"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capableof entrusting a man like him with the Presidency...."

On 21/09/2010 19:09, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:08:56 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 17:38, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:23:35 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 11:01, O'Donovan, PJ, Himself wrote:


This quote was translated into English from an article appearing in
the Czech Republic as published in the Prager
Zeitung of 28 April 2010.

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama,

but a citizenry

capable of entrusting

a man like him

with the Presidency.



It will be far easier to limit and undo

the follies of an Obama presidency

than to restore the necessary common sense

and good judgment to a depraved electorate

willing to have such a man for their president.



The problem is much deeper

and far more serious than Mr. Obama,

who is a mere symptom of what ails America .



Blaming the prince of fools

should not blind anyone

to the vast confederacy of fools

that made him their prince.



The Republic can survive

a Barack Obama,

who is, after all,

merely a fool.



It is less likely to survive

a multitude of fools

such as those

who made him

their president."

Your contempt for the democratic process is noted.

Show where the writer *even implied* a contempt for democracy


Read it idiot.

Go for it you pretentious asshole, show where the "contempt for democracy"
is in the post or admit it was just one more of your malicious attempts to
smear someone.

The contempt for democracy resonates in almost every line.
But as you are blinded by your own prejudice you cannot
see that. 'Vast confederacy of fools' and 'multitude of
fools' are phrases by a person who has a deep contempt
for the opinion of the majority which is a not very
subtle attack on democracy.

On 21/09/10 23:24, John Rennie wrote:
On 21/09/2010 19:09, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:08:56 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 17:38, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:23:35 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 11:01, O'Donovan, PJ, Himself wrote:


This quote was translated into English from an article appearing in
the Czech Republic as published in the Prager
Zeitung of 28 April 2010.

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama,

but a citizenry

capable of entrusting

a man like him

with the Presidency.



It will be far easier to limit and undo

the follies of an Obama presidency

than to restore the necessary common sense

and good judgment to a depraved electorate

willing to have such a man for their president.



The problem is much deeper

and far more serious than Mr. Obama,

who is a mere symptom of what ails America .



Blaming the prince of fools

should not blind anyone

to the vast confederacy of fools

that made him their prince.



The Republic can survive

a Barack Obama,

who is, after all,

merely a fool.



It is less likely to survive

a multitude of fools

such as those

who made him

their president."

Your contempt for the democratic process is noted.

Show where the writer *even implied* a contempt for democracy


Read it idiot.

Go for it you pretentious asshole, show where the "contempt for
democracy"
is in the post or admit it was just one more of your malicious
attempts to
smear someone.

The contempt for democracy resonates in almost every line.
But as you are blinded by your own prejudice you cannot
see that. 'Vast confederacy of fools' and 'multitude of
fools' are phrases by a person who has a deep contempt
for the opinion of the majority which is a not very
subtle attack on democracy.

What he said.

But I couldn't be arsed.


--
William Black

Free men have open minds
If you want loyalty, buy a dog...

On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:44:32 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 19:09, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:08:56 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 17:38, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:23:35 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 11:01, O'Donovan, PJ, Himself wrote:


This quote was translated into English from an article appearing in
the Czech Republic as published in the Prager
Zeitung of 28 April 2010.

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama,

but a citizenry

capable of entrusting

a man like him

with the Presidency.



It will be far easier to limit and undo

the follies of an Obama presidency

than to restore the necessary common sense

and good judgment to a depraved electorate

willing to have such a man for their president.



The problem is much deeper

and far more serious than Mr. Obama,

who is a mere symptom of what ails America .



Blaming the prince of fools

should not blind anyone

to the vast confederacy of fools

that made him their prince.



The Republic can survive

a Barack Obama,

who is, after all,

merely a fool.



It is less likely to survive

a multitude of fools

such as those

who made him

their president."

Your contempt for the democratic process is noted.

Show where the writer *even implied* a contempt for democracy


Read it idiot.

Go for it you pretentious asshole,

Two answers, similar insults.

Is your mind starting to slip a bit?

Short term memory going?

Alzheimer's or age?

In other words, you can't back up your claim for contempt for democracy.
That, you have shown.

Sometimes i think that you are an officiously pretentious ******* and then
at other times I think that you are a pretentiously officious *******.

In this case you were just being a malicious ******* in an officious way.

The one constant is that you are a *******.

On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:24:45 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, John Rennie
, wrote

On 21/09/2010 19:09, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:08:56 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 17:38, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:23:35 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 11:01, O'Donovan, PJ, Himself wrote:


This quote was translated into English from an article appearing in
the Czech Republic as published in the Prager
Zeitung of 28 April 2010.

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama,

but a citizenry

capable of entrusting

a man like him

with the Presidency.



It will be far easier to limit and undo

the follies of an Obama presidency

than to restore the necessary common sense

and good judgment to a depraved electorate

willing to have such a man for their president.



The problem is much deeper

and far more serious than Mr. Obama,

who is a mere symptom of what ails America .



Blaming the prince of fools

should not blind anyone

to the vast confederacy of fools

that made him their prince.



The Republic can survive

a Barack Obama,

who is, after all,

merely a fool.



It is less likely to survive

a multitude of fools

such as those

who made him

their president."

Your contempt for the democratic process is noted.

Show where the writer *even implied* a contempt for democracy


Read it idiot.

Go for it you pretentious asshole, show where the "contempt for democracy"
is in the post or admit it was just one more of your malicious attempts to
smear someone.

The contempt for democracy resonates in almost every line.
But as you are blinded by your own prejudice you cannot
see that. 'Vast confederacy of fools' and 'multitude of
fools' are phrases by a person who has a deep contempt
for the opinion of the majority which is a not very
subtle attack on democracy.

Only in your mind.

It has nothing to do with democracy and everything to with his opinion of
the fooled electorate.

I can see that you are the type that if I said Obama was an idiot, you
would say that was racist.

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:25:33 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 23:24, John Rennie wrote:
On 21/09/2010 19:09, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:08:56 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 17:38, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:23:35 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 11:01, O'Donovan, PJ, Himself wrote:


This quote was translated into English from an article appearing in
the Czech Republic as published in the Prager
Zeitung of 28 April 2010.

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama,

but a citizenry

capable of entrusting

a man like him

with the Presidency.



It will be far easier to limit and undo

the follies of an Obama presidency

than to restore the necessary common sense

and good judgment to a depraved electorate

willing to have such a man for their president.



The problem is much deeper

and far more serious than Mr. Obama,

who is a mere symptom of what ails America .



Blaming the prince of fools

should not blind anyone

to the vast confederacy of fools

that made him their prince.



The Republic can survive

a Barack Obama,

who is, after all,

merely a fool.



It is less likely to survive

a multitude of fools

such as those

who made him

their president."

Your contempt for the democratic process is noted.

Show where the writer *even implied* a contempt for democracy


Read it idiot.

Go for it you pretentious asshole, show where the "contempt for
democracy"
is in the post or admit it was just one more of your malicious
attempts to
smear someone.

The contempt for democracy resonates in almost every line.
But as you are blinded by your own prejudice you cannot
see that. 'Vast confederacy of fools' and 'multitude of
fools' are phrases by a person who has a deep contempt
for the opinion of the majority which is a not very
subtle attack on democracy.

What he said.

But I couldn't be arsed.

You're an idiot. You couldn't back up something that was not there except
in your fevered mind. Now you have another fevered mind for a chorus.
You "couldn't be arsed" is one of the lamest excuses for being without
response around.

Damn, you are stupid, you officiously pretentious *******.........

FACE

John Rennie wrote:
On 21/09/2010 19:09, FACE wrote:


Go for it you pretentious asshole, show where the "contempt for
democracy"
is in the post or admit it was just one more of your malicious
attempts to
smear someone.

The contempt for democracy resonates in almost every line.
But as you are blinded by your own prejudice you cannot
see that. 'Vast confederacy of fools' and 'multitude of
fools' are phrases by a person who has a deep contempt
for the opinion of the majority which is a not very
subtle attack on democracy.

If you trust democracy, you are more of a fool than I thought. Sensible
democracies check the excesses of that sort of system with things like
constitutions. Constitutions can't be modified by a simple majority
exactly because while most people aren't stupid all the time, they
definitely are some of the time.

On 22/09/10 00:36, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:44:32 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 19:09, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:08:56 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 17:38, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:23:35 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 11:01, O'Donovan, PJ, Himself wrote:


This quote was translated into English from an article appearing in
the Czech Republic as published in the Prager
Zeitung of 28 April 2010.

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama,

but a citizenry

capable of entrusting

a man like him

with the Presidency.



It will be far easier to limit and undo

the follies of an Obama presidency

than to restore the necessary common sense

and good judgment to a depraved electorate

willing to have such a man for their president.



The problem is much deeper

and far more serious than Mr. Obama,

who is a mere symptom of what ails America .



Blaming the prince of fools

should not blind anyone

to the vast confederacy of fools

that made him their prince.



The Republic can survive

a Barack Obama,

who is, after all,

merely a fool.



It is less likely to survive

a multitude of fools

such as those

who made him

their president."

Your contempt for the democratic process is noted.

Show where the writer *even implied* a contempt for democracy


Read it idiot.

Go for it you pretentious asshole,

Two answers, similar insults.

Is your mind starting to slip a bit?

Short term memory going?

Alzheimer's or age?

In other words, you can't back up your claim for contempt for democracy.
That, you have shown.


That you can't see the contempt in the statement says more about you
than anything I might say.



--
William Black

Free men have open minds
If you want loyalty, buy a dog...

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:48:03 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 22/09/10 00:36, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:44:32 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 19:09, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:08:56 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 17:38, FACE wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:23:35 +0100, in uk.politics.misc, William Black
, wrote

On 21/09/10 11:01, O'Donovan, PJ, Himself wrote:


This quote was translated into English from an article appearing in
the Czech Republic as published in the Prager
Zeitung of 28 April 2010.

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama,

but a citizenry

capable of entrusting

a man like him

with the Presidency.



It will be far easier to limit and undo

the follies of an Obama presidency

than to restore the necessary common sense

and good judgment to a depraved electorate

willing to have such a man for their president.



The problem is much deeper

and far more serious than Mr. Obama,

who is a mere symptom of what ails America .



Blaming the prince of fools

should not blind anyone

to the vast confederacy of fools

that made him their prince.



The Republic can survive

a Barack Obama,

who is, after all,

merely a fool.



It is less likely to survive

a multitude of fools

such as those

who made him

their president."

Your contempt for the democratic process is noted.

Show where the writer *even implied* a contempt for democracy


Read it idiot.

Go for it you pretentious asshole,

Two answers, similar insults.

Is your mind starting to slip a bit?

Short term memory going?

Alzheimer's or age?

In other words, you can't back up your claim for contempt for democracy.
That, you have shown.


That you can't see the contempt in the statement says more about you
than anything I might say.

You have failed to back anything up. No surprise.

When you are not being a complete *******, others say you are hideously
unctuous.

I simply say that you are hideous.