

Cruising is like being awake, and dreaming!

Visit my cruise page:
http://parnami.tripod.com/


  #10  
Old January 14th, 2005, 06:56 AM
Chrissy Cruiser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 14 Jan 2005 02:11:14 GMT, PARNAMI wrote:

In the 70's, I vowed never to patronize any town that
implemented a chargeto use the beach. To this day, I've remained true to my
word...and I'm just an hour's drive away.


Why? You get to kick more kids that way.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carnival Quarter & Full Year Earnings! Ray Goldenberg Cruises 0 December 16th, 2004 03:29 PM
Carnival Triumph Review 3/13/2004 Sailing Gordon Cruises 32 March 29th, 2004 11:31 PM
Oosterdam review (Long) A. Brown Cruises 7 February 20th, 2004 01:39 AM
Cruise Review, or "Best of the Best": Radisson Seven Seas' Navigator E.k.R. Cruises 12 February 6th, 2004 03:50 AM
Carnival Corporation 4th Quarter Financials! Ray Goldenberg Cruises 0 December 18th, 2003 03:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 TravelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.