Just returned from cruise - don't get it...

Charles lid wrote:

Nice sentiment but you would have to file suit for any compensation

Of course.

Charles wrote:

In article , RTCReferee
wrote:


Your health insurance should not have had to pay for it, HIS shoud have.
Better yet, he should have had to pay something out of pocket, like a fine.


Nice sentiment but no way to collect.


Plus, from what you describe, you could have had cause to be compensated for
"pain and suffering" for which he would be additionally liable.


Nice sentiment but you would have to file suit for any compensation.

Most times there is no justice for the actions of rude/clueless folk.

I agree with you Charles! Nice sentiment, but not worth the effort.

sue

Charles wrote:

In article , RTCReferee
wrote:


Your health insurance should not have had to pay for it, HIS shoud have.
Better yet, he should have had to pay something out of pocket, like a fine.


Nice sentiment but no way to collect.


Plus, from what you describe, you could have had cause to be compensated for
"pain and suffering" for which he would be additionally liable.


Nice sentiment but you would have to file suit for any compensation.

Most times there is no justice for the actions of rude/clueless folk.

I agree with you Charles! Nice sentiment, but not worth the effort.

sue

Dillon Pyron wrote:

Most places, it's not just against hospital policy, it's flat out
illegal. He should have been fined for his behavior.

In this case it was just against hospital policy, it was many years ago.

sue

Dillon Pyron wrote:

Most places, it's not just against hospital policy, it's flat out
illegal. He should have been fined for his behavior.

In this case it was just against hospital policy, it was many years ago.

sue

Sue and Kevin Mullen wrote:

Nice sentiment but you would have to file suit for any compensation.
Most times there is no justice for the actions of rude/clueless folk.

I agree with you Charles! Nice sentiment, but not worth the effort.

Oops, sorry. I must have misunderstood. I thought you said that you had to
spend an extra three days IN A HOSPITAL due specifically to the smoke.

Did I misread that?

Sue and Kevin Mullen wrote:

Nice sentiment but you would have to file suit for any compensation.
Most times there is no justice for the actions of rude/clueless folk.

I agree with you Charles! Nice sentiment, but not worth the effort.

Oops, sorry. I must have misunderstood. I thought you said that you had to
spend an extra three days IN A HOSPITAL due specifically to the smoke.

Did I misread that?

Sue and Kevin Mullen wrote:

Nice sentiment but you would have to file suit for any compensation.
Most times there is no justice for the actions of rude/clueless folk.

I agree with you Charles! Nice sentiment, but not worth the effort.

Oops, sorry. I must have misunderstood. I thought you said that you had to
spend an extra three days IN A HOSPITAL due specifically to the smoke.

Did I misread that?

RTCReferee wrote:

Sue and Kevin Mullen wrote:


Nice sentiment but you would have to file suit for any compensation.
Most times there is no justice for the actions of rude/clueless folk.

I agree with you Charles! Nice sentiment, but not worth the effort.


Oops, sorry. I must have misunderstood. I thought you said that you had to
spend an extra three days IN A HOSPITAL due specifically to the smoke.

Did I misread that?

I did have to spend extra days in the hospital and it was because the
smoke irritated my airways.

sue

RTCReferee wrote:

Sue and Kevin Mullen wrote:


Nice sentiment but you would have to file suit for any compensation.
Most times there is no justice for the actions of rude/clueless folk.

I agree with you Charles! Nice sentiment, but not worth the effort.


Oops, sorry. I must have misunderstood. I thought you said that you had to
spend an extra three days IN A HOSPITAL due specifically to the smoke.

Did I misread that?

I did have to spend extra days in the hospital and it was because the
smoke irritated my airways.

sue