Lego in, Ikea out when naming Swedish boys

Tim C. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:41:36 -0400, terrable wrote:

You must live in a very strange place as throwing yourself from a high
building is very illegal around here.

where's "here"?

SFAIK, it's "illegal" most places (as is suicide), but if the attempt is
successful, the "legality" is moot, n'est-ce pas?

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote:

Tim C. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:41:36 -0400, terrable wrote:

You must live in a very strange place as throwing yourself from a high
building is very illegal around here.

where's "here"?

SFAIK, it's "illegal" most places (as is suicide), but if the attempt is
successful, the "legality" is moot, n'est-ce pas?

It's not moot if you're the victim of someone's suicide, which can
happen.

A sick individual commited suicide by parking his car on a train track a
few years ago in the UK (Ufton Nervet) which killed 6 people in addition
to himself. And a parent trying to commit suicide taking their children
with them isn't completely unheard of either.

I find it ironic that in the UK railways' obsession with safety, in this
century, most rail travellers have been killed by car drivers, putting
their car on the tracks through intention, or by falling asleep at the
wheel.

--
(*) of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate -www.davidhorne.net
(email address on website) "If people think God is interesting, the
onus is on them to show that there is anything there to talk about.
Otherwise they should just shut up about it." -Richard Dawkins

In article , David Horne,
_the_ chancellor (*) wrote:

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote:

Tim C. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:41:36 -0400, terrable wrote:

You must live in a very strange place as throwing yourself from a high
building is very illegal around here.

where's "here"?

SFAIK, it's "illegal" most places (as is suicide), but if the attempt is
successful, the "legality" is moot, n'est-ce pas?

It's not moot if you're the victim of someone's suicide, which can
happen.

And that victim, rightly, will sue your estate.

jay
Tue Jun 10, 2008




A sick individual commited suicide by parking his car on a train track a
few years ago in the UK (Ufton Nervet) which killed 6 people in addition
to himself. And a parent trying to commit suicide taking their children
with them isn't completely unheard of either.

I find it ironic that in the UK railways' obsession with safety, in this
century, most rail travellers have been killed by car drivers, putting
their car on the tracks through intention, or by falling asleep at the
wheel.

Go Fig wrote:

In article , David Horne,
_the_ chancellor (*) wrote:

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote:

Tim C. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:41:36 -0400, terrable wrote:

You must live in a very strange place as throwing yourself from a high
building is very illegal around here.

where's "here"?

SFAIK, it's "illegal" most places (as is suicide), but if the attempt is
successful, the "legality" is moot, n'est-ce pas?

It's not moot if you're the victim of someone's suicide, which can
happen.

And that victim, rightly, will sue your estate.

Only a twisted mind like yours would think that an appropriate statement
in the context.

--
(*) of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate -www.davidhorne.net
(email address on website) "If people think God is interesting, the
onus is on them to show that there is anything there to talk about.
Otherwise they should just shut up about it." -Richard Dawkins

David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*) wrote:
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote:

Tim C. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:41:36 -0400, terrable wrote:

You must live in a very strange place as throwing yourself from a high
building is very illegal around here.
where's "here"?
SFAIK, it's "illegal" most places (as is suicide), but if the attempt is
successful, the "legality" is moot, n'est-ce pas?

It's not moot if you're the victim of someone's suicide, which can
happen.

A sick individual commited suicide by parking his car on a train track a
few years ago in the UK (Ufton Nervet) which killed 6 people in addition
to himself. And a parent trying to commit suicide taking their children
with them isn't completely unheard of either.

But that's not leaping off of a tall building! (Although an episode of
one of the various incarnations of TV's "CSI" TV here had someone
committing "murder by suicide" - the perpetrator landed on an innocent
bystander who was exiting the building, killing the bystander, but
walking away from the scene, himself.)

In article , David Horne,
_the_ chancellor (*) wrote:

Go Fig wrote:

In article , David Horne,
_the_ chancellor (*) wrote:

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote:

Tim C. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:41:36 -0400, terrable wrote:

You must live in a very strange place as throwing yourself from a
high
building is very illegal around here.

where's "here"?

SFAIK, it's "illegal" most places (as is suicide), but if the attempt is
successful, the "legality" is moot, n'est-ce pas?

It's not moot if you're the victim of someone's suicide, which can
happen.

And that victim, rightly, will sue your estate.

Only a twisted mind like yours would think that an appropriate statement
in the context.

I correctly, dealt with the "legality" issue.

jay
Tue Jun 10, 2008

Go Fig wrote:

In article , David Horne,
_the_ chancellor (*) wrote:

Go Fig wrote:

In article , David Horne,
_the_ chancellor (*) wrote:

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote:

Tim C. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:41:36 -0400, terrable wrote:

You must live in a very strange place as throwing yourself from a
high
building is very illegal around here.

where's "here"?

SFAIK, it's "illegal" most places (as is suicide), but if the
attempt is successful, the "legality" is moot, n'est-ce pas?

It's not moot if you're the victim of someone's suicide, which can
happen.

And that victim, rightly, will sue your estate.

Only a twisted mind like yours would think that an appropriate statement
in the context.

I correctly, dealt with the "legality" issue.

WGAF.

--
(*) of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate -www.davidhorne.net
(email address on website) "If people think God is interesting, the
onus is on them to show that there is anything there to talk about.
Otherwise they should just shut up about it." -Richard Dawkins

On 2008-06-10, David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*) wrote:
Go Fig wrote:

In article , David Horne,
_the_ chancellor (*) wrote:

Go Fig wrote:

In article , David Horne,
_the_ chancellor (*) wrote:

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote:

Tim C. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:41:36 -0400, terrable wrote:

You must live in a very strange place as throwing yourself from a
high
building is very illegal around here.

where's "here"?

SFAIK, it's "illegal" most places (as is suicide), but if the
attempt is successful, the "legality" is moot, n'est-ce pas?

It's not moot if you're the victim of someone's suicide, which can
happen.

And that victim, rightly, will sue your estate.

Only a twisted mind like yours would think that an appropriate statement
in the context.

I correctly, dealt with the "legality" issue.

WGAF.

You do. As quoted above Evelyn wrote:

SFAIK, it's "illegal" most places (as is suicide), but if the
attempt is successful, the "legality" is moot, n'est-ce pas?

and you replied:

It's not moot if you're the victim of someone's suicide, which can
happen.

So what were you talking about?

Jesper Lauridsen wrote:

On 2008-06-10, David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*) wrote:
Go Fig wrote:

In article , David Horne,
_the_ chancellor (*) wrote:

Go Fig wrote:

In article , David Horne,
_the_ chancellor (*) wrote:

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote:

Tim C. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:41:36 -0400, terrable wrote:

You must live in a very strange place as throwing yourself
from a high
building is very illegal around here.

where's "here"?

SFAIK, it's "illegal" most places (as is suicide), but if the
attempt is successful, the "legality" is moot, n'est-ce pas?

It's not moot if you're the victim of someone's suicide, which can
happen.

And that victim, rightly, will sue your estate.

Only a twisted mind like yours would think that an appropriate statement
in the context.

I correctly, dealt with the "legality" issue.

WGAF.

You do.

I appreciate English isn't your first language, but learn to read for
content, then get back to me. I _might_ decide to reply to your inane
comments then. Or I might not.

--
(*) of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate -www.davidhorne.net
(email address on website) "If people think God is interesting, the
onus is on them to show that there is anything there to talk about.
Otherwise they should just shut up about it." -Richard Dawkins

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote:

David Horne, _the_ chancellor (*) wrote:
EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote:

Tim C. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:41:36 -0400, terrable wrote:

You must live in a very strange place as throwing yourself from a high
building is very illegal around here.
where's "here"?
SFAIK, it's "illegal" most places (as is suicide), but if the attempt is
successful, the "legality" is moot, n'est-ce pas?

It's not moot if you're the victim of someone's suicide, which can
happen.

A sick individual commited suicide by parking his car on a train track a
few years ago in the UK (Ufton Nervet) which killed 6 people in addition
to himself. And a parent trying to commit suicide taking their children
with them isn't completely unheard of either.

But that's not leaping off of a tall building!

I'm referring to suicides causing death to other people- hence why it's
not moot.

--
(*) of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate -www.davidhorne.net
(email address on website) "If people think God is interesting, the
onus is on them to show that there is anything there to talk about.
Otherwise they should just shut up about it." -Richard Dawkins