![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I had to handle passport registration for my wife's British Airway flight to the USA and back. She has a US passport (and French) so usually has no visa hassles. I registered the required information twice into a BOA web site (an e-mail requested information) and each time I logged back on they still did not have it. The US has a visa waiver policy with most European countries, as those countries have with the US. It is reciprocal. But recently the US changed the rules requiring pre-flight information and a special form be filed via the internet. The European countries don't hae such a requirement, so the situation is no loner authentically reciprocal. American egocentric exceptionalism is always doing this kind of thing. European Officials Broadly Criticize U.S. Airport Security Methods By JULIA WERDIGIER Published: October 27, 2010 LONDON ‹ Several European officials questioned American requirements for airport security on Wednesday, a day after the chairman of British Airways criticized Britain for bowing too quickly to Washington¹s demands. Add to Portfolio The chairman, Martin Broughton, said at a conference on Tuesday that Britain should not ³kowtow to the Americans every time they wanted something done² with aviation security procedures. Especially irritating, Mr. Broughton said, according to The Financial Times, was the requirement that passengers take off their shoes and remove their laptops from their luggage during security checks. The practice should be abandoned, he said. A representative for British Airways confirmed that he made the remarks. The complaints added to the discontent and frustration among passengers, airlines and airport operators in Europe over the ever-changing safety requirements and the long waiting times at security screening points in airports. Executives from other carriers and airports echoed the criticisms from British Airways. Some airlines have repeatedly called for more sophisticated scanning machines to replace procedural safety measures like requiring passengers to pack liquids separately. Virgin Atlantic said on Wednesday that it had pleaded ³for many years² for new security procedures that would be ³effective but quicker and less intrusive on our passengers.² Lufthansa of Germany was more circumspect, The Associated Press reported. A Lufthansa spokesman, Jan Baerwald, told The A.P. that airlines have ³had more and more regulations since 9/11.² But, he added, ³I¹m not going to say it is Lufthansa¹s opinion that it is too strict ‹ that is not for us to say.² BAA, the company that operates Heathrow airport, argued that there was room to consider an overhaul of the current safety regulation and said that it was ³committed to ensuring passengers are safe and that we also constantly improve the levels of service we offer.² Mr. Broughton specifically criticized the United States for burdening European airports and airlines with what he called ³redundant² checks, added a new twist to the debate. He also criticized Washington for not imposing certain safety restrictions on domestic flights that it requires from flights to and from the United States. Even within Britain, however, there have been discussions about updated airport security. A plan by the British government this year to introduce body scanners at airports was met with strong opposition in Parliament. The new coalition government is now reviewing the need for scanners and whether they violate the privacy of passengers. (The United States has started to introduce body scanners in some airports.) Mike Carrivick, chief executive of the Board of Airline Representatives, which represents more than 80 airlines, including British Airways, Delta and Continental, joined Mr. Broughton¹s call for a safety overhaul and said ³let¹s step back and have a look at the whole situation.² ³Every time there is a new security scare, an extra layer is added on to procedures,² Mr. Carrivick said. ³Let¹s look at technology and see what we can do so that passengers don¹t have to take off their shoes.² The Transportation Security Administration said Wednesday in Washington that officials ³constantly review and evolve our security measures based on the latest intelligence.² It also said it ³works closely with our international partners to ensure the best possible security.² The British government on Wednesday distanced itself from the debate and said that the additional security rules requested by Washington were a matter for the airlines flying passengers to the United States. But a representative for the Department for Transport in Britain added that the coalition government was reviewing its airport security regulation and considering giving airport operators more flexibility in how they meet certain security goals. British airport security regulation, like that of other European countries, is based on standards set by the European Union. ³Our security measures go further than the minimum set by the E.U., and we have one of the safest systems in the world,² the British airport representative said. The European Commission also criticized air security measures for entry to the United States , saying that a so-called Electronic System for Travel Authorization was impeding travel, difficult to comply with and raised a possible threat to privacy. The system requires European passengers to register before traveling to the United States, which ³represents a burden for European citizens,² Michele Cercone, a spokesman for the commission, told a news conference in Brussels. The procedure is also ³inconsistent with the commitment by the U.S. to facilitate trans-Atlantic mobility.² Mr. Cercone said commission authorities were examining whether the system was ³tantamount² to introducing visas on all European Union nationals. Citizens from Poland, Bulgaria and Romania must get a visa to travel to the United States. And while citizens from all other European Union countries are covered by a visa waiver program, they must still register. An estimated 13 million Europeans traveled to the United States in 2009. He said that the system had become vulnerable to ³scam² Web sites and ³fraudulent operations.² That, he said, should prompt the United States to ³give a second thought² to the system. In addition, it was unclear to the European authorities whether privacy was adequately protected, even when Europeans were able to pay for the registration by credit card. Mr. Cercone said the commission wanted to know whether credit card details were retained or used for purposes other than those for which they were collected, and he suggested that there needed to be safeguards. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28/10/2010 08:04, Earl Evleth wrote:
Mr. Broughton specifically criticized the United States for burdening European airports and airlines with what he called ³redundant² checks, added a new twist to the debate. He also criticized Washington for not imposing certain safety restrictions on domestic flights that it requires from flights to and from the United States. Presumably that's because US authorities are under the impression that all terrorists come from this side of the Atlantic. They are wrong of course. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Old polluter
"Earl Evleth" a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion : ... I had to handle passport registration for my wife's British Airway flight to the USA and back. She has a US passport (and French) so usually has no visa hassles. I registered the required information twice into a BOA web site (an e-mail requested information) and each time I logged back on they still did not have it. The US has a visa waiver policy with most European countries, as those countries have with the US. It is reciprocal. But recently the US changed the rules requiring pre-flight information and a special form be filed via the internet. The European countries don't hae such a requirement, so the situation is no loner authentically reciprocal. American egocentric exceptionalism is always doing this kind of thing. European Officials Broadly Criticize U.S. Airport Security Methods By JULIA WERDIGIER Published: October 27, 2010 LONDON Several European officials questioned American requirements for airport security on Wednesday, a day after the chairman of British Airways criticized Britain for bowing too quickly to Washington¹s demands. Add to Portfolio The chairman, Martin Broughton, said at a conference on Tuesday that Britain should not ³kowtow to the Americans every time they wanted something done² with aviation security procedures. Especially irritating, Mr. Broughton said, according to The Financial Times, was the requirement that passengers take off their shoes and remove their laptops from their luggage during security checks. The practice should be abandoned, he said. A representative for British Airways confirmed that he made the remarks. The complaints added to the discontent and frustration among passengers, airlines and airport operators in Europe over the ever-changing safety requirements and the long waiting times at security screening points in airports. Executives from other carriers and airports echoed the criticisms from British Airways. Some airlines have repeatedly called for more sophisticated scanning machines to replace procedural safety measures like requiring passengers to pack liquids separately. Virgin Atlantic said on Wednesday that it had pleaded ³for many years² for new security procedures that would be ³effective but quicker and less intrusive on our passengers.² Lufthansa of Germany was more circumspect, The Associated Press reported. A Lufthansa spokesman, Jan Baerwald, told The A.P. that airlines have ³had more and more regulations since 9/11.² But, he added, ³I¹m not going to say it is Lufthansa¹s opinion that it is too strict that is not for us to say.² BAA, the company that operates Heathrow airport, argued that there was room to consider an overhaul of the current safety regulation and said that it was ³committed to ensuring passengers are safe and that we also constantly improve the levels of service we offer.² Mr. Broughton specifically criticized the United States for burdening European airports and airlines with what he called ³redundant² checks, added a new twist to the debate. He also criticized Washington for not imposing certain safety restrictions on domestic flights that it requires from flights to and from the United States. Even within Britain, however, there have been discussions about updated airport security. A plan by the British government this year to introduce body scanners at airports was met with strong opposition in Parliament. The new coalition government is now reviewing the need for scanners and whether they violate the privacy of passengers. (The United States has started to introduce body scanners in some airports.) Mike Carrivick, chief executive of the Board of Airline Representatives, which represents more than 80 airlines, including British Airways, Delta and Continental, joined Mr. Broughton¹s call for a safety overhaul and said ³let¹s step back and have a look at the whole situation.² ³Every time there is a new security scare, an extra layer is added on to procedures,² Mr. Carrivick said. ³Let¹s look at technology and see what we can do so that passengers don¹t have to take off their shoes.² The Transportation Security Administration said Wednesday in Washington that officials ³constantly review and evolve our security measures based on the latest intelligence.² It also said it ³works closely with our international partners to ensure the best possible security.² The British government on Wednesday distanced itself from the debate and said that the additional security rules requested by Washington were a matter for the airlines flying passengers to the United States. But a representative for the Department for Transport in Britain added that the coalition government was reviewing its airport security regulation and considering giving airport operators more flexibility in how they meet certain security goals. British airport security regulation, like that of other European countries, is based on standards set by the European Union. ³Our security measures go further than the minimum set by the E.U., and we have one of the safest systems in the world,² the British airport representative said. The European Commission also criticized air security measures for entry to the United States , saying that a so-called Electronic System for Travel Authorization was impeding travel, difficult to comply with and raised a possible threat to privacy. The system requires European passengers to register before traveling to the United States, which ³represents a burden for European citizens,² Michele Cercone, a spokesman for the commission, told a news conference in Brussels. The procedure is also ³inconsistent with the commitment by the U.S. to facilitate trans-Atlantic mobility.² Mr. Cercone said commission authorities were examining whether the system was ³tantamount² to introducing visas on all European Union nationals. Citizens from Poland, Bulgaria and Romania must get a visa to travel to the United States. And while citizens from all other European Union countries are covered by a visa waiver program, they must still register. An estimated 13 million Europeans traveled to the United States in 2009. He said that the system had become vulnerable to ³scam² Web sites and ³fraudulent operations.² That, he said, should prompt the United States to ³give a second thought² to the system. In addition, it was unclear to the European authorities whether privacy was adequately protected, even when Europeans were able to pay for the registration by credit card. Mr. Cercone said the commission wanted to know whether credit card details were retained or used for purposes other than those for which they were collected, and he suggested that there needed to be safeguards. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Earl Evleth" wrote in message ... I had to handle passport registration for my wife's British Airway flight to the USA and back. She has a US passport (and French) so usually has no visa hassles. I registered the required information twice into a BOA web site (an e-mail requested information) and each time I logged back on they still did not have it. The US has a visa waiver policy with most European countries, as those countries have with the US. It is reciprocal. But recently the US changed the rules requiring pre-flight information and a special form be filed via the internet. The European countries don't hae such a requirement, so the situation is no loner authentically reciprocal. American egocentric exceptionalism is always doing this kind of thing. Why Earl...you sound just like Obama! No wonder some Europeans are so enamored of him! They love to bash the US, too! But as you will see next Tuesday, how long that love affair with Obama has lasted. People who were so gullible during the last election finally are seeing the "real Obama!" Yesterday, when I voted at an early voting site, the parking lot was full with cars lined up along the highway, waiting to get a parking place in order to vote. And this was EARLY voting...Wait until election day on Nov. 2nd! Lines inside the building were very long...I counted four wheel-chaired people in line ahead of us. People are really turning out for this election! A president who deliberately goes against the will of 70% of the people in the country by passing unwanted legislation is not popular, believe me! His rating has gone below President Bush's now and he has only been president for not quite two years compared to Bush's eight years! Funny how people not even living here think they know what is really happening in the USA. As for security...what happened yesterday with those flights containing "packages" from Yemen might just put a different slant on all this criticism...I know...they were commercial transports, although one did deal with a passenger flight from the Emirates. Kudos and a big thank you to those in Saudi Arabia for the alerts and the ones at the airport in England! I will gladly take off my shoes for my (and other's) safety! Things change, Earl, and it is not up the airlines whose primary interest is profit, but for the Airport Security Officials to determine. They see what is happening behind the scene...we aren't privy to it all or we probably would hesitate about flying...period...The first time a plane goes down, it is people like you will yell the loudest! By the way, pre-flight information online is required by each airline that I use...no problem for me and I fly often....in country and international. --Jean |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Jean O'Boyle" wrote: I will gladly take off my shoes for my (and other's) safety! That's fine for young people, but until they give me a place to sit down to take them off and another to put them back on, I'll continue to call it age discrimination. -- Erilar, biblioholic medievalist http://www.mosaictelecom.com/~erilarlo |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
erilar wrote on Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:01:52 -0500:
I will gladly take off my shoes for my (and other's) safety! That's fine for young people, but until they give me a place to sit down to take them off and another to put them back on, I'll continue to call it age discrimination. I'll quite happily submit to back-scatter scanning and take my shoes off if required; to hell with civil liberties protests. If I were sure of their guilt, I'd favor disappearing over the sea, Argentinean style, for Quaedists. -- James Silverton Potomac, Maryland Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
31.10.2010 0:01, erilar kirjoitti:
In , "Jean wrote: I will gladly take off my shoes for my (and other's) safety! That's fine for young people, but until they give me a place to sit down to take them off and another to put them back on, I'll continue to call it age discrimination. Transit scheme is dead at the US airports now. Transit passengers must cross the border to the USA even if their next destination is abroad. In the past you arrived in an airport and walked to a proper gate and flew away. Nowadays it is different and transit passengers arriving in USA from abroad and departing from the same airport to a destination abroad take following steps: 1. you must fill in so called "ESTA" application online (or have a visa) which is good for two years. 2. At the airport you have a prefilled document for the immigration (you go through the border to the US soil). Depending how busy the airport is there may be a lengthy wait on queue until it will be your turn to deliver finger prints. 3. The next process has been introduced last year and I don't have a faintest idea what it has to do with "security": Even if luggage is checked to the destination outside the USA it will be collected by the owner at the US airport. 4. You walk to the customs (because you cross the border) a prefilled document in hand. Some queueing may take place. Your belongings are or are not checked. You walk through out from the customs area and there you are - in the USA! 5. Because you don't mind to drag your heavy luggage, you leave it to the luggage drop area. Now you are ready to go back there where you just came from. 6. Because you are in an area of free access to anyone and you are going to an area designated only to passengers with a valid ticket you must queue once again as is usual in these days at airports: you leave the USA so there will be a security check. While queueing there is probably a sign somewhere telling our exhausted passenger to KEEP THINGS SIMPLE and have the travelling documents in hand and wear off the shoes (the floor is naturally quite filthy). Has Osama bin Laden won the war against the American legislator and the airport authority? He definitely has done so! If one can decently fly in a route which does not include US American ports then it should be used. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/30/2010 5:01 PM, erilar wrote:
In , "Jean wrote: I will gladly take off my shoes for my (and other's) safety! That's fine for young people, but until they give me a place to sit down to take them off and another to put them back on, I'll continue to call it age discrimination. I used to travel in my hiking boots, to avoid having to pack them - now I wear a pair of slip-on clogs. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "erilar" wrote in message ... In article , "Jean O'Boyle" wrote: I will gladly take off my shoes for my (and other's) safety! That's fine for young people, but until they give me a place to sit down to take them off and another to put them back on, I'll continue to call it age discrimination. LOL, Erilar...I'm not a young person either...I wear slip on shoes or sandals. There are usually chairs in the back of the security scan area. --Jean |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Jean O'Boyle" wrote: "erilar" wrote in message ... In article , "Jean O'Boyle" wrote: I will gladly take off my shoes for my (and other's) safety! That's fine for young people, but until they give me a place to sit down to take them off and another to put them back on, I'll continue to call it age discrimination. LOL, Erilar...I'm not a young person either...I wear slip on shoes or sandals. There are usually chairs in the back of the security scan area. I don't check luggage. The hiking boots I wear all trip are my sole footwear. I'm not going to pay extra to check a suitcase just to make things simpler for TSA. They could provide a chair to take them OFF. Heathrow, for all its faults, does. -- Erilar, biblioholic medievalist http://www.mosaictelecom.com/~erilarlo |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nightmare at Reagan National Airport: A Security Story to End all Security Stories | [email protected] | Air travel | 77 | June 20th, 2007 09:52 PM |
airport perimeter security vs pasenger security | jamoran | Air travel | 1 | August 22nd, 2005 05:25 PM |
An Asia-Pacific broacasting solution to a European security problem | Max Power | Europe | 2 | July 8th, 2005 12:40 AM |
CT to assess airport security after joyride (plane stolen from DanburyMunicipal Airport) | Fly Guy | Air travel | 0 | June 28th, 2005 03:51 AM |
Passengers Criticize NCL's New Hawaii Tour!!! | [email protected] | Cruises | 10 | September 13th, 2004 10:26 PM |