Final Solution to all those menacing Gypsies in Rome

http://www.corriere.it/english/artic...shooting.shtml

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:48:33 -0000, "Visitor No 3"
wrote:

http://www.corriere.it/english/artic...shooting.shtml


This is mainly aimed at the much-hated Albanians, whose main export is
crime. The gypsies are little more than a nuisance.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:48:33 -0000, "Visitor No 3"
wrote:

http://www.corriere.it/english/artic...shooting.shtml


"ROME From now on, if a burglar breaks into your home, you’ll be able
to shoot without risking a custodial sentence, even if you kill the
intruder.And even if your reaction is “disproportionate” to the actual
threat. The Chamber of Deputies has approved a law on legitimate
defence that makes provision for armed response by citizens in their
own homes defending their lives or property. The measure, strongly
supported by the Northern League, was passed by 244 votes to 175...."

Well well. That's hilarious, considering how I was just reading that
round goldfish bowls in Rome were just outlawed as being inhumane. And
that walking your dog has become mandatory, to make sure it gets
enough exercise. And that abandoning a dog or cat is now punishable by
jail.

Sounds very nuch like typical big cities--pets get cherished and
respected far more than one's fellow humans.

"Viking" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:48:33 -0000, "Visitor No 3"
wrote:

http://www.corriere.it/english/artic...shooting.shtml


"ROME From now on, if a burglar breaks into your home, you'll be able
to shoot without risking a custodial sentence, even if you kill the
intruder.And even if your reaction is "disproportionate" to the actual
threat. The Chamber of Deputies has approved a law on legitimate
defence that makes provision for armed response by citizens in their
own homes defending their lives or property. The measure, strongly
supported by the Northern League, was passed by 244 votes to 175...."

Well well. That's hilarious, considering how I was just reading that
round goldfish bowls in Rome were just outlawed as being inhumane. And
that walking your dog has become mandatory, to make sure it gets
enough exercise. And that abandoning a dog or cat is now punishable by
jail.

Sounds very nuch like typical big cities--pets get cherished and
respected far more than one's fellow humans.

Do you cherish and respect burglars?

Under original British common law, burglary was an offense punishable by
execution (burglary was defined as, "breaking and entering the dwelling
house of another in the night with the intent to commit a felony therein").
The rationale was that, by breaking into someone's home at night, a burglar
has voluntarily accepted that he may run into the householder and will have
to deal with him in some fashion. I see nothing wrong with that rationale.

PTRAVEL wrote:

"Viking" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:48:33 -0000, "Visitor No 3"
wrote:

http://www.corriere.it/english/artic...shooting.shtml


"ROME From now on, if a burglar breaks into your home, you'll be able
to shoot without risking a custodial sentence, even if you kill the
intruder.And even if your reaction is "disproportionate" to the actual
threat. The Chamber of Deputies has approved a law on legitimate
defence that makes provision for armed response by citizens in their
own homes defending their lives or property. The measure, strongly
supported by the Northern League, was passed by 244 votes to 175...."

Well well. That's hilarious, considering how I was just reading that
round goldfish bowls in Rome were just outlawed as being inhumane. And
that walking your dog has become mandatory, to make sure it gets
enough exercise. And that abandoning a dog or cat is now punishable by
jail.

Sounds very nuch like typical big cities--pets get cherished and
respected far more than one's fellow humans.

Do you cherish and respect burglars?

Under original British common law, burglary was an offense punishable by
execution (burglary was defined as, "breaking and entering the dwelling
house of another in the night with the intent to commit a felony therein").
The rationale was that, by breaking into someone's home at night, a burglar
has voluntarily accepted that he may run into the householder and will have
to deal with him in some fashion. I see nothing wrong with that rationale.

You're bonkers then.

--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org

David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and
prestwich tesco 24h offy wrote:

PTRAVEL wrote:

"Viking" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:48:33 -0000, "Visitor No 3"
wrote:


http://www.corriere.it/english/artic...shooting.shtml


"ROME From now on, if a burglar breaks into your home, you'll be able
to shoot without risking a custodial sentence, even if you kill the
intruder.And even if your reaction is "disproportionate" to the actual
threat. The Chamber of Deputies has approved a law on legitimate
defence that makes provision for armed response by citizens in their
own homes defending their lives or property. The measure, strongly
supported by the Northern League, was passed by 244 votes to 175...."

Well well. That's hilarious, considering how I was just reading that
round goldfish bowls in Rome were just outlawed as being inhumane. And
that walking your dog has become mandatory, to make sure it gets
enough exercise. And that abandoning a dog or cat is now punishable by
jail.

Sounds very nuch like typical big cities--pets get cherished and
respected far more than one's fellow humans.

Do you cherish and respect burglars?

Under original British common law, burglary was an offense punishable by
execution (burglary was defined as, "breaking and entering the dwelling
house of another in the night with the intent to commit a felony
therein").
The rationale was that, by breaking into someone's home at night, a
burglar
has voluntarily accepted that he may run into the householder and will
have
to deal with him in some fashion. I see nothing wrong with that
rationale.

You're bonkers then.


Not if the burglar is carrying a weapon...

--
Best
Greg

"David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and
prestwich tesco 24h offy" wrote in
message news:1h9sry2.1bmkazc1uphv9wN%this_address_is_for_s ...
PTRAVEL wrote:

"Viking" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:48:33 -0000, "Visitor No 3"
wrote:


http://www.corriere.it/english/artic...shooting.shtml


"ROME From now on, if a burglar breaks into your home, you'll be able
to shoot without risking a custodial sentence, even if you kill the
intruder.And even if your reaction is "disproportionate" to the actual
threat. The Chamber of Deputies has approved a law on legitimate
defence that makes provision for armed response by citizens in their
own homes defending their lives or property. The measure, strongly
supported by the Northern League, was passed by 244 votes to 175...."

Well well. That's hilarious, considering how I was just reading that
round goldfish bowls in Rome were just outlawed as being inhumane. And
that walking your dog has become mandatory, to make sure it gets
enough exercise. And that abandoning a dog or cat is now punishable by
jail.

Sounds very nuch like typical big cities--pets get cherished and
respected far more than one's fellow humans.

Do you cherish and respect burglars?

Under original British common law, burglary was an offense punishable by
execution (burglary was defined as, "breaking and entering the dwelling
house of another in the night with the intent to commit a felony
therein").
The rationale was that, by breaking into someone's home at night, a
burglar
has voluntarily accepted that he may run into the householder and will
have
to deal with him in some fashion. I see nothing wrong with that
rationale.

You're bonkers then.

Well, there's a stunningly astute and thoughtful response. I guess I should
rise to your in-depth analysis by saying:

Neener neener pumpkin eater.

Sheesh.


--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:48:33 -0000, "Visitor No 3"
wrote:

http://www.corriere.it/english/artic...shooting.shtml


"ROME From now on, if a burglar breaks into your home, you’ll be able
to shoot without risking a custodial sentence, even if you kill the
intruder.And even if your reaction is “disproportionate” to the actual
threat. The Chamber of Deputies has approved a law on legitimate
defence that makes provision for armed response by citizens in their
own homes defending their lives or property. The measure, strongly
supported by the Northern League, was passed by 244 votes to 175...."

Sounds like Florida...

PTravel wrote:

"David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and
prestwich tesco 24h offy" wrote in
message news:1h9sry2.1bmkazc1uphv9wN%this_address_is_for_s ...
PTRAVEL wrote:
[]
Under original British common law, burglary was an offense punishable by
execution (burglary was defined as, "breaking and entering the dwelling
house of another in the night with the intent to commit a felony
therein").
The rationale was that, by breaking into someone's home at night, a
burglar
has voluntarily accepted that he may run into the householder and will
have
to deal with him in some fashion. I see nothing wrong with that
rationale.

You're bonkers then.

Well, there's a stunningly astute and thoughtful response.

It's exactly what your rationale for the rationale deserved.

--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org

Gregory Morrow
gregorymorrowEMERGENCYCANCELLATIONARCHIMEDES@eart hlink.net wrote:

David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and
prestwich tesco 24h offy wrote:

PTRAVEL wrote:
[]
Under original British common law, burglary was an offense punishable by
execution (burglary was defined as, "breaking and entering the dwelling
house of another in the night with the intent to commit a felony
therein").
The rationale was that, by breaking into someone's home at night, a
burglar
has voluntarily accepted that he may run into the householder and will
have
to deal with him in some fashion. I see nothing wrong with that
rationale.

You're bonkers then.

Not if the burglar is carrying a weapon...

And if you live in a culture where it's OK to murder anyone breaking and
entering, the burglars will be sure to arm themselves. In the UK,
breaking and entering is going down. 'Street' crimes like theft of
mobile phones, mp3 players etc., is up.

--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org