If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#421
|
|||
|
|||
Nice Ugly Americans
"Miss L. Toe" wrote:
"me" wrote in message . com... However, if one wants to discuss specific freedoms, probably the one that strikes me most often is the number of countries that all a fair amount of control over their press institutions. All sorts of things one "can't print" in various countries. I also understand one can't insult a civil servant in Germany. I suspect the freedom of speech clause would probably prevent such a law here. So - You've got the freedom to insult someone ? - Great ! And they, obviously, have the freedom to carry a gun :-) I do like consistency! -- PB The return address has been MUNGED |
#422
|
|||
|
|||
Nice Ugly Americans
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:11:59 +0100, "Miss L. Toe"
wrote: "me" wrote in message . com... However, if one wants to discuss specific freedoms, probably the one that strikes me most often is the number of countries that all a fair amount of control over their press institutions. All sorts of things one "can't print" in various countries. I also understand one can't insult a civil servant in Germany. I suspect the freedom of speech clause would probably prevent such a law here. So - You've got the freedom to insult someone ? - Great ! And they, obviously, have the freedom to carry a gun :-) Insulting politicians is a great American pastime. And the right to openly accuse them of inappropriate or illegal conduct is at times a great thing indeed. Laws of lese majeste are easily invoked to hide misbehavior. ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
#423
|
|||
|
|||
Nice Ugly Americans
le 13 Oct 2003 09:00:22 -0700, dans l'article 73af7090.0310130800.631ab6=
, me a dit ...=20 { snip } I also understand one can't insult a civil servant in Germany.=20=20 Nor in France: 7,500 EUR fine, or the same plus six months in prison for 'rebellion' [2]. [1] Article 433-5, Code P=E9nal [2] Article 433-6 --=20 Desmond Coughlan |desmond [at] zeouane [dot] org http://www.zeouane.org/=20 |
#424
|
|||
|
|||
Nice Ugly Americans
Desmond Coughlan wrote:
I also understand one can't insult a civil servant in Germany. Nor in France: 7,500 EUR fine, or the same plus six months in prison for 'rebellion' [2]. How do laws like this work? What if I point out a subjective matter which is derotagory to the person, like "you are ugly" and I'm prepared to back it up with a survey of popular attitudes towards the person's appearance? What if I say they're not very good at their job? What if I say "you're quite tall" and they take that as an insult because they always wanted to be short? miguel -- Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu |
#425
|
|||
|
|||
Nice Ugly Americans
le Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:43:32 GMT, dans l'article , Miguel Cruz a dit ...
I also understand one can't insult a civil servant in Germany. Nor in France: 7,500 EUR fine, or the same plus six months in prison for 'rebellion' [2]. How do laws like this work? What if I point out a subjective matter which is derotagory to the person, like "you are ugly" and I'm prepared to back it up with a survey of popular attitudes towards the person's appearance? What if I say they're not very good at their job? What if I say "you're quite tall" and they take that as an insult because they always wanted to be short? There's a difference between expressing an opinion, and insulting, IMHO. Most people who get their collars felt for the above, are of the kind who get stopped for speeding, and call the cop 'un pauvre con' [1], or who go to the local social security office, get told that they're not getting any money that day, and start screaming that the lady behind the counter is 'une sale pute' [2]. The view in French law is that people who serve the state, don't deserve to be on the receiving end of such abuse. I find it hard to disagree, but as an aside, there's nothing stopping any private citizen bringing a case against someone, for having called them any of the above. The penalties are lower, of course [3], but it's technically possible. [1] a f*****g arsehole [2] a dirty whore [3] law of 29 July 1881 -- Desmond Coughlan |desmond [at] zeouane [dot] org http://www.zeouane.org/ |
#426
|
|||
|
|||
Nice Ugly Americans
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 20:03:49 +0200, Desmond Coughlan
wrote: le Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:43:32 GMT, dans l'article , Miguel Cruz a dit ... I also understand one can't insult a civil servant in Germany. Nor in France: 7,500 EUR fine, or the same plus six months in prison for 'rebellion' [2]. How do laws like this work? What if I point out a subjective matter which is derotagory to the person, like "you are ugly" and I'm prepared to back it up with a survey of popular attitudes towards the person's appearance? What if I say they're not very good at their job? What if I say "you're quite tall" and they take that as an insult because they always wanted to be short? There's a difference between expressing an opinion, and insulting, IMHO. Unfortunately, politicians and civil servants tend to get the two confused themselves. Most people who get their collars felt for the above, are of the kind who get stopped for speeding, and call the cop 'un pauvre con' [1], or who go to the local social security office, get told that they're not getting any money that day, and start screaming that the lady behind the counter is 'une sale pute' [2]. Nonsense. Although it certainly happens, even here in the USA where one can be severely inconvenienced if one feels inclined to insult the cop who has stopped him in traffic. The view in French law is that people who serve the state, don't deserve to be on the receiving end of such abuse. You have just struck on a fundamental difference with the USA. In the USA politicians, civil servants, and even the police are assumed to serve the public, not the state. This results in an entirely different political philosophy. Famously, the motto on the side of police cars in Los Angeles is "To serve and protect", and it's not govverment officials who are supposed to be the served and protected. Needless to say, this is sometimes more observed in teh breach than teh ovservance, but it still underlies how it is supposed to work. I find it hard to disagree, but as an aside, there's nothing stopping any private citizen bringing a case against someone, for having called them any of the above. The penalties are lower, of course [3], but it's technically possible. The US Supreme Court definitively ruled a couple of decades ago that public figures have less protection against defamation than the general public, the more public, the less protection. ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
#427
|
|||
|
|||
Nice Ugly Americans
"Miguel Cruz" wrote in message ... Desmond Coughlan wrote: I also understand one can't insult a civil servant in Germany. Nor in France: 7,500 EUR fine, or the same plus six months in prison for 'rebellion' [2]. How do laws like this work? What if I point out a subjective matter which is derotagory to the person, like "you are ugly" and I'm prepared to back it up with a survey of popular attitudes towards the person's appearance? What if I say they're not very good at their job? What if I say "you're quite tall" and they take that as an insult because they always wanted to be short? miguel -- You gotta be more subtle: "When I see you, time stands still" = "you have a face which would stop a clock". "With respect" = "you are a liar". "With great respect" = "You are an inveterate liar". etc etc etc Suggesting that someone is not very good at their job is not necessarily regarded as an insult. (Mixy will probably respond to this in his usual manner!). JohnT |
#428
|
|||
|
|||
Nice Ugly Americans
Desmond Coughlan wrote:
There's a difference between expressing an opinion, and insulting, IMHO. Most people who get their collars felt for the above, are of the kind who get stopped for speeding, and call the cop 'un pauvre con' [1], or who go to the local social security office, get told that they're not getting any money that day, and start screaming that the lady behind the counter is 'une sale pute' [2]. The view in French law is that people who serve the state, don't deserve to be on the receiving end of such abuse. What's the difference between the person at the social security office, and the person at the bank or the phone company office? If they've decided they're going to legislate politeness, it ought to at least be equal-opportunity. Personally, I'd say it should be the opposite: Anyone who is so immature as to respond in any way but laughter to being called 'un pauvre con' or anything else should be hauled off to re-education camp. All the power in words like that comes from the recipient. miguel -- Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu |
#429
|
|||
|
|||
Nice Ugly Americans
Miguel Cruz wrote:
Personally, I'd say it should be the opposite: Anyone who is so immature as to respond in any way but laughter to being called 'un pauvre con' or anything else should be hauled off to re-education camp. Not always. It depends on the context- soome insults are off-the-cuff, others are much more personal and threatening. David -- David Horne- www.davidhorne.co.uk davidhorne (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk |
#430
|
|||
|
|||
Nice Ugly Americans
David Horne wrote:
Miguel Cruz wrote: Personally, I'd say it should be the opposite: Anyone who is so immature as to respond in any way but laughter to being called 'un pauvre con' or anything else should be hauled off to re-education camp. Not always. It depends on the context- soome insults are off-the-cuff, others are much more personal and threatening. Threats are another matter entirely. miguel -- Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USA Continues to Abuse Innocent UK Tourists | S.Byers | Air travel | 77 | July 10th, 2004 10:48 PM |
Tourists who end up dead in Thailand | scuffler | Asia | 3 | March 20th, 2004 09:02 AM |
BHARAT HAS THE WORLD'S MOST LUXURIOUS TRAIN | Dr. Jai Maharaj | Asia | 3 | January 19th, 2004 11:47 PM |
Thai Navy rescues tourists | Alfred Molon | Asia | 8 | October 26th, 2003 07:39 PM |
world's worst tourists | Blackden | Asia | 480 | October 20th, 2003 11:03 AM |