If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
PTRAVEL wrote:
We were struck with our guard down in 2001 because this administration simply refused to listen anything coming from its predecessor. It's predecessor?? You mean the one that had ample opportunity to do something and did nothing yet the leftist nuts loved the guy. 9/11 occurred only 7 months into Bush's term. 6 months into his term Bush signed a directive to take out Al Queda. That directive was given over to the military but it was too late. That directive should have been given under Clinton but was not yet you blame Bush? Good grief. Your hatred will continue to cost your side more elections until you get a clue. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
miles blasts: That is the leftists conspiracy theory at work. The key here is your assumption that Bush directed it. Perhaps in your next life you can be Ann Coulter's sanitary napkin. -- Best Greg |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Morrow wrote:
I was so overjoyed when John Kerry got elected. To the senate? Great, keep him there. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Morrow wrote:
Perhaps in your next life you can be Ann Coulter's sanitary napkin. Ah yes, the ever so popular leftist form of debate. Oh so predictable. The use of colorfull language is probably next. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
miles wrote: Gregory Morrow wrote: Perhaps in your next life you can be Ann Coulter's sanitary napkin. Ah yes, the ever so popular leftist form of debate. Oh so predictable. The use of colorfull language is probably next. You are silly to assume that I'm "leftist". -- Best Greg |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
miles wrote: Gregory Morrow wrote: Perhaps in your next life you can be Ann Coulter's sanitary napkin. Ah yes, the ever so popular leftist form of debate. Oh so predictable. The use of colorfull language is probably next. Keep it up and we'll soon be calling you "inches" instead of "miles". -- Best Greg |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
The significant point is that the Sinclair FORCED their TV affiliates to show this Bush propaganda film at prime time. No exactly. They are not "affiliates". They are PROPERTY. We have a Sinclair station here. It is an "NBC" "affiliate". It is OWNED by Sinclair. Sinclair says what it broadcasts, not NBC. And it most emphatically was NOT a Bush propaganda film. If we want to talk about affiliates and programs, I suggest CBS and their outright FRAUDLENT attack program against Bush. Doug McDonald |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 08:41:13 -0700, miles wrote:
PTRAVEL wrote: but whether it is appropriate for the highest elected official in the United States to engage in deliberate propaganda by subverting a supposedly-free press with huge cash bribes Talk about twisting the facts to suit your own bias and hatred. The highest elected official in the US did not engage in deliberate propaganda by subverting a supposedly-free press with huge cash bribes. That is the leftists conspiracy theory at work. The key here is your assumption that Bush directed it. Oh, yeah, Bush will always deny knowing anything about it. The people pulling Bush's puppet strings give him plausuble deniability. Bush always comes out with a statement: "Oh, my, I didn't know that. I will have to tell them to stop doing that" It is the atmosphere around Bush that tells all subordinates to do ANYTHING you want in order to further my cause, my programs, my political party. |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
In article 91JRd.18506$Tt.12842@fed1read05, miles
wrote: € Alan Street wrote: € € But if they'd done an anti-Kerry piece you'd have been just fine with € it? € € What kind of crap is that reply? I didn't complain about anything other € than to point out the hypocrisy of the bias in this thread. Both sides € fling mud. So what the heck is your point? That you're extremely biased. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
How did "Jeff Gannon" get a White House press pass from the Secret
Service (and under a false name) if not with the the collusion and assistance of the administration? Of course, you're right -- mere speculation isn't a substitute for facts. So why is it that Bush et al aren't calling for an investigation? Where's the administration outrage at using MY tax money for partisan propaganda? Who are the Republican committee chairs setting up Senate hearings? And, as a final point, perhaps you're familiar with Harry Truman who said, "The buck stops here." Even you can't deny that the administration paid columnists to support administration policies. Who do you think is responsible for running the administration? Oh, wait -- you're right again. It's Karl Rove. But go ahead and keep your head in sand while the country goes to hell in Red State handbasket. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
U.S. tourism may be casualty of war on terror | spamfree | Air travel | 333 | February 26th, 2005 01:12 AM |
Cruise ship contracts spout controversy !!! | steinbrenner | Cruises | 0 | October 8th, 2004 10:43 PM |
Myanmar Times - Tourism in the age of globalisation | utunlin | Asia | 0 | August 4th, 2004 05:05 AM |
National Geog. says Scottish Highlands beat Colorado Rockies, Key West and Yosemite for sustainable tourism | Owain | Europe | 1 | April 22nd, 2004 10:02 AM |
Zanzibar - Terror, tourism and odd beliefs (from The Economist) | Hans-Georg Michna | Africa | 1 | February 20th, 2004 10:49 PM |