If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dems split: Liberal whackos apoplectic over Lieberman support by their own
How sweet it is....
Published 07/17/2006 WASHINGTON - "Liberal activists, including some California Democrats, are furious with Sen. Barbara Boxer -- a leading critic of the Iraq war -- for her active support of Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Democrat who staunchly defends the war in Iraq. Lieberman is fighting for his political life in Connecticut, facing an anti-war opponent, cable magnate Ned Lamont, in an Aug. 8 Senate primary. Lieberman, his party's nominee for vice president in 2000, has already announced he will run as an independent in the fall if he loses the primary. That decision has divided his Senate colleagues and Democrats nationwide. And the Lieberman race has ignited a fiery debate among Democrats, now raging on political blogs, about loyalty, political principles and whether the three-term senator has betrayed his party and should be tossed out. Boxer, a California Democrat, said she decided to support Lieberman, and campaign for him in Connecticut, even though ``we have no common ground surrounding the issue of the Iraq war.'' Lieberman has been one of her ``staunchest allies'' on the environment and reproductive rights, two issues very important to her, Boxer said in a statement. ``I will be campaigning with him to let the voters know about his record on those issues.'' Several other Senate Democrats said they would campaign for Lieberman, but Boxer ``is among the most liberal members of the Senate, and her decision surprised some people,'' said Norman Ornstein, a longtime analyst of Congress and elections. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, also a California Democrat, is backing Lieberman, but has no plans to campaign for him. Boxer's decision stunned some California Democrats. Arianna Huffington, on her popular blog, titled one post ``What the hell is Barbara Boxer thinking?'' Within days, Huffington Post and Daily Kos, another liberal blog, were filled with angry responses from Californians. ``She better cancel that [Connecticut] trip if she wants any more donations from me and other California activists,'' wrote one..... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dems split: Liberal whackos apoplectic over Lieberman support by their own
His district will take him out...
Jenni The Dems want Lieberman muzzled and they are working quietly to torpedo his campaign. The Democrat Party strategy has been somewhat effective. A Quinnipiac University poll has Lamont gaining ground among Democrat voters, although Lieberman maintains high ratings among Republicans and unaffiliated voters. Unaffiliated voters are the state's largest voting bloc, followed by Democrats and Republicans, according to Quinnipiac pollsters. The poll reveals that if Lieberman runs as an Independent, he would win with 56 percent of the vote, compared with 18 percent for Lamont and 8 percent for Republican Alan Schlesinger, a moderate. And that surely angers -- even scares -- the Democrats." Jenni wrote: His district will take him out... "PJ O'Donovan" wrote in message oups.com... How sweet it is.... Published 07/17/2006 WASHINGTON - "Liberal activists, including some California Democrats, are furious with Sen. Barbara Boxer -- a leading critic of the Iraq war -- for her active support of Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Democrat who staunchly defends the war in Iraq. Lieberman is fighting for his political life in Connecticut, facing an anti-war opponent, cable magnate Ned Lamont, in an Aug. 8 Senate primary. Lieberman, his party's nominee for vice president in 2000, has already announced he will run as an independent in the fall if he loses the primary. That decision has divided his Senate colleagues and Democrats nationwide. And the Lieberman race has ignited a fiery debate among Democrats, now raging on political blogs, about loyalty, political principles and whether the three-term senator has betrayed his party and should be tossed out. Boxer, a California Democrat, said she decided to support Lieberman, and campaign for him in Connecticut, even though ``we have no common ground surrounding the issue of the Iraq war.'' Lieberman has been one of her ``staunchest allies'' on the environment and reproductive rights, two issues very important to her, Boxer said in a statement. ``I will be campaigning with him to let the voters know about his record on those issues.'' Several other Senate Democrats said they would campaign for Lieberman, but Boxer ``is among the most liberal members of the Senate, and her decision surprised some people,'' said Norman Ornstein, a longtime analyst of Congress and elections. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, also a California Democrat, is backing Lieberman, but has no plans to campaign for him. Boxer's decision stunned some California Democrats. Arianna Huffington, on her popular blog, titled one post ``What the hell is Barbara Boxer thinking?'' Within days, Huffington Post and Daily Kos, another liberal blog, were filled with angry responses from Californians. ``She better cancel that [Connecticut] trip if she wants any more donations from me and other California activists,'' wrote one..... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dems split: Liberal whackos apoplectic over Lieberman support by their own
Another Hezbollah Jihad Democrat Terrorist wrote: "Jenni" wrote in message ... His district will take him out... ================== Senaotrs dont have a ' district" you retarded maggot larvae. THE whole state votes for a Senator. Man you Democrats are stupid inbred donkey anuses. you are thinking of Americans |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Dems split: Liberal whackos apoplectic over Lieberman support by their own
PJ O'Donovan wrote: How sweet it is.... Published 07/17/2006 WASHINGTON - "Liberal activists, including some California Democrats, are furious with Sen. Barbara Boxer -- a leading critic of the Iraq war -- for her active support of Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Democrat who staunchly defends the war in Iraq. Lieberman is fighting for his political life in Connecticut, facing an anti-war opponent, cable magnate Ned Lamont, in an Aug. 8 Senate primary. Lieberman, his party's nominee for vice president in 2000, has already announced he will run as an independent in the fall if he loses the primary. That decision has divided his Senate colleagues and Democrats nationwide. And the Lieberman race has ignited a fiery debate among Democrats, now raging on political blogs, about loyalty, political principles and whether the three-term senator has betrayed his party and should be tossed out. Boxer, a California Democrat, said she decided to support Lieberman, and campaign for him in Connecticut, even though ``we have no common ground surrounding the issue of the Iraq war.'' Lieberman has been one of her ``staunchest allies'' on the environment and reproductive rights, two issues very important to her, Boxer said in a statement. ``I will be campaigning with him to let the voters know about his record on those issues.'' Several other Senate Democrats said they would campaign for Lieberman, but Boxer ``is among the most liberal members of the Senate, and her decision surprised some people,'' said Norman Ornstein, a longtime analyst of Congress and elections. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, also a California Democrat, is backing Lieberman, but has no plans to campaign for him. Boxer's decision stunned some California Democrats. Arianna Huffington, on her popular blog, titled one post ``What the hell is Barbara Boxer thinking?'' Within days, Huffington Post and Daily Kos, another liberal blog, were filled with angry responses from Californians. ``She better cancel that [Connecticut] trip if she wants any more donations from me and other California activists,'' wrote one..... Just to show you that unlike you guys we don't march lock step |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dems split: Liberal whackos apoplectic over Lieberman support by their own
"bushlied" wrote in message ps.com... PJ O'Donovan wrote: How sweet it is.... Published 07/17/2006 WASHINGTON - "Liberal activists, including some California Democrats, are furious with Sen. Barbara Boxer -- a leading critic of the Iraq war -- for her active support of Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Democrat who staunchly defends the war in Iraq. Lieberman is fighting for his political life in Connecticut, facing an anti-war opponent, cable magnate Ned Lamont, in an Aug. 8 Senate primary. Lieberman, his party's nominee for vice president in 2000, has already announced he will run as an independent in the fall if he loses the primary. That decision has divided his Senate colleagues and Democrats nationwide. And the Lieberman race has ignited a fiery debate among Democrats, now raging on political blogs, about loyalty, political principles and whether the three-term senator has betrayed his party and should be tossed out. Boxer, a California Democrat, said she decided to support Lieberman, and campaign for him in Connecticut, even though ``we have no common ground surrounding the issue of the Iraq war.'' Lieberman has been one of her ``staunchest allies'' on the environment and reproductive rights, two issues very important to her, Boxer said in a statement. ``I will be campaigning with him to let the voters know about his record on those issues.'' Several other Senate Democrats said they would campaign for Lieberman, but Boxer ``is among the most liberal members of the Senate, and her decision surprised some people,'' said Norman Ornstein, a longtime analyst of Congress and elections. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, also a California Democrat, is backing Lieberman, but has no plans to campaign for him. Boxer's decision stunned some California Democrats. Arianna Huffington, on her popular blog, titled one post ``What the hell is Barbara Boxer thinking?'' Within days, Huffington Post and Daily Kos, another liberal blog, were filled with angry responses from Californians. ``She better cancel that [Connecticut] trip if she wants any more donations from me and other California activists,'' wrote one..... Just to show you that unlike you guys we don't march lock step ========================= Yeah, your whole party is in disarray because they have no agenda that voters want to vote for. One day Rats are against Illegal immigration, the next day democrast like Howeid Dean and Hairy reid are calling Americans racist for wanting Englis as the USA official language. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Dems split: Liberal whackos apoplectic over Lieberman support by their own
"Jenni" wrote in message ... He needs to go. He has sided with Bush... ========================= I guess 90 % of Democrats need to go this elction as they sided with Bush in the recent Congressional votes on staying in Iraq . I like that idea. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Dems split: Liberal whackos apoplectic over Lieberman support by their own
"Another Hezbollah Jihad Democrat Terrorist" democrat Hezbollah
Terrorist @DNC.com wrote in om: "Jenni" wrote in message ... His district will take him out... ================== Senaotrs dont have a ' district" you retarded maggot larvae. THE whole state votes for a Senator. Man you Democrats are stupid inbred donkey anuses. Isn't it about time you change handles again? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Dems split: Liberal whackos apoplectic over Lieberman support by their own
"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message ... "Another Hezbollah Jihad Democrat Terrorist" democrat Hezbollah Terrorist @DNC.com wrote in om: "Jenni" wrote in message ... His district will take him out... ================== Senaotrs dont have a ' district" you retarded maggot larvae. THE whole state votes for a Senator. Man you Democrats are stupid inbred donkey anuses. Isn't it about time you change handles again? ========================== Aren't you going to tell us about Lieberman's district in Conn? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Dems split: Liberal whackos apoplectic over Lieberman support by their own
His district will take him out...
"PJ O'Donovan" wrote in message oups.com... How sweet it is.... Published 07/17/2006 WASHINGTON - "Liberal activists, including some California Democrats, are furious with Sen. Barbara Boxer -- a leading critic of the Iraq war -- for her active support of Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Democrat who staunchly defends the war in Iraq. Lieberman is fighting for his political life in Connecticut, facing an anti-war opponent, cable magnate Ned Lamont, in an Aug. 8 Senate primary. Lieberman, his party's nominee for vice president in 2000, has already announced he will run as an independent in the fall if he loses the primary. That decision has divided his Senate colleagues and Democrats nationwide. And the Lieberman race has ignited a fiery debate among Democrats, now raging on political blogs, about loyalty, political principles and whether the three-term senator has betrayed his party and should be tossed out. Boxer, a California Democrat, said she decided to support Lieberman, and campaign for him in Connecticut, even though ``we have no common ground surrounding the issue of the Iraq war.'' Lieberman has been one of her ``staunchest allies'' on the environment and reproductive rights, two issues very important to her, Boxer said in a statement. ``I will be campaigning with him to let the voters know about his record on those issues.'' Several other Senate Democrats said they would campaign for Lieberman, but Boxer ``is among the most liberal members of the Senate, and her decision surprised some people,'' said Norman Ornstein, a longtime analyst of Congress and elections. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, also a California Democrat, is backing Lieberman, but has no plans to campaign for him. Boxer's decision stunned some California Democrats. Arianna Huffington, on her popular blog, titled one post ``What the hell is Barbara Boxer thinking?'' Within days, Huffington Post and Daily Kos, another liberal blog, were filled with angry responses from Californians. ``She better cancel that [Connecticut] trip if she wants any more donations from me and other California activists,'' wrote one..... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Dems split: Liberal whackos apoplectic over Lieberman support by their own
"Another Hezbollah Jihad Democrat Terrorist" democrat Hezbollah Terrorist
@DNC.com wrote in om: "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message ... "Another Hezbollah Jihad Democrat Terrorist" democrat Hezbollah Terrorist @DNC.com wrote in om: "Jenni" wrote in message ... His district will take him out... ================== Senaotrs dont have a ' district" you retarded maggot larvae. THE whole state votes for a Senator. Man you Democrats are stupid inbred donkey anuses. Isn't it about time you change handles again? ========================== Aren't you going to tell us about Lieberman's district in Conn? For Senators their state and their district are the same thing. Next? Mitchell Holman "They want the federal government controlling Social Security like it's some kind of federal program." George W. Bush, November 2, 2000 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|