A Travel and vacations forum. TravelBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » TravelBanter forum » Travelling Style » Air travel
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

JAL runway incursion nearly causes crash



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 1st, 2005, 08:31 PM
A Guy Called Tyketto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default JAL runway incursion nearly causes crash

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


[ Looks like JAL has some explaining to do. -Ed. ]

http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/newse/20050301wo26.htm

Daily Yomiuri On-Line

JAL plane nearly caused runway crash

Yomiuri Shimbun

A Japan Airlines aircraft attempted to take off without approval from
air traffic control at Hokkaido's New Chitose Airport in January, an
incident that could have caused a rear-end collision on a runway, The
Yomiuri Shimbun learned Monday.

JAL apparently then failed to report the incident to the Construction
and Transport Ministry.

Disaster was narrowly avoided by the two commercial airplanes
involved, which were carrying more than 300 passengers, as an air
traffic controller noticed on radar that the JAL plane was moving
ahead and ordered it to stop, according to sources.

The incident occurred in poor weather conditions of snow at night at
about 9:16 p.m. on Jan. 22.

The JAL flight 1036--a Boeing 777 bound for Haneda Airport with 201
passengers on board--was ordered to move to the runway and wait, the
sources said. But on its arrival, the pilot began to accelerate and
initiate pre-take off maneuvers.

At the time, one of the airport's two three-kilometer runways was not
in use as workers were removing snow from it, so airplanes both taking
off and landing had to use the same runway.

The JAL plane began to increase its speed, even though the All Nippon
Airways' flight 1717--an Airbus 320 with 115 on board that had landed
about two minutes earlier--was two kilometers ahead, according to the
sources.

The controller from the Air Self-Defense Force, which directs traffic
at the airport, saw the JAL plane's movements on the radar and told it
to stop about 10 seconds after it had started down the runway.

Although the pilot hit the brakes immediately, the aircraft skidded
about one-third the distance of the runway to merely one kilometer
behind the ANA plane, according to the sources.

If the order had been made just a few seconds later, there could have
been a collision.

The JAL aircraft followed the controller's orders and left the runway,
they said, adding that the plane took off about 10 minutes later.

Under the Civil Aeronautics Law, such cases could be considered a
significant incident and next to an accident in terms of severity. The
law stipulates a pilot must compile a report under such circumstances
to be handed to the government.

JAL admitted the pilot's mistake and made an apology to the SDF, but
failed to report the incident to the government.

The ministry Monday admonished JAL, saying it took such incidents very
seriously as it could have led to a major disaster, but was not
reported.

JAL admitted the pilot had overlooked the fact that the flight had not
been approved to take off because he was busy ensuring the plane was
ready to leave the airstrip.

But the company also said it did not consider the case a significant
incident under the law because the pilot thought the ANA plane already
had left the runway and did not see any danger in taking off.

An expert with in-depth knowledge of New Chitose Airport said the
incident could have caused a collision if the controller had not
ordered it to stop.

"The airplane didn't brake well in snow. If the pilot couldn't tell
where the other plane was on the runway, it would make the incident
more serious," he said.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |

Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! |
http://www.sbcglobal.net/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCJMMqyBkZmuMZ8L8RAgdTAKCQED/d5e7aL2CSD1a5MPPfrSrOgwCfWKcb
l/yc2kDFZ1qwkohA17wsKbc=
=Ruu4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
China crash jet had fatigue cracks [email protected] Europe 0 February 25th, 2005 01:22 PM
Sun Times Mag: Death row Sufaud Europe 0 September 26th, 2004 11:53 AM
No (French) Survivors Reported in Egyptian Crash Earl Evleth Europe 7 January 4th, 2004 12:30 PM
JBU to cut back KFLL service if new runway isn't built A Guy Called Tyketto Air travel 0 October 14th, 2003 02:53 AM
KSMF looks west for new runway A Guy Called Tyketto Air travel 0 September 26th, 2003 05:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 TravelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.