If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why Dulles Airport Sucks...
[For Miguel, RJ Carpenter, and other IAD fans :-) ]
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/3cb65d50-4a...00e2511c8.html _The Financial Times_ Jurek Martin: Letter to America Published: December 10 2004 "Airports are gateways to countries, especially those serving capital cities. They can, do or should reflect at least some of the values and standards that a country likes to think is its public face to the rest of the world. London's Heathrow, for example, is messy but it works, a reflection of the great British virtue of muddling through against all odds. Charles de Gaulle in Paris is quintessentially French: lots of style but infuriatingly difficult to negotiate. Moscow's Sheremetyevo had all the charms of Soviet bureaucracy, offset by vodka and Cuban cigars. Which brings us to the strange and disturbing case of Dulles Airport outside Washington, DC. I think there is a conspiracy of silence in the American media not to report about Dulles and it is time it was broken. On the plus side, Eero Saarinen's elegant design, even if now extended, still soars over the flat Virginia countryside, sometimes seeming all the more beautiful because for years it has been an oasis in a desert of construction. But that is the sum of the plus side, period. Whether leaving or arriving, Dulles is without other redeeming virtues. Two recent personal trips, and anecdotal evidence beyond number, show an airport in chaos - think Calcutta, Nairobi or any other erstwhile Third World hell hole, where to get on or off a flight was often an achievement in itself, and you have Dulles. This is not exactly appropriate for the world's only superpower. The slowly shuffling lines to pass through security snake endlessly inside and sometimes outside the airport itself (I calculated upwards of half a mile on one recent non-holiday midweek afternoon). Every other person seems to be on a cell phone to airlines saying they were going to miss flights in spite of arriving two hours early, to friends and relatives advising of cataclysmic delays. Women and children can be seen weeping while businessmen gnash their teeth. A Scandinavian ambassador of distinctly democratic persuasion says that for the first time in his long career he has started using diplomatic privileges to evade the chaos. Meanwhile the airport's public address system is either silent or incomprehensible, unless warning that smoking is prohibited. I used my time in line to call The Washington Post to say I thought there was a story here that a reporter might investigate, but I don't think one ever appeared. What did make page one, though, was a photo of a just opened high tech walkway, thus fostering the illusion that everything is up to date in Dulles, as well as Kansas City. Give me a break. The collective agony is compounded because to complain publicly is not allowed any more when the issue is national security, even if its implementation is far from perfect. It is, for example, patently obvious that Dulles does not have enough security gates, but to point this out could mean a one way ticket to Guantánamo. It would also be unwise to ask if it is always entirely necessary to half undress before passing through screening, frozen-footed, clutching belt-less trousers, boarding passes and government-issued identification clenched between teeth. Last month I witnessed a security agent ordering a mother to pass a three-month-old separately through screening (by rolling the child through, perhaps). Arriving is no breeze either, especially on flights from overseas. Passengers are funnelled through a series of narrow, windowless corridors, often moving no faster than they were on the way out before passing through security, only to be subject to the not always tender mercies of customs and immigration, which is another story entirely. Another Dulles indignity has just been added. Those waiting in the international arrival hall used to be able to get a glimpse of the huddled masses inside whenever the swing doors opened to let passengers out. Large ugly black screens now prevent even this minor facility, installed presumably to stop terrorists inside passing hand signals to their accomplices outside (as if they would not be using cell phones anyway). Finally, there is the question of how to get the 25 miles from Dulles into the capital of the land of the free. Just about every other country regardless of the state of development has managed to provide a variety of transport options at a reasonable cost. But at Dulles there is no economical downtown bus any longer, unless you count the under-advertised one connecting to an underground stop some miles away, practical only if travelling fairly light. There is no light rail or underground service, though the airport access highway has plenty of space for one in its central reservation. This is because not-in-my-backyard suburban communities in Virginia keep objecting to the cost and because federal and state governments, caring little about public transportation in any case, will not independently step into the breach. Even the taxi service, which costs 50 bucks and up, is a monopoly (and this in the bastion of capitalism) while the ubiquitous blue van facility, at about half the cost, can take its time depositing you at your destination. And, naturally, car parking rates seem to rise every quarter. Finally it is impossible to say if Dulles is a nice place to eat and shop. You can do neither while shuffling in line. You are just relieved to get out of the place on the same day." / |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Gregory Morrow" wrote in message k.net... [For Miguel, RJ Carpenter, and other IAD fans :-) ] Sir, You have not read my various comments about Dulles. Yes, I have mentioned some recent improvements, but it is still a "slow" airport. Bushels of money have been spent correcting Saarinen's baggage and passenger traffic flow errors and more need to be spent. The airport is owned by the Feds and really still controlled by Congress, so don't expect Viriginia or Metro to want to drown in debt building and subsidizing rapid transit to IAD. It tends to take me an hour from the time the plane arrives until I leave the economy parking. Look at the FAA traffic site and you'll find that almost anything causes delays at Dulles during their peak afternoon / evening hours. http://www.fly.faa.gov/flyfaa/usmap.jsp Independence Air and other small-jet services have overloaded the place. Another E-W runway is coming, but probably not in my lifetime. When coming to DC, use National Airport. It's a "no-walking" airport with only a couple of hundred yards from your gate to ground transportation, including Metrorail. This past Tuesday evening I was in my Rockville, MD, house within 90 minutes of landing at DCA including collecting baggage, shuttle to economy lot & buying milk at Potomac. You can WALK to hotels in Crystal City in about 20 minutes. http://users.erols.com/rcarpen/Hotel2DCA.htm bob c. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Gregory Morrow" wrote in message k.net... [For Miguel, RJ Carpenter, and other IAD fans :-) ] Sir, You have not read my various comments about Dulles. Yes, I have mentioned some recent improvements, but it is still a "slow" airport. Bushels of money have been spent correcting Saarinen's baggage and passenger traffic flow errors and more need to be spent. The airport is owned by the Feds and really still controlled by Congress, so don't expect Viriginia or Metro to want to drown in debt building and subsidizing rapid transit to IAD. It tends to take me an hour from the time the plane arrives until I leave the economy parking. Look at the FAA traffic site and you'll find that almost anything causes delays at Dulles during their peak afternoon / evening hours. http://www.fly.faa.gov/flyfaa/usmap.jsp Independence Air and other small-jet services have overloaded the place. Another E-W runway is coming, but probably not in my lifetime. When coming to DC, use National Airport. It's a "no-walking" airport with only a couple of hundred yards from your gate to ground transportation, including Metrorail. This past Tuesday evening I was in my Rockville, MD, house within 90 minutes of landing at DCA including collecting baggage, shuttle to economy lot & buying milk at Potomac. You can WALK to hotels in Crystal City in about 20 minutes. http://users.erols.com/rcarpen/Hotel2DCA.htm bob c. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
DCA is great for domestic and flights to and from the eastern half of
Canada. But if you're on your way to Europe or other overseas destinations then you're pretty much stuck with IAD. IAD used to be a sleepy little operation that attracted little attention from domestic flyers. I used to love flying from it, but about 4 or 5 years ago the traffic started to go crazy with the advent of the discount carriers. Now I avoid it like the plague and prefer going from DCA. Don't even mention BWI to me as that place is even worse than IAD. DP "R J Carpenter" wrote in message ... "Gregory Morrow" wrote in message k.net... [For Miguel, RJ Carpenter, and other IAD fans :-) ] Sir, You have not read my various comments about Dulles. Yes, I have mentioned some recent improvements, but it is still a "slow" airport. Bushels of money have been spent correcting Saarinen's baggage and passenger traffic flow errors and more need to be spent. The airport is owned by the Feds and really still controlled by Congress, so don't expect Viriginia or Metro to want to drown in debt building and subsidizing rapid transit to IAD. It tends to take me an hour from the time the plane arrives until I leave the economy parking. Look at the FAA traffic site and you'll find that almost anything causes delays at Dulles during their peak afternoon / evening hours. http://www.fly.faa.gov/flyfaa/usmap.jsp Independence Air and other small-jet services have overloaded the place. Another E-W runway is coming, but probably not in my lifetime. When coming to DC, use National Airport. It's a "no-walking" airport with only a couple of hundred yards from your gate to ground transportation, including Metrorail. This past Tuesday evening I was in my Rockville, MD, house within 90 minutes of landing at DCA including collecting baggage, shuttle to economy lot & buying milk at Potomac. You can WALK to hotels in Crystal City in about 20 minutes. http://users.erols.com/rcarpen/Hotel2DCA.htm bob c. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
DCA is great for domestic and flights to and from the eastern half of
Canada. But if you're on your way to Europe or other overseas destinations then you're pretty much stuck with IAD. IAD used to be a sleepy little operation that attracted little attention from domestic flyers. I used to love flying from it, but about 4 or 5 years ago the traffic started to go crazy with the advent of the discount carriers. Now I avoid it like the plague and prefer going from DCA. Don't even mention BWI to me as that place is even worse than IAD. DP "R J Carpenter" wrote in message ... "Gregory Morrow" wrote in message k.net... [For Miguel, RJ Carpenter, and other IAD fans :-) ] Sir, You have not read my various comments about Dulles. Yes, I have mentioned some recent improvements, but it is still a "slow" airport. Bushels of money have been spent correcting Saarinen's baggage and passenger traffic flow errors and more need to be spent. The airport is owned by the Feds and really still controlled by Congress, so don't expect Viriginia or Metro to want to drown in debt building and subsidizing rapid transit to IAD. It tends to take me an hour from the time the plane arrives until I leave the economy parking. Look at the FAA traffic site and you'll find that almost anything causes delays at Dulles during their peak afternoon / evening hours. http://www.fly.faa.gov/flyfaa/usmap.jsp Independence Air and other small-jet services have overloaded the place. Another E-W runway is coming, but probably not in my lifetime. When coming to DC, use National Airport. It's a "no-walking" airport with only a couple of hundred yards from your gate to ground transportation, including Metrorail. This past Tuesday evening I was in my Rockville, MD, house within 90 minutes of landing at DCA including collecting baggage, shuttle to economy lot & buying milk at Potomac. You can WALK to hotels in Crystal City in about 20 minutes. http://users.erols.com/rcarpen/Hotel2DCA.htm bob c. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Morrow wrote: [For Miguel, RJ Carpenter, and other IAD fans :-) ] http://news.ft.com/cms/s/3cb65d50-4a...00e2511c8.html _The Financial Times_ Jurek Martin: Letter to America Published: December 10 2004 "Airports are gateways to countries, especially those serving capital cities. They can, do or should reflect at least some of the values and standards that a country likes to think is its public face to the rest of the world. snip One problem with the analysis is that Dulles isn't the major entry point for the US. For the other capitals that the article mentions the airport for the capital is the major international entry. Even Berlin is a more important city locally than Washington. Perhaps we should consider Canberra & Brazil. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Morrow wrote: [For Miguel, RJ Carpenter, and other IAD fans :-) ] http://news.ft.com/cms/s/3cb65d50-4a...00e2511c8.html _The Financial Times_ Jurek Martin: Letter to America Published: December 10 2004 "Airports are gateways to countries, especially those serving capital cities. They can, do or should reflect at least some of the values and standards that a country likes to think is its public face to the rest of the world. snip One problem with the analysis is that Dulles isn't the major entry point for the US. For the other capitals that the article mentions the airport for the capital is the major international entry. Even Berlin is a more important city locally than Washington. Perhaps we should consider Canberra & Brazil. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Morrow quoted:
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/3cb65d50-4a...00e2511c8.html _The Financial Times_ Jurek Martin: Letter to America Arriving is no breeze either, especially on flights from overseas. Passengers are funnelled through a series of narrow, windowless corridors, often moving no faster than they were on the way out before passing through security, only to be subject to the not always tender mercies of customs and immigration, which is another story entirely. He misses the worst part: Arriving passengers are all bunched up, a plane-full if at all possible, in a single one of those horrible mobile lounges, for transport to the main terminal (though it could be the gas chambers for the way you're treated en route). Who wants to get off a cramped plane only to be stuffed in an even more cramped lurching top-heavy funny-smelling bus? People who have never been to the USA before get pushed into that thing and look at each other with pained and confused expressions that clearly read, "What the hell??" But at Dulles there is no economical downtown bus any longer, unless you count the under-advertised one connecting to an underground stop some miles away, practical only if travelling fairly light. This isn't correct, though. There is an hourly $2.50 bus operated by DC Metro that goes all the way to L'Enfant Plaza. However, word has gotten out about this bus and these days it's often completely packed. So you get to choose between standing with all your luggage for an hour, or fronting the $11 to ride the bus mentioned by the article's author and then the Metro. miguel -- Hit The Road! Photos from 32 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Morrow quoted:
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/3cb65d50-4a...00e2511c8.html _The Financial Times_ Jurek Martin: Letter to America Arriving is no breeze either, especially on flights from overseas. Passengers are funnelled through a series of narrow, windowless corridors, often moving no faster than they were on the way out before passing through security, only to be subject to the not always tender mercies of customs and immigration, which is another story entirely. He misses the worst part: Arriving passengers are all bunched up, a plane-full if at all possible, in a single one of those horrible mobile lounges, for transport to the main terminal (though it could be the gas chambers for the way you're treated en route). Who wants to get off a cramped plane only to be stuffed in an even more cramped lurching top-heavy funny-smelling bus? People who have never been to the USA before get pushed into that thing and look at each other with pained and confused expressions that clearly read, "What the hell??" But at Dulles there is no economical downtown bus any longer, unless you count the under-advertised one connecting to an underground stop some miles away, practical only if travelling fairly light. This isn't correct, though. There is an hourly $2.50 bus operated by DC Metro that goes all the way to L'Enfant Plaza. However, word has gotten out about this bus and these days it's often completely packed. So you get to choose between standing with all your luggage for an hour, or fronting the $11 to ride the bus mentioned by the article's author and then the Metro. miguel -- Hit The Road! Photos from 32 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Morrow quoted:
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/3cb65d50-4a...00e2511c8.html _The Financial Times_ Jurek Martin: Letter to America Arriving is no breeze either, especially on flights from overseas. Passengers are funnelled through a series of narrow, windowless corridors, often moving no faster than they were on the way out before passing through security, only to be subject to the not always tender mercies of customs and immigration, which is another story entirely. He misses the worst part: Arriving passengers are all bunched up, a plane-full if at all possible, in a single one of those horrible mobile lounges, for transport to the main terminal (though it could be the gas chambers for the way you're treated en route). Who wants to get off a cramped plane only to be stuffed in an even more cramped lurching top-heavy funny-smelling bus? People who have never been to the USA before get pushed into that thing and look at each other with pained and confused expressions that clearly read, "What the hell??" But at Dulles there is no economical downtown bus any longer, unless you count the under-advertised one connecting to an underground stop some miles away, practical only if travelling fairly light. This isn't correct, though. There is an hourly $2.50 bus operated by DC Metro that goes all the way to L'Enfant Plaza. However, word has gotten out about this bus and these days it's often completely packed. So you get to choose between standing with all your luggage for an hour, or fronting the $11 to ride the bus mentioned by the article's author and then the Metro. miguel -- Hit The Road! Photos from 32 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FYI: Fresno, Calif., Airport Launches Wi-Fi Internet Access | [email protected] | Air travel | 4 | May 15th, 2004 09:53 AM |
WiFi free airport list | [email protected] | Air travel | 0 | March 4th, 2004 08:25 PM |
Tobago and Barbados | [email protected] | Caribbean | 8 | December 29th, 2003 02:26 PM |
Explosive at airport uncovers security lapse | The Bill Mattocks | Air travel | 5 | December 18th, 2003 02:08 AM |
They changed the name of Atlanta International Airport. | James Anatidae | Air travel | 17 | November 14th, 2003 03:32 PM |