If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Hatunen wrote: communication when you could only post, there was no such thing as top or bottom posting because you could not include the previous post in your response" so without Usenet (the topic here) just what was it you were posting TO? If you asked 'who', the answer would be 'other physicists'. As to 'what', I don't recall that we even had a name for those early network attempts, maybe the electrical guys did. A lot of the early work, including projects like analog computers and masers, was supported in the US by the Army Signal Corp. Seems like that work just sorta faded away, but years later ARPA was formed and put money into what became the arpanet; like the WWW, initially as a tool for physicists to communicate. The first six or so arpanet nodes joined the computers at the US national labs like Los Alamos, Argonne and Oak Ridge. -- wf. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
"randee" wrote in message ... Keith W wrote: Where would I look for a v"vi" editor? On a Unix workstation. Operating systems like HPUX, IRIX, Solaris, AIX, UNICOS. Don't worry about it, well off topic for r.t.e. And one shuld be forewarned that vi is a text based program with a very arcane command code system. See http://www.eng.hawaii.edu/Tutor/vi.html for an idea. And for the masochistic there are windows and mac versions available http://www.vim.org/download.php Personally I always made a point of getting the GNU emacs editor on all my Unix boxes and Windows Keith I once spent a lot of lunch hours putting emacs on one of my programmer's workstations, then she decided she did not like it and went on using vi! EMACS did not compile easily at all under HPUX, at least back 10 or 12 years ago. Didn't do much for me either, vi works fine. My first and only experience of it it crashed when navigating using the arrow keys (instead of whichever cryptic set of alpha keys that you were meant to use). I decided it was a crock of ****e and have never touched it since tim |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:44:09 -0600, randee
wrote: Hatunen wrote: communication when you could only post, there was no such thing as top or bottom posting because you could not include the previous post in your response" so without Usenet (the topic here) just what was it you were posting TO? If you asked 'who', the answer would be 'other physicists'. As to 'what', I don't recall that we even had a name for those early network attempts, maybe the electrical guys did. A lot of the early work, including projects like analog computers and masers, was supported in the US by the Army Signal Corp. Seems like that work just sorta faded away, but years later ARPA was formed and put money into what became the arpanet; like the WWW, initially as a tool for physicists to communicate. The first six or so arpanet nodes joined the computers at the US national labs like Los Alamos, Argonne and Oak Ridge. Ah. Well, the subject of this thread was manner of posting to usenet; I'm not clear of the relevance of posting to other physicists. What kind of posting was it? BB? ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Hatunen wrote: Ah. Well, the subject of this thread was manner of posting to usenet; I'm not clear of the relevance of posting to other physicists. What kind of posting was it? BB? No the subject of the thread is obtaining Euros. It devolved into a discussion of the Uselessnet and predecessors. The earliest computer communications were related to computational results and were sent directly to other computers/teletypes, closest today might be ftp. -- wf. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:11:16 -0600, randee
wrote: Hatunen wrote: Ah. Well, the subject of this thread was manner of posting to usenet; I'm not clear of the relevance of posting to other physicists. What kind of posting was it? BB? No the subject of the thread is obtaining Euros. It devolved into a discussion of the Uselessnet and predecessors. The earliest computer communications were related to computational results and were sent directly to other computers/teletypes, closest today might be ftp. Excuse me; I shouild have said 'sub-thread" not "thread" ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Russia Weighs Shifting Its Holdings to Euros | Earl Evleth | Europe | 1 | November 24th, 2004 05:22 PM |
Travel Gear List -- Need Advice from You Euros!! | Łą$„ | Europe | 133 | August 4th, 2004 09:17 AM |
Euros or US $ in Peru/Bolivia ??? | pierre durand | Latin America | 3 | March 29th, 2004 04:24 PM |
USD for Euros | Jimmie | Europe | 17 | February 17th, 2004 03:45 AM |
Euros in Russia | Luca Logi | Europe | 14 | November 4th, 2003 05:49 AM |