If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Trip report: BMI/UA, MAN-ORD-PHX
Greetings!
BMI, MAN-ORD: I arrived in Manchester an hour or so before check-in opened, but the queue was already long enough to be interfering with other airlines. Luckily, someone from BMI walked up and down to make sure everyone was in the right place. I was pulled out of the line for random screening. The staff were polite and chatty, and I managed to skip the rest of the queue by being let into the front. A member of the security staff waited with me, to make sure I didn't sneak anything into my checked baggage. I was checked-in for my on- going flight too, which made me very happy. This was my first non-BA flight, so I wasn't sure what to expect. I've always considered BA's customer service to be excellent, and BMI's was on a par, though the FAs didn't smile nearly as much. When I found my seat and sat down, I noticed a few changes. On BA, I was never given a lunch menu, and I'd never had so many movies and TV shows to choose from, nor any video games at all. I also liked the aircraft nose camera, which was fun to watch. Unfortunately, though, I had to watch the camera on my neighbour's screen. Even before we started taxiing, I was frustrated as hell trying to get my screen to respond to my poking. When I finally got some video, it was badly washed out, and I couldn't adjust any colour or contrast. When we were up in the air and the movies started, the volume controls didn't respond, and I couldn't hear it at all. An FA tried rebooting the system, and told me she'd move me to another seat if she could, but I was without movies for the flight. Incidentally, the headphones were an odd ear-clip design which looked really uncomfortable, and I didn't have an adapter to use my own headphones. Drinks were served before take-off and several times during the flight. I'd requested the vegeterian lunch, and it was good. Along with all the snacks too, I couldn't eat it all. And unlike BA, we had icecream! The only 'interesting' part of the flight was when my neighbour across the aisle started huffing and moaning about the passenger in front of him laying her seat back. He called for an FA, then told her to tell the passenger to raise her seat. The FA apologised to him, but explained that it's a function of the seat that passengers are allowed to use, and he should lay his own seat back if he wants more room. He refused. Then later in the flight, he called again for an FA. A different one arrived this time; she agreed with his request, and asked the woman to raise her seat. Personally, my ideal seat would be against a bulkhead, with no-one behind me. I'm not at all bothered if someone in front takes their seat back, but I don't want to lay my own down and have the guy behind me bitch and moan. One of my worst flights was having some kid kick me until I asked the parents to stop him, after which he jammed his feet into the gap between my seat and my neighbour's, and rested them on my armrest. CHICAGO O'HA We landed about 10 minutes early, and I jumped off the plane as soon as I could. I'd left myself only 90 minutes to the connection (in my defence, Expedia told me I'd be just fine), and I wanted to run. I got off the plane relatively quickly, but the immigration line was already hell. I've used PHX's immigration twice, and it's always been orderly with several staff watching over. In Chicago, it was a free-for- all. People were running, jumping over barriers, screaming and shouting. If anyone wants to try running past the line into baggage claim, then please let me know how well you get on. I didn't see any staff to stop you. All in all, I was in that queue for 70 minutes. The immigration officer didn't ask nearly as many questions about my visit as the officer (both times, I got the same one) in Phoenix, and I was let through quickly. It took only a few minutes to get my baggage and the long, long queue through Customs and Dept. of Agriculture moved quickly. The baggage reclaim was a rushed confusion of people and noises. I couldn't see what the people in front of me where doing, and when it got to my turn, I didn't know whether the staff needed to see any papers. As it was, they picked my baggage off me, scanned a barcode, and I was bustled along with the crowd. The ATS to T1 was very cool. I only had to wait a minute or so, and it was crowded, but not too full. The security screening to get into T1 was confusing -- myself and several people followed a bad sign and ended up in a dead end of tape barriers. The staff were polite, but rushed. I made it to my departure gate 4 minutes before boarding. I was /lucky/. I do not recommend a connection of less than 2 hours. UA, ORD-PHX: This was my first US domestic flight, so I was a bit nervous; whenever I visit, it takes me a day or so to adjust to the accent, and to slow my own speech down so they can understand me. The atmosphere on that flight was amazingly different to the UK domestic flights I've taken. The staff were a lot more informal and chatty, and the passengers were /quiet/. I'm used to yelling and people running down the aisle, but these people were barely talking to each other. I'm grateful too, because I couldn't figure out where my headphones were supposed to plug in, and I missed the movie. The FAs were friendly, and drinks and snacks were served. I think there was a cold meal, but I didn't want it, so I don't remember. The return flights took the same route, and weren't especially different. The most surprising thing was that on my return to the UK, the immigration staff seemed to simply check I had /a/ passport, rather than looking at the details. But then I guess they have trained eyes and know what to look for. At some point in the return flight, my baggage was opened and checked by the TSA. Yep, I found a form explaining the situation. Nothing was missing, which was a surprise to me because the bag had been only 3/4 zipped and a multi-coloured strap (I use to spot the bag) was hanging onto the handle and trailing behind. The only damage inside was a rolled-up poster; I put it into the bag diagonally because it wouldn't fit horizontally, but some enterprising TSA agent found a way to make it fit. All things considered, I'm not sure whether to go back to BA or not for my next trip. I like BA's convenience of a direct flight to Phoenix, and their staff are a lot friendlier. But BMI and UA are significantly cheaper, and their staff do the job just as well -- they just don't seem to enjoy it. Whatever I decide, I'm never doing another 90-minute connection. With thanks to Traveller, who nudged me back in August to write this. -- Jon Eccleston :: http://jon-eccleston.net "This is the light of my soul; A sacred territory in which no-one may intrude!" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Trip report: BMI/UA, MAN-ORD-PHX
Jon Eccleston wrote:
Incidentally, the headphones were an odd ear-clip design which looked really uncomfortable, and I didn't have an adapter to use my own headphones. Actually I find those more comfortable than the over-the-top-of-the-head variety; it's worth giving them a try next time. You can barely feel that they're on. With thanks to Traveller, who nudged me back in August to write this. And thanks for writing it. miguel -- Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu Site remodeled 10-Sept-2003: Hundreds of new photos, easier navigation. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Trip report: BMI/UA, MAN-ORD-PHX
Jon Eccleston wrote:
The most surprising thing was that on my return to the UK, the immigration staff seemed to simply check I had /a/ passport, rather than looking at the details. Hmmm. But then I guess they have trained eyes and know what to look for. Don't you believe it. They may want you to think that, but it's all a big Public Relations con-game. On the one hand, they claim that their highly-trained operatives employ highly-sophisticated psychological profiles, etc., to identify smugglers, 'terrorists', persons seeking to enter illegally (e.g., false Beatles fans), and so forth. But on the other hand, the fact that they harass thousands of completely innocent passengers every day makes one doubt how effective their 'scientific techniques' really are. Furthermore, even Customs admits that they are interdicting an astonishingly low percentage of contraband. They are seeking to have it both ways. They would have us think they are very very good ('Don't try anything; we have our secret methods and you'll be caught!') while at the same time they clamour for more powers, a bigger budget, etc., to stem the flood of illegal people and stuff. How stupid do they think we are? (On second thought--don't answer that question!) cheers, Henry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Trip report: BMI/UA, MAN-ORD-PHX
"Jon Eccleston" wrote in message . .. Greetings! BMI, MAN-ORD: I arrived in Manchester an hour or so before check-in opened, but the queue was already long enough to be interfering with other airlines. Luckily, someone from BMI walked up and down to make sure everyone was in the right place. I was pulled out of the line for random screening. The staff were polite and chatty, and I managed to skip the rest of the queue by being let into the front. A member of the security staff waited with me, to make sure I didn't sneak anything into my checked baggage. I was checked-in for my on- going flight too, which made me very happy. This was my first non-BA flight, so I wasn't sure what to expect. I've always considered BA's customer service to be excellent, and BMI's was on a par, though the FAs didn't smile nearly as much. When I found my seat and sat down, I noticed a few changes. On BA, I was never given a lunch menu, and I'd never had so many movies and TV shows to choose from, nor any video games at all. I also liked the aircraft nose camera, which was fun to watch. BA used to do menus but were withdrawn (2001 I think) as a cost saving. Now you have the problem of the FA asking "beer or chicken" then having to explain to everyone exactly *what* beef or chicken it was. Haven't seen the nose camera on UA, but the air-traffic channel on audio is fun (expect if you hear "Arrrghhh.... we a re going to die!" An FA tried rebooting the system, and told me she'd move me to another seat if she could, but I was without movies for the flight. You should have asked for some compensation for that. On a recent BA flight the guy next to me got to pick something from the duty free cart (up to £50 I think). He came away with a bottle of campagne which more than compensated for a a crappy movie. I'd requested the vegeterian lunch, and it was good. Along with all the snacks too, I couldn't eat it all. And unlike BA, we had icecream! Used to get chocices on BA Personally, my ideal seat would be against a bulkhead, with no-one behind me. I'm not at all bothered if someone in front takes their seat back, but I don't want to lay my own down and have the guy behind me bitch and moan. It's always a balancing act this. I hate people who put their seat back immediately as I like to have dinner and watch a movie upright then switch to the radio channels, lie back and try for some alcohol induced sleep. Kicking kids should be locked away in the hold. Mind you, had a really great flight sat next to an 8 yr old. Was worried at first thinking he would be a brat, but he turned into the most polite and well behaved kid you have ever met. All things considered, I'm not sure whether to go back to BA or not for my next trip. I like BA's convenience of a direct flight to Phoenix, and their staff are a lot friendlier. But BMI and UA are significantly cheaper, and their staff do the job just as well -- they just don't seem to enjoy it. Whatever I decide, I'm never doing another 90-minute connection. Was recently bumped off a BA flight onto a UA one (my first time transatlantic on non-BA) and was pretty impressed. Seats seemed a big bigger - though I had an empty seat next to me so that may have helped. Some of the best and worst FAs I have seen have been on BA, but overall the standard is pretty good. I wouldn't even think about a 90 min connection - 3 hours is usually by minimum (expect in India - leave 6 hours for the bureaucracy ) Mr C. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SOUTH AFRICA: a trip report with photos, links and tips | Eddy le Couvreur | Africa | 0 | April 27th, 2004 06:16 PM |
SOUTH AFRICA: a trip report with photos, links and tips | Eddy le Couvreur | Africa | 0 | April 27th, 2004 06:15 PM |
My terrible Dragoman experience in Africa | Nadine S. | Africa | 5 | April 26th, 2004 06:54 PM |
Trip to South Africa and Zimbabwe this past October: report and photos | Martin Pergler | Africa | 6 | December 16th, 2003 04:13 AM |
Trip report and pictures from Kilimanjaro | Gard | Africa | 1 | October 30th, 2003 08:22 PM |