If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Couple Sue AA Over Legroom
From the Sun Times: http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-air14.html
============ More legroom? Hardly. A Cook County couple say they were cramped aboard an American Airlines flight to Paris -- and now they're suing. In a lawsuit filed Thursday, Jerome and Judith O'Callaghan say they were enticed to buy their tickets from American Airlines two years ago because it advertised generous legroom. But they were so jammed during the nine hours in seats 19A and 19B aboard the Boeing 767, they suffered back and leg pain throughout their vacation and after they got back home. Judith O'Callaghan had suffered from back injuries and had been assured there would be plenty of legroom, the suit claims. When they saw their assigned seats in May 2002, they complained about the lack of space but were denied a switch to roomier seats. Jerome O'Callaghan says his legs were so wobbly afterwards he tripped at the entrance to the Basilica of St. Paul's in Rome, leading to a broken nose and smashed teeth. They are seeking more than $100,000. ========= Guess they should have called well in advance and requested bulkhead seats :0) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Couple Sue AA Over Legroom
Ozzy Kopec wrote:
From the Sun Times: http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-air14.html ============ More legroom? Hardly. A Cook County couple say they were cramped aboard an American Airlines flight to Paris -- and now they're suing. In a lawsuit filed Thursday, Jerome and Judith O'Callaghan say they were enticed to buy their tickets from American Airlines two years ago because it advertised generous legroom. It has more legroom than the average carrier to Europe. But they were so jammed during the nine hours in seats 19A and 19B aboard the Boeing 767, they suffered back and leg pain throughout their vacation and after they got back home. Judith O'Callaghan had suffered from back injuries and had been assured there would be plenty of legroom, the suit claims. When they saw their assigned seats in May 2002, they complained about the lack of space but were denied a switch to roomier seats. I see, they didn't get an free upgrade to business or first class like they felt entitled to, or were they expecting to displace people in other economy seats? No one would have denied them a move to unassigned economy seating. Jerome O'Callaghan says his legs were so wobbly afterwards he tripped at the entrance to the Basilica of St. Paul's in Rome, leading to a broken nose and smashed teeth. They are seeking more than $100,000. How in the world he can prove his tripping was caused due to the airline is beyond me. He should have had plenty of time to unwobble his legs by the time he decided to tour Rome. After all, he flew to Paris. AA doesn't fly Paris to Rome. Guess they should have called well in advance and requested bulkhead seats :0) They were free to pay for business class seating. The seating dimensions are not a closely guarded secret. Guess they should have looked at Saatguru. 19A & B have less legroom than other seats http://www.seatguru.com/american/B762T.shtml |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Couple Sue AA Over Legroom
"mrtravelkay" wrote in message . com... Ozzy Kopec wrote: From the Sun Times: http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-air14.html ============ More legroom? Hardly. A Cook County couple say they were cramped aboard an American Airlines flight to Paris -- and now they're suing. In a lawsuit filed Thursday, Jerome and Judith O'Callaghan say they were enticed to buy their tickets from American Airlines two years ago because it advertised generous legroom. It has more legroom than the average carrier to Europe. But they were so jammed during the nine hours in seats 19A and 19B aboard the Boeing 767, they suffered back and leg pain throughout their vacation and after they got back home. Judith O'Callaghan had suffered from back injuries and had been assured there would be plenty of legroom, the suit claims. When they saw their assigned seats in May 2002, they complained about the lack of space but were denied a switch to roomier seats. I see, they didn't get an free upgrade to business or first class like they felt entitled to, or were they expecting to displace people in other economy seats? No one would have denied them a move to unassigned economy seating. Jerome O'Callaghan says his legs were so wobbly afterwards he tripped at the entrance to the Basilica of St. Paul's in Rome, leading to a broken nose and smashed teeth. They are seeking more than $100,000. How in the world he can prove his tripping was caused due to the airline is beyond me. He should have had plenty of time to unwobble his legs by the time he decided to tour Rome. After all, he flew to Paris. AA doesn't fly Paris to Rome. Guess they should have called well in advance and requested bulkhead seats :0) They were free to pay for business class seating. The seating dimensions are not a closely guarded secret. Guess they should have looked at Saatguru. 19A & B have less legroom than other seats http://www.seatguru.com/american/B762T.shtml And how convenient that they BOTH suffered back and leg pain. Ridiculous. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Couple Sue AA Over Legroom
mrtravelkay wrote:
They were free to pay for business class seating. The seating dimensions are not a closely guarded secret. Guess they should have looked at Saatguru. 19A & B have less legroom than other seats http://www.seatguru.com/american/B762T.shtml Wow. Thanks for the seatguru site URL. Bookmarked and will definitely be printing up the seat layout for my next flight - good to have with me when I make my e-ticket check in seat choice. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Couple Sue AA Over Legroom
Blake S wrote:
And how convenient that they BOTH suffered back and leg pain. Ridiculous. The way I read it, she had back pain before the flight.. "Judith O'Callaghan had suffered from back injuries and had been assured there would be plenty of legroom, " |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Couple Sue AA Over Legroom
On Sat, 15 May 2004 04:48:28 GMT, mrtravelkay wrote:
They were free to pay for business class seating. The seating dimensions are not a closely guarded secret. Guess they should have looked at Saatguru. 19A & B have less legroom than other seats http://www.seatguru.com/american/B762T.shtml That's a bit harsh. AA had been promoting "More Room Throughout Coach", not "More room throughout coach except seats 19A & B." Caveat emptor went out with the Latin language, even in the airline industry. Having said that, blaming AA for collapsing later is a stretch. They should get their tickets refunded, though. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Couple Sue AA Over Legroom
Dick Locke wrote: On Sat, 15 May 2004 04:48:28 GMT, mrtravelkay wrote: They were free to pay for business class seating. The seating dimensions are not a closely guarded secret. Guess they should have looked at Saatguru. 19A & B have less legroom than other seats http://www.seatguru.com/american/B762T.shtml That's a bit harsh. AA had been promoting "More Room Throughout Coach", not "More room throughout coach except seats 19A & B." Caveat emptor went out with the Latin language, even in the airline industry. MRTC coach never advertised that all seats had more room. We also don't know if 19A and B had more room at that time or before the MRTC started. Not all seats had it any more than all seats having movable armrests or reclining seats. Having said that, blaming AA for collapsing later is a stretch. They should get their tickets refunded, though. They could have refused to fly and got a refund. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Couple Sue AA Over Legroom
On Sat, 15 May 2004 17:18:57 GMT, mrtravelkay wrote:
MRTC coach never advertised that all seats had more room "\Through*out"\, prep. Quite through; from one extremity to the other of; also, ***every part of***; as, to search throughout the house." (Webster's unabridged.) That looks like a statement that all of coach has more room. I'd have to see a two year old ad to be sure, but I bet the "Throughout" was in a LOT larger type face than anything that said "some exceptions apply." I'm startled that people condone or even approve of airline behaviour that forces people to read small print that might counteract a large headline. Even worse is to expect a traveller to even know about seatguru. Psych 101 again on victim bashing to increase one's self esteem. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Couple Sue AA Over Legroom
"Dick Locke" wrote in message ... On Sat, 15 May 2004 04:48:28 GMT, mrtravelkay wrote: They were free to pay for business class seating. The seating dimensions are not a closely guarded secret. Guess they should have looked at Saatguru. 19A & B have less legroom than other seats http://www.seatguru.com/american/B762T.shtml That's a bit harsh. AA had been promoting "More Room Throughout Coach", not "More room throughout coach except seats 19A & B." Caveat emptor went out with the Latin language, even in the airline industry. Having said that, blaming AA for collapsing later is a stretch. They should get their tickets refunded, though. I flew BOS-LHR last Summer in an AA 767 in seat 19B. There was ample legroom - much more than on the equivalent product from NW to AMS or Virgin to LHR. JohnT |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Couple Sue AA Over Legroom
.. I really doubt the flight to Paris had anything to do with him tripping on the stairs in Rome. To me, the mention of that throws doubt on whole lawsuit. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Legroom | Andi Schmid | Air travel | 0 | May 13th, 2004 10:07 PM |
Legroom | Matt | Air travel | 0 | May 12th, 2004 05:18 PM |
Question about legroom.... | Nick | Air travel | 3 | February 16th, 2004 07:06 PM |
Legroom: Swiss A330 or American B767? | Manuel | Air travel | 2 | January 7th, 2004 01:12 AM |
Couple caught in the act - on a flight | Boris the Spider | Air travel | 0 | December 28th, 2003 08:35 PM |