If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Channel Tunnel potential disaster
Seems to have been largely under-reported - or not with any great
excitement. In the Channel Tunnel yesterday 2,000 people were trapped under the sea, for 15 hours overnight, in the dark, no fresh air, no food or water and ONE totally swamped loo. Because of that, traffic was backed up solid for many miles all around Kent for many hours (still so, as far as I know), with all lorry and other drivers stuck with their vehicles in freezing temperatures. Many issues being raised, of course ... Except for what I consider to be the main one - safety. What happened to all the emergency plans for evacuation (in the case of fire or whatever, not simply broken-down trains)? For xxxxxxxxx sake, all those people could have walked out to Dover or Calais in less than 15 hours!!!!! Am I the only person to have even noticed this aspect? No Channel Tunnel travelling for me in the future, it's a potential colossal death trap!!!!! The whole system should be closed down, total, until the management are shafted and entirely new escape procedures/systems installed. Just a warning to any potential users of the Chunnel from overseas!! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Channel Tunnel potential disaster
"Surreyman" wrote in message ... Seems to have been largely under-reported - or not with any great excitement. In the Channel Tunnel yesterday 2,000 people were trapped under the sea, for 15 hours overnight, in the dark, no fresh air, no food or water and ONE totally swamped loo. Because of that, traffic was backed up solid for many miles all around Kent for many hours (still so, as far as I know), with all lorry and other drivers stuck with their vehicles in freezing temperatures. Many issues being raised, of course ... Except for what I consider to be the main one - safety. What happened to all the emergency plans for evacuation (in the case of fire or whatever, not simply broken-down trains)? For xxxxxxxxx sake, all those people could have walked out to Dover or Calais in less than 15 hours!!!!! Am I the only person to have even noticed this aspect? No Channel Tunnel travelling for me in the future, it's a potential colossal death trap!!!!! The whole system should be closed down, total, until the management are shafted and entirely new escape procedures/systems installed. Just a warning to any potential users of the Chunnel from overseas!! You're overreacting based on overhyped media reports. Yes, there is a problem and yes there are questions to be answered but calm down. For a more measured view have a read of the appropriate thread in uk.railway. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Channel Tunnel potential disaster
On 20 Dec, 13:06, "Graham Harrison"
wrote: "Surreyman" wrote in message ... Seems to have been largely under-reported - or not with any great excitement. In the Channel Tunnel yesterday 2,000 people were trapped under the sea, for 15 hours overnight, in the dark, no fresh air, no food or water and ONE totally swamped loo. Because of that, traffic was backed up solid for many miles all around Kent for many hours (still so, as far as I know), with all lorry and other drivers stuck with their vehicles in freezing temperatures. Many issues being raised, of course ... Except for what I consider to be the main one - safety. What happened to all the emergency plans for evacuation (in the case of fire or whatever, not simply broken-down trains)? For xxxxxxxxx sake, all those people could have walked out to Dover or Calais in less than 15 hours!!!!! Am I the only person to have even noticed this aspect? No Channel Tunnel travelling for me in the future, it's a potential colossal death trap!!!!! The whole system should be closed down, total, until the management are shafted and entirely new escape procedures/systems installed. Just a warning to any potential users of the Chunnel from overseas!! You're overreacting based on overhyped media reports. * Yes, there is a problem and yes there are questions to be answered but calm down. For a more measured view have a read of the appropriate thread in uk.railway.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Nope. The distressed people who were actually there were interviewed on TV, plus all above details are as on BBC news, which does not over-hype. Are you the PR department of the Chunnel?! Surreyman |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Channel Tunnel potential disaster
"Surreyman" wrote in message ... On 20 Dec, 13:06, "Graham Harrison" wrote: "Surreyman" wrote in message ... Nope. The distressed people who were actually there were interviewed on TV, plus all above details are as on BBC news, which does not over-hype. Are you the PR department of the Chunnel?! I don't think that there's any doubt that the distressed people were interviewed. What is in doubt is this qualifications for deciding if the situation was safe or not. I saw the interviews and what they did was *complain* repeatedly about being left stuck on the train for hours. This may have been uncomfortable for them, but they aren't in the slightest bit qualified to say that this was unsafe. tim |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Channel Tunnel potential disaster
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:26:47 -0000, "tim...."
wrote: I saw the interviews and what they did was *complain* repeatedly about being left stuck on the train for hours. This may have been uncomfortable for them, but they aren't in the slightest bit qualified to say that this was unsafe. Fortunatelly, Claudia Schiffer was able to get off the train and continue her trip by car leaving the other passengers stuck "for their own safety". The least they could do was provide food, drinks and blankets. Bye Maurice -- Hamradio: ON4BAM http://www.on4bam.com/ Travelogues and Amateur radio http://blog.on4bam.com/blog/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Channel Tunnel potential disaster
On Dec 20, 5:26*pm, "tim...." wrote:
"Surreyman" wrote in message ... On 20 Dec, 13:06, "Graham Harrison" wrote: "Surreyman" wrote in message ... Nope. The distressed people who were actually there were interviewed on TV, plus all above details are as on BBC news, which does not over-hype. Are you the PR department of the Chunnel?! I don't think that there's any doubt that the distressed people were interviewed. What is in doubt is this qualifications for deciding if the situation was safe or not. I saw the interviews and what they did was *complain* repeatedly about being left stuck on the train for hours. *This may have been uncomfortable for them, but they aren't in the slightest bit qualified to say that this was unsafe. Not qualified? In what sense? Stuck in a train, no lighting, no food, no water, no heating, people reduced to urinating in the aisles, one report suggesting they were advised to "breathe shallowly" panicking passengers, no information, no ventilation, ... what else might they need be qualified to recognise 'unsafe'... a degree on it perhaps? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Channel Tunnel potential disaster
aquachimp wrote:
Not qualified? In what sense? Stuck in a train, no lighting, no food, no water, no heating, people reduced to urinating in the aisles, one report suggesting they were advised to "breathe shallowly" panicking passengers, no information, no ventilation, ... what else might they need be qualified to recognise 'unsafe'... a degree on it perhaps? The worst aspect of this farce was the complete lack of information from the crew, who seemed to have locked themselves in their cab incommunicado, till a couple of off-duty cops intervened. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Channel Tunnel potential disaster
"Maurice ON4BAM" wrote in message ... On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:26:47 -0000, "tim...." wrote: I saw the interviews and what they did was *complain* repeatedly about being left stuck on the train for hours. This may have been uncomfortable for them, but they aren't in the slightest bit qualified to say that this was unsafe. Fortunatelly, Claudia Schiffer was able to get off the train and continue her trip by car leaving the other passengers stuck "for their own safety". The least they could do was provide food, drinks and blankets. I agree, they were treated appallingly, as are the passengers who have bookings to travel this week (who appear to have been told not to except to get to their destination before Xmas). But none of them are in any position to say that the solution is unsafe tim |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Channel Tunnel potential disaster
On Dec 20, 1:17*pm, Surreyman
wrote: Seems to have been largely under-reported - or not with any great excitement. In the Channel Tunnel yesterday 2,000 people were trapped under the sea, for 15 hours overnight, in the dark, no fresh air, no food or water and ONE totally swamped loo. Because of that, traffic was backed up solid for many miles all around Kent for many hours (still so, as far as I know), with all lorry and other drivers stuck with their vehicles in freezing temperatures. Many issues being raised, of course ... Except for what I consider to be the main one - safety. What happened to all the emergency plans for evacuation (in the case of fire or whatever, not simply broken-down trains)? For xxxxxxxxx sake, all those people could have walked out to Dover or Calais in less than 15 hours!!!!! Am I the only person to have even noticed this aspect? No Channel Tunnel travelling for me in the future, it's a potential colossal death trap!!!!! The whole system should be closed down, total, until the management are shafted and entirely new escape procedures/systems installed. Just a warning to any potential users of the Chunnel from overseas!! Don't Panic Mr Mainwaring, don't panic' |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Channel Tunnel and North West France | Clohogue | Europe | 13 | February 25th, 2007 09:14 PM |
NY Times on the Channel Tunnel | Sufaud | Europe | 25 | May 19th, 2004 06:19 AM |
Times Letters: Cross-Channel tunnel timings | Sufaud | Europe | 0 | April 13th, 2004 09:02 AM |
Will the tunnel have much impact on NYC - LON flights :-) | Dennis G. Rears | Air travel | 3 | April 9th, 2004 10:35 AM |
Channel tunnel open Paris-Kent | Casey | Europe | 28 | September 19th, 2003 09:58 PM |