If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
777 are a fizard hazard
http://news.airwise.com/stories/2004/08/1093895994.html
Halogen lights in the cargo hold are too hot and caused a fire last year during a flight (ignited a bag). Fire supression worked that time. FAA is issuing a request to change all cargo halogen lights to normal incadescent ones, and until this is done, operators of the 777 are urged not to place cargo too close to those ceiling lights. (how come they didn't use fluorescent fixtures ?, one doesn't need trendy halogens for a cargo hold). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
LED lights would make alot of sense in this case...small, light and very
little heat "Bob Chipeska" wrote in message ... "nobody" wrote in message ... http://news.airwise.com/stories/2004/08/1093895994.html Halogen lights in the cargo hold are too hot and caused a fire last year during a flight (ignited a bag). Fire supression worked that time. FAA is issuing a request to change all cargo halogen lights to normal incadescent ones, and until this is done, operators of the 777 are urged not to place cargo too close to those ceiling lights. (how come they didn't use fluorescent fixtures ?, one doesn't need trendy halogens for a cargo hold). 777s need new fizard extinguishers, JF! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"steve" wrote in message ... LED lights would make alot of sense in this case...small, light and very little heat And they wouldn't start any fizards either. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fire Hazard on QM2 !!! | steinbrenner | Cruises | 5 | July 7th, 2004 09:04 PM |