If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2001
|
|||
|
|||
Deep Foiled Malls writes:
At what point of your market research did you determine that customers would pay you ¤300 euros for a days tour of you accompanying them around Paris as a friend in toe, and then having them obliged to pay for your lunch? After examining the rates and services of the competition. But I actually charge less than that, for small groups, and my fees are roughly average for the handful of people who offer this exact service. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
#2002
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:00:38 -0700, Hatunen wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:54:25 GMT, Deep Foiled Malls wrote: No. 1 problem with Shakespeare is that people feel it should not be modernised, and that you should read the original versions. I would rather marvel at the great story telling that wrestling with the language that it was written in. Since Will stole most of his plots I'm sure you can find non-Shakespearian versions thereof updated to today's language. Or read the Cliff's Notes (or their non-Merkin equivalent). In my experience, the academic study of Shakespeare often (but not always) ignores the performance dynamic. Whether or not Will intended an "industry" to grow up around hid works, with so-called "scholars" combing his words for hidden meanings, is a moot point. I somehow doubt that he sat there, scratching away with his quill, thinking: "Phwooar! Gotta put a bit of water symbolism in here." I tend to think that he intended the plays to be performed rather than be read My totally personal take on this is that I've thoroughly enjoyed acting in Will's plays but have heartily dtested trying to psychoanalyze the guy in Lit-Crit classes. Keith, Bristol, UK DE-MUNG for email replies |
#2003
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:00:38 -0700, Hatunen wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:54:25 GMT, Deep Foiled Malls wrote: No. 1 problem with Shakespeare is that people feel it should not be modernised, and that you should read the original versions. I would rather marvel at the great story telling that wrestling with the language that it was written in. Since Will stole most of his plots I'm sure you can find non-Shakespearian versions thereof updated to today's language. Or read the Cliff's Notes (or their non-Merkin equivalent). In my experience, the academic study of Shakespeare often (but not always) ignores the performance dynamic. Whether or not Will intended an "industry" to grow up around hid works, with so-called "scholars" combing his words for hidden meanings, is a moot point. I somehow doubt that he sat there, scratching away with his quill, thinking: "Phwooar! Gotta put a bit of water symbolism in here." I tend to think that he intended the plays to be performed rather than be read My totally personal take on this is that I've thoroughly enjoyed acting in Will's plays but have heartily dtested trying to psychoanalyze the guy in Lit-Crit classes. Keith, Bristol, UK DE-MUNG for email replies |
#2004
|
|||
|
|||
TourLeader wrote:
Unless he moved since he registered his website, of course. He's not on the run, never sleeping in the same house two nights running. Extraordinary mxsmanic, finally since the beginning - All he wanted was to advertise, but he didn't want to do it directly as i could do. Why ? mxsmanic don't worry if you're in jail one day, i will bring you oranges.... I'll bring limes. -- David Horne- www.davidhorne.net usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk |
#2005
|
|||
|
|||
TourLeader wrote:
Unless he moved since he registered his website, of course. He's not on the run, never sleeping in the same house two nights running. Extraordinary mxsmanic, finally since the beginning - All he wanted was to advertise, but he didn't want to do it directly as i could do. Why ? mxsmanic don't worry if you're in jail one day, i will bring you oranges.... I'll bring limes. -- David Horne- www.davidhorne.net usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk |
#2006
|
|||
|
|||
Unless he moved since he registered his website, of course.
He's not on the run, never sleeping in the same house two nights running. Extraordinary mxsmanic, finally since the beginning - All he wanted was to advertise, but he didn't want to do it directly as i could do. Why ? mxsmanic don't worry if you're in jail one day, i will bring you oranges.... |
#2007
|
|||
|
|||
"Keith Anderson" wrote in message ... On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:00:38 -0700, Hatunen wrote: On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:54:25 GMT, Deep Foiled Malls wrote: No. 1 problem with Shakespeare is that people feel it should not be modernised, and that you should read the original versions. I would rather marvel at the great story telling that wrestling with the language that it was written in. Since Will stole most of his plots I'm sure you can find non-Shakespearian versions thereof updated to today's language. Or read the Cliff's Notes (or their non-Merkin equivalent). In my experience, the academic study of Shakespeare often (but not always) ignores the performance dynamic. Whether or not Will intended an "industry" to grow up around hid works, with so-called "scholars" combing his words for hidden meanings, is a moot point. I somehow doubt that he sat there, scratching away with his quill, thinking: "Phwooar! Gotta put a bit of water symbolism in here." I tend to think that he intended the plays to be performed rather than be read My totally personal take on this is that I've thoroughly enjoyed acting in Will's plays but have heartily dtested trying to psychoanalyze the guy in Lit-Crit classes. Indeed, were old Bill around today he'd be writing scripts for TV and Film and not trying to win The Booker. His plays were genuinely popular entertainment, people talked about the latest Shakespeare Play in the same way they now discuss the latest Starwars blockbuster. It was never especially highbrow or respectable, which is why most playhouses were south of the river along with the bear baiting and whorehouses Keith ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#2008
|
|||
|
|||
Keith Anderson wrote:
In my experience, the academic study of Shakespeare often (but not always) ignores the performance dynamic. True. My teacher of English, a wise man, reminded us of this very much. He invited us to consider Will doing a hasty rewrite during rehearsals because a scene was not working well. Whether or not Will intended an "industry" to grow up around hid works, with so-called "scholars" combing his words for hidden meanings, is a moot point. I somehow doubt that he sat there, scratching away with his quill, thinking: "Phwooar! Gotta put a bit of water symbolism in here." I tend to think that he intended the plays to be performed rather than be read My totally personal take on this is that I've thoroughly enjoyed acting in Will's plays but have heartily dtested trying to psychoanalyze the guy in Lit-Crit classes. From the recesses of my mind, I drag up: I dreamt last night that Shakespeare's ghost Sat an exam for a civil service post. The English paper for that year Contained a question on King Lear Which Shakespeare answered very badly Because he had not read his Bradley. -- PB The return address has been MUNGED |
#2009
|
|||
|
|||
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... Statistically, the French are still among the dirtiest people in Western Europe, although it's nothing like the old days. Please cite the evidence from which your statistics are derived. |
#2010
|
|||
|
|||
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... Statistically, the French are still among the dirtiest people in Western Europe, although it's nothing like the old days. Please cite the evidence from which your statistics are derived. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
getting from London to Paris (Stade de France) and back same night | [email protected] | Europe | 3 | January 30th, 2005 11:41 AM |
France will not give up on Euro Disney | poldy | Europe | 0 | January 27th, 2005 04:54 AM |
Suggested Tour Company for a Costa Rica Trip | Dario Wolfish | Latin America | 0 | January 3rd, 2005 03:08 AM |
Paris to Andorra and Souther France questions | Nick | Europe | 11 | June 1st, 2004 09:37 AM |
Difference between Roissybus and Air France bus and RER for transport to Paris from CDG? | Traveler | Europe | 1 | March 3rd, 2004 10:28 AM |