If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2071
|
|||
|
|||
Emilia writes:
No one said it had to "forever end ever" A lifetime plus 70 years is effectively forever and ever. A carpenter isn't the author of an original work. So? Why should authors of original works be paid over and over for a single instance of their work, when people in other professions only get paid once for each bit of work they produce? No one said for ever. If others want to get in on the royality deal then they just need to create an original work that someone wants to license and that others want to buy. Really easy. Get to work. That can be reversed, too: If artists want to make money, let them get real jobs as butchers or construction workers instead of goofing off producing useless "art." -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
#2072
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote: There is nothing unethical about making money from your creative works. Perhaps for a limited time, but not forever. Originally, in the U.S., copyright was just 14 years, which was plenty. Today, it's the lifetime of the author plus 70 years, which is ridiculous. Work once, get paid forever? There are a lot of people in other occupations who would love to have that opportunity! The problem in the US is that copyright is often controlled by conglomerates, not the artist who created the work. Look at the way the record industry is. They strong-arm artists into one-sided contracts at one end and then lobby Congress to extend copyrights and induce penalties for so-called copyright infringement on the other end. Just this week, Congress passed a law, which Bush signed, which makes it illegal to sue a company called Clear Play, which removes scenes and adult language from mainstream feature film DVDs. Most directors had decried this product as copyright infringement. Congress basically wrote a law just to give exception to this one company because the religious right favors the product. |
#2073
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote: There is nothing unethical about making money from your creative works. Perhaps for a limited time, but not forever. Originally, in the U.S., copyright was just 14 years, which was plenty. Today, it's the lifetime of the author plus 70 years, which is ridiculous. Work once, get paid forever? There are a lot of people in other occupations who would love to have that opportunity! The problem in the US is that copyright is often controlled by conglomerates, not the artist who created the work. Look at the way the record industry is. They strong-arm artists into one-sided contracts at one end and then lobby Congress to extend copyrights and induce penalties for so-called copyright infringement on the other end. Just this week, Congress passed a law, which Bush signed, which makes it illegal to sue a company called Clear Play, which removes scenes and adult language from mainstream feature film DVDs. Most directors had decried this product as copyright infringement. Congress basically wrote a law just to give exception to this one company because the religious right favors the product. |
#2074
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Emilia wrote: Sure ... once. But not forever and ever. No one said it had to "forever end ever" How long does a copyright last in the EU? |
#2075
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Emilia wrote: Sure ... once. But not forever and ever. No one said it had to "forever end ever" How long does a copyright last in the EU? |
#2076
|
|||
|
|||
poldy wrote:
In article , Emilia wrote: Sure ... once. But not forever and ever. No one said it had to "forever end ever" How long does a copyright last in the EU? I think it is an internationally-agreed convention: the lifetime of the creator plus 50 years. -- PB The return address has been MUNGED |
#2077
|
|||
|
|||
poldy wrote:
In article , Emilia wrote: Sure ... once. But not forever and ever. No one said it had to "forever end ever" How long does a copyright last in the EU? I think it is an internationally-agreed convention: the lifetime of the creator plus 50 years. -- PB The return address has been MUNGED |
#2078
|
|||
|
|||
"Emilia" wrote in message
.54... ... create an original work that someone wants to license and that others want to buy. Really easy. Get to work. Mixi? Original? WORK? Not bloody likely. Can you imagine? Mixi doing real work? It's hilarious! |
#2079
|
|||
|
|||
nitram writes:
Good advice! Why don't you? I have. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
#2080
|
|||
|
|||
poldy writes:
How long does a copyright last in the EU? Different countries can specify different durations, but in France it's the life of the author plus 75 years, IIRC. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
getting from London to Paris (Stade de France) and back same night | [email protected] | Europe | 3 | January 30th, 2005 11:41 AM |
France will not give up on Euro Disney | poldy | Europe | 0 | January 27th, 2005 04:54 AM |
Suggested Tour Company for a Costa Rica Trip | Dario Wolfish | Latin America | 0 | January 3rd, 2005 03:08 AM |
Paris to Andorra and Souther France questions | Nick | Europe | 11 | June 1st, 2004 09:37 AM |
Difference between Roissybus and Air France bus and RER for transport to Paris from CDG? | Traveler | Europe | 1 | March 3rd, 2004 10:28 AM |