If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Hilary wrote:
john wrote: Woolworths? That's the name of a very old retail firm which went out of business in the US a few years ago. It's also the name of a major high-street retailer in the UK. Who are still very much in business at the moment. Still going strong in Australia too. miguel -- Hit The Road! Photos from 36 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu Latest photos: Queens Day in Amsterdam; the Grand Canyon; Amman, Jordan |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Hilary wrote:
That's the name of a very old retail firm which went out of business in the US a few years ago. It's also the name of a major high-street retailer in the UK. Who are still very much in business at the moment. Hilary In 1909, FW Woolworth expanded to the UK http://www.woolworthsgroupplc.com/ab...up_history.cfm In 1997, Woolworth closed its last 400 US stores and changed its name to Venator. In 2000, it took the name of its top retail performer and became Foot Locker, Inc. Source: http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclop...lworth-Company So, the US Company that was Woolworth exists today as Foot Locker, Inc. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Miguel Cruz wrote:
Hilary wrote: john wrote: Woolworths? That's the name of a very old retail firm which went out of business in the US a few years ago. It's also the name of a major high-street retailer in the UK. Who are still very much in business at the moment. Still going strong in Australia too. Woolworths in Australia was like Woolworths in the UK, but it has for decades been a supermarket chain, not a "5 & dime". The supermarkets are called Safeway in some states, and oddly share livery with the recently defunct UK safeway chain, but I don't think they have any connection. joan -- Joan McGalliard, UK http://www.mcgalliard.org |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
This experienced traveler uses a bag that wasn't cheap, but sure looks
like crap. It's held up for a remarkable 13 years of near-constant travel, and other than a broken zipper handle (which I replaced with a jumbo paper clip in order to accentuate the trashy look) it shows no signs of giving up. It's never been broken into, and I attribute that to all the stains it's picked up from rain, baggle handling, being kicked along airport floors, and the like. In 8 years of lots of travel, my very cheap backpack which was the cheapest Argos had in 1997 has stood up, a couple of the less important straps have a broke, but it's still solid, and I've not seriously thought about replacing it yet. My 25-year-old Karrimor rucksack is still going fine. Grubby as you'd expect from something that old, though finally it's lost the ingrained marble dust from sharing the baggage compartment with a load of grave- stones on a bus ride near Trabzon. It's had no repairs, though I've customized it a bit by sewing on extra straps to hold a heavy tripod. By now it's utterly distinctive on a carousel. ============== j-c ====== @ ====== purr . demon . co . uk ============== Jack Campin: 11 Third St, Newtongrange EH22 4PU, Scotland | tel 0131 660 4760 http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/ for CD-ROMs and free | fax 0870 0554 975 stuff: Scottish music, food intolerance, & Mac logic fonts | mob 07800 739 557 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Joan McGalliard wrote:
Miguel Cruz wrote: Still going strong in Australia too. Woolworths in Australia was like Woolworths in the UK, but it has for decades been a supermarket chain, not a "5 & dime". The supermarkets are called Safeway in some states, and oddly share livery with the recently defunct UK safeway chain, but I don't think they have any connection. The Woolies across the street from me when I lived in Sydney (1992-1994) sold everything from socks to hair dryers. But there seems to have been a lot of changes in Australian Supermarketry since then. miguel -- Hit The Road! Photos from 36 countries on 5 continents: http://travel.u.nu Latest photos: Queens Day in Amsterdam; the Grand Canyon; Amman, Jordan |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:35:21 +0100, Jack Campin - bogus address
wrote: My 25-year-old Karrimor rucksack is still going fine. Grubby as you'd expect from something that old, though finally it's lost the ingrained marble dust from sharing the baggage compartment with a load of grave- stones on a bus ride near Trabzon. It's had no repairs, though I've customized it a bit by sewing on extra straps to hold a heavy tripod. By now it's utterly distinctive on a carousel. I thought mine was too, but I managed to walk off and through customs at Jo'burg with someone elses... Jim. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
There is, of course, cheap and cheap. I use bags made from Cordura,
which is well-nigh indestructible. Those bags most often fail because the internal steel stiffening breaks, while the outer remains intact. Ah-ha! We may be in violent agreement. In my opinion, there are three classes of luggage: 1) cheap crap that costs 50 USD or so, bought from such places as Walmart; the fabric is usually thin nylon of some sort 2) intermediate luggage costing 200 USD or so, constructed of Cordura and other quality materials 3) high-priced luggage such as Hartmann and designer labels The type of luggage as described in my story was of the first category. I personally buy luggage of the second category. Most people in this thread seem to assume that there are only two categories of luggage, and they are wrong. I remain convinced that buying #1 is a short- sighted policy, buying #2 is probably good value for the money, and buying #3 may be worth it (in the case of Hartmann and certain other brands), but often may result in poor value for the money. Many people assumed that I prefer #3, but they are wrong. In some respects, e.g. handle length, high-priced brands like Hartmann are inferior to cheaper brands like Eagle Creek and LL Bean. All of the above references are American based, of course. Pete |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"spamfree" wrote in message ink.net... There is, of course, cheap and cheap. I use bags made from Cordura, which is well-nigh indestructible. Those bags most often fail because the internal steel stiffening breaks, while the outer remains intact. Ah-ha! We may be in violent agreement. In my opinion, there are three classes of luggage: 1) cheap crap that costs 50 USD or so, bought from such places as Walmart; the fabric is usually thin nylon of some sort 2) intermediate luggage costing 200 USD or so, constructed of Cordura and other quality materials 3) high-priced luggage such as Hartmann and designer labels We are only in agreement if US luggage prices are exorbitantly high. I would count very cheap as being GBP10-15 and expensive starting at around GBP 85-90, which is about the price of a Samsonite rigid wheeled suitcase. Colin Bignell |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cheap luggage bites | spamfree | Air travel | 35 | June 22nd, 2005 03:53 PM |
TSA Contaminated our luggage | Elias Klein | Cruises | 21 | August 21st, 2004 05:38 AM |
Where's my luggage ??? | Miss L. Toe | Air travel | 0 | August 10th, 2004 01:53 PM |
Really cheap vehicle for transcontinental travel | Jean-Marc V. Liotier | Africa | 6 | December 14th, 2003 03:07 PM |
Cheap place to stay in Hong Kong? | aimee | Asia | 2 | September 12th, 2003 01:17 PM |