If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:02:29 -0600, Doug McDonald
wrote: john wrote: Let me re-phrase my statement above: The significant point is that the Sinclair FORCED their TV PROPERTY to show this Bush propaganda film at prime time. They didn;t have to "force" them. There is noting to "force". There is nothing to "push back". Sinclair OWNS the stations ... they, Sinclair, tell them what to broadcast. The top management of Sinclair tells the stations what to do. Doug McDonald I guess that you must agree with the statements which you conventionly chose to not copy and comment on. Well, here they are again: " It was a Kerry hit piece to influence the presidential election. The Sinclair executives have only been ALLOWED to license the use of the airwaves. They don't own them. The FCC should go after those *******s and take away their license." |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
On 19 Feb 2005 21:16:52 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:
In oups.com "PTravel" wrote: Of course, you're right -- mere speculation isn't a substitute for facts. So why is it that Bush et al aren't calling for an investigation? Where's the administration outrage at using MY tax money for partisan propaganda? Who are the Republican committee chairs setting up Senate hearings? Are you suggesting that the administration is entitled to determine who is a "real" reporter, or what's a "real" news service, or if what they write is "propaganda" and to exclude or allow reporters based on that determination? Are you further suggesting that Congress should hold investigations into the content of some reports? Now, that's interesting. Gee, you are really stupid. Do you think that they are going to allow a "reporter" into the White House Briefing Room without a security check of his background? Gannon, the so-called reporter is a male prostitute. Who checked his background? Who cleared him? |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
In john
wrote: On 19 Feb 2005 21:16:52 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote: In oups.com "PTravel" wrote: Of course, you're right -- mere speculation isn't a substitute for facts. So why is it that Bush et al aren't calling for an investigation? Where's the administration outrage at using MY tax money for partisan propaganda? Who are the Republican committee chairs setting up Senate hearings? Are you suggesting that the administration is entitled to determine who is a "real" reporter, or what's a "real" news service, or if what they write is "propaganda" and to exclude or allow reporters based on that determination? Are you further suggesting that Congress should hold investigations into the content of some reports? Now, that's interesting. Gee, you are really stupid. Do you think that they are going to allow a "reporter" into the White House Briefing Room without a security check of his background? Nope. But others are calling for much more than a "security check", being mostly concerned that he wasn't a "real" reporter, and didn't work for a "real" news service, and that he was producing "propaganda". I could make the same claims against Molly Ivins or Rush Limbaugh; would you deny them credentials merely because you don't like their questions? Gannon, the so-called reporter is a male prostitute. What's wrong with that? Who checked his background? Who cleared him? The same people who check and clear everybody else. Did he kill anybody once he got inside? What's your problem with what he does in his second job? -- Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
"Gregory Morrow"
gregorymorrowEMERGENCYCANCELLATIONARCHIMEDES@eart hlink.net wrote in message nk.net... miles wrote: Gregory Morrow wrote: Perhaps in your next life you can be Ann Coulter's sanitary napkin. Ah yes, the ever so popular leftist form of debate. Oh so predictable. The use of colorfull language is probably next. Keep it up and we'll soon be calling you "inches" instead of "miles". He is the Yin to JF Mezei's Yang. In JF's case, perhaps that should be "Wang". |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
On 19 Feb 2005 23:49:16 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:
In john wrote: On 19 Feb 2005 21:16:52 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote: In oups.com "PTravel" wrote: Of course, you're right -- mere speculation isn't a substitute for facts. So why is it that Bush et al aren't calling for an investigation? Where's the administration outrage at using MY tax money for partisan propaganda? Who are the Republican committee chairs setting up Senate hearings? Are you suggesting that the administration is entitled to determine who is a "real" reporter, or what's a "real" news service, or if what they write is "propaganda" and to exclude or allow reporters based on that determination? Are you further suggesting that Congress should hold investigations into the content of some reports? Now, that's interesting. Gee, you are really stupid. Do you think that they are going to allow a "reporter" into the White House Briefing Room without a security check of his background? Nope. But others are calling for much more than a "security check", being mostly concerned that he wasn't a "real" reporter, and didn't work for a "real" news service, and that he was producing "propaganda". I could make the same claims against Molly Ivins or Rush Limbaugh; would you deny them credentials merely because you don't like their questions? Gannon, the so-called reporter is a male prostitute. What's wrong with that? Who checked his background? Who cleared him? The same people who check and clear everybody else. Did he kill anybody once he got inside? What's your problem with what he does in his second job? With your answers I see that you are nothing but a ****en troll. |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Morrow wrote:
You are silly to assume that I'm "leftist". No I'm not. You've proven that. But liberals hate to admit what they are. Kinda sad really. |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Morrow wrote:
Keep it up and we'll soon be calling you "inches" instead of "miles". Oh geez. Originality is certainly not your forte now is it? |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
john wrote:
Oh, yeah, Bush will always deny knowing anything about it. Oh yeah, the leftist conspiracy theory again. Have any proof or is this just based on your bias and hatred? |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Street wrote:
That you're extremely biased. I'm biased because I don't like either sides mud slinging just the same? I think you just showed your own bias in that stupid remark. |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
PTravel wrote:
How did "Jeff Gannon" get a White House press pass from the Secret Service (and under a false name) if not with the the collusion and assistance of the administration? Its already been established how that occurred and who was responsible. Of course, you're right -- mere speculation isn't a substitute for facts. So why is it that Bush et al aren't calling for an investigation? He did just that. Won't stop your hatred either way though. Where's the administration outrage at using MY tax money for partisan propaganda? There was outrage. But your hatred won't allow you to hear any because it goes against said hatred. Who are the Republican committee chairs setting up Senate hearings? Senate hearings? Ya, thats a good use of tax money. Leftists rant like hell at hearings against their own kind. Both sides waste our money. But go ahead and keep your head in sand while the country goes to hell in Red State handbasket. Keep your hatred alive and your favorate politicians will continue to loose. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
U.S. tourism may be casualty of war on terror | spamfree | Air travel | 333 | February 26th, 2005 01:12 AM |
Cruise ship contracts spout controversy !!! | steinbrenner | Cruises | 0 | October 8th, 2004 10:43 PM |
Myanmar Times - Tourism in the age of globalisation | utunlin | Asia | 0 | August 4th, 2004 05:05 AM |
National Geog. says Scottish Highlands beat Colorado Rockies, Key West and Yosemite for sustainable tourism | Owain | Europe | 1 | April 22nd, 2004 10:02 AM |
Zanzibar - Terror, tourism and odd beliefs (from The Economist) | Hans-Georg Michna | Africa | 1 | February 20th, 2004 10:49 PM |