If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The Supreme Court is 'evading " the issue so individual states arenow taking it upon themselves in addressing question of Constitutionaleligibility to be POTUS and VPOTUS
The demand for documentation of Barack Obama’s eligibility to occupy
the Oval Office is surging, with lawmakers in several states now working on legislation that could be used to require future presidential candidates to reveal precisely how they are qualified under the U.S. Constitution’s demand for a “natural born citizen.” The Supreme Court is 'evading " the issue so individual states are now taking it upon themselves in addressing question of Constitutional eligibility to be POTUS and VPOTUS "WND already has reported on a bill co-sponsored by some three dozen lawmakers in Arizona who want to require candidates not only to submit the information, but state officials to independently verify the accuracy. Bill sponsor Rep. Judy Burges, R-Skull Valley, told WND she already has started getting questions from other states who want details about the proposal. A separate proposal has been created by a freedom of information action group in New York state, and now the National Conference of State Legislatures, which monitors and tabulates the work of legislative bodies, confirms through its database that several other plans are in the works. Some of the proposals are very clear even without the full text. In New Hampshire, for example, a pending plan would require “certified copies of birth certificates for nominees for president and vice president.” Others are a little more oblique. In Georgia, for example, lawmakers propose a bill “relating to procedures for qualification of candidates generally, so as to require each candidate for public office to be in compliance with certain disclosure requirements.” There is no definitive word on what that would mean to presidential candidates. An Indiana proposal is equally unclear, because it “authorizes a challenge to a candidate’s eligibility to seek an office to be filed by a registered voter of the jurisdiction conducting the election.” It could apply only to local elections. In Virginia, a summary says the proposal “provides that candidates shall provide evidence of their qualifications for office to have their names printed on the ballot. The State Board of Elections shall provide a list of acceptable forms of evidence.” And in the New York state plan proposed by a freedom of information organization to state lawmakers would provide that “an individual seeking placement on the New York State’s election ballot(s) for the office of president or vice president of the United States must present proof of eligibility, as per requirements that are stated in Article 2, section 1, paragraph 5 of the U.S. Constitution.” Related: | Settings ▼ | Sign out Advanced Search WebShow options... Results 1 - 10 of about 125,000 for Thomas court evading eligibility. (0.42 seconds) Search Results Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility Apr 17, 2010 ... Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility. Does testimony hint at division behind Supreme Court's doors? ... www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=142101&fa=PAGE.view - Cached Justice Clarence Thomas Admits Supreme Court 'Evading' Eligibility ... Apr 18, 2010 ... Justice Clarence Thomas Admits Supreme Court 'Evading' Eligibility Issue. The Question Is, Why Evade A Constitutional Obligation? ... aconservativeedge.com/.../justice-clarence-thomas-admits-supreme-court- evading-eligibility-issue-the-question-is-why-evade-a- constitutional-... - Cached Clarence Thomas: We're "Evading" Eligibility Issues | The FOX Nation Apr 18, 2010 ... Clarence Thomas: We're "Evading" Eligibility Issues. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told a House subcommittee that when it comes ... http://www.thefoxnation.com/.../clar...ibility-issues - Cached Bluegrass Pundit: Video: Justice Clarence Thomas admits Supreme ... Apr 18, 2010 ... Jose Serrano (D-NY) and U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Thomas seems to admit the Supreme Court is evading the eligibility issue ... http://www.bluegrasspundit.com/.../v...as-admits.html - Cached Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility 21 posts - 9 authors - Last post: Apr 17 Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility Does testimony hint at ... U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told a House ... http://www.sodahead.com/...thomas......y/blog-303143/ - Cached Justice Thomas says Supreme Court evading eligibility question. - Apr 20, 2010 Supreme Court Justice Thomas questions if the Court is "EVADING ... - Apr 19, 2010 Clarence Thomas: We're "Evading" Eligibility Issues - Apr 18, 2010 More results from sodahead.com » The Plain Truth: Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility Apr 18, 2010 ... US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told a House subcommittee that when it ... Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility ... http://www.plaintruth.com/.../justic...igibility.html - Cached Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility - PC Free Zone Apr 18, 2010 ... Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility. Does testimony hint at division behind Supreme Court's doors? wnd. U.S. Supreme Court ... http://www.theodoresworld.net/.../ju...as_were_e.html - Cached JUDICIAL HIGH TREASON: Justice Thomas Admits U.S. Supreme Court ... Apr 19, 2010 ... Justice Thomas' admission that the U.S. Supreme Court is evading the Obama eligibility issue is going to create a hailstorm of protests! ... americancommondefencereview.wordpress.com/.../judicial-high-treason- justice-thomas-admits-u-s-supreme-court-evading-obama-eligibility-... - Cached Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility Apr 17, 2010 ... Thomas is saying that the Supreme Court....not Thomas, personally...is evading the eligibility issue. The Court will have to answer the ... www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2495404/posts - Cached Video results for Thomas court evading eligibility Justice Thomas: We are evading the eligibility ... 1 min 16 sec - Apr 16, 2010 www.youtube.com Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading ... 3 min 43 sec - 5 days ago www.youtube.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Following Arizona's lead in legislation questioning Obama'sConstitutional eligibility as POTUS, now State of Georgia introduces similarlegislation. "When Congress won't act, States have a duty to step up" | O'Donovan, PJ, Himself | Europe | 19 | April 25th, 2010 02:37 PM |
Supreme court and cruise lines compliance | Charlie Funk | Cruises | 3 | June 7th, 2005 12:32 AM |
Supreme Court re disabled | FRANK | Cruises | 0 | June 6th, 2005 11:38 PM |
Supreme Court to Decide Disability Law! | Ray Goldenberg | Cruises | 0 | September 28th, 2004 03:57 PM |
Canadian Supreme Court upholds election "gag law" | [email protected] | USA & Canada | 0 | July 30th, 2004 06:22 AM |