U.S. tourism may be casualty of war on terror

In john
wrote:


With your answers I see that you are nothing but a ****en troll.

You and your buddies start this thread crossposted to two TRAVEL groups
and you call -me a troll because you don't like my -answers?

That's funny!

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN

In article CnRRd.18565$Tt.14741@fed1read05, miles
wrote:

€ PTravel wrote:
€ How did "Jeff Gannon" get a White House press pass from the Secret
€ Service (and under a false name) if not with the the collusion and
€ assistance of the administration?
€
€ Its already been established how that occurred and who was responsible.
€
€ Of course, you're right -- mere speculation isn't a substitute for
€ facts. So why is it that Bush et al aren't calling for an
€ investigation?
€
€ He did just that. Won't stop your hatred either way though.
€
€ Where's the administration outrage at using MY tax
€ money for partisan propaganda?
€
€ There was outrage. But your hatred won't allow you to hear any because
€ it goes against said hatred.
€
€ Who are the Republican committee chairs
€ setting up Senate hearings?
€
€ Senate hearings? Ya, thats a good use of tax money. Leftists rant like
€ hell at hearings against their own kind. Both sides waste our money.
€
€ But go ahead and keep your head in sand while the country goes to hell
€ in Red State handbasket.
€
€ Keep your hatred alive and your favorate politicians will continue to loose.
€

Funny you should say that. The right's hatred of Clinton is the *only*
thing that got Bush elected and re-elected. I expect it will be the
left's hatred of Bush that unseats the republican party in 2008.

Alan Street wrote:

Funny you should say that. The right's hatred of Clinton is the *only*
thing that got Bush elected and re-elected. I expect it will be the
left's hatred of Bush that unseats the republican party in 2008.

Hatred of Clinton got Bush elected and then re-elected? Oh too funny.
Bush ran against Gore and Kerry, not Clinton. The lefts hatred of Bush
rather than be focused on their own party platform is why Kerry lost.
People didn't re-elect Bush because of hatred of Clinton or even Kerry
for that matter. Geez, some ppl's kids.

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:05:39 -0700, miles wrote:

PTravel wrote:
How did "Jeff Gannon" get a White House press pass from the Secret
Service (and under a false name) if not with the the collusion and
assistance of the administration?

Its already been established how that occurred and who was responsible.

How about you telling us who was responsible and how that occurred?


Of course, you're right -- mere speculation isn't a substitute for
facts. So why is it that Bush et al aren't calling for an
investigation?

He did just that. Won't stop your hatred either way though.

Where's the administration outrage at using MY tax
money for partisan propaganda?

There was outrage. But your hatred won't allow you to hear any because
it goes against said hatred.

Who are the Republican committee chairs
setting up Senate hearings?

Senate hearings? Ya, thats a good use of tax money. Leftists rant like
hell at hearings against their own kind. Both sides waste our money.

But go ahead and keep your head in sand while the country goes to hell
in Red State handbasket.

Keep your hatred alive and your favorate politicians will continue to loose.

On 20 Feb 2005 01:34:03 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote:

In john
wrote:


With your answers I see that you are nothing but a ****en troll.

You and your buddies start this thread crossposted to two TRAVEL groups
and you call -me a troll because you don't like my -answers?

That's funny!

You didn't give any answers--only non sequitors, you asshole.

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:59:13 -0700, miles wrote:

john wrote:
Oh, yeah, Bush will always deny knowing anything about it.

Oh yeah, the leftist conspiracy theory again. Have any proof or is this
just based on your bias and hatred?


Can you tell us ANYTHING that Bush admitted knowing about?

He publically stated he didn't know anthing about his agencies hiring
journalists to be press agent flacks in secret for the administration
for big fees.

Armstrong received 250 million.

"miles" wrote in message
news:CnRRd.18565$Tt.14741@fed1read05...
PTravel wrote:
How did "Jeff Gannon" get a White House press pass from the Secret
Service (and under a false name) if not with the the collusion and
assistance of the administration?

Its already been established how that occurred and who was responsible.

Well, it's news to me. Would you care to enlighten me?


Of course, you're right -- mere speculation isn't a substitute for
facts. So why is it that Bush et al aren't calling for an
investigation?

He did just that. Won't stop your hatred either way though.

No, he did not. Feel free to point to a credible source which suggests that
he did.


Where's the administration outrage at using MY tax
money for partisan propaganda?

There was outrage. But your hatred won't allow you to hear any because it
goes against said hatred.

Please tell me which committee has been convened by which Republican party
committee chairperson.

Because the simple fact is, no one has done anything.



Who are the Republican committee chairs
setting up Senate hearings?

Senate hearings? Ya, thats a good use of tax money.

Subversion of the 1st Amendment isn't serious enough to deserve a Senate
hearing? What, in your opinion, is?

Leftists rant like hell at hearings against their own kind. Both sides
waste our money.

Please explain why government bribes paid to columnists isn't sufficiently
serious to merit a hearing. I'd really like to understand your logic.


But go ahead and keep your head in sand while the country goes to hell
in Red State handbasket.

Keep your hatred alive and your favorate politicians will continue to
loose.

In article hjRRd.18562$Tt.17829@fed1read05, miles
wrote:

€ Alan Street wrote:
€
€ That you're extremely biased.
€
€ I'm biased because I don't like either sides mud slinging just the same?
€ I think you just showed your own bias in that stupid remark.

Do you realize that you argue like a ten year old? ("well, if I'm a
weenie, you're a bigger weeine")

In article HyTRd.18588$Tt.9633@fed1read05, miles
wrote:

€ Alan Street wrote:
€
€ Funny you should say that. The right's hatred of Clinton is the *only*
€ thing that got Bush elected and re-elected. I expect it will be the
€ left's hatred of Bush that unseats the republican party in 2008.
€
€ Hatred of Clinton got Bush elected and then re-elected? Oh too funny.
€ Bush ran against Gore and Kerry, not Clinton.

Really?

Then please tell me why every right winger on Usenet and talk radio
immediately lapses into the "Bush didn't get a blowjob" mantra as soon
as they backed into a corner (much as you are now).

The lefts hatred of Bush
€ rather than be focused on their own party platform is why Kerry lost.
€ People didn't re-elect Bush because of hatred of Clinton or even Kerry
€ for that matter. Geez, some ppl's kids.

Kids?

john wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:05:39 -0700, miles wrote:

Its already been established how that occurred and who was responsible.


How about you telling us who was responsible and how that occurred?

Oh geez, now this is so typical of the leftist ranters. Is it that you
really don't know? Or more likely, you really don't care as its far
more important just to hate and rant?