Driver Licensing not about highway safety

Dave Smith wrote:
proffsl wrote:

At least you have accepted the fact their not linked by nature,
and only by a police power. Good for you!

I never said otherwise.

As if you agree.

So, you agree that Licensing is not a natural part of our Right to
operate a motor vehicle on our public highways, but instead a part
of a police power circumventing this Right.

That's a completely illogical conclusion on your part,

As if you disagree.

How about going to someone who can provide a professional opinion.
And I don't mean a lawyer.

I'm not here to take directives, nor am I seeking advice.

wrote:

Wrong.

Wrong


False

False

wrote:

I dropped my crack pipe in my whisky while I was sucking on my meth pipe.

True.

proffsl wrote:

Dave Smith wrote:


That's a completely illogical conclusion on your part,

As if you disagree.

How about going to someone who can provide a professional opinion.
And I don't mean a lawyer.

I'm not here to take directives, nor am I seeking advice.


We know. We Know. You are just here to parrot your idiotic claims and to
disregard fact and logic.

On Oct 19, 8:48 pm, proffsl wrote:

I'm not here to take directives, nor am I seeking advice.

Too bad. You might learn something.

Like how to debate without turning abusive as you always do.

On Oct 19, 8:51 pm, proffsl wrote:
wrote:

Wrong.

Wrong

False

False

Good doggie... now roll over and play dead, Proffy Woffy.

Also, thank you for this tacit admission that your claims have once
again utterly failed. Your complete inability to handle the devasting
proofs against you could not be more apparent than in your kook
meltdown here.

On Oct 19, 8:55 pm, proffsl wrote:
wrote:

Proffy Woffy is a jizz-lipped moron.

True.

Wow! You ARE? Well, thanks again for the admission. Here I thought you
were merely an admitted drug abuser and cop-killer wannabe.

Nice to see you once again in kook meltdown. You must have run out of
dope again.

"proffsl" wrote in message
ups.com...
"Alohacyberian" wrote:

Operation of motor vehicles isn't a "right".

The operation of a motor vehicle on public highways is a Right,

Sorry, you don't know the legal meaning of a "right". KM
--
(-:alohacyberian:-) At my website view over 3,600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI, and
NBA, the White House, Academy Awards, 150 language translators!
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more at: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/

"proffsl" wrote in message
ups.com...
"Alohacyberian" wrote:
Operation of motor vehicles isn't a "right".

The operation of a motor vehicle on public highways is a Right, that
is being circumvented by a police power requiring Licensing.


It isn't the police who require driver licenses; they are only enforcing
the laws they don't make. You need to study up on how laws are enacted and
for what reason, and how those laws are enforced and who's responsible for
their enforcement. It would be much easier for you to study your local
driver license manual and try to pass the test this time rather than go on
the Usenet and plea for laws to be changed for those who flunk the tests.
KM
--
(-:alohacyberian:-) At my website view over 3,600 live cameras or
visit NASA, the Vatican, the Smithsonian, the Louvre, CIA, FBI, and
NBA, the White House, Academy Awards, 150 language translators!
Visit Hawaii, Israel and more at: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/

"Alohacyberian" wrote:
"proffsl" wrote:
"Alohacyberian" wrote:

Operation of motor vehicles isn't a "right".

The operation of a motor vehicle on public highways is a Right,

Sorry, you don't know the legal meaning of a "right".

Baseless Ad Hominem.

"The Idaho Supreme Court, however, has held that the right to operate
a motor vehicle on public highways is a matter of constitutional
dimension. In Adams v. City of Pocatello , 91 Idaho 99, 101, 416 P.2d
46, 48 (1966), the Court declared that the right to drive "is a right
or liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of
the federal and state constitutions. Consequently, the courts of this
state must regard the right to drive a motor vehicle on public
highways as constitutionally protected." - State of Idaho v. Mark
Wilder (2003) - http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/...033/wilder.pdf