If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Babies Caught Up in 'No-Fly' Confusion
Again, why have such a list if you don't immediately detain,
interrogate, or arrest someone that matches the list? If the point of the list is NOT to capture these bad guys, then what's the point of the list? Is there anything printed these days on tickets (ie the fine print in the contract of carriage) between airline and passenger that spells out any contingency when a name match happens? And why can't some alert happen at the time of booking? Why does it have to happen at check-in? ------------------------ http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050815/D8C0FUO80.html Babies Caught Up in 'No-Fly' Confusion Aug 15, 4:47 PM (ET) By LESLIE MILLER WASHINGTON (AP) - Infants have been stopped from boarding planes at airports throughout the U.S. because their names are the same as or similar to those of possible terrorists on the government's "no-fly list." It sounds like a joke, but it's not funny to parents who miss flights while scrambling to have babies' passports and other documents faxed. Ingrid Sanden's 1-year-old daughter was stopped in Phoenix before boarding a flight home to Washington at Thanksgiving. "I completely understand the war on terrorism, and I completely understand people wanting to be safe when they fly," Sanden said. "But focusing the target a little bit is probably a better use of resources." The government's lists of people who are either barred from flying or require extra scrutiny before being allowed to board airplanes grew markedly since the Sept. 11 attacks. Critics including the American Civil Liberties Union say the government doesn't provide enough information about the people on the lists, so innocent passengers can be caught up in the security sweep if they happen to have the same name as someone on the lists. That can happen even if the person happens to be an infant like Sanden's daughter. (Children under 2 don't need tickets but Sanden purchased one for her daughter to ensure she had a seat.) "It was bizarre," Sanden said. "I was hugely pregnant, and I was like, 'We look really threatening.'" Sarah Zapolsky and her husband had a similar experience last month while departing from Dulles International Airport outside Washington. An airline ticket agent told them their 11-month-old son was on the government list. They were able to board their flight after ticket agents took a half-hour to fax her son's passport and fill out paperwork. "I understand that security is important," Zapolsky said. "But if they're just guessing, and we have to give up our passport to prove that our 11-month-old is not a terrorist, it's a waste of their time." Well-known people like Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., and David Nelson, who starred in the sitcom "The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet," also have been stopped at airports because their names match those on the lists. The government has sought to improve its process for checking passengers since the Sept. 11 attacks. The first attempt was scuttled because of fears the government would have access to too much personal information. A new version, called Secure Flight, is being crafted. But for now, airlines still have the duty to check passengers' names against those supplied by the government. That job has become more difficult - since the 2001 attacks the lists have swelled from a dozen or so names to more than 100,000 names, according to people in the aviation industry who are familiar with the issue. They asked not to be identified by name because the exact number is restricted information. Not all those names are accompanied by biographical information that can more closely identify the suspected terrorists. That can create problems for people who reserve flights under such names as "T Kennedy" or "David Nelson." ACLU lawyer Tim Sparapani said the problem of babies stopped by the no-fly list illustrates some of the reasons the lists don't work. "There's no oversight over the names," Sparapani said. "We know names are added hastily, and when you have a name-based system you don't focus on solid intelligence leads. You focus on names that are similar to those that might be suspicious." The Transportation Security Administration, which administers the lists, instructs airlines not to deny boarding to children under 12 - or select them for extra security checks - even if their names match those on a list. But it happens anyway. Debby McElroy, president of the Regional Airline Association, said: "Our information indicates it happens at every major airport." The TSA has a "passenger ombudsman" who will investigate individual claims from passengers who say they are mistakenly on the lists. TSA spokeswoman Yolanda Clark said 89 children have submitted their names to the ombudsman. Of those, 14 are under the age of 2. If the ombudsman determines an individual should not be stopped, additional information on that person is included on the list so he or she is not stopped the next time they fly. Clark said even with the problems the lists are essential to keeping airline passengers safe. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fly Guy wrote:
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050815/D8C0FUO80.html WASHINGTON (AP) - Infants have been stopped from boarding planes at airports throughout the U.S. because their names are the same as or similar to those of possible terrorists on the government's "no-fly list." I've got a friend with a 9-year-old son who always has trouble when they fly because the computer flags his name as being an alias for a known terrorist called, and I kid you not, "Bilbo Baggins". They've told her that it was a name put in for testing but don't seem to be able to get rid of it. miguel -- Hit The Road! Photos from 36 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu Latest photos: Queens Day in Amsterdam; the Grand Canyon; Amman, Jordan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Miguel Cruz" wrote:
I've got a friend with a 9-year-old son who always has trouble when they fly because the computer flags his name as being an alias for a known terrorist called, and I kid you not, "Bilbo Baggins". They've told her that it was a name put in for testing but don't seem to be able to get rid of it. Theoretically, they should be able to contact the Ombudsman's Office at TSA to have this issue resolved. =R= |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:20:10 -0400 "Rog'" wrote:
:"Miguel Cruz" wrote: : I've got a friend with a 9-year-old son who always has trouble : when they fly because the computer flags his name as being an : alias for a known terrorist called, and I kid you not, "Bilbo : Baggins". They've told her that it was a name put in for testing : but don't seem to be able to get rid of it. :Theoretically, they should be able to contact the Ombudsman's :Office at TSA to have this issue resolved. =R= Thank the ACLU for not allowing the TSA to profile for likely terrorists. -- Binyamin Dissen http://www.dissensoftware.com Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:20:10 -0400 "Rog'" wrote: :"Miguel Cruz" wrote: : I've got a friend with a 9-year-old son who always has trouble : when they fly because the computer flags his name as being an : alias for a known terrorist called, and I kid you not, "Bilbo : Baggins". They've told her that it was a name put in for testing : but don't seem to be able to get rid of it. :Theoretically, they should be able to contact the Ombudsman's :Office at TSA to have this issue resolved. =R= Thank the ACLU for not allowing the TSA to profile for likely terrorists. ACLU doesn't make the law. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Binyamin Dissen wrote: On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:20:10 -0400 "Rog'" wrote: :"Miguel Cruz" wrote: : I've got a friend with a 9-year-old son who always has trouble : when they fly because the computer flags his name as being an : alias for a known terrorist called, and I kid you not, "Bilbo : Baggins". They've told her that it was a name put in for testing : but don't seem to be able to get rid of it. :Theoretically, they should be able to contact the Ombudsman's :Office at TSA to have this issue resolved. =R= Thank the ACLU for not allowing the TSA to profile for likely terrorists. Thank the Bush administration for agreeing with the ACLU. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:52:51 -0400 Shawn Hirn wrote:
:In article , : Binyamin Dissen wrote: : On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:20:10 -0400 "Rog'" wrote: : :"Miguel Cruz" wrote: : : I've got a friend with a 9-year-old son who always has trouble : : when they fly because the computer flags his name as being an : : alias for a known terrorist called, and I kid you not, "Bilbo : : Baggins". They've told her that it was a name put in for testing : : but don't seem to be able to get rid of it. : :Theoretically, they should be able to contact the Ombudsman's : :Office at TSA to have this issue resolved. =R= : Thank the ACLU for not allowing the TSA to profile for likely terrorists. :Thank the Bush administration for agreeing with the ACLU. Wasn't aware that the courts gave him much choice. -- Binyamin Dissen http://www.dissensoftware.com Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Binyamin Dissen wrote: On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:52:51 -0400 Shawn Hirn wrote: :In article , : Binyamin Dissen wrote: : On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:20:10 -0400 "Rog'" wrote: : :"Miguel Cruz" wrote: : : I've got a friend with a 9-year-old son who always has trouble : : when they fly because the computer flags his name as being an : : alias for a known terrorist called, and I kid you not, "Bilbo : : Baggins". They've told her that it was a name put in for testing : : but don't seem to be able to get rid of it. : :Theoretically, they should be able to contact the Ombudsman's : :Office at TSA to have this issue resolved. =R= : Thank the ACLU for not allowing the TSA to profile for likely terrorists. :Thank the Bush administration for agreeing with the ACLU. Wasn't aware that the courts gave him much choice. The true silliness here is that the folks implementing the screening aren't given any flexibility in implementation. The most amusing thing in the article is that the parents were trying to get a fax of the kids passport. Why did anyone care. If the kid had a different name or was slightly older it was still to young to be a threat. A blind idiot could see that the kid wasn't a threat. Where is some sense in the process. No TSA has to assume that everyone in the process is an idiot and only they can make any judgment. Thus confirming that they are complete idiots. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Frank F. Matthews" wrote in message . .. Binyamin Dissen wrote: On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:52:51 -0400 Shawn Hirn wrote: :In article , : Binyamin Dissen wrote: : On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:20:10 -0400 "Rog'" wrote: : :"Miguel Cruz" wrote: : : I've got a friend with a 9-year-old son who always has trouble : : when they fly because the computer flags his name as being an : : alias for a known terrorist called, and I kid you not, "Bilbo : : Baggins". They've told her that it was a name put in for testing : : but don't seem to be able to get rid of it. : :Theoretically, they should be able to contact the Ombudsman's : :Office at TSA to have this issue resolved. =R= : Thank the ACLU for not allowing the TSA to profile for likely terrorists. :Thank the Bush administration for agreeing with the ACLU. Wasn't aware that the courts gave him much choice. The true silliness here is that the folks implementing the screening aren't given any flexibility in implementation. The most amusing thing in the article is that the parents were trying to get a fax of the kids passport. Why did anyone care. If the kid had a different name or was slightly older it was still to young to be a threat. A blind idiot could see that the kid wasn't a threat. Where is some sense in the process. No TSA has to assume that everyone in the process is an idiot and only they can make any judgment. Thus confirming that they are complete idiots. The question is; Are TSA employees incapable of using discretion, or do their Supervisors refuse to *allow* them to use discretion? None the less, there *are* idiots involved here. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:41:18 GMT "Maxx." wrote:
:"Frank F. Matthews" wrote in message m... : Binyamin Dissen wrote: : On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:52:51 -0400 Shawn Hirn wrote: : :In article , : : Binyamin Dissen wrote: : : On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:20:10 -0400 "Rog'" : wrote: : : :"Miguel Cruz" wrote: : : : I've got a friend with a 9-year-old son who always has trouble : : : when they fly because the computer flags his name as being an : : : alias for a known terrorist called, and I kid you not, "Bilbo : : : Baggins". They've told her that it was a name put in for testing : : : but don't seem to be able to get rid of it. : : :Theoretically, they should be able to contact the Ombudsman's : : :Office at TSA to have this issue resolved. =R= : Thank the ACLU : for not allowing the TSA to profile for likely terrorists. : :Thank the Bush administration for agreeing with the ACLU. : Wasn't aware that the courts gave him much choice. : The true silliness here is that the folks implementing the screening : aren't given any flexibility in implementation. The most amusing thing in : the article is that the parents were trying to get a fax of the kids : passport. Why did anyone care. If the kid had a different name or was : slightly older it was still to young to be a threat. A blind idiot could : see that the kid wasn't a threat. Where is some sense in the process. : No TSA has to assume that everyone in the process is an idiot and only : they can make any judgment. Thus confirming that they are complete : idiots. :The question is; :Are TSA employees incapable of using discretion, or do their Supervisors :refuse to *allow* them to use discretion? The latter. If they use discretion, the ACLU will get on their backs about "profiling". :None the less, there *are* idiots involved here. No question about that. -- Binyamin Dissen http://www.dissensoftware.com Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why Europeans dislike Bush Boo Hoo..... Cry Babies. | Jo Jo | Air travel | 4 | November 15th, 2004 05:39 PM |
Mexico: Car confusion as Customs cracks down | ivan jay | Backpacking and Budget travel | 0 | May 4th, 2004 04:10 PM |
sister caught with the kid next store 4666 | sombody | Australia & New Zealand | 0 | April 18th, 2004 04:35 AM |
Vietnamese sisters may have caught bird flu from brother, WHO says (EMMA ROSS, AP Medical Writer) | LIBERTY FLAME | Asia | 0 | February 3rd, 2004 03:37 AM |
Grand Canyon Confusion | Scott Blankenship | USA & Canada | 4 | October 15th, 2003 10:40 AM |