A Travel and vacations forum. TravelBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » TravelBanter forum » Travelling Style » Cruises
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Renovated Brooklyn Shed no good for QM2!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 17th, 2004, 10:34 PM
E.k.R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Renovated Brooklyn Shed no good for QM2!

I found this tidbit from the most recent Travel Weekly rather interesting.
I posted it below. After reading it I'm not quite certain just where QM2's
East Coast home port will end up being... at least temporarily until NY gets
it's act together.

The options seem rather limited. Even if the West Side piers are renovated,
I haven't heard anything about them being lengthened which would be required
to accommodate QM2's length. As of now, I believe the US Coast Guard has
only given Cunard an 18 month exemption which allows QM2 to extend into the
Hudson some 100 feet. I'm not even sure if the West Side piers can be
lengthened or if they are at their maximum length?

Of course Carnival saw this coming and started plans for a very nice pier
complex in Brooklyn that could accommodate QM2. It appears that has now
been put on indefinite hold while NY figures out what to do. NY proposes a
temporary pier in Brooklyn while the West Side piers are renovated. It
seems this is not acceptable to Carnival as I'm sure they want a more
permanent solution and one that will not take 10 years as proposed by NY.
It's also obvious they don't want QM2 passengers embarking and disembarking
from a temporary shed in Brooklyn. I can't say I blame them.

Where QM2 will end up a year from now is anyone's guess, but I'm betting
Boston which is dying to welcome QM2 to their facilities which are more than
large enough to accommodate QM2 and then some.

Unless NY comes up with something quick, they chance losing the newest,
largest, and most famous liner to another city. No doubt any relocation of
QM2 would be temporary until a permanent solution is found in NY, but I
don't for one minute put it past Carnival to take QM2 out of NY all together
until they are satisfied. One only needs look at the CARNIVAL CONQUEST in
New Orleans and her move to Gulfport as an example. Carnival played
hardball and succeeded, meanwhile Gulfport did such a great job they got
their own, smaller Carnival ship home-ported there.

I find this political saga quite interesting as it continues to unfold!

Ernie


From Travel Weekly February 16th issue:
============================
Regardless of what happens in terms of renovating or rebuilding New York's
aging cruise-ship piers, Giora Israel, Carnival Corp.'s vice president of
strategic planning, has repeatedly said that he's willing to work with the
city.
Except on one point. A "temporary facility" in Brooklyn is "unacceptable"
for the glamorous QUEEN MARY 2, he told TC (Travel Confidential). "If they
want to do it, it's fine, but look," Israel said. "To operate from a ...
shed, even it it's a little bit renovated, will not work for the QUEEN
MARY."


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JFK Airtrain: Good News, Bad News, Good News and Bad News Arnold Reinhold Air travel 103 June 30th, 2006 05:59 PM
Report on Mali and Burkina Faso (a bit long !) MassimoM Africa 6 June 11th, 2004 05:13 AM
Vietnam - The Internet Travel Guide (FAQ) (part 2/5) http://www.pmgeiser.ch, Peter M. Geiser Asia 0 December 27th, 2003 09:15 AM
Laos - The Internet Travel Guide (FAQ) (part 1/2) http://www.pmgeiser.ch, Peter M. Geiser Asia 0 December 27th, 2003 09:13 AM
Good time of year for Yosemite / good park for late July or early August? Charles Kozierok USA & Canada 13 October 4th, 2003 07:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 TravelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.