If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Another Kook surfaces on RTA!
Jim Davis Sr. kooked:
This all started 5 days after I requested a Damage Claim Form for a $ 1,700.00 Test Scope which a TSA Employee Damaged while inspecting my tool box. (This was 2 years ago, & no answer on that yet.) I asked all the questions you list above.. (Everything is Documented. I have a lot of time waiting in Airports) A few E-Mails. (Hard Drive crashed & I lost the copies) 57 Calls to TSA - (1-866-289-3673) They took information, and said they would return the calls. (No returned calls.) 102 Messages on their answering service. (Same Number) No Responses. I got their Fax number, and politely asked the same questions, + the question of being removed. I started sending 1 fax per day for 10 days. After that, 20 per day. (My lap top can pump out faxes like a spammer.) After a few weeks of this, I received a call from TSA. They sent me forms to return. They wanted me to send them notarized copies of my Birth Certificate, Drivers License, SS#, & Proof of address. He then told me that this would not guaranty to solve my problem. (He never would admit that their was a list.) Did I send them this personal information?? I think not. Also, My son has the same name (He's a Jr.) He flys occasionally, and gets the same song & Dance. My son, gave me the information for ACLU. I wrote to them. They requested my files, which I E-Mailed. Catherine Kim ) (212-549-2682) She called later & asked if I wanted to be part of the Class Action Suit. I said "Hell Yeah!" I send her updated files regularly, and speak to her occasionally. I told her I'm not looking for monetary damages. I just want to be removed from the list. But I'm rethinking that. And you wonder why you're on the TSA's No Fly List ? ! ? Congratulations! You've just been fast-tracked to RTA Kook of the Year. (Past winners JF Mezei, Kook of the Millenium; Michael Voight Kook of the Decade). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services. The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is unverified. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Are You On Uncle Sam's No Fly List?
"Olivers" wrote in message ... Jim Davis Sr. muttered.... 57 Calls to TSA - (1-866-289-3673) They took information, and said they would return the calls. (No returned calls.) 102 Messages on their answering service. (Same Number) No Responses. I got their Fax number, and politely asked the same questions, + the question of being removed. I started sending 1 fax per day for 10 days. After that, 20 per day. (My lap top can pump out faxes like a spammer.) Wow.....Didn't it occur to you that someone at TSA, after a few days of FAXes, might perorm a relatively standard governmental evolution....constantly reminded of your name, address and particulars, he/she (and it could have been no more than a low level secretary) assigned you to the dreaded "KN&W" (Kooks, Nuts and Whackos") file drawer/data base, a designator existing in most federal government depatments. Over at Homeland Security the results of such assignment works out to be worse than being on the Agriculture Department's **** List. Send 20 FAXes a day to your Mayor, and within a few days, there may be an unmarked Ford occasionally parked down the street from your house. What you viewed as persistence, somebody at TSA saw as semi-harassment and decided to pull the chain on your cistern. Sure, it's wrong and inexcusable, but as predictable as sunrise. TMO People in public or semi-public office should in fact be personally liable for their use of power. Nik. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Are You On Uncle Sam's No Fly List?
Nik muttered....
O People in public or semi-public office should in fact be personally liable for their use of power. Elected ones are in a sense (and for the deeds/misdeeds of the unelected who work for them). Unfortunately, thruout the US, we all too often reward incumbency, especially among legislators. On the other hand, the veritable plethora of lawsuits against government and "governors" is but a copout. Simply throwing the rascals out would be more punitive and to the thrown out more painful. The most decent act possible within the US electorate would be an absolute ban on any former governmental official, elected or appointed, lobbying for or representing any company, cause (noble or ignoble), group or association. TMO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
China Travel Discussion List | Peter Neville-Hadley | Asia | 0 | May 11th, 2004 05:40 PM |
China Travel Discussion List | Peter Neville-Hadley | Asia | 0 | April 30th, 2004 10:33 PM |
Lawsuit challenges USA "No-Fly" list | Edward Hasbrouck | Air travel | 0 | April 7th, 2004 03:30 AM |
Are You On Uncle Sam's No Fly List? | jake | Air travel | 52 | February 29th, 2004 05:01 PM |
China Travel Discussion List | Peter Neville-Hadley | Asia | 0 | November 11th, 2003 05:57 AM |