If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
European trip ?'s
PTRAVEL wrote:
I'm not disagreeing that it's not possible to pack much lighter than the average American. Bear in mind, though, that "pack light" shouldn't be a religion, and there are good reasons why it's not always possible, e.g. extended trips (3 to 5 weeks), business attire, cold weather, etc. I agree. I have a Rick Steves' Back Door bag, and usually travel in that and one additional small bag. This Fall, though, I went to German from September 29 to December 4. As a student of the German language. I needed clothes for summer temps, my winter coat, boots, plenty of books. I packed relatively heavy. (I also did laundry weekly). I would not do that on a real trip, here I was in one place for four weeks at a time, so it was less of an issue. But on the in between weekends it was murder! You get my point -- different people have different needs. Over-packing is unnecessary and a pain, but people need what they need. It's like those obsessed with budget travel. Sure, it's nice if you eat on 1 Euro a day or less, but if you don't have to, why would you? different folks, different strokes. Exactly. Finally, as PTravel mentioned, lugging around smaller luggage makes your train travel and walkabouts to/from hotels much easier and less stressful. I refer any American traveling to Europe to the hallowed halls of pragmatic travel guru Rick Steves: http://www.ricksteves.com/. Ah, I think I understand. I am definitely _not_ in the Rick Steves school of world travel. I agree completely with his basic philosophy, i.e. get off the beaten path, eat local, experience the culture. His approach to budgeting, though, is not something I would ever do. i I'm the same way. I like his philosphy, but I want both my cameras with. I have invested in a certain amount of travel clothing, which is light, durable, easily washed and packs small. I am willing to wash, though. But I need something for the Opera, too. Quite often, but not always, the touristy crap is very much the real part of a city or region. Think Florence, for example. The best point Steves makes, I think, is that there is no reason to be afraid to get off the tourist path, particularly in Europe. There is, however, a reason why tourist attractions become tourist attractions. Again, using Florence as an example, would you really suggest skipping the Uffizi? I'd re-phrase that to: don't be afraid to stay in B'n'Bs. Big hotels can very, very nice if they're the right big hotels, and if you travel at the right time of year, the difference between a luxury 5-star and a budget 3-star can be considerably less than most people think. Learn enough of the language and customs to greet people and ask simple questions. (Mea Culpa: my Czech consisted of 3 words - and I paid the price for my ignorance). Absolutely! I can't emphasize this enough -- it makes SO much difference if you can say, "Excuse me," "Thank you," etc. I've found that people the world over appreciate and enjoy it if you make the effort. It says, "I'm interested enough in you, your country and culture to learn to be polite in your language." One final word for the OP: 10 days is a short trip. I recommend you spend 5 days in London (with side trips to Bath or Brighton or Stonehenge or whatever), then take the Channel train for 5 days in Paris, with a day trip or two from there. Then fly home from Paris. I agree completely with this suggestion. Taking day trips is one of the joys of travelling for a few reasons. Aside from getting out of town and experiencing something different, you get a chance to really immerse yourself in day-to-day real life of whatever country you visit. In catching the train or bus, you'll observe lots of little details, some similar, some different, that are part of the culture that you're visiting. My wife and I have been travelling together extensively for about ten years. We find, as time goes on, we want to spend more and more time in a single place, using it as a base to explore the surrounding environs. Now, we'll rarely spend less than a week to 10 days in a new city, though we might do as little as 5 days in one which we've visited often. We find that we really get a sense of the gestalt of a place by doing this. As an added bonus, we invariably find a restaurant, cafe, magazine stand, or something similar, that we like enough to continue going back to and, after a few days, we become regulars -- it's nice to be greeted as returning friends when you're in another country. You'll enjoy the trip more without the endless travel and musical-chair hotel stays. Amen! The biggest mistake new travelers make is to forget that a travel day is, usually, a wasted day. Whether you're travelling by train or plane, it means packing, checking out, get to the airport or train station, making the actual trip, getting to the new hotel, checking in, and then getting unpacked. I don't care how light someone travels, it's exhausting and not particularly fun. And when you get home all excited about the cool time you had, you can crack open the atlas and start planning your next 10 day, 2 city trip to Europe. Sing it, brother! Now, THAT's my religion! - TR "Dám si jedno pivo prosím." --- too late to properly ask "I'll have a beer, please..." -- Julie ********** Check out the blog of my 9 week Germany adventure at www.blurty.com/users/jholm Check out my Travel Pages (non-commercial) at http://www.dragonsholm.org/travel.htm |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
European trip ?'s
The Reid wrote:
Following up to PTRAVEL do you mean you walk on with two bags? A lot of airlines seem to be pretty strict on hand luggage (increasingly I think). I've only had problems in Europe on the LCCs (Ryan Air comes to mind) -- I've never had any problem with the major carriers. I've had a couple insist on weighting them in the last couple of years.(non LCC in at least one case, IIRC). To tell the truth, I wouldn't mind if some of the airlines were a bit stricter. I was on a full NW plane last night from Boston to Amsterdam where quite a few people had two large carry-ons with them. It wasted a lot of time in loading the plane IMO, and several of the passengers had to have the cabin crew check-in some of the bags which wouldn't fit. Say what you like about budgets like Ryanair and Easyjet, but they can load a plane quickly! -- David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
European trip ?'s
B Vaughan wrote:
On 2 Jan 2006 18:37:12 -0800, "keybdwizrd" wrote: - Many flights to Europe from the US are overnight flights. Sleeping difficulties (especially in coach) combined with jet lag can make the first day or two really rough. If arriving in the morning, book a hotel room for the night before so that you can check in immediately upon arrival and try to catch a quick nap. I disagree with this advice. Taking a nap in the morning is just setting yourself up for several more days of being on the wrong schedule. The best thing you can do on your arrival in Europe is stay outdoors in the sunshine as much as possible and try to go to bed at a reasonable hour for your new time zone. I used to swear by this, but I now find that a nap in the early morning can be wonderful, especially if like me you can't sleep on flights. Admittedly, I find it only works if I happen to get in very early, and have a bed- not always guaranteed when you're staying in a hotel with afternoon check-in times. For me, the most important thing is to get up as early as possible the following morning. I'm planning on getting up at around 4.30 tomorrow- that's what I usually do, and it seems to work in 'knocking' my system back into the local time zone. -- David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
European trip ?'s
The Reid wrote:
Following up to Martin 3 days in London, easiest place to start as English spoken, then Eurostar to Paris, then on to Switzerland (car/train?), so three places in about 10 days, sounds sensible to me. You dont want ages in a place you might decide you dont like. Next year maybe try somewhere "latin", Sevilla, Firenze, Venice? NEW YEAR'S RESOLUTION: If you are going to use local spelling be consistent, Mike. Nah, I'll use what I'm comfortable with, as does pretty much everybody else. I think you're missing the point- many people here are comfortable with vernacular names- doesn't mean they use them when they write in English. In any case, it doesn't make sense that you Englished Venice, but not the other two. With preference for the "real" name is there's a choice in the front of my mind. Huh? -- David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
European trip ?'s
B Vaughan wrote:
- Many flights to Europe from the US are overnight flights. Sleeping difficulties (especially in coach) combined with jet lag can make the first day or two really rough. If arriving in the morning, book a hotel room for the night before so that you can check in immediately upon arrival and try to catch a quick nap. I disagree with this advice. Taking a nap in the morning is just setting yourself up for several more days of being on the wrong schedule. The best thing you can do on your arrival in Europe is stay outdoors in the sunshine as much as possible and try to go to bed at a reasonable hour for your new time zone. I have tried it different ways. I cannot sleep on a plane or in any other moving vehicle. On my first overseas flight I arrived in Paris, got down to Gare Est and headed to Strasbourg. I went to bed after dinner, slept late the next day and was jet lagged for several days. On my second trip I arrived in Copenhagen, caught my second wind while some friends took me for a tour of the island and delivered me to my hotel. We had a late lunch / early dinner and I went to bed at 6:30 pm, slept right through the night and got up early the next day feeling pretty good. On my last trip, we flew to Hamburg after a short layover in Munich. We drove about an hour to Lubeck, checked into our hotel and had a short nap, about an hour. We then went out for dinner, and went to bed around 9am and woke up at 7 am feeling great. I think that was the best option. It allowed us to catch up on the sleep we missed without ruining the first day entirely. To achieve this, you should try to sleep as much as possible during the flight. Skip the movie and try to fall asleep immediately after the meal service. Do whatever you have to do to fall asleep: eyeshades, ear plugs, funny inflatable pillows, a glass of wine, whatever it takes to get a decent night's sleep. It's bound to be too short on a flight to England, but even five or six hours should be enough to allow you to get through the first day. Fine for those who can sleep on the plane. I cannot. It doesn't matter what time of day or night or the distance and duration of the flight. I just don't fall asleep if I the thing is moving. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
European trip ?'s
Dave Smith wrote:
Fine for those who can sleep on the plane. I cannot. It doesn't matter what time of day or night or the distance and duration of the flight. I just don't fall asleep if I the thing is moving. Eat a lot-take a memory foam pillow-take an Ambien right after eating-hydrate like crazy when u awake. Then stay awake until regular sleeping time when u arrive. Works for me even after 14 hr Australia flights |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
European trip ?'s
Dave Smith writes:
I disagree with this advice. Taking a nap in the morning is just setting yourself up for several more days of being on the wrong schedule. The best thing you can do on your arrival in Europe is stay outdoors in the sunshine as much as possible and try to go to bed at a reasonable hour for your new time zone. I have tried it different ways. I cannot sleep on a plane or in any other moving vehicle. Life on Starship Earth must just be one long bummer for you, isn't it? Des |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
European trip ?'s
Jens Arne Maennig wrote:
While it's certainly possible to do a lot of one's own research on the net, one should head stright to a good travel agent when it comes time to buy international airline tickets. A good travel agent can get a better price on international flights than any online source. Buying an international ticket on the internet is a ripoff, even from the airlines' own websites. 1. For which part of the world should this theory be valid? It's true for any IATA member airline, which is pretty much all of them. A consolidator agent has access to lower fares that are simply not available from any online source or from the airlines directly. K. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
European trip ?'s
PTRAVEL wrote:
Sorry, but that's not true. Virtually all U.S. airlines have "internet special" prices that are unpublished and unavailable from travel agents. And good travel agents have access to even lower fares that are not available from the airlines directly, or from any other online source. When I was researching prices for Malev flight 0097 from Toronto to Budapest last year, my travel agent was able to get me a price much lower than any website, and several hundred dollars lower than Malev's own "web-only special." Travel agents in the U.S. also charge a ticketing fee, as they no longer earn commissions. That may be true for domestic flights, but not for international ones sold under IATA rules. only -- there are airlines out there I wouldn't fly if they gave me a ticket for free. However, for leisure travel, I will always book on-line, usually directly with the airline's website, to avoid the ticketing fee, get the best price, and have access to the maximum number of alternatives. You won't get the lowest price on an international ticket from an airline. IATA-member airlines cannot sell an international ticket for anything less than the IATA-approved lowest fare. But consolidator travel agents can undercut that price by rebating some of their commission to the customer: "All sales of international tickets on scheduled airlines at less than official fares are made through travel agencies, not directly by the airlines, and ultimately depend on rebating of commissions by travel agents to customers. This is how travel agencies can and do, quite legally, offer lower prices for international tickets than the airlines themselves." See http://hasbrouck.org/faq/#Section_5 K. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Where to order railwaytickets for eastern Europe? | Georg K | Europe | 17 | April 6th, 2005 01:04 AM |
rec.travel.europe FAQ | Yves Bellefeuille | Europe | 1 | March 1st, 2005 04:28 AM |
rec.travel.europe FAQ | Yves Bellefeuille | Europe | 0 | January 28th, 2005 05:46 AM |
rec.travel.europe FAQ | Yves Bellefeuille | Europe | 2 | August 29th, 2004 02:17 PM |
rec.travel.europe FAQ | Yves Bellefeuille | Europe | 0 | October 10th, 2003 09:44 AM |