A Travel and vacations forum. TravelBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » TravelBanter forum » Travel Regions » USA & Canada
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Groningen, Holland Is Automobile-Free



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old May 14th, 2004, 09:14 AM
The Reids
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Car Free Fantasy

Following up to Olivers

While we might argue constantly over the state of Cuban economy and the
financial outlook for Cubans, the bottom line is that as long as Fidel
Castro or a government drawn from successors who emulate his policies
remains in place, Cuba's economy and Cubans will lag behind the country's
economic potential (punished as it were for the sins of its masters, an
undeserved fate for most Cubans, and one not easily avoided).


If US had lifted its sanctions years ago Cuba would probably not
now be either poor or communist.
--
Mike Reid
"Art is the lie that reveals the truth" P.Picasso
Wasdale-Lake district-Thames path-London "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" -- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" -- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
  #22  
Old May 14th, 2004, 03:24 PM
Olivers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Car Free Fantasy

The Reids extrapolated from data available...



If US had lifted its sanctions years ago Cuba would probably not
now be either poor or communist.


If you really believe that, it may be time to change your prescription.

Until 1990 at least Castro and his Soviet partners would have created their
own "embargo" in the same sense that Eastern European states certainly had
tightly controlled access and economies which lagged decades behind the
rest of the Western world. After 1991, unless some country were willing to
face international opprobrium by sponsoring (or actually participating in)
a well funded and equipped insurgency, certain to be lengthy and bloody,
much worse PR than Iraq or Viet Nam, there was not going to be an internal
opposition with even a fraction of the popular strength necessary to
overthrow Fidel. A major problem which faces any post Castro government
continues to be the potential financial claims from the children and
grandchildren of middle class Cubans who suffered expropriation. It's one
thing to confiscate a sugar mill, but it wasn't just the rich who were
called upon to enrich the state with their assets.

Can you imagine the inevitable settling of personal scores that will come
with the institution of a new government, be it repressive or anarchist,
socialist or laissez faire capitalist? Some observant political scientists
might claim that it would take a couple of decades to elevate Cubans to a
state of grace and readiness for participatory democracy.

Comparing Cuba to the Dominican Republic and Haiti seems pretty
unrealistic. In 1959, Cuba's economy and society (even under a petty
tyrant - former Army sergeant) were immeasurably more healthy than those of
either. The Dominican Republic has made substantial strides since
1965 or so (starting pretty far back, with a sort of familial set of
dictators who spent more on their wardrobes and decorations than on
infrastructure or education), while Haiti's strides have been almost as
great, simply backwards toward the Stone Age, it turning out that even a
RCatholic priest, the status of his frock questionable, can be expected to
employ repression and violence at about the same level as professed
dictators. I'm sure that Padre Aristide's Swiss depositories are
adequately filled to allow comfortable asylum. I wouldn't want the
SAfrican taxpayer to have to maintain his inevitably lavish and high
security villa. Better and cheaper perhaps that the US had not dispatched
a corporal's guard to whisk him out of the country, and simply left him at
the palace, where the advancing mob could have been counted upon to hack
him into convenient souvenir sized gobbets. Damned for "forcing" him to
leave, we would have been even more greatly damned had we allowed him to be
sliced and diced, Haiti's traditional treatment of rulers who overstay
their days in the sun. And the gentle Swiss would have never sent the
money back to Haiti, likely melding it with other ill-gotten gains from a
century of depositors who met their ends before presenting their checks.


TMO
  #24  
Old May 14th, 2004, 10:11 PM
Gregory Morrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cuba (WAS: Car Free Fantasy


Sjoerd wrote:

Can you imagine how well the economy and
the lives of Cubans would be, especially given the natural advantages of
geography and skills, had they had been able to lose Castro y amigos,


About as good as Haiti or the Dominican Republic perhaps?



Castro's revolution *really* benefited the poor and rural folk, who were
living in horrendous and even slave - like conditions (thanks in large part
to US companies like United Fruit, etc.) Much of the Cuban middle and upper
classes (who had a prosperous US - style lifestyle) fled because they lost
everything when Castro came to power...they had nothing to lose by going to
Miami or wherever.

The poor and rural folk are still pretty poor materially speaking but unlike
other Third World poor they have access to free education, health care, etc.
That's why Castro is still fairly popular among that strata of people...he
gave the downtrodden some real dignity.

In a best case scenario Cuba without a revolution *might* have turned out
something like today's Costa Rica (admittedly though that is a real
stretch, given the propensity of the US to meddle in Cuba). In 1959 Cuba
ranked (comparativly speaking and in urban areas) high in many indicators as
compared to most other Latin American/Caribbean nations....

Given the drug presence in the Caribbean and the always present Cuban
corruption, I think today in an alternative timeline capitalist Cuba a lot
of the Cuban economy would be "narco - driven"...the US mafia were well -
entrenched pre - 1959 and they ran the drugs, prostitution, money
laundering, gambling etc. rackets (this was largely in response to US govt.
crackdowns on the Mob in Las Vegas and elsewhere).

I might have to post a "what if" about this subject on soc.history.what-if
;-)

--
Best
Greg



  #25  
Old May 14th, 2004, 10:20 PM
Gregory Morrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Car Free Fantasy


poldy wote:

They're alredy predicting car ownership for China, which also is heavily
reliant on bicycles.



IIRC Shanghai has recently banned bicycles on many major streets (per a
_New York Times_ article from a few months back). And guess how many
people are in many of those shiny new Passats and Buicks that the newly -
affluent Chinese are buying? Yep, you guessed it: *one*....

One of the first goals of many newly affluent people everywhere is to buy a
car (viz the ex - USSR and it's former European satellites).

--
Best
Greg


  #26  
Old May 14th, 2004, 10:28 PM
Miguel Cruz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Car Free Fantasy

George W. Russell wrote:
Miguel Cruz wrote:
The closest thing to a real car-free city I've seen is Saigon. Millions
of people and in many parts of town you'll only see one car for every 500
mopeds. Cars are so slow there that they're only used by people for whom
the prestige value is worth the wait.

Which points to the eventual reason why many cities will probably have to do
without cars: In places with truly high population density, the cars just
won't fit. Saigon's streets are completely saturated already with vehicles
that are nimbler and 1/8 the size of cars. Replace them and you'll have
permanent and total gridlock.


I go to Saigon once or twice a year and each time I can't fail notice
the seemingly huge increase in the number of private four-wheeled
vehicles in the city.

Cars will come to Saigon just as they did everywhere else --
eventually. The only limiting factor is cost.


I disagree. The density on the streets is just too high. Cars won't fit. Now
you see 200 a day instead of 10 a few years ago, but that rate of growth
can't go on indefinitely.

The main roads are already incredibly wide, and they're packed solid with
machines that fit about 8 times as many people per unit of road space as
cars.

miguel
--
Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu
  #27  
Old May 15th, 2004, 01:11 PM
George W. Russell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Car Free Fantasy

Miguel Cruz wrote in message ...
George W. Russell wrote:
Miguel Cruz wrote:
The closest thing to a real car-free city I've seen is Saigon. Millions
of people and in many parts of town you'll only see one car for every 500
mopeds. Cars are so slow there that they're only used by people for whom
the prestige value is worth the wait.

Which points to the eventual reason why many cities will probably have to do
without cars: In places with truly high population density, the cars just
won't fit. Saigon's streets are completely saturated already with vehicles
that are nimbler and 1/8 the size of cars. Replace them and you'll have
permanent and total gridlock.


I go to Saigon once or twice a year and each time I can't fail notice
the seemingly huge increase in the number of private four-wheeled
vehicles in the city.

Cars will come to Saigon just as they did everywhere else --
eventually. The only limiting factor is cost.


I disagree. The density on the streets is just too high. Cars won't fit. Now
you see 200 a day instead of 10 a few years ago, but that rate of growth
can't go on indefinitely.


I'm sure that was said about Bangkok, Jakarta and Hong Kong. It's
remarkable how places adapt to vast numbers of traffic. If Vietnam
continues on its present rate of growth and increasing urban affluence
the number of cars will grow. And they will fit ... somehow, same as
they did elsewhere.

What you will see over time is less street life as roads are widened
and heavily used roads such as Nguyen Hue become more car-oriented.
Neither Ho Chi Minh City nor Hanoi have any multistorey or large
street-level car parks, though several are planned over the next few
months. (Hey, another blight!).

This year, Hanoi tried to restrict the number of motorcycles on the
road by refusing to register them. All that did was increase the
number of unregistered vehicles. Crackdowns are patchy because
authorities fear alientating too much of the population, sparking
social unrest.

Both cities have tentative plans for light rail systems, but at cost
estimates of US$2 billion for HCMC and $1 billion for Hanoi, don't
hold your breath.

Sorry, this is geographically off topic for r.t.e. and r.t.u-c

Regards,
George W. Russell
Hanoi
  #28  
Old May 15th, 2004, 01:16 PM
George W. Russell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Car Free Fantasy

Olivers wrote in message ...
George W. Russell extrapolated from data available...



Cars will come to Saigon just as they did everywhere else --
eventually. The only limiting factor is cost. After all, Vietnamese
are only in their first generation of mass motorcycle ownership.


"Return", not "come". There were a number of them around for a decade or
so....(especially the black Cadillacs of Cholon).


You are of course correct. And indeed probably before that, when
Renaults, Darracqs and Clermont-Ferrands cruised Rue Catinat and
surrounding byways. But I was thinking more of the kind of 5pm
crowdstopping scenes that plague Sukhumvit/Queen's Road/Jl. Jend.
Sudirman/take your pick of any major metropolitan throughway. They
will most assuredly come to Vietnam's cities ... I just can't predict
when.

[ ...] like planners everywhere, they'll spend gadzillions building a
freeway/grand boulevard to the airport.


Alas, I suspect so, too.

George W. Russell
Hanoi
  #29  
Old May 15th, 2004, 01:45 PM
Sjoerd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Car Free Fantasy


"Miguel Cruz" schreef in bericht
...
I disagree. The density on the streets is just too high. Cars won't fit.


Cars didn't fit in Bangkok during most of the 1980's and 1990's. (until they
constructed more roads and the Skytrain). Still, all Thais that could afford
them bought cars. Talking to my Vietnamese colleagues, the same will happen
in Hanoi and HCM City.

Sjoerd



  #30  
Old May 15th, 2004, 01:59 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Car Free Fantasy

Seriously,
The traffic with just the motorcycles and bicycles can completely gridlock
at times depending on what is going on. There was an aids benefit at one of
the turnabouts and it took almost 2 hours just to get through the
intersection with a taxi. Even on a motorcycle it would have taken an hour.
I don't think your off topic, this all relates to travel and it's
information well received by people traveling to different places to know
ahead of time what to expect. I drive in Saigon when I am there, but the
rules of the road maybe similar, but they sure aren't practiced that way.
I'd much prefer my wife to drive as she is used to it. We were clipped twice
by other drivers on the same day. Usually not a problem but even in the city
where the speeds are about 20-25 mph people still die from accidents. Let
alone on the highways where you would think people are completely insane.
LOL
You're right about the cars, there are very few and the high taxes on them
limits the people that can purchase. Usually it's the elite and those that
have them, like to flaunt them. You'll always see the mercedes or lexus
parked in front of the sidewalk cafes on Nguyen Hue so that everyone can see
them. Myself I prefer driving a scooter as it would take you forever to get
through town.
"George W. Russell" wrote in message
om...
Miguel Cruz wrote in message

...
George W. Russell wrote:
Miguel Cruz wrote:
The closest thing to a real car-free city I've seen is Saigon.

Millions
of people and in many parts of town you'll only see one car for every

500
mopeds. Cars are so slow there that they're only used by people for

whom
the prestige value is worth the wait.

Which points to the eventual reason why many cities will probably

have to do
without cars: In places with truly high population density, the cars

just
won't fit. Saigon's streets are completely saturated already with

vehicles
that are nimbler and 1/8 the size of cars. Replace them and you'll

have
permanent and total gridlock.

I go to Saigon once or twice a year and each time I can't fail notice
the seemingly huge increase in the number of private four-wheeled
vehicles in the city.

Cars will come to Saigon just as they did everywhere else --
eventually. The only limiting factor is cost.


I disagree. The density on the streets is just too high. Cars won't fit.

Now
you see 200 a day instead of 10 a few years ago, but that rate of growth
can't go on indefinitely.


I'm sure that was said about Bangkok, Jakarta and Hong Kong. It's
remarkable how places adapt to vast numbers of traffic. If Vietnam
continues on its present rate of growth and increasing urban affluence
the number of cars will grow. And they will fit ... somehow, same as
they did elsewhere.

What you will see over time is less street life as roads are widened
and heavily used roads such as Nguyen Hue become more car-oriented.
Neither Ho Chi Minh City nor Hanoi have any multistorey or large
street-level car parks, though several are planned over the next few
months. (Hey, another blight!).

This year, Hanoi tried to restrict the number of motorcycles on the
road by refusing to register them. All that did was increase the
number of unregistered vehicles. Crackdowns are patchy because
authorities fear alientating too much of the population, sparking
social unrest.

Both cities have tentative plans for light rail systems, but at cost
estimates of US$2 billion for HCMC and $1 billion for Hanoi, don't
hold your breath.

Sorry, this is geographically off topic for r.t.e. and r.t.u-c

Regards,
George W. Russell
Hanoi



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
This Week's Hot Deals 03/20 test USA & Canada 1 August 27th, 2004 10:36 PM
Top Hosting Plan Comparison (as on 2004/04/07) Finding Best Hosting USA & Canada 2 April 9th, 2004 11:21 PM
Hot Deals Starting 12/12 Liberal USA & Canada 4 December 14th, 2003 01:29 AM
Deal Newsletter (2003.10.03) Public Interest USA & Canada 1 October 5th, 2003 07:48 PM
Deals for Oct.02, 2003 Deal Finder USA & Canada 0 October 2nd, 2003 07:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 TravelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.